德州坚决不用软件DOMINION数票，据说自2012年测试了三次，硬件软件都不合格。

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/ As Dominion Voting Systems software comes increasingly under scrutiny in contested presidential elections this cycle, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton tells Newsmax TV his state tested the software and rejected it. "There is a reason that Texas rejected it," Paxton told "Stinchfield" host Grant Stinchfield. "We didn''t do it arbitrarily. We knew that these were unreliable systems. We didn''t want to trust them. "We didn''t want to be in the same situation that some of these other states are in now where we''re questioning the results, so we clearly believe that this was a problem."
Paxton said Texas tested Dominion software up to three different times, beginning in 2012, each time finding system failures in both hardware and software.

关于这个软件，川普的最新推文：
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

川普律师林伍德的最新推文： Lin Wood @LLinWood
Replying to @LLinWood Chinese Communists used computer fraud & mail ballot fraud to interfere with our national election. They thought we could be had & they could overthrow our duly elected President without firing a shot.
这个律师据说口碑很好，推特也没敢贴标。。。

软件作弊厉害了 轻松偷几十万选票。
BTW，LZ链接不工作

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election “ There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” 美国政府官员联名的声明，和某一个候选人的私人律师，不知道那个更有公信力。

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election “ There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” 美国政府官员联名的声明，和某一个候选人的私人律师，不知道那个更有公信力。
westlake 发表于 2020-11-12 22:02

律师更有公信力

律师更有公信力+1

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election “ There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” 美国政府官员联名的声明，和某一个候选人的私人律师，不知道那个更有公信力。
westlake 发表于 2020-11-12 22:02

联邦政府官员现在是被告呀，他们说了不算了吧，算抵赖。

等着Trump 连任吧，铁板钉钉的事。

Lin Wood: Communist Timeline: 1. Infiltrate media & local, state & national government officials (ideology, money & extortion). Over 2 decades. 2. Dominion Voting Systems deployed in US prior to 2020 Election. Computer fraud. 3. Unleash biological weapon Covid-19. Mail ballot fraud. 这不会是真的吧，太可怕了

回复 1楼darkblueli的帖子
Department of homeland security 已经辟谣了。根本就没有任何问题。
“There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election
建议你不要每天只看川普的tweet. 这样很容易被他洗脑和利用的。

回复 4楼woshihai的帖子
你脑子坏了吧。律师谁付钱就可以请的。川普想要律师怎么造谣律师就可以造。上面发的声明可是川普领导下的国土安全部的声明。

软件有没有问题不是什么部门什么人名头大就能打保票就能解决的事。 现在问题是，主流媒体，所谓的权威组织，没有信用了。 所以调查，取证，听听过来人的看法也很重要。

回复 4楼woshihai的帖子
你脑子坏了吧。律师谁付钱就可以请的。川普想要律师怎么造谣律师就可以造。上面发的声明可是川普领导下的国土安全部的声明。
Twenty20002020 发表于 2020-11-12 23:38

请律师是为了造谣？培养一个律师那么贵的学费读那么多书考那么多证是为了造谣？逻辑太感人了，我觉得为了造谣这个目的请你合适多了，第一便宜只要五毛一贴有时候还倒贴，第二没下限，撒泼打滚胡搅蛮缠样样俱到

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election “ There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” 美国政府官员联名的声明，和某一个候选人的私人律师，不知道那个更有公信力。
westlake 发表于 2020-11-12 22:02

声明没有用，而且是个associateion，也就相当于一个微信群。 关键是别人测试过，有证据