回复 18楼onlooker的帖子 来了几十年，还这么幼稚。只能说，在美的华人群体没有前途。 http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2034088_2034097_2033887,00.html And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It's becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down, unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S. in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms.He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. " Aspects of the Chinese government, [the] Chinese public-security service, appear to be terrified of free speech, and while one might say that means something awful is happening in the country, I actually think that is a very optimistic sign, because it means that speech can still cause reform and that the power structure is still inherently political as opposed to fiscal. So journalism and writing are capable of achieving change, and that is why Chinese authorities are so scared of it." On the other hand, in the U.S. and much of the West, he said, "the basic elements of society have been so heavily fiscalized through contractual obligations that political change doesn't seem to result in economic change, which in other words means that political change doesn't result in change."
回复 18楼onlooker的帖子 来了几十年，还这么幼稚。只能说，在美的华人群体没有前途。 http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2034088_2034097_2033887,00.html And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It's becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down, unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S. in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms.He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. " Aspects of the Chinese government, [the] Chinese public-security service, appear to be terrified of free speech, and while one might say that means something awful is happening in the country, I actually think that is a very optimistic sign, because it means that speech can still cause reform and that the power structure is still inherently political as opposed to fiscal. So journalism and writing are capable of achieving change, and that is why Chinese authorities are so scared of it." On the other hand, in the U.S. and much of the West, he said, "the basic elements of society have been so heavily fiscalized through contractual obligations that political change doesn't seem to result in economic change, which in other words means that political change doesn't result in change."
太恐怖了!!
看看这里的大妈们, 只知道中国有2个地方北京和上海, 中国其他地方都不是中国!!
看看美国, 再小的州, 大家也知道, 而且也很重要!!
而这里的中国大妈只知道 中国 2个地方,
其他中国那么大的地方, 在中国大妈眼里都不是中国!!
真希望 中国实行联邦制 或者欧盟吧!!
哎
赞。民主的优势是可以纠错。民主不好的地方是可以选一个像川普那样的无赖。
你刚来美国吧？能写出这段话，只能说明你对美国政治，美式民主太不了解了，门都没入。要么说美国洗脑比中国强千百倍的，说的就是你这种人。如果真的这么不明不白biden就上台了，美国的民主制度真的是命不久矣名存实亡了。
您之前打赌说直播吃shit都两回了，老跳票！
不止，光我看到的就四回了。怕他一次吃不下，还是分期付款吧。
可惜选择面太小 就两个，非此即彼 应该多几个选择 今年我都弃权了 实在是哪个都不行
前提是不能被操纵
他不走secret service 就把他赶出去了
对，不过民众最多要忍受的时间是4年，而不是半辈子或更长。
我到美国来，你还在幼儿园吧。我的几十年观察，不是通过任何党媒，而是访问了美国几乎所有州。如果你到美国来还被洗脑，只能说明你在大陆专制体系下完全丧失了独立思考能力，只有党媒的灌输。顺便告诉你，我没有选拜登，不是个人问题，而是对许多民主党的政策。但是美国民众选了拜登，我心里也完全接受他是全美国的总统
你才是刚来美国吧？完全不尊重美国民主制度，没有证据张口就来。
以后毒品全部合法，监狱里的都放出来 全民吸毒，让东方大国随便拍打！
自己随便选择性别，辈份：老子睡儿子的媳妇；弟弟睡侄女和嫂子，怎么方便怎么来！
学费全免，w2加税到70%；房产税翻倍，活着真好，真是遇到了好时代！！
说的好
只有川粉觉得整个美国人都是支持大统领的，其他人都是在五廊来的。不要忘记上次选举，希拉里的票数也是比Trump多的！只是输给这个选举制度！川普体面认输也是对美国做贡献了。
你出来讲话是要直播直播吗？
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/V0AuKn-hZKE
嗯，还有庚子年的阴影。 https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=2614812&postid=85999387#85999387
我估计比你来美国时间长 我觉得楼主非常对！！！
就是这个道理！
轮子的电视台
呵呵。。。
赞总结
懂王的支持者果然也是懂哥，你最懂，赶快去想想怎么让懂王少坐几年牢吧。
提醒一下这位大嘴学学历史，美国已经经历了 14 位民主党总统，别拿这些极端主义吓唬网友了。
来了几十年，还这么幼稚。只能说，在美的华人群体没有前途。 http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2034088_2034097_2033887,00.html
And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It's becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down, unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S. in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms. He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. "
Aspects of the Chinese government, [the] Chinese public-security service, appear to be terrified of free speech, and while one might say that means something awful is happening in the country, I actually think that is a very optimistic sign, because it means that speech can still cause reform and that the power structure is still inherently political as opposed to fiscal.
So journalism and writing are capable of achieving change, and that is why Chinese authorities are so scared of it." On the other hand, in the U.S. and much of the West, he said, "the basic elements of society have been so heavily fiscalized through contractual obligations that political change doesn't seem to result in economic change, which in other words means that political change doesn't result in change."
隔壁帖子说了 像ta这种散布谣言抹黑污蔑美国选举系统的人 应该是中共软实力工程队伍 的重要组成部分 ta不在美国也不怕被抓
不觉得中国改革比美国更容易，Asange对中国并不了解。对美国政治的fiscalized 倒是谈得到位。谢谢分享