If you assume what they told are lies, you are taking a side. If they don't have the right to tell their side of story, you can forget any right of yours
If you assume what they told are lies, you are taking a side. If they don''t have the right to tell their side of story, you can forget any right of yours xlljll 发表于 2020-11-19 14:38
You are not GUARANTEED a PLATFORM. There is no requirement for any press to cover any story.
有空大家可以读一读FCC fairness doctrine的故事 差不多就是说从前美国也有一个enforce媒体对有争议的话题必须要从多方面讨论 - 必须mention对方观点 后来里根年代把这个取消了 理由是宪法第一修正案-言论自由 这也被认为是美国左右派别在里根卸任后迅速走向分裂的一个因素 连Pence都反对搞这个rule In the same year, the Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007 was proposed in the Senate by Senators Coleman with 35 co-sponsors (S.1748) and John Thune (R-SD) with 8 co-sponsors (S.1742)[59] and in the House by Republican Representative Mike Pence (R-IN) with 208 co-sponsors (H.R. 2905).[60] It provided that: The Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the `Fairness Doctrine'', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).[61]
怎么说这也是总统团队发布会，YouTube 说mute就mute. 那一般老百姓咋办啊？我今年谁也没选，哪方也不喜欢。
但是所谓的美国不就是言论自由吗？黑命贵打砸抢怎么骂都可以。总统团队发言会可以给你直接掐了。 那我们普通老百姓会怎样？今天真的是给惊了。 媒体要是给一方控制也太可怕了吧。 我真是觉得也别笑话天朝了，美国媒体现在下限也没差多少啊
If you assume what they told are lies, you are taking a side.
If they don't have the right to tell their side of story, you can forget any right of yours
这话说的，拿这个做理由那还谈什么言论自由。
You are not GUARANTEED a PLATFORM. There is no requirement for any press to cover any story.
你有想讲什么讲什么的权利。但人家平台有自己的管理权利。
你家里开party，有人大声讲别人的坏话，那是他的自由，但你有权利要求他不要在你家里讲，因为这传出去，对你家的声誉不好。
就这么简单的道理。
哈哈 mute是他们自己搞的，还hot mic了：他们自己负责转播的人嘲笑朱利安尼都被播出来了。
团队里都是什么废柴蠢货，为什么川川总是遇人不淑，心疼川川
这话不能这么说，媒体是负责报道真相，如果媒体根据自己喜好来选择播什么不播什么，这跟新闻联播有任何区别吗？
如果恐怖分子开发布会号召大家干坏事，每天也应该全程直播？所以boundary在哪？
一个国家选举出来的总统要求彻查选举的irregularities(先不说这些是不是fraud 但这些irregularities 大家有目共睹) 你居然能和恐怖份子开发布会等同？ 那前段时间“和平”的BLM运动呢 怎么就可以号召了？ 这双标 啧啧
这事上过搞几次高法其实 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine
连Pence都反对搞这个rule
In the same year, the Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007 was proposed in the Senate by Senators Coleman with 35 co-sponsors (S.1748) and John Thune (R-SD) with 8 co-sponsors (S.1742)[59] and in the House by Republican Representative Mike Pence (R-IN) with 208 co-sponsors (H.R. 2905).[60] It provided that: The Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the `Fairness Doctrine'', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).[61]