各国政要名流致信拜登:呼吁美国放弃新冠疫苗专利

b
bigjohn123456
楼主 (北美华人网)
上次是WHO呼吁,这次是大量世界政要名流炸药奖得主再次呼吁,拜登想必也亚历山大,不想背负骂名吧。
https://www.ft.com/content/43fd53f5-2b82-4e41-981c-8544a6ce996b
Former world leaders call on Biden to suspend Covid-19 vaccine patents Gordon Brown one of 175 figures urging action to boost inoculation rates in the developing world

A group of 175 former world leaders and Nobel laureates is urging the US to take “urgent action” to suspend intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global inoculation rates. A measure to allow countries to temporarily override patent rights for Covid-related medical products was proposed at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October, and has since been backed by nearly 60 countries. Doing so would allow developing countries to make their own copies of the vaccines that have been developed by pharmaceutical companies without fear of being sued for intellectual property infringements.
“A WTO waiver is a vital and necessary step to bringing an end to this pandemic. It must be combined with ensuring vaccine knowhow and technology is shared openly,” the signatories, comprising more than 100 Nobel prizewinners and over 70 former world leaders, wrote in a letter to US president Joe Biden, seen by the Financial Times.
They added a waiver in tandem with other measures would “expand global manufacturing capacity, unhindered by industry monopolies that are driving the dire supply shortages blocking vaccine access”. Recommended Covid-19 vaccines Covid-19 vaccine tracker: the global race to vaccinate While wealthier countries have access to doses of Covid vaccines and are increasing vaccination programmes for their populations, developing economies have so far had more limited access to doses.
Former leaders who signed the letter included Gordon Brown, former UK prime minister; François Hollande, former French president; Mikhail Gorbachev, former president of the USSR; and Yves Leterme, former Belgian prime minister. Hollande branded the inequality in access to vaccines “an unbearable political and moral situation”, that was “economic nonsense”. The individuals who signed the letter, including Nobel laureates in economics as well as from across the arts and sciences, warned that inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent it from recovering.
“The world saw unprecedented development of safe and effective vaccines, in major part thanks to US public investment,” the group wrote. “We all welcome that vaccination rollout in the US and many wealthier countries is bringing hope to their citizens.” “Yet for the majority of the world that same hope is yet to be seen. New waves of suffering are now rising across the globe. Our global economy cannot rebuild if it remains vulnerable to this virus.” Latest coronavirus news Follow FT's live coverage and analysis of the global pandemic and the rapidly evolving economic crisis here.
The group warned that fully enforcing IP was “self-defeating for the US” as it hindered global vaccination efforts. “Given artificial global supply shortages, the US economy already risks losing $1.3tn in gross domestic product this year.” US business groups, including pharmaceutical industry representatives, have urged Biden to resist supporting a waiver to IP rules at the WTO, arguing that the proposal led by India and South Africa was too “vague” and “broad”. The US has previously opposed a waiver for Covid-19 products, along with the UK, EU and Switzerland. The US trade representative’s office said late last month that it was “exploring every avenue” and “evaluating the efficacy” of the proposal to waive so-called Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. 
Katherine Tai, US trade representative, told a WTO meeting on vaccine equity on Wednesday that both the government and the private sector would need to do their part to “live up to” the “spirit” of the Trips agreement, which was born out of the HIV crisis. “We hope to hear more today about how the market once again has failed in meeting the health needs of developing countries,” Tai said. “As part of that we have to consider what modifications and reforms to our trade rules might be necessary to reflect what we have learned.” Countries already have the ability to make their own generic versions of branded drugs and vaccines by issuing so-called compulsory licenses under the WTO Trips agreement, but so far none has for Covid-19 products. Recommended Coronavirus economic impact Countries set to pay economic price for failing to control Covid
Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, told the FT that the compulsory license rule already in place indicated that the principles of pausing patents in emergencies had been accepted by the international community. However, developing countries have often been reluctant to take advantage of the compulsory license option for fear of diplomatic blowback, he said. “Historically, the US has always threatened countries that have used it,” Stiglitz said. “So we’ve agreed to it, but we undermine it.” He said governments had made funding available for research into vaccines, and that pharmaceutical companies had “already made their profit”. “And we know that next time something like this happens, the government will come forward and help pay for the development of the vaccines because the economic trade-off between the loss of trillions versus a few billions of dollars for research is a no brainer.”
金言的马家
私营公司的专利和技术,总统给免费了属于侵犯股东利益,破坏了私有财产权。
现在主要是生产问题吧,专利授权了也不见得能生产出来
A
AlwaysHopeful
专利也不是拜登的,轮得到他做主吗?拜登也不能搞authoritarian government直接就把别人专利取消了啊。他们要么就给药厂施压。
V
VozProgresiva
没什么好压力的, 放弃了, 今后还有什么医药公司要研发新药?
S
Sisyphus
希望私企顶住压力别松口
墨西哥辣椒
专利也不是拜登的,轮得到他做主吗?拜登也不能搞authoritarian government直接就把别人专利取消了啊。他们要么就给药厂施压。
AlwaysHopeful 发表于 2021-04-14 19:07


民主党比较仁慈吧??

民主党 代表了美国的好人吧?
H
Haribough
回复 1楼bigjohn123456的帖子
我记得以前都是发明者主动放弃专利的。这事儿跟拜登和美国政府无关啊。
c
calrose
可以问Pfizer Moderna买专利啊!各国政要都很穷吗?
墨西哥辣椒
可以问Pfizer Moderna买专利啊!各国政要都很穷吗?
calrose 发表于 2021-04-14 19:31


把这个公司 收归国有吧!!
合并 为 美国国有制药厂吧!
c
chmod999
为毛盯着辉瑞 光要辉瑞的够吗? biontech和uupen的专利拿到了吗 记得辉瑞搞这个从头到尾没拿政府的funding吧?这个情况下政府有权强制放弃专利吗? 吃相也太难看了直接要白拿 坐下来好好商量谈一个双方都能接受的价钱会死吗?
k
kathyy
这些政要所在国家是穷的要靠讨饭为生了吗?
q
qqyxgz
辉瑞不就一个分销商吗? 找biontech、复兴 要技术去呀
爱与自由
觉得接下来疫苗会成为战略物资
南京菜农
楼下继续。
a
arabdopsis
出钱买专利啊
g
gzhsyw
别给中国就行了 别的第三世界国家也没有产能 给不给的最后还是西方国家捐款买的
l
lovedarren
为什么都盯着美国啊,其他国家没有疫苗怎么的?柿子专门找软的捏,不要脸了。 还是那句话,让辉瑞赚钱,多赚,才有动力下次继续科研,让疫情惨重的美国走出来再说。辉瑞利润大,美国税收多,好歹平一平那个什么破stimulus支票的亏空,物价不要总涨,关系到每一个在美国的人。 想要专利拿钱啊,多简单个事儿。
e
elleyy
简直恬不知耻,忙一点没帮上,现在伸手吃白食。
庚子
上次是WHO呼吁,这次是大量世界政要名流炸药奖得主再次呼吁,拜登想必也亚历山大,不想背负骂名吧。
https://www.ft.com/content/43fd53f5-2b82-4e41-981c-8544a6ce996b
Former world leaders call on Biden to suspend Covid-19 vaccine patents Gordon Brown one of 175 figures urging action to boost inoculation rates in the developing world

A group of 175 former world leaders and Nobel laureates is urging the US to take “urgent action” to suspend intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global inoculation rates. A measure to allow countries to temporarily override patent rights for Covid-related medical products was proposed at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October, and has since been backed by nearly 60 countries. Doing so would allow developing countries to make their own copies of the vaccines that have been developed by pharmaceutical companies without fear of being sued for intellectual property infringements.
“A WTO waiver is a vital and necessary step to bringing an end to this pandemic. It must be combined with ensuring vaccine knowhow and technology is shared openly,” the signatories, comprising more than 100 Nobel prizewinners and over 70 former world leaders, wrote in a letter to US president Joe Biden, seen by the Financial Times.
They added a waiver in tandem with other measures would “expand global manufacturing capacity, unhindered by industry monopolies that are driving the dire supply shortages blocking vaccine access”. Recommended Covid-19 vaccines Covid-19 vaccine tracker: the global race to vaccinate While wealthier countries have access to doses of Covid vaccines and are increasing vaccination programmes for their populations, developing economies have so far had more limited access to doses.
Former leaders who signed the letter included Gordon Brown, former UK prime minister; François Hollande, former French president; Mikhail Gorbachev, former president of the USSR; and Yves Leterme, former Belgian prime minister. Hollande branded the inequality in access to vaccines “an unbearable political and moral situation”, that was “economic nonsense”. The individuals who signed the letter, including Nobel laureates in economics as well as from across the arts and sciences, warned that inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent it from recovering.
“The world saw unprecedented development of safe and effective vaccines, in major part thanks to US public investment,” the group wrote. “We all welcome that vaccination rollout in the US and many wealthier countries is bringing hope to their citizens.” “Yet for the majority of the world that same hope is yet to be seen. New waves of suffering are now rising across the globe. Our global economy cannot rebuild if it remains vulnerable to this virus.” Latest coronavirus news Follow FT's live coverage and analysis of the global pandemic and the rapidly evolving economic crisis here.
The group warned that fully enforcing IP was “self-defeating for the US” as it hindered global vaccination efforts. “Given artificial global supply shortages, the US economy already risks losing $1.3tn in gross domestic product this year.” US business groups, including pharmaceutical industry representatives, have urged Biden to resist supporting a waiver to IP rules at the WTO, arguing that the proposal led by India and South Africa was too “vague” and “broad”. The US has previously opposed a waiver for Covid-19 products, along with the UK, EU and Switzerland. The US trade representative’s office said late last month that it was “exploring every avenue” and “evaluating the efficacy” of the proposal to waive so-called Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. 
Katherine Tai, US trade representative, told a WTO meeting on vaccine equity on Wednesday that both the government and the private sector would need to do their part to “live up to” the “spirit” of the Trips agreement, which was born out of the HIV crisis. “We hope to hear more today about how the market once again has failed in meeting the health needs of developing countries,” Tai said. “As part of that we have to consider what modifications and reforms to our trade rules might be necessary to reflect what we have learned.” Countries already have the ability to make their own generic versions of branded drugs and vaccines by issuing so-called compulsory licenses under the WTO Trips agreement, but so far none has for Covid-19 products. Recommended Coronavirus economic impact Countries set to pay economic price for failing to control Covid
Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, told the FT that the compulsory license rule already in place indicated that the principles of pausing patents in emergencies had been accepted by the international community. However, developing countries have often been reluctant to take advantage of the compulsory license option for fear of diplomatic blowback, he said. “Historically, the US has always threatened countries that have used it,” Stiglitz said. “So we’ve agreed to it, but we undermine it.” He said governments had made funding available for research into vaccines, and that pharmaceutical companies had “already made their profit”. “And we know that next time something like this happens, the government will come forward and help pay for the development of the vaccines because the economic trade-off between the loss of trillions versus a few billions of dollars for research is a no brainer.”

bigjohn123456 发表于 2021-04-14 18:54

我相信Biden很擅长搞一些形左实右的东西。表面上答应但是实际上会让各国付出一定代价。免费给专利或者疫苗,哪有那种好事?现在Biden政府应该赤字亏空很大吧。
s
saison
恬不知耻,把科学家的辛勤劳动当作是免费的一样。都像他们这样不尊重科研工作者,再来一次大家等死算了。钻钱眼里去了,救命钱也不舍得给自己国民花,留着干嘛,搞腐败,养私生子么?
L
Luclulu123
郁闷,各国政要名流都认为美国是傻白甜。。。
d
dolinny
辉瑞不就一个分销商吗? 找biontech、复兴 要技术去呀
qqyxgz 发表于 2021-04-14 20:23

复兴 算干什么的 他有技术???
他生产? 有么?
他分销? 从辉瑞买?
我都没弄清他到底干什么了?
a
abracadabraa
呼吁中国献出抢注的专利
c
coalpilerd
就冲着拜登连牛津疫苗都死抓着不放的抠门劲,让他suspend美国药厂的专利,想想也知道不可能。
Resistance has been fierce, however. In March, the US, UK, and the European Union all voted to block such a waiver from being granted, arguing that they need to preserve an economic incentive for the development of new medical technologies.
d
diaoshan
Former world leaders 应该 call on 各国政府和央行自己印钱买疫苗,也就几小时的事。
说白了还是自己国民的命不值钱,等着拜登去当冤大头。
g
geneontology
子贡赎人
鲁国有一道法律:如果鲁国人在外国见到同胞遭遇不幸,沦落为奴隶,只要能够把这些人赎回来帮助他们恢复自由,就可以从国家获得补偿和奖励。 孔子的学生子贡,把鲁国人从外国赎回来,但拒绝了国家的补偿。孔子说:“赐(端木赐,即子贡),你错了!向国家领取补偿金,不会损伤到你的品行;但不领取补偿金,鲁国就没有人再去赎回自己遇难的同胞了。” 子路救起一名溺水者,那人感谢他送了一头牛,子路收下了。孔子高兴地说:“鲁国人从此一定会勇于救落水者了。”
w
whatafool
多少象Katalin Karikó那样的科学家默默无闻奋斗了一辈子的成果,为什么要免费赠送?
z
zhangfei123
别给中国就行了 别的第三世界国家也没有产能 给不给的最后还是西方国家捐款买的
gzhsyw 发表于 2021-04-14 21:19

拜登says,US give the IP, Japan give technology, India give manufacturing, and produce vaccine to be distributed in third-world countries.
it is US' diplomatic weapon to win hearts and mind, it won't be given out for free.
n
nutrilite
我觉得可以官方出面买断专利,然后分享给全世界 比如说FDA每年给pfizer几个priority review 的slot,这样双方都得利
梅干茶泡饭
一旦各国都搞仿制疫苗,质量不过关,可能反而损害群众对于mRNA疫苗的信心。
y
yemao
我太佩服各国政要了, 共产主义可能快要实现了。
同样的逻辑, 任何药物都不应该有专利, 因为都是治病救人的, 不但不能有专利, 生产厂家也也不应该收费, 这样才能保证穷人有药。 其实食物也不应该收费,毕竟收费导致有些人穷得吃不上饭。 衣服也不应该收费。 房子就更不应该了, 总之, 还是共产主义吧, 各取所需, zero dollar shopping.
w
walkingclounds
就想知道biden管的着吗?
e
ebc
这些疫苗美国政府是出了不少钱的,所估计有一些份额。 但是政府如果同意无偿转让就是要把药厂的份额买下来,就相当于美国纳税人来买单。。
f
feo
回复 1楼bigjohn123456的帖子
不要脸啊…不能花点钱买吗?人家做疫苗也花了好多钱的…
R
Rutang48
中国有五款又高效又安全的疫苗,让他们放弃专利呗。老早就说了中国疫苗拯救全世界
酒酒_
专利是私产,找biden。。。各国政要神逻辑 再说就算技术包给了他们能做出符合GMP要求的产品么
s
shoeholic
杀鸡取卵就是这样的吧。慷他人之慨要人家放弃专利,以后谁做研发这种亏本生意。有本事圣母们自己捐钱或者要求自己政府付钱买断人家专利啊
l
lovedarren
我觉得可以官方出面买断专利,然后分享给全世界 比如说FDA每年给pfizer几个priority review 的slot,这样双方都得利
nutrilite 发表于 2021-04-15 05:06

官方的钱难道是‘官方’的,不是税款收入,不是我们纳税的钱?为啥不能够把这钱用于更好的基建设施? 关键是,为啥要分享?他们没钱自己买吗?能用钱解决的事儿非要免费要。穷国可以给予人道主义,但是负担不起所有国民疫苗的国家一共多少,透明化,他们本国的财务报表拿出来,政要们有钱公费吃饭的国家先扣除这一部分费用。
p
pevcmao
回复 1楼bigjohn123456的帖子
不要脸啊…不能花点钱买吗?人家做疫苗也花了好多钱的…
feo 发表于 2021-04-15 10:04

真的不要脸 可以捐献疫苗,绝对不能放弃专利,想想去年那个韦德西韦那啥药放弃专利的后果吧,第一天就被国内注册了专利,回头自己生产然后天天说这药没用。
m
mingdrew
美国人民瑟瑟发抖地不敢打,这群人在想啥呢,万一不好,要美国背锅吗
A
ArizonaGreenTea
典型的慷他人之慨
M
MissWeiWei
真的不要脸 可以捐献疫苗,绝对不能放弃专利,想想去年那个韦德西韦那啥药放弃专利的后果吧,第一天就被国内注册了专利,回头自己生产然后天天说这药没用。
pevcmao 发表于 2021-04-15 10:44

才知道这个抢专利的事,虽说意料之中,还是太卑鄙了。
R
RainyBambooJepp
他们干嘛不自己掏钱买,不要脸的东西
c
cicicecilia
这些疫苗美国政府是出了不少钱的,所估计有一些份额。 但是政府如果同意无偿转让就是要把药厂的份额买下来,就相当于美国纳税人来买单。。
ebc 发表于 2021-04-15 10:00

我咋记得政府没有出钱搞研发,他们只是承诺如果做出来会买多少
A
ATuTuA
这事儿背后透着蹊跷。。。,按说最需要疫苗应该是最贫困的国家,这些国家别说开放专利了,你就是手把手教帮着盖厂都不是一时半会儿能弄出来的。真正开放专利了里面收益最大的绝对是有实力弄只是还差点劲儿做不出来的。另外开放专利假如有能力的B国大批量生产卖遍全世界,收益利润算谁的,难不成B国生产企业都免费赠送?
c
catchwolly
自己做不出來就給錢給藥廠! 科研需要大量經費
r
redcy
其他国家可以联合买别人专利吧,实在不行还可以上网去GO FUND ME。
h
huarensunny
五毛不是说Pfizer就是个生产商么,那干嘛找美国来放弃专利。
想要就出钱买
k
kathyy
这事儿背后透着蹊跷。。。,按说最需要疫苗应该是最贫困的国家,这些国家别说开放专利了,你就是手把手教帮着盖厂都不是一时半会儿能弄出来的。真正开放专利了里面收益最大的绝对是有实力弄只是还差点劲儿做不出来的。另外开放专利假如有能力的B国大批量生产卖遍全世界,收益利润算谁的,难不成B国生产企业都免费赠送?
ATuTuA 发表于 2021-04-15 12:32

的确,正儿八经的穷国不会要专利,会直接要疫苗,想要专利的大部分都是自己不想花钱搞科研或者花了钱也搞不出来的。