正式判决违宪在哪里？ 而且法官是说 IF，是个假设，不是承认 unconstitutional。不要又浑水摸鱼了。 Another Republican effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been stopped, this time by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which on Saturday rejected a request that some 2.5 million mail-in ballots in the state be thrown out. In its ruling, the high court unanimously dismissed a lawsuit that claimed that a 2019 state law allowing no-excuse absentee ballots was unconstitutional. The suit, filed by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly and others on Nov. 21, requested that the state reject mail ballots submitted under that law or allow state lawmakers to select presidential electors. The state legislature is controlled by Republicans. The justices contended that if the plaintiffs had constitutional concerns over the mail-in voting law, their suit would have been filed earlier and not after millions of mail-in ballots were cast in the 2020 primary and general election. The justices further noted that the plaintiffs waited until after the votes had been tallied and their preferred presidential candidate lost the state.
回复 108楼artdong的帖子 Many of these cases have been either dismissed or dropped。 RN1 发表于 2021-01-02 22:47
And many others have been ruled and voluntarily dismissed. BTW, dismissal does NOT mean the judges did not look at the evidences. Dismissal means the judge have looked at all the evidences and rule that a lawsuit or criminal charge is terminated.
立案英文是 file a case. File is to deposit with the clerk of the court a written complaint or petition which is the opening step in a lawsuit. https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=747 然后法官决定是否开庭或者调查，不是你我路人。
回复 114楼artdong的帖子 英文法律用词我不了解。我所说的立案不仅仅是file a case. 任何人都可以file a case to sue sb., 但是能不能真正立案走上法庭，就需要证据，l舞弊指控尤其需要检查机关例如DOJ和FBI的证据。 RN1 发表于 2021-01-02 23:29
And many others have been ruled and voluntarily dismissed. BTW, dismissal does NOT mean the judges did not look at the evidences. Dismissal means the judge have looked at all the evidences and rule that a lawsuit or criminal charge is terminated. artdong 发表于 2021-01-02 22:48
川粉基本都是想当然，就比如当初闹得沸沸扬扬的不许共和党监票员在场，实情是什么呢？前半段开现场投票川普领先，等到开始开mail in了川普就落后了，在外面的川粉就臆测里面造假了，纷纷要求现场注册成为监票员，一百多号人不戴口罩就要往里冲。被拒绝以后就哭天抹泪高喊fraud不许监票，那里头6个共和党的监票是死人？最后还闹出那个non zero number这种让人笑掉大牙的庭审。要我说这种案子都能上庭也就仗着川粉跟川普一起胡搅蛮缠不要脸就算了。
这就是说比赛中改规则不行，太晚了。这个是正常逻辑，不然任何比赛都不可能进行。
我说过了，宾州法院已经承认违宪了。
正式判决违宪在哪里？
而且法官是说 IF，是个假设，不是承认 unconstitutional。不要又浑水摸鱼了。
Another Republican effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been stopped, this time by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which on Saturday rejected a request that some 2.5 million mail-in ballots in the state be thrown out. In its ruling, the high court unanimously dismissed a lawsuit that claimed that a 2019 state law allowing no-excuse absentee ballots was unconstitutional.
The suit, filed by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly and others on Nov. 21, requested that the state reject mail ballots submitted under that law or allow state lawmakers to select presidential electors. The state legislature is controlled by Republicans.
The justices contended that if the plaintiffs had constitutional concerns over the mail-in voting law, their suit would have been filed earlier and not after millions of mail-in ballots were cast in the 2020 primary and general election. The justices further noted that the plaintiffs waited until after the votes had been tallied and their preferred presidential candidate lost the state.
都没立案，那来得判决。
川黑们心瞎了导致👀也瞎了，脑子也残了。
红卅蓝市，绝大多數是贵命人。
既然没有立案，宾州法院是怎么“承认”违宪的？法院意见原文或者非大纪元新闻报道链接请给一个
不好意思，从不看大纪元。我只是回那个层主的贴。
没有立案？？？ Are you kidding me?
Arizona 就有七个舞弊案立案， Michigan 有八个立案，Pennsylvania 有十五个立案，Wisconsin 有七个立案。。。。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Arizona
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Michigan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Pennsylvania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Wisconsin
哎，如此无知，还理直气壮，也真服了你们这些川粉了。
Many of these cases have been either dismissed or dropped。
Most of these cases have been dismissed or dropped.
And many others have been ruled and voluntarily dismissed.
BTW, dismissal does NOT mean the judges did not look at the evidences. Dismissal means the judge have looked at all the evidences and rule that a lawsuit or criminal charge is terminated.
你知道这个太晚不是说虽然作弊证据确凿，但是你们起诉太晚。而是说游戏规则是一年前定的，你比赛前同意规则，比赛完了输了才怪规则不对太晚吧。
什么叫立案？立案需要涉及检查机关的investigations; 举报人说我发现有舞弊现象，检查机关应该进行investigations从而使之成为了法庭上的证据。DOJ和FBI的不作为，使舞弊官司不能真正走上法庭。
立案英文是 file a case.
File is to deposit with the clerk of the court a written complaint or petition which is the opening step in a lawsuit.
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=747
然后法官决定是否开庭或者调查，不是你我路人。
英文法律用词我不了解。我所说的立案不仅仅是file a case. 任何人都可以file a case to sue sb., 但是能不能真正立案走上法庭，就需要证据，l舞弊指控尤其需要检查机关例如DOJ和FBI的证据。
原来是要照你所说的啊，不早说呢。
法官对于这么多的人证和证言，不予立案调查，就是不作为。
检查机关不作为，哪里来的经过法律程序审核的所谓证据？
支持美国法官对美国法律效忠。
我的问题是“既然没有立案，宾州法院是怎么“承认”违宪的”，不是你看不看大纪元。。。
那些个证据，我随手看了几个，基本上就是有可能有动机，推断这个事情一定发生了，这种证据，估计在哪个法庭也没法当证据用
所以需要检查机关的介入。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/eHT3VXJUvRc
类似于“某个街边小店没安装监控，所以进店买东西的人肯定顺手牵羊了”
跟川闹们说了白说，他们根本不会去读docket
没正经读过法官的意见吧。法官看了人证和证词，认为都不足采信
川粉基本都是想当然，就比如当初闹得沸沸扬扬的不许共和党监票员在场，实情是什么呢？前半段开现场投票川普领先，等到开始开mail in了川普就落后了，在外面的川粉就臆测里面造假了，纷纷要求现场注册成为监票员，一百多号人不戴口罩就要往里冲。被拒绝以后就哭天抹泪高喊fraud不许监票，那里头6个共和党的监票是死人？最后还闹出那个non zero number这种让人笑掉大牙的庭审。要我说这种案子都能上庭也就仗着川粉跟川普一起胡搅蛮缠不要脸就算了。
比如说，TRUMP说vaccine很快就出来了，当时各种丢人的政客和媒体不停的出来言之凿凿的说TRUMP撒谎， 搞得VACCINE出来都不敢承认，一直到大选结束才敢宣布。你说这是TRUMP领导不力，还是一些政客的手段？？？！！！！三月份让你关国门，让你在家呆着，各种打波打滚的闹着要自由。现在满大街死人了，才想起TRUMP！！！
当初为了赢大选，一直说ANTIFA不存在，BLM是PEACEFUL 的。现在出来又开始打脸了吧。总有一天，也会有人求解决BLM的问题。
还有Hunter Biden 的事也是各种隐瞒污蔑说是Russia Disinformation，现在呢？即便上台又怎么样，不知道BIDEN能不能等到群众有时间去impeach他。你们可以继续为了政治把头埋在沙子里当鸵鸟，告诉你自己，这不是真的
isn't Trump the commander-in-chief? 川总之前有三年时间去协调政府各部门和企业合作，2020就是他执政三年的成果。然后川粉又说他是政治素人，不是politician，拜托那就不要揽这个瓷器活啊！ 如果都不是川普的错，为什么之前都是奥巴马的错？这双标的也太明显了吧?