回复 1楼artdong的帖子 Hi WUMAO, everyone knows Washington Post is Bezo''''s propaganda machine to push for one world order. To learn what really happened on Jan 6th at the Capitol, 每一位美国人都应该看 21 分钟视频 below: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ekQGipzU7E49/
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez revealed in an emotional online broadcast Monday that she is a survivor of sexual assault and called for Republican politicians to be held accountable for the storming on the Capitol last month.
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez revealed in an emotional online broadcast Monday that she is a survivor of sexual assault and called for Republican politicians to be held accountable for the storming on the Capitol last month.
有意思，其实川普所谓“赢”的只有14个，但是，因为撤诉的都不算，只算了21个，这才是所谓的赢了2/3的案子。。。 First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud. Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits. You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7. 我去看了原文的那个表格，粗看一下，所谓赢的也未必就是赢，无非是法官指令当地选举的实际措施有改进的余地，但是没有一个案子，是推翻选举结果的， http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm 等有时间再去看看细节。 Devil is in the detail
回复 1楼artdong的帖子 Hi WUMAO, everyone knows Washington Post is Bezo''''s propaganda machine to push for one world order. To learn what really happened on Jan 6th at the Capitol, 每一位美国人都应该看 21 分钟视频 below: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ekQGipzU7E49/
Jared and Ivanka Made Up to $640 Million While Working in Washington, or 457,142 Stimulus Checks https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-white-house-income/amp Earlier this month, we learned that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump made up to $120 million between January 1, 2020 and January 20, 2021. While that was less than what they’d made the year prior, it was still quite a lot, particularly given that Kushner’s father had angrily claimed in 2019 that people should cut his son some slack because he’d allegedly made “a substantial financial sacrifice” to work at the White House. But as it turns out, this could have been merely a drop in the bucket, or a drop in the Scrooge McDuck–style pool of money that the couple raked in during their four years in Washington, a sum that financial disclosures reveal may have been well over half a billion dollars
Jared and Ivanka Made Up to $640 Million While Working in Washington, or 457,142 Stimulus Checks https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-white-house-income/amp Earlier this month, we learned that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump made up to $120 million between January 1, 2020 and January 20, 2021. While that was less than what they’d made the year prior, it was still quite a lot, particularly given that Kushner’s father had angrily claimed in 2019 that people should cut his son some slack because he’d allegedly made “a substantial financial sacrifice” to work at the White House. But as it turns out, this could have been merely a drop in the bucket, or a drop in the Scrooge McDuck–style pool of money that the couple raked in during their four years in Washington, a sum that financial disclosures reveal may have been well over half a billion dollars 落地无声 发表于 2021-02-10 21:29
Fox News lawyer tells judge that Tucker Carlson's audience doesn't expect him to report the facts "It's not the front page of the New York Times," a network attorney says in court. "It's 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'"
这个不通。哪有让人证明说亲眼目睹有舞弊的？你以为把楼上的话换一下显得很聪明吗？
说的太对了，我可以说，你从小到大每一次考试都是作弊的，现在，请提出证据证明你没有作弊
Hi WUMAO, everyone knows Washington Post is Bezo''''s propaganda machine to push for one world order. To learn what really happened on Jan 6th at the Capitol, 每一位美国人都应该看 21 分钟视频 below:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ekQGipzU7E49/
说的太对了，你从小到大每一次考试都是作弊的，现在，请提出证据证明你没有作弊
你从小到大每一次考试都是作弊的，现在，请提出证据证明你没有作弊
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/ffI3IPgFnSk
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez revealed in an emotional online broadcast Monday that she is a survivor of sexual assault and called for Republican politicians to be held accountable for the storming on the Capitol last month.
不对吧，选举公正太重要了，整个过程应该经得起查才对。
这次选举有太多不正常的地方，临时改规则，大规模mail-in, 拜登曲线，半夜数票，选举机器的软件系统不透明不允许检查，这些事情都不许查，现在连提都不许提。正常吗？不正常。主党和RINO的表现在旁观者眼里就是做贼心虚
选举跟刑事犯罪不一样，刑事犯罪是谁提告谁举证，选举应该是主持选举的机构保证透明，凡是不透明肯定有问题，要求透明度是公民的义务和权利
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZVsDhOKJKuE
我同意你说的。我只是随便扔了个逻辑陷阱。现在的cancel culture就是要把提问题的人都杀死。
共产党官员睡几百个情妇，家里几亿现金，你看见了？你数了？总有一天有什么事情发生在你这样的p民身上，没人知道真相
这位就这么喜欢让人轮流打脸啊。。。
正在看弹劾第二天。
众多国会议员出来陈述川普的各种恶行。
其实这次弹劾多数会失败，因为不可能有十七位共和党议员否决自己党派的总统而投票弹劾。
但是从一个国家的角度来说，公开审判，把恶行说出来，就是痊愈的开始，就是以后避免再发生恶行的基础。
中国就永远没有机会把领导人的恶行说出来，所以永远不能痊愈，恶性循环连续不断。
批斗与陈述事实的区别，你不会懂的。
是的，太多反常，不让人问，也不让查。一个通俄花费巨大，调查有两年吧，人都走了，还要想尽办法让人今后永远都不能从政，这是有多害怕这人东山再起吗？都恶贯满盈，人人喊打了，还担心有人投他票吗？
结果aoc还特别红。这世界啊
你这是胡乱总结啊，人家的意思是，大选以后，为了对抗作弊的谣言，全社会做出了巨大的努力
这么多反常，川普的律师都选择不提，是智商不够吗？
你先把你没作弊的证明拿出来，我自然可以把我没作弊的证据拿出来。
做回音壁有意思吗？
如果觉得班加西调查合理，1/6死的比班加西的人还多，弹劾没啥不合理的。我就觉得都很合理。
做人别太双标
被捕的“骄傲男孩”供词出来了，他们当时如果抓住副总统Pence，他们会杀了他。他们如果找到国会议长南希佩罗希，他们会杀了她。
上截图 大家看看呗 话说times是美国版人民日报的意思？
共和党也不是什么好鸟， 没有他们支持纵容川普也不会出这乱子。 他们当然会否决弹劾， 不然下一个被庭审的就是他们。
还有奥巴马与夫人，拜登与其家人，不是也天天给川粉吊打的。而且这些都是造谣抹黑的，啥奥巴马不是公民，啥夫人是黑猩猩，啥拜登是弱智，这些才是真正的批斗。
川普煽动暴民，污蔑造谣，攻击民主攻击法院法官，都是发生在光天白日之下，活生生的事实。这不叫批斗，这叫证据确凿，这叫接受司法审判！
川粉就是这样颠倒黑白，恶心至极。
你呀，连自己同志们说的话都不记得了？
怪不得整天跟在别人后面学说话。。。
Trump New York co-chair makes racist 'gorilla' comment about Michelle Obama
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/donald-trump-carl-paladino-michelle-obama
哎，链接都给你了，快去查字典读文章！
原来真的看不懂英文。。。
看看是谁说的？ 再给你一次链接。
Trump New York co-chair makes racist 'gorilla' comment about Michelle Obama
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/donald-trump-carl-paladino-michelle-obama
你这样给人打完脸，还哭哭啼啼的耍赖的，有意思吗？
引一百次，原作者也还是你们这些川粉。
Trump New York co-chair makes racist 'gorilla' comment about Michelle Obama
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/donald-trump-carl-paladino-michelle-obama
大选后不是很多川粉说奥巴马被抓起来了，看来他们对抓前总统没有啥异议。
呵呵说了要弹劾总统了吗？罪犯不管是总统还是平民都要抓起来
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/trump-is-winning-election-lawsuits-in-case-you-havent-heard
弹劾是1/13/2021，trump还在任不是前总统。
快把奥巴马的犯罪证据提供上去，犯罪就要抓起来。
有意思，其实川普所谓“赢”的只有14个，但是，因为撤诉的都不算，只算了21个，这才是所谓的赢了2/3的案子。。。
First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud. Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits. You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7.
我去看了原文的那个表格，粗看一下，所谓赢的也未必就是赢，无非是法官指令当地选举的实际措施有改进的余地，但是没有一个案子，是推翻选举结果的， http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm 等有时间再去看看细节。
Devil is in the detail
我靠，这种劣质的视频都信？明显是阴谋论嘛，还是智商不高的那种。
我们是旁观者，看到的就是，按照程序，官司也打了，查也查了。。。最后没有结论说明有大规模舞弊。
当然肯定有人认为查的不够。这无所谓，总有人有与众不同的爱好不是？ 但有正常程序已经给出了结论，我们旁观者看到了这结论，就这么简单。
你们这种有与众不同的爱好的人，爱委屈爱咋样无所谓。正常人也未必真的愿意拿命去赌现在的结论就是百分之百的事实 - 用不着100%，可以接受的范畴就够了。正常人会对正常程序（比如，法官判决）的结论更能接受而已。你如果愿意花心思去推翻那结论，请便，正常人没这义务也没这么大兴趣。
打什么了，收政治压力被驳回的官司也叫打了？
我管你是什么原因被驳回呢？
你觉得一般人不该信法官，该信你的，是吧？明明比你更有资格做结论的人已经给出了结论，你不会以为天下人都闲着没事干，要听你去解释法官的结论为什么没有你的结论正确？
这叫偏执。
当然，如果我押了宝在“选举就是有大规模舞弊”上面，那么我也不管啥是事实，也不管谁有权威给结论，反正我就是要坚持我的说法。
但我没押宝，这事对我来说就是一八卦而已。
他们最擅长就是睁眼说瞎话，双标。那个推氢氯奎被骂疯子的医生也是黑人，这时候怎么不政治正确了，就因为她坚持了真理？如果早推这个可以少死多少人？ CDC和主流媒体就是杀人犯
McConell 今天又说了同样的话，这次弹劾，共和党议员投票是显示良心的， a conscience vote。
俺特别佩服这班共和党老骨干，从州法官到大法官到议员到副总统，都太有骨气了。
美国加油！共和党加油！
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-10/mcconnell-signals-to-gop-trump-impeachment-is-a-conscience-vote
注意老乌龟的用词
matter of conscience 不是 matter of your conscience
大大的狡猾
查不到，你给几个case来验证一下。赢了2/3是在你家里赢的？
这里有谁在赞扬 BLM 暴力？BLM 抓了多少人你知道吗？
真是受不了你们这些转移视线的川粉，好像因为 BLM 也有暴徒，川粉暴徒就无罪了一样。
你想讨论 BLM 暴力，自己开个楼吧。
抓了之后呢？审判了？坐牢了？
这个还用你担心？
美国司法制度自会断定。
blm looters很多被charge felony，怎么了，失望了？
其实很多评论说过，警察对川粉暴徒的处理方式，相对比对付 BLM 暴徒温和多了，这也是为什么川粉暴徒可以如此破坏国会山的一个原因。
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/capitol-police-response-rioters-draws-claims-racist-double-standards-n1253363
说到底，川普图啥？
Jared and Ivanka Made Up to $640 Million While Working in Washington, or 457,142 Stimulus Checks
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-white-house-income/amp Earlier this month, we learned that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump made up to $120 million between January 1, 2020 and January 20, 2021. While that was less than what they’d made the year prior, it was still quite a lot, particularly given that Kushner’s father had angrily claimed in 2019 that people should cut his son some slack because he’d allegedly made “a substantial financial sacrifice” to work at the White House. But as it turns out, this could have been merely a drop in the bucket, or a drop in the Scrooge McDuck–style pool of money that the couple raked in during their four years in Washington, a sum that financial disclosures reveal may have been well over half a billion dollars
正大光明的裙带关系捞金，不愧是美国式自由民主
川粉得了便宜还卖乖
人家几十亿的资产一年租金利息就有好几亿～～
别忘了那举世闻名，省了自己家族还有富豪老友记亿万税收的川普税改啊。
Trump would save more than $20 million himself, according to the analysis of how the legislation affects his 2005 tax return, and his heirs could potentially save $1.1 billion based on his reported wealth
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/trump-his-family-could-save-more-1-billion-under-house-n821491
哇，这么有钱，还只交七百五税？
你说谁蠢谁精呢？
750是川普的那个新闻说的是他女儿女婿
说的是川普。
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54319948
https://apnews.com/article/archive-personal-taxes-donald-trump-f0e2af5f9f99de9d30dc6b9097121188
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2020/10/19/trump-will-have-900-million-of-loans-coming-due-in-his-second-term-if-hes-reelected/?sh=43df3d2f5f37
不过没关系，谁叫人家粉丝有钱呢，不当总统有这么多人给捐么？ TOPLINE Former President Trump pulled in $255.4 million in political donations from his supporters in the eight weeks following the 2020 election, according to new federal filings, but much of this money—which was solicited to fund challenges to the outcome based on specious claims of voter fraud—will likely be put to other uses. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/01/31/trump-raised-250-million-since-election-to-challenge-outcome-heres-where-most-of-the-money-will-actually-go/amp/
大家务必要记住这些为美国的未来做出“卓越贡献”的ID们
https://twitter.com/i/status/1359928593070116868
Tucker的节目只能当fiction看，你忘了？
Fox News lawyer tells judge that Tucker Carlson's audience doesn't expect him to report the facts "It's not the front page of the New York Times," a network attorney says in court. "It's 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'"
https://twitter.com/i/status/1360055537967202308
您真太聪明了，那您给说说看，选他们出来的人，是觉得他们嫁祸嫁得好，所以支持他们继续在那位子上呆着？还是傻，没您聪明，看不出您大嘴一张就能说出来的东西？
再说了，美国是大家的美国，您非觉得人家真要搞乱美国，摧毁经济，然后嫁祸给谁，您却又没办法通过正当的程序抓住他们，这说明什么？说明这个制度无能？还是说明那些是您自个儿想出来的？
与其忙不迭地定性和扣帽子，还不如想一想为什么这么多愤怒的民众会质疑这个政府的正当性，既然标榜自己是民主政府，为什么听证会上那么多证据的情况下、民众的质疑没有被认真解决和回答。
另外这个帖子是不是应该挪到政治版？
我今天听到某党最印象深的两句话是： 第一，不支持弹劾的共和党人都是同谋 第二，如果这次不弹劾，下次这样的国会 riot还会发生。
我不做任何评论。
这种视频会不会变相的鼓励暴力。
政客说话的时候这种煽动性的说法多了去了，这种话一看就知道属于此类，没多少傻子会真信。
华人上和政治有关的“讨论”，各种逻辑混乱的说法那更是海了去了。