这才是理性的voter

x
xqhbh
楼主 (北美华人网)
by 无名氏
Policy, not persona
I am not voting for a man. I am voting for the principles for which this country has stood since its founding. I am voting for Constitutional government. I am voting for a strong and viable military. I am voting for a vibrant economy. I am voting for the right to keep and bear arms. I am voting for the freedom to worship. I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles. I am voting for the ability for anyone to rise above their circumstances and become successful. I am voting for my children and grandchildren to be able to choose their own path in life, including how and where their children are educated. I am voting for our borders to be open to everyone who enters under our law and closed to everyone who would circumvent or ignore the law. I am voting for the Electoral College to remain in place, so that a few heavily populated liberal centers do not control the elections. I am voting for a Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution rather than rewrites it. I am voting to teach history, with all its warts, not erase it or revise it. I am voting for the sanctity of life from conception to birth and after. Let’s all Make America Great Again.—Writer unknown
b
badgerbadger
If you''ve learned some basic logic in school, you''ll recognize those are loaded statements. Jefferson看到今日美国,棺材板都要压不住了。
b
bangobunny
but but but i can’t find “policy” section in trump2020.com
c
cnp
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
赞👍
i
ipanther
If you''ve learned some basic logic in school, you''ll recognize those are loaded statements. Jefferson看到今日美国,棺材板都要压不住了。
badgerbadger 发表于 2020-10-16 17:31

现在basic logic in school 已经被打乱了。唉真是从根搞烂
m
mingdrew
我是华人我跟土生土长的白人教徒有很大区别
y
yaner11
很悲哀的是: what you think you are voting for might not be what you are actually voting for.
F
FTrumptards
拜登政策每项都是10几页, 川普政策列了三页的bullet points , 看到十个月10 millions jobs 就不想看下去了,
上个月都已经掉到660k jobs created 了怎么能达到一个月平均1百万?
j
junezj
"I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles." 等等,什么时候美国成了基督教国家了?The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document.
r
rosesavels
很悲哀的是: what you think you are voting for might not be what you are actually voting for.
yaner11 发表于 2020-10-16 18:14

Exactly. 买家秀vs卖家秀。
R
RN1
回复 3楼bangobunny的帖子
那是你不愿意看。
q
qwerty_sun
by 无名氏
Policy, not persona
I am not voting for a man. I am voting for the principles for which this country has stood since its founding. I am voting for Constitutional government. I am voting for a strong and viable military. I am voting for a vibrant economy. I am voting for the right to keep and bear arms. I am voting for the freedom to worship. I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles. I am voting for the ability for anyone to rise above their circumstances and become successful. I am voting for my children and grandchildren to be able to choose their own path in life, including how and where their children are educated. I am voting for our borders to be open to everyone who enters under our law and closed to everyone who would circumvent or ignore the law. I am voting for the Electoral College to remain in place, so that a few heavily populated liberal centers do not control the elections. I am voting for a Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution rather than rewrites it. I am voting to teach history, with all its warts, not erase it or revise it. I am voting for the sanctity of life from conception to birth and after. Let’s all Make America Great Again.—Writer unknown
xqhbh 发表于 2020-10-16 17:26

Cause he knows “the man” he is voting for cannot be called a man.
s
shalalala2
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
“I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles.” 这是founding fathers的理念么?请举例说明。who cares what this unknown is voting for.
E
EdwardVIII
"I am voting for a national recognition of the founding of our nation on Biblical principles." 等等,什么时候美国成了基督教国家了?The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document.
junezj 发表于 2020-10-16 18:16

founding on biblical principles 不是說美國是基督教國家。當年跑到美國的人就是逃避宗教迫害,他們要建的就是政教分離的囯,當然憲法是secular。但憲法是secula證明不了funding principles不是biblical。
S
SomeNight
我觉得:在蓝州的投红的,在红州投蓝的,在摇摆州跟自己的判断走。这个系统的稳定性和健壮性的一个重要因素是两党制衡。当一方有压倒性优势的时候,伊做事就容易肆无忌惮,这是人性,跟党派关系不大。
b
bangobunny
回复 3楼bangobunny的帖子
那是你不愿意看。
RN1 发表于 2020-10-16 18:18

where? 我真的想看
h
heartinny
回复 1楼xqhbh的帖子
选举本来就是不理性的行为,但是这个具体分析很复杂,我就总结这一句。
b
badgerbadger
我觉得:在蓝州的投红的,在红州投蓝的,在摇摆州跟自己的判断走。这个系统的稳定性和健壮性的一个重要因素是两党制衡。当一方有压倒性优势的时候,伊做事就容易肆无忌惮,这是人性,跟党派关系不大。
SomeNight 发表于 2020-10-16 19:15

Can’t agree more,一党独大啥幺蛾子都出来了。 这也是为啥我觉得6-3吃相太难看。 深红深蓝都臭不可闻。
q
quace
拜登政策每项都是10几页, 川普政策列了三页的bullet points , 看到十个月10 millions jobs 就不想看下去了,
上个月都已经掉到660k jobs created 了怎么能达到一个月平均1百万?
FTrumptards 发表于 2020-10-16 18:15

几万页的Obamacare 大名叫ACA,民主党的迷魂汤都是老太婆的裹脚布