我是政治小白，知识面和深度有限，还需华人mm给开个窍。比如我觉得华人商会还有律师协会，能不能整合在一起？比如这次案件，能否有个组织代表华人出面intervene呢？ In 1939 the NAACP established as an independent legal arm for the civil rights movement the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, which litigated to the Supreme Court Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the case that resulted in the high court’s landmark 1954 school-desegregation decision. The organization had also won a significant victory in 1946, with Morgan v. Virginia, which successfully barred segregation in interstate travel, setting the stage for the Freedom Rides of 1961. The murder of NAACP field director Medgar Evers in 1963 gave the group national prominence, likely contributing to the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. In the 1980s the NAACP publicized opposition to apartheid policies in South Africa. The organization moved its headquarters from New York City to Baltimore, Maryland, in 1986. It also operates a bureau in Washington, D.C., and has branch offices in dozens of cities across the United States. At the turn of the 21st century, the NAACP sponsored campaigns against youth violence, encouraged economic enterprise among African Americans, and led voter drives to increase participation in the political process. source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Association-for-the-Advancement-of-Colored-People
我是政治小白，知识面和深度有限，还需华人mm给开个窍。比如我觉得华人商会还有律师协会，能不能整合在一起？比如这次案件，能否有个组织代表华人出面intervene呢？ In 1939 the NAACP established as an independent legal arm for the civil rights movement the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, which litigated to the Supreme Court Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the case that resulted in the high court’s landmark 1954 school-desegregation decision. The organization had also won a significant victory in 1946, with Morgan v. Virginia, which successfully barred segregation in interstate travel, setting the stage for the Freedom Rides of 1961. The murder of NAACP field director Medgar Evers in 1963 gave the group national prominence, likely contributing to the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. In the 1980s the NAACP publicized opposition to apartheid policies in South Africa. The organization moved its headquarters from New York City to Baltimore, Maryland, in 1986. It also operates a bureau in Washington, D.C., and has branch offices in dozens of cities across the United States. At the turn of the 21st century, the NAACP sponsored campaigns against youth violence, encouraged economic enterprise among African Americans, and led voter drives to increase participation in the political process. source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Association-for-the-Advancement-of-Colored-People tuer 发表于 2021-03-22 16:05
看你提到这个，我在这个网上提到好多次了，没人在乎。 NAACP有个法律部，平时自己接生意，在Brown vs. BOE之后，很多学区拒绝结束隔离，这个法律部一个个学区打官司，上百个官司，结果所有学区屈服。
NAACP Legal Defense Fund History | NAACP LDF In the face of fierce and often violent “massive resistance” to public school desegregation, LDF was forced to sue hundreds of school districts across the country to vindicate Brown’s promise. It was not until LDF’s subsequent victories in cases such as Cooper v. Aaron (1958)2, Green v. County School Board (1968)3, and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg (1971)4, that the Supreme Court issued mandates that ultimately required all vestiges of desegregation to be eliminated “root and branch.” 如果不是这个案子，红州的华人小孩读书，坐公车，不知道会被安排在哪里那。
“But Are They Colored?”: Asian Americans and Segregated Schools in the South (bard.edu) During the early-to-mid twentieth century, principals and superintendents of segregated schools in the South faced a perplexing question: Were Asian American children white or colored? The question was important for deciding where the small number of Asian American students should attend school and a firm answer was necessary for upholding racial segregation and maintaining social order. Asian Americans were just as concerned with the question of their racial identity in, as one Chinese American student explained, a “two color” society. While laws pertaining to school segregation for Asian Americans varied throughout the South, battles between school districts and Asian American parents over their right to send their children to white schools resulted in local, state, and federal courts determining the “correct” race of Asian Americans for segregation purposes. Asian Americans did not readily accept the courts’ decisions, however, and actively pursued their rights to send their children to white schools through lawsuits and appeals. The Lum v. Rice Supreme Court decision and the Bond v. Tij Fung Supreme Court of Mississippi case (both from 1927) highlight the fascinating legal strategies that Asian Americans used in fighting school segregation in Mississippi and expose the understudied connections among Asian immigration, citizenship, and Jim Crow prior to the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision.
看到这个页面很震撼。有可能不分政党出生只看肤色来支持吗？比如只要是华人政客，就支持，列到本族荣耀人士下面。 但从华人反对歧视看出来，内部分裂蛮大的，而且说中文的看不起不会说中文的华人，abc也不爱和一代掺合，没个代表的感觉。
In 1939 the NAACP established as an independent legal arm for the civil rights movement the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, which litigated to the Supreme Court Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the case that resulted in the high court’s landmark 1954 school-desegregation decision. The organization had also won a significant victory in 1946, with Morgan v. Virginia, which successfully barred segregation in interstate travel, setting the stage for the Freedom Rides of 1961.
The murder of NAACP field director Medgar Evers in 1963 gave the group national prominence, likely contributing to the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. In the 1980s the NAACP publicized opposition to apartheid policies in South Africa. The organization moved its headquarters from New York City to Baltimore, Maryland, in 1986. It also operates a bureau in Washington, D.C., and has branch offices in dozens of cities across the United States. At the turn of the 21st century, the NAACP sponsored campaigns against youth violence, encouraged economic enterprise among African Americans, and led voter drives to increase participation in the political process.
source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Association-for-the-Advancement-of-Colored-People
看你提到这个，我在这个网上提到好多次了，没人在乎。
NAACP有个法律部，平时自己接生意，在Brown vs. BOE之后，很多学区拒绝结束隔离，这个法律部一个个学区打官司，上百个官司，结果所有学区屈服。
In the face of fierce and often violent “massive resistance” to public school desegregation, LDF was forced to sue hundreds of school districts across the country to vindicate Brown’s promise. It was not until LDF’s subsequent victories in cases such as Cooper v. Aaron (1958)2, Green v. County School Board (1968)3, and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg (1971)4, that the Supreme Court issued mandates that ultimately required all vestiges of desegregation to be eliminated “root and branch.”
如果不是这个案子，红州的华人小孩读书，坐公车，不知道会被安排在哪里那。
During the early-to-mid twentieth century, principals and superintendents of segregated schools in the South faced a perplexing question: Were Asian American children white or colored? The question was important for deciding where the small number of Asian American students should attend school and a firm answer was necessary for upholding racial segregation and maintaining social order. Asian Americans were just as concerned with the question of their racial identity in, as one Chinese American student explained, a “two color” society. While laws pertaining to school segregation for Asian Americans varied throughout the South, battles between school districts and Asian American parents over their right to send their children to white schools resulted in local, state, and federal courts determining the “correct” race of Asian Americans for segregation purposes. Asian Americans did not readily accept the courts’ decisions, however, and actively pursued their rights to send their children to white schools through lawsuits and appeals. The Lum v. Rice Supreme Court decision and the Bond v. Tij Fung Supreme Court of Mississippi case (both from 1927) highlight the fascinating legal strategies that Asian Americans used in fighting school segregation in Mississippi and expose the understudied connections among Asian immigration, citizenship, and Jim Crow prior to the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision.
我没看到过你的帖子哎。 不过我这帖子也快沉了。。。 我觉得黑人和我们不一样的是，优秀的人会很为自己的出生自豪，我分别参加过一个华裔和非洲裔组织搭建的活动，明显感觉他们的更令人有归属感，感觉是，你是同族的，我尽力帮你，你差没关系，我拉你一把。华人，包括我自己也是，有点自卑，自己不优秀的都不敢争，会更look up to白人/主流社会的样子。
不过毕竟华人在美国人口不像他们那么多，还是少少数族裔。
OK，他们主要干嘛？感觉组织的活动更多是帮律师会计（白人）在华人圈子里拉生意。
华人是文化问题，在母国大多数人一直被压迫，不敢说话的，即使超有钱的，上面也有皇帝。所以结果是：
很多人即使有钱也不敢争，并且也不会帮普通人的，大家在皇帝面前，想的是如何比其他仆人过的好一些，想近办法帮皇帝管理其他和自己一样的人。如果其他“仆人”比自己过的好，就不舒服，如果其他“仆人”要造反，就会帮皇帝把其他仆人做掉。仆人之间是斗的，目的为了争宠，为自己拿到一些好处。
相当一部分这些基因到了美国，就认白人是主人，自己是仆人，为主人急，为主人想，觉得其他种族不能爬到主人头上，觉得MAGA非常好，就是为主人着想的。我和一些MAGA的华人聊过，他们根深蒂固的就是这种想法，其中有些是华尔街中层，有些是名校教授。
在中国以前，造反的底层居多，有些好处的一般不会造反。很多当官的为了皇帝，做很多事情，最后结局也不是很好。
对，黑人看到对方都喊兄弟homie之类的很亲热，也没有什么“我祖上是坦桑尼亚黑人，看不起乌干达黑人”
华人日本人韩国人互相鄙视就不说了，光看华人网上窝里斗还少吗
我本身是宅到出花儿的人，偶尔有几个本地华人朋友，我老公都说不要走太近，也不要邀请到家里来，原因就不详叙述了，我替自己留点空间lol
是啊，我们都不是民主社会出来的。民主社会要出头，基本上要有社区，关系，很多是宗教，也要有普通人支持自己，所以必须交流。
中国社会要出头，一是读书，二是要接近官员，往上谄媚，只要上面人喜欢自己就行，谁在乎比自己差的或者和自己平级的？
我觉得商会势力蛮强大的，但是有个问题是，华人和中国的牵扯和犹太人和以色列还不太一样，毕竟中国现在是美国的敌对国，美国在科技领域的合作宗旨就是，我们愿意和一切freedom loving国家合作，意思就是排除中国俄罗斯（但美国对俄罗斯更友好些似乎，毕竟都算是白人吧。。），所以华人成立政治团体，免不了会被黑通共，所以也蛮尴尬的，而且一代二代的利益似乎很不同，商会大约只代表一代？感觉蛮难。
是的，这边选举出来的人都是从社区上来的，至少要，人人都认识你，替社区做过事情。
你看，没几个人在乎这个帖子，华人目前有些政治需求，但都是狭隘的，目的明确的，比如藤校，不被打骂，很少有人会长远看问题。要形成犹太人，黑人的这种大型组织，需要中国本土民主化后30年大家习惯社区运作才有希望。
哈哈，那沉了吧。你可以去兔兔的wx群。你让她拉你。