共和党参议员故意放水想问点简单问题，问她宪法第一修正案中的五大自由是什么，小学生都知道的常识，她居然脑子短路答不上来... 就这样个草包还最高法大法官？ 昨天也是问她最基本的法律，她说不知道。一天基本上都在说我不知道。 知道是这货，RBG会不会气得活过来？ Sen. Ben Sasse: "What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?" Judge Barrett: "Speech, religion, press, assembly... I don't know -- what am I missing?"
共和党参议员故意放水想问点简单问题，问她宪法第一修正案中的五大自由是什么，小学生都知道的常识，她居然脑子短路答不上来... 就这样个草包还最高法大法官？ 昨天也是问她最基本的法律，她说不知道。一天基本上都在说我不知道。 知道是这货，RBG会不会气得活过来？ Sen. Ben Sasse: "What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?" Judge Barrett: "Speech, religion, press, assembly... I don''t know -- what am I missing?" dukenyc125 发表于 2020-10-14 15:37
共和党参议员故意放水想问点简单问题，问她宪法第一修正案中的五大自由是什么，小学生都知道的常识，她居然脑子短路答不上来... 就这样个草包还最高法大法官？ 昨天也是问她最基本的法律，她说不知道。一天基本上都在说我不知道。 知道是这货，RBG会不会气得活过来？ Sen. Ben Sasse: "What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?" Judge Barrett: "Speech, religion, press, assembly... I don''t know -- what am I missing?" dukenyc125 发表于 2020-10-14 15:37不想说吧。这种时候候选人都是装傻，说的越多，越会被相反方抓住不放，拖延时间 PT8964 发表于 10/14/2020 3:39:24 PM
共和党参议员故意放水想问点简单问题，问她宪法第一修正案中的五大自由是什么，小学生都知道的常识，她居然脑子短路答不上来... 就这样个草包还最高法大法官？ 昨天也是问她最基本的法律，她说不知道。一天基本上都在说我不知道。 知道是这货，RBG会不会气得活过来？ Sen. Ben Sasse: "What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?" Judge Barrett: "Speech, religion, press, assembly... I don't know -- what am I missing?" dukenyc125 发表于 2020-10-14 15:37
共和党参议员故意放水想问点简单问题，问她宪法第一修正案中的五大自由是什么，小学生都知道的常识，她居然脑子短路答不上来... 就这样个草包还最高法大法官？ 昨天也是问她最基本的法律，她说不知道。一天基本上都在说我不知道。 知道是这货，RBG会不会气得活过来？ Sen. Ben Sasse: "What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?" Judge Barrett: "Speech, religion, press, assembly... I don''t know -- what am I missing?" dukenyc125 发表于 2020-10-14 15:37不想说吧。这种时候候选人都是装傻，说的越多，越会被相反方抓住不放，拖延时间 PT8964 发表于 10/14/2020 3:39:24 PM
宪法第一修正案里的5大自由跟好像枪支一毛钱关系都没有吧。。。 (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and. (d) freedom of association.
First Amendment: An Overview The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of the press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. Freedom of Religion Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." However, some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person''s practice of their religion. Freedom of Speech / Freedom of the Press The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right to freedom of speech.Freedom of speech may be exercised in a direct (words) or a symbolic (actions) way. Freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion and such statements. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place. Despite the popular misunderstanding, the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general. Right to Assemble / Right to Petition The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Freedom of assembly is recognized as a human right under article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under article 20. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual''s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups. The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through litigation or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government. Last Updated in March of 2020 by Elvin Egemenoglu.
不想说吧。这种时候候选人都是装傻，说的越多，越会被相反方抓住不放，拖延时间
bomb 炸了。。。
说了立场就要明确，反对方会很打。 枪就是一个非常有争议的问题
真没想到
现在一看
哎呀 托马斯和索托马约那都是学霸啊！！
别自以为是了。
这没啥嘛，需要的时候上网查就是了。今后听证会也应该允许上网查。。。
这位PT同学显然没读过宪法第一修正案呀 露馅了吧
真的吗？这种问题说不知道有什么好处？说我不想回答这种白痴问题都比说不知道强啊
lmao Interpret Constitution as it is.
川粉的角度永远这么刁钻。 ACB是腹黑小萌新？颜值与智慧并存啊！
别扯淡了，人家自己心里有数。 宪法规定的多了，民主党连law and order都能不遵守，还有什么不可以改变的
宪法第一修正案里的5大自由跟好像枪支一毛钱关系都没有吧。。。
(a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and. (d) freedom of association.
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/dXyds_jalBU
你读过？扯淡！ 给你放这你也不会都读了： First Amendment Primary tabs
First Amendment: An Overview The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of the press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. Freedom of Religion Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." However, some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person''s practice of their religion. Freedom of Speech / Freedom of the Press The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right to freedom of speech.Freedom of speech may be exercised in a direct (words) or a symbolic (actions) way. Freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion and such statements. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place. Despite the popular misunderstanding, the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general. Right to Assemble / Right to Petition The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Freedom of assembly is recognized as a human right under article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under article 20. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual''s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups. The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through litigation or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government. Last Updated in March of 2020 by Elvin Egemenoglu.
living and breathing 哈哈哈哈
读过啊～～～～～哈哈哈哈哈
说明将来巨巨在最高法6:3保送连任以后可能用不着第一修正案了，大法官只要懂第二修正案就好。
然后说不定什么十五、十九修正案也都用不上了。
你这么说我终于明白了，这位把第一修正案和第二修正案搞混了。怪不得我一直觉得莫名其妙，心说petition犯了共和党哪条忌讳，怎么说不得了。
我觉得第22修正案最为要紧啊 12 more years
天，这都能洗？请问按这个逻辑该选智障吧？
这女法官连法律条文都不知道，会解释毛的法律。我虽然很愿意高法多一个保守派的大法官，但是最起码最起码得是个受过法律教育的，不是这种不学无术的。太丢人了。
如果全美国的女性法律工作者里头竟然挑不出一个比这个女人更专业一点的来站保守派，那只能说明保守派的理念必然有极其不利于女性的一面，这个共和党应该自己反省。
“has she answered a single question that didn't involve what her kids hobbies are?”
笑死我了
瞎扯了，小过失，不用小题大做，上纲上线。 这么多年的学术背景，成就都是明摆着的，要是有问题，民主党加左叉媒体早找出来了。根本不用到这步。 看她回答问题，口齿伶俐，头脑清醒，逻辑严谨，不上民主党议员的圈套，还是很有水平的。 关键是大事不糊涂，干掉AA，就能留名千史。不比金老太差。
共和党就喜欢她把自己地位放低，认为女人应该是使女，男人应该是主人
笑死人要偿命啊，来看看内行听了3天的评价吧： 说正经的， Amy Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing 很值得听听（如果能上Youtube的话），我是连着听了3天了，So great！[强][强][强]，不论我们的政治倾向，都必须承认，专业，严谨，睿智，简直是滴水不漏，无懈可击（有非常犀利， 挑战的问题），可以看得出来，Amy是一个正直的人，我是不知道她怎么能把所有的回答全部记在脑子里？这个job interview真不容易，不服不行啊！ 我就纳闷，一个混不吝的笨蛋总统怎么会提名这么一个聪明的女性法官进入最高法院？而且好玩的是提问题的议员几乎都是在读事先写好的问题和看提纲提问。我能挑出的毛病是Amy Barrett的嗓音实在是不太好听[弱]。