United States: Twenty-five years ago, the median-priced U.S. home could be yours for less than six figures: $97,300. By the end of 2015, national prices had climbed to an all-time high of $223,900, a long-term gain of 130 percent. California: Golden State homes still cost about twice as much as the national average in 1990: $193,770. By the end of last year, a single-family California home had a median sales price of $474,420 — still short of the 2007 peak but 145 percent more than 1990 prices. San Francisco County: These days, San Francisco grabs national headlines for its sky-high housing prices, but in 1990, a single-family home ran just $285,920. Last year, prices in the city hit a record $1,270,492, a 25-year gain of 344 percent. Prices in San Francisco didn’t take as big of a hit during the recent recession as they did in other parts of the Bay Area but put up double-digit-percent gains each year between 2012 and 2015. San Mateo County: CAR also lacks 1990 data for San Mateo County median prices, but one year later they stood at $328,310. By the end of last year, homes in the county were priced at $1,250,000, up 281 percent over 25 years. San Mateo home prices closed 2015 at a record high. Santa Clara County: If old-school prices in San Francisco seem unbeleivably inexpensive by today’s standards, consider Silicon Valley’s hub, where a home ran $245,670 in 1990. That’s 287 percent less than CAR’s most recent numbers, which peg the median at $950,410, a Santa Clara County record. After dropping by about 20 percent in 2007 and 2008, prices in the county bounced back by about the same amount in 2013.
United States: Twenty-five years ago, the median-priced U.S. home could be yours for less than six figures: $97,300. By the end of 2015, national prices had climbed to an all-time high of $223,900, a long-term gain of 130 percent. California: Golden State homes still cost about twice as much as the national average in 1990: $193,770. By the end of last year, a single-family California home had a median sales price of $474,420 — still short of the 2007 peak but 145 percent more than 1990 prices. San Francisco County: These days, San Francisco grabs national headlines for its sky-high housing prices, but in 1990, a single-family home ran just $285,920. Last year, prices in the city hit a record $1,270,492, a 25-year gain of 344 percent. Prices in San Francisco didn’t take as big of a hit during the recent recession as they did in other parts of the Bay Area but put up double-digit-percent gains each year between 2012 and 2015. San Mateo County: CAR also lacks 1990 data for San Mateo County median prices, but one year later they stood at $328,310. By the end of last year, homes in the county were priced at $1,250,000, up 281 percent over 25 years. San Mateo home prices closed 2015 at a record high. Santa Clara County: If old-school prices in San Francisco seem unbeleivably inexpensive by today’s standards, consider Silicon Valley’s hub, where a home ran $245,670 in 1990. That’s 287 percent less than CAR’s most recent numbers, which peg the median at $950,410, a Santa Clara County record. After dropping by about 20 percent in 2007 and 2008, prices in the county bounced back by about the same amount in 2013. 小苏打 发表于 2021-01-06 19:38
我要是还有钱我就买
我前天在santa cruz的海边，好多冲浪的人，健美养眼。海边的房子也是美美的。 阳光海滩，在那里走一走，真的觉得神清气爽，人生不能更美好。
真的生活过了，才知道湾区贵有贵的道理，湾区的吸引力不仅仅是工作带来的。
嗯。 单凭夏天不热，冬天有阳光就值了。
Salt 的cap如果能去掉，就是利好
GA出结果了么？
别自欺欺人好吗？这样的地方又不是只有湾区有。。。论风光论环境，湾区根本排不上号
南加那海边是码工买得起的吗？ Santa Cruz 多便宜。
求几个 zip code 学习一下
La Jolla 啊。好多富人开小飞机。
的确不是只有湾区有。 别的地方风光好环境好的，房价也不便宜啊。没毛病。
那里只能买远点儿了，海边那块儿实在买不起 其实在湾区也是挑便宜的地方买，也不太能挑地方
全加州都不便宜。 除非去老少边穷。
普渡微弱领先，不一定守得住，另一席应该是民主党赢了。
至于全体wfh, 只要有1/3的人想去上班, 公司的facility的cost就没法省, 那wfh对公司就是亏本买卖.
没看懂。只有三分之一去on-site, 不是可以少租几个楼吗？外地员工工资也低啊。
现在的数据看起来是普渡也输了。两个席位都输了。所以马上新总统的加税法案就会投票通过了。
加税为啥针对湾区？还是针对高科技公司？今天纳斯达克暴跌。
因为码工的收入刚好落入加税的那个level。大选的时候有个帖子分析过的。新税率再加上州税，直接到60%的税率了。
楼主也只是每个星期开一个多小时的车，然后站在海边看看别人happy，望洋兴叹一把后，又得急急赶回拥挤不堪的湾区。虽然楼主住在湾区，但你真正的日常生活与你羡慕的生活方式（天天冲浪）还是有天壤之别的。
好多人只是被生活困住了
西雅图已经又涨了一波了. 湾区应该一样的. 现在都是multiple offer.
弯曲房子贵得原因还是因为地方不大，不让开发供应量少
南加地盘铺得开，虽然不便宜，比起弯曲得变态房价还是好多了
其实弯曲风景好得地方是280西边的绿地， 不过那地方不让人住
fault 地震带
湾区的中心 好像是三藩市吧 从三藩市一路high way 35道一号公路沿岸 冲浪的人天天都很多啊 冷的海 也是海啊
可惜只有华人上的 觉得湾区应该中心是南湾 甚至是南湾加东湾
是的。别总是盯着中西部和穷乡僻壤。 现在稍微像样的地方，都涨的不便宜了。 湾区有湾区的魅力。大家还在抢房有人买就是有市场有需求。
南加有好工作离海近的，2，3m入门。也不便宜。
夏天冻得我需要穿毛衣。。。。一点也不喜欢
哈哈哈，没错。 每次说到湾区，华人上的就默认是南湾，没有比南湾更大的井口了。。。 实话说，我也觉得南湾生活质量很差的，要风景没风景，要文化没文化， 除了strip mall还是strip mall。被鄙视也是理所应当的。
更准确的说是，Google，FB，Apple这三大公司的总部所在的区域是huaren认为的核心，而刚好这三个公司都在南湾附近。半岛其实也很多人提及的，因为去这三个公司也不算远。
这三个公司属于人多钱多，大部分有购买力的人都是在这三个公司工作，尤其是Google。还有一些小公司待遇不输这三家，但人数少很多，而其他大公司的待遇差了一大截。
我记得之前有个id发帖子问什么地方风景好，气候好，学区好，周围有靠谱的中餐馆，让大家推荐，但要求房价半米以下，答案是没有，哈哈哈哈哈
不一定，就怕回头无论如何上不了车。有了心里就踏实了。
南湾有QQ noodle就够了
Santa Cruz海边没觉得好，人很杂，那边治安出门的差，怎么也得往南再走走，montery或者Camel by the sea.有钱人会在17 miles里买度假屋
280西边有房子啊，woodside，有钱就可以买，跟Larry Ellison做邻居，哦，对了，那位已经搬去夏威夷了。只能跟孙正义做邻居了。
湾区哪里中国人都多，不只是南湾。半岛也很多，城里也很多，别忘了还有一大帮做finance和生物的，湾区的好处除了冬天不冷，夏天不热，更重要的是两个人可以找到各自开车半小时内的工作，就算不是搬砖工
其实中西部大农村治安最好了
真的除了南湾就看不到别的了吗？ pacifica也在280西边哪。 不过你是只要有三好拉面就足够的人。。。
但是huaren上的某些网友们一说起湾区，就非南湾莫属啊。 南湾就是她们世界的全部，三好拉面就是最好的美食
Castro 是世界最繁华商业街。
其实我觉得Florida就很好又比南加便宜好多，可惜老公不喜欢湿度高，唉……不过加州有山火佛州飓风，也是负面因素
😂 LOL 👍
不好意思castro已经是老黄历了
我也觉得florida不错，可能我喜欢比较温暖的地方。 每个地方都有优点有缺点， 肯定没有完美的地方的， 自己选合适自己的就行。
因为拜各类马工及马公家属所赐， 湾区是huaren上的靶子吧 大家都盼着湾区房价跌可以来幸灾乐祸地踩几脚呢
我也希望房价跌，for a different reason, 可以有更多的人能住的起房，租得起房， 不需要commute2，3个小时单程， 尤其是服务业的人
弯曲一直到80/90年代都不是房价贵的地方，难道那时候天气不好？谁都知道房价贵的唯一原因是最近高科技势头很好
那时候又没有互联网
你这房价不贵的结论是怎么来的？和现在比吗？那是不贵。 但是和同时期美国其他地方比，还是贵啊。都是2.5-3倍。
United States: Twenty-five years ago, the median-priced U.S. home could be yours for less than six figures: $97,300. By the end of 2015, national prices had climbed to an all-time high of $223,900, a long-term gain of 130 percent.
California: Golden State homes still cost about twice as much as the national average in 1990: $193,770. By the end of last year, a single-family California home had a median sales price of $474,420 — still short of the 2007 peak but 145 percent more than 1990 prices.
San Francisco County: These days, San Francisco grabs national headlines for its sky-high housing prices, but in 1990, a single-family home ran just $285,920. Last year, prices in the city hit a record $1,270,492, a 25-year gain of 344 percent. Prices in San Francisco didn’t take as big of a hit during the recent recession as they did in other parts of the Bay Area but put up double-digit-percent gains each year between 2012 and 2015.
San Mateo County: CAR also lacks 1990 data for San Mateo County median prices, but one year later they stood at $328,310. By the end of last year, homes in the county were priced at $1,250,000, up 281 percent over 25 years. San Mateo home prices closed 2015 at a record high.
Santa Clara County: If old-school prices in San Francisco seem unbeleivably inexpensive by today’s standards, consider Silicon Valley’s hub, where a home ran $245,670 in 1990. That’s 287 percent less than CAR’s most recent numbers, which peg the median at $950,410, a Santa Clara County record. After dropping by about 20 percent in 2007 and 2008, prices in the county bounced back by about the same amount in 2013.
最近有钱人不要太多好伐，都是在股市赚了一大笔的。
wow, 赞用数据说话。但是近10年来湾区房价的涨幅确实比其他地区高
。。。。真是生活过了，才知道湾区不如南加
lol
躺枪了
“身在南湾 心在LA”的飘过
千万别来南加了，市面上已经没房子了。去年前年大家不要的老破小现在都秒光。 码工都来炒房子的话，白人民不聊生都跑光了，南加又变成中印联合村了。
哈哈，天气和户外活动来说我也更喜欢南加。 不过工作和diversity方面，我觉得湾区稍微好一点。
是的是的，北加发财的机会的确是多很多。南加基本上找个大公司的工作都很难。都是年纪比较大了（四五十），存了一些钱，职业上不想奔了，娃又要上好高中才搬到南加的。属于半退休状态。 年轻人还是拼湾区吧。