https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/california-recording-laws/ Penalties: Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: In California. the first arrest for eavesdropping or wiretapping is subject to a fine of up to $2,500, or a jail sentence lasting no longer than a year. Further offenses are subject to a fine of $10,000 at most or imprisonment for up to a year. Cal. Penal Code § 637: Sharing the details of intercepted phone communications can be subject to fines of up to $5,000 and one year in jail.
https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/california-recording-laws/ Penalties: Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: In California. the first arrest for eavesdropping or wiretapping is subject to a fine of up to $2,500, or a jail sentence lasting no longer than a year. Further offenses are subject to a fine of $10,000 at most or imprisonment for up to a year. Cal. Penal Code § 637: Sharing the details of intercepted phone communications can be subject to fines of up to $5,000 and one year in jail. BottleNoseD 发表于 2021-01-19 16:35
这是法律的原文： 632. (a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. ... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=632
这是法律的原文： 632. (a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. ... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=632 BottleNoseD 发表于 2021-01-19 16:58
https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/california-recording-laws/ Penalties: Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: In California. the first arrest for eavesdropping or wiretapping is subject to a fine of up to $2,500, or a jail sentence lasting no longer than a year. Further offenses are subject to a fine of $10,000 at most or imprisonment for up to a year. Cal. Penal Code § 637: Sharing the details of intercepted phone communications can be subject to fines of up to $5,000 and one year in jail. BottleNoseD 发表于 2021-01-19 16:35
回复 29楼dajiangyoude的帖子 These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. 剩下的州只要有一方就可以。
为了防止自己受伤害，有没有必要带录音笔什么的。
拿出来爆料的话。。。从我吃瓜人角度看，对方说的话多半是没防备下的真话，但是主动录音这边说的话，可信度要打点折扣。
没有规定不能当证据
话说这个偷录有没有民事刑事之分？
Criminal case 肯定严格一般不行
不知道civil case怎么算，估计看法官吧。假如有其他证据再加上录音让法官觉得当妈的不要孩子了给sole guardianship就行了吧
真心话的话，那也要看是轻松聊天下说的还是生气的状态下说的，说话的语气开玩笑的还是认真的？诱导别人说出对自己有利的话然后录音放到网上让网友攻击对方绝对是居心不良。路人无心记录身边的事，放到网上不知道。
有的时候看看他做的事，会拿录音说他这么做是事先计划好的。行动和自己计划的是一样的。
Two-party consent 州，不经对方同意一定是违法的。在加州， 非法录音可以判一年监禁，公开录音还可以可以加判一年监禁。
问题不是违法与否，而是当政者是否要抓你。
有link吗？
https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/california-recording-laws/
Penalties: Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: In California. the first arrest for eavesdropping or wiretapping is subject to a fine of up to $2,500, or a jail sentence lasting no longer than a year. Further offenses are subject to a fine of $10,000 at most or imprisonment for up to a year. Cal. Penal Code § 637: Sharing the details of intercepted phone communications can be subject to fines of up to $5,000 and one year in jail.
+1。主动录音的一方肯定是有所准备的，对话是会受引导和影响的。例如日常生活中，也会偶尔和队友吐槽亲戚或者同事，这些吐槽内容当面我是绝对不会讲的。随口的抱怨、狠话什么的，也就是一时的情绪没啥必要正面刚。和郑爽这种弃养孩子大事大非的问题不能类比，但她没设防被人录了音就是情况更糟糕、更倒霉。
这些说的都不是录音啊，这是窃听。。。
其实就是有心算计无意，握在手上当把柄，等时机到了截些对方劲爆的话放出来。个人观点，郑爽这事是狗咬狗，父母都不是好人，可怜那俩孩子就是了。想到了小龙女，被亲生父亲成龙嫌弃成那样，一生都治愈不了自己。
这是法律的原文： 632. (a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. ...
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=632
看到了，大概有10 个state不允许单方面录音，剩下的都允许。。。
哪些state 不允许呢？看来以后真的要管好自己的嘴。谁知道对方兜里是不是有录音笔之类的。
尤其不要背后说同事和老板的坏话
录了也没啥用，录下来的不是和男方这边的一样吗？
+1 版上文盲太多 这男的违法的事做了一堆
These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. 剩下的州只要有一方就可以。
如果是在内华达或者Colorado录音都没问题。如果是在加州，是违法的。当然在中国录的，就啥问题都没有。考虑到是双方父母的对话，更大概率是在中国通话的，然后录制的，那至少在录音方面是不违法的。
你怎么知道男方在合法州？
z
她是傻在钱多不知道怎么花。她找个好律师，不用自己和家人开口，律师谈，谈好条件，签好文件写好保密协定，她付钱就搞定。她挣钱的速度就是普通人上个厕所吃个饭的时间，瞎折腾。
还是太单存。。。。。。
国内可以的。我家也是借贷纠纷，对方欠款不还我们上庭用过。同时录音最好确认对方姓名。比如自报家门我是谁谁谁，你是xxx？都确认了这段录音基本完美被法官采用概率很大。当然这是国内的操作。
各州不同的，有的违法，有的不违
看着男的带两个孩子带的很不错啊，不象是不想要孩子的。
这男的白捡了两个孩子，花完了郑爽钱还能站在道德制高点上指指点点。虽然郑爽很多地方不对，但是现在看起来这个男的更渣。
美国有38州是one party consent state，即只要有通话一方同意，电话录音就可以作为法庭合法证据，另外的州需要双方同意录音。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#United_States
明星和素人谈恋爱，一起塌房，当然明星付出更多，更别说是自己作的 这是作为公众人物应该有的担当和代价
前一阵Trump给Georgia的州务卿打电话要求查大选票数，被州务卿悄悄录音然后发给媒体了。在Georgia未经录音是许可的，Trump也没辙。