这才是理性的voter

xqhbh
楼主 (北美华人网)
by 无名氏
Policy, not persona
I am not voting for a man. I am voting for the principles for which this country has stood since its founding. I am voting for Constitutional government. I am voting for a strong and viable military. I am voting for a vibrant economy. I am voting for the right to keep and bear arms. I am voting for the freedom to worship. I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles. I am voting for the ability for anyone to rise above their circumstances and become successful. I am voting for my children and grandchildren to be able to choose their own path in life, including how and where their children are educated. I am voting for our borders to be open to everyone who enters under our law and closed to everyone who would circumvent or ignore the law. I am voting for the Electoral College to remain in place, so that a few heavily populated liberal centers do not control the elections. I am voting for a Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution rather than rewrites it. I am voting to teach history, with all its warts, not erase it or revise it. I am voting for the sanctity of life from conception to birth and after. Let’s all Make America Great Again.—Writer unknown
badgerbadger
If you''ve learned some basic logic in school, you''ll recognize those are loaded statements. Jefferson看到今日美国,棺材板都要压不住了。
bangobunny
but but but i can’t find “policy” section in trump2020.com
c
cnp
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
赞👍
ipanther
If you''ve learned some basic logic in school, you''ll recognize those are loaded statements. Jefferson看到今日美国,棺材板都要压不住了。
badgerbadger 发表于 2020-10-16 17:31

现在basic logic in school 已经被打乱了。唉真是从根搞烂
mingdrew
我是华人我跟土生土长的白人教徒有很大区别
yaner11
很悲哀的是: what you think you are voting for might not be what you are actually voting for.
FTrumptards
拜登政策每项都是10几页, 川普政策列了三页的bullet points , 看到十个月10 millions jobs 就不想看下去了,
上个月都已经掉到660k jobs created 了怎么能达到一个月平均1百万?
j
junezj
"I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles." 等等,什么时候美国成了基督教国家了?The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document.
rosesavels
很悲哀的是: what you think you are voting for might not be what you are actually voting for.
yaner11 发表于 2020-10-16 18:14

Exactly. 买家秀vs卖家秀。
RN1
回复 3楼bangobunny的帖子
那是你不愿意看。
q
qwerty_sun
by 无名氏
Policy, not persona
I am not voting for a man. I am voting for the principles for which this country has stood since its founding. I am voting for Constitutional government. I am voting for a strong and viable military. I am voting for a vibrant economy. I am voting for the right to keep and bear arms. I am voting for the freedom to worship. I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles. I am voting for the ability for anyone to rise above their circumstances and become successful. I am voting for my children and grandchildren to be able to choose their own path in life, including how and where their children are educated. I am voting for our borders to be open to everyone who enters under our law and closed to everyone who would circumvent or ignore the law. I am voting for the Electoral College to remain in place, so that a few heavily populated liberal centers do not control the elections. I am voting for a Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution rather than rewrites it. I am voting to teach history, with all its warts, not erase it or revise it. I am voting for the sanctity of life from conception to birth and after. Let’s all Make America Great Again.—Writer unknown
xqhbh 发表于 2020-10-16 17:26

Cause he knows “the man” he is voting for cannot be called a man.
s
shalalala2
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
“I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles.” 这是founding fathers的理念么?请举例说明。who cares what this unknown is voting for.
EdwardVIII
"I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles." 等等,什么时候美国成了基督教国家了?The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document.
junezj 发表于 2020-10-16 18:16

founding on biblical principles 不是說美國是基督教國家。當年跑到美國的人就是逃避宗教迫害,他們要建的就是政教分離的囯,當然憲法是secular。但憲法是secula證明不了funding principles不是biblical。
S
SomeNight
我觉得:在蓝州的投红的,在红州投蓝的,在摇摆州跟自己的判断走。这个系统的稳定性和健壮性的一个重要因素是两党制衡。当一方有压倒性优势的时候,伊做事就容易肆无忌惮,这是人性,跟党派关系不大。
bangobunny
回复 3楼bangobunny的帖子
那是你不愿意看。
RN1 发表于 2020-10-16 18:18

where? 我真的想看
heartinny
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
选举本来就是不理性的行为,但是这个具体分析很复杂,我就总结这一句。
badgerbadger
我觉得:在蓝州的投红的,在红州投蓝的,在摇摆州跟自己的判断走。这个系统的稳定性和健壮性的一个重要因素是两党制衡。当一方有压倒性优势的时候,伊做事就容易肆无忌惮,这是人性,跟党派关系不大。
SomeNight 发表于 2020-10-16 19:15

Can’t agree more,一党独大啥幺蛾子都出来了。 这也是为啥我觉得6-3吃相太难看。 深红深蓝都臭不可闻。
q
quace
拜登政策每项都是10几页, 川普政策列了三页的bullet points , 看到十个月10 millions jobs 就不想看下去了,
上个月都已经掉到660k jobs created 了怎么能达到一个月平均1百万?
FTrumptards 发表于 2020-10-16 18:15

几万页的Obamacare 大名叫ACA,民主党的迷魂汤都是老太婆的裹脚布