都是新建的房子,我们装了fence, 邻居虽然房子的进展比我们快,但是装fence在我家后面装的。那么他们就直接share了一段我家的fence, 却不用付(share)任何费用 --- 这个我们好像也只能认了,对吧? 另外就是,builder 按照规定是installed the fence 6'' from the property line, 那么邻居势必还占用了我们6'' from the property line的面积。根据以前版上也讨论过的Adverse Possession,谁长期占有就算谁的,我家岂不是就失去了这部分面积?实在求解惑,求安慰。 谢谢姐妹们~
回复 9楼peachypeach的帖子 问了,这个是他们的回答: Your fence is installed completely on your property and belongs to you, you are responsible for its maintenance etc. The neighbors fence is installed on his property and belongs to him, for legal reasons we cannot install directly on the property line. We cannot predict who may install a fence in the future and they do benefit from your fence being installed first. This is a fairly common situation with the only logical and legal solution.
回复 9楼peachypeach的帖子 问了,这个是他们的回答: Your fence is installed completely on your property and belongs to you, you are responsible for its maintenance etc. The neighbors fence is installed on his property and belongs to him, for legal reasons we cannot install directly on the property line. We cannot predict who may install a fence in the future and they do benefit from your fence being installed first. This is a fairly common situation with the only logical and legal solution. oncestart 发表于 2021-01-24 20:03
另外就是,builder 按照规定是installed the fence 6'' from the property line, 那么邻居势必还占用了我们6'' from the property line的面积。根据以前版上也讨论过的Adverse Possession,谁长期占有就算谁的,我家岂不是就失去了这部分面积?实在求解惑,求安慰。 谢谢姐妹们~
对的,价格另算的。这里的问题是他们告诉我们fence是不能建在border line上的,所以我家这边缩进了6‘’。
你的fence是建在border line上吗,还是每边都缩进了一些?
这个问题你要抗议啊,让他们重新修fence,要不然多少年后那块地就成了她家的了
问个问题,fence坏了,homeowner insurance cover吗?
问了,这个是他们的回答:
Your fence is installed completely on your property and belongs to you, you are responsible for its maintenance etc. The neighbors fence is installed on his property and belongs to him, for legal reasons we cannot install directly on the property line.
We cannot predict who may install a fence in the future and they do benefit from your fence being installed first. This is a fairly common situation with the only logical and legal solution.
要是没啥后果,是不是真的可以去拆了? 真是郁闷。 builder说这个问题很common,倒是显得我们自己孤陋寡闻似的。
我买保险的时候确认过,会cover一部分,好像叫outside structure啥的。看你买的保险情况。
是的。第一个问题只是一点钱的问题。
主要是不知道怎么去有效解决这个问题
修在你家地里,builder也说是你的,由你来管,所以你不需要它就可以拆了。
hmm, 你这个说法和我的builder的contractor说的很类似。有什么依据吗?看来要温柔交涉 :-)
意思就是谁先修谁倒霉?