她是追随 Scalia 的观点。这个意义上的保守派不是思想观点是否 “进步” 而是司法解释不能代替立法。 左派多年来的战略是希望从司法机构解決本应立法的问题。Ginsberg 是这一战略的先行者。现在右派也想用这个战略，大家就愿賭服输呗。这也怪美国的案例法体系。 这样比较下来，还是文本主义的观点好一些， 把两派的战场限制在立法机构。 另外, Harvard 宪法教授 左派 对她称赞有加。 Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman, a liberal constitutional scholar who advocated for Trump’s impeachment before the House Judiciary Committee, wrote in a Bloomberg opinion article that Barrett has the qualifications to be on the Supreme Court. “I got to know Barrett more than 20 years ago when we clerked at the Supreme Court during the 1998-99 term. Of the 30-some clerks that year, all of whom had graduated at the top of their law school classes and done prestigious appellate clerkships before coming to work at the court, Barrett stood out,” Feldman wrote. “To add to her merits, Barrett is a sincere, lovely person. I never heard her utter a word that wasn’t thoughtful and kind – including in the heat of real disagreement about important subjects. She will be an ideal colleague,” he said. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/26/who-is-amy-coney-barrett-trumps-nominee-to-supreme-court
她是追随 Scalia 的观点。这个意义上的保守派不是思想观点是否 “进步” 而是司法解释不能代替立法。 左派多年来的战略是希望从司法机构解決本应立法的问题。Ginsberg 是这一战略的先行者。现在右派也想用这个战略，大家就愿賭服输呗。这也怪美国的案例法体系。 这样比较下来，还是文本主义的观点好一些， 把两派的战场限制在立法机构。 另外, Harvard 宪法教授 左派 对她称赞有加。 Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman, a liberal constitutional scholar who advocated for Trump’s impeachment before the House Judiciary Committee, wrote in a Bloomberg opinion article that Barrett has the qualifications to be on the Supreme Court. “I got to know Barrett more than 20 years ago when we clerked at the Supreme Court during the 1998-99 term. Of the 30-some clerks that year, all of whom had graduated at the top of their law school classes and done prestigious appellate clerkships before coming to work at the court, Barrett stood out,” Feldman wrote. “To add to her merits, Barrett is a sincere, lovely person. I never heard her utter a word that wasn’t thoughtful and kind – including in the heat of real disagreement about important subjects. She will be an ideal colleague,” he said. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/26/who-is-amy-coney-barrett-trumps-nominee-to-supreme-court
仅仅拿trump的五位女性候选人来说 一，只有她不是T14 law school（这个要求真不算高，本科法学院都算进来），另外四位均是哥大/杜克/西北/康奈尔&哈佛均属于T14 二，aba committee judical rating五位候选人至少两位（Lagoa和Larsen）都是Unanimously Well Qualified，barrett只是well qualified by a mixed vote. aba 是american bar association. 三，Barrett履历闪光有名气的一点就是clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia，她自称她将成为a female Antonin Scalia，差不多让trump敲定选她，呵呵，身为一个女性高院法官，目的就是为了成为一个女版的某男性榜样，不能做最优秀的自己吗？ 你给我说说就凭credentials她凭什么能压过另外四位女性连去白宫面试的机会也没有？
仅仅拿trump的五位女性候选人来说 一，只有她不是T14 law school（这个要求真不算高，本科法学院都算进来），另外四位均是哥大/杜克/西北/康奈尔&哈佛均属于T14 二，aba committee judical rating五位候选人至少两位（Lagoa和Larsen）都是Unanimously Well Qualified，barrett只是well qualified by a mixed vote. aba 是american bar association. 三，Barrett履历闪光有名气的一点就是clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia，她自称她将成为a female Antonin Scalia，差不多让trump敲定选她，呵呵，身为一个女性高院法官，目的就是为了成为一个女版的某男性榜样，不能做最优秀的自己吗？ 你给我说说就凭credentials她凭什么能压过另外四位女性连去白宫面试的机会也没有？ 世事如棋 发表于 2020-09-27 12:15
liberal法学教授对Amy Barrett的评价：https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-09-26/amy-coney-barrett-deserves-to-be-on-the-supreme-court But a Republican is president, and the Senate is Republican. Elections have consequences, and so do justices’ decisions about when or whether to retire. Trump is almost certainly going to get his pick confirmed. Given that reality, it is better for the republic to have a principled, brilliant lawyer on the bench than a weaker candidate. That’s Barrett. To add to her merits, Barrett is a sincere, lovely person. I never heard her utter a word that wasn’t thoughtful and kind — including in the heat of real disagreement about important subjects. She will be an ideal colleague. I don’t really believe in “judicial temperament,” because some of the greatest justices were irascible, difficult and mercurial. But if you do believe in an ideal judicial temperament of calm and decorum, rest assured that Barrett has it. This combination of smart and nice will be scary for liberals. Her old boss, Scalia, did not have the ideal judicial temperament (too much personality, a wicked sense of humor) and managed over the years to alienate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, which may conceivably have helped produce more liberal outcomes as she moved to the left. Barrett is also a profoundly conservative thinker and a deeply committed Catholic. What of it? Constitutional interpretation draws on the full resources of the human mind. These beliefs should not be treated as disqualifying. 作者背景满足你们t14的鄙视链了吧Noah Feldman is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and host of the podcast “Deep Background.” He is a professor of law at Harvard University and was a clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter. His books include “The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President.”
仅仅拿trump的五位女性候选人来说 一，只有她不是T14 law school（这个要求真不算高，本科法学院都算进来），另外四位均是哥大/杜克/西北/康奈尔&哈佛均属于T14 二，aba committee judical rating五位候选人至少两位（Lagoa和Larsen）都是Unanimously Well Qualified，barrett只是well qualified by a mixed vote. aba 是american bar association. 三，Barrett履历闪光有名气的一点就是clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia，她自称她将成为a female Antonin Scalia，差不多让trump敲定选她，呵呵，身为一个女性高院法官，目的就是为了成为一个女版的某男性榜样，不能做最优秀的自己吗？ 你给我说说就凭credentials她凭什么能压过另外四位女性连去白宫面试的机会也没有？ 世事如棋 发表于 2020-09-27 12:15
具體要說什麼，一下說人沒經歷，一下說他歷年判的意識形態都不行，到底是哪個case，判了哪了，寫個明白阿，就像隔壁好幾帖墮胎的，一幫人估計啥法案啥bill都沒看，就只看了wiki結論直接擼起袖子加油幹 At a 2013 event reflecting on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, she described the decision—in Notre Dame Magazine's paraphrase—as "creating through judicial fiat a framework of abortion on demand". She also remarked that it was "very unlikely" the court would overturn the core of Roe: "The fundamental element, that the woman has a right to choose abortion, will probably stand. The controversy right now is about funding. It's a question of whether abortions will be publicly or privately funded.
左派多年来的战略是希望从司法机构解決本应立法的问题。Ginsberg 是这一战略的先行者。现在右派也想用这个战略，大家就愿賭服输呗。这也怪美国的案例法体系。
这样比较下来，还是文本主义的观点好一些， 把两派的战场限制在立法机构。
另外, Harvard 宪法教授 左派 对她称赞有加。
Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman, a liberal constitutional scholar who advocated for Trump’s impeachment before the House Judiciary Committee, wrote in a Bloomberg opinion article that Barrett has the qualifications to be on the Supreme Court.
“I got to know Barrett more than 20 years ago when we clerked at the Supreme Court during the 1998-99 term. Of the 30-some clerks that year, all of whom had graduated at the top of their law school classes and done prestigious appellate clerkships before coming to work at the court, Barrett stood out,” Feldman wrote.
“To add to her merits, Barrett is a sincere, lovely person. I never heard her utter a word that wasn’t thoughtful and kind – including in the heat of real disagreement about important subjects. She will be an ideal colleague,” he said.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/26/who-is-amy-coney-barrett-trumps-nominee-to-supreme-court
职场上大妈们最讨厌这样的女同事，为什么到了这里就追捧了。
你跟她同事过？
可能这里大部分家庭妇女，地产经纪之类的
wow，你這語氣簡直像他是睡上去一樣，什麼老男人的觀點，這些觀點在奧巴去基督教化八年以前都還是美國主流觀點，就突然奧巴上任之後God都不能提了，川普上任之後大提特提，每次演講必說God，估計讓很多人不開心。
你講的這種人，我覺得harris比較符合吧?
说得好像印度人似的，印度人大多数基本一个人挣钱养家，还是全美收入第一的族群。
我说迎合观点，你别把我拖下水。 你觉得国会里面的大多数，包括现在两个候选人，难道不是男人居多，难道不老么？
80岁的爹妈公婆是啥样，自己不明白么？
美国的前途靠这些人？
那你骂过Ginsburg不肯退休吗？
可不是。有些“独立”女性，一边骂着女性，一边女权主义，太精分了。
哈哈 板上抱怨婆婆媳妇大姑子之前 是不是还要立个牌坊先
有病
版上骂七大姑八大姨外带老婆婆的又没自称女权主义者。人家价值观很consistent。把她们跟侮辱女人的女权主义者相提并论，根本就是逻辑不通。谁有病很清楚了啊。
打人不打脸。。。
不好意思，歪个楼：
呼吁版主容许政治捐款贴 可能有些人不关心政治，但是政治是生活的一个重要组成部分，切实关系到每一个人的生活，影响每一个人的利益。
西方民主的本质是每个人为自己的利益发声，多方妥协后达到各方利益的平衡。华裔现在成多方面的靶子，蛋糕，一个关键因素就是声音太小。犹太裔投票率过90%，而华裔投票率低于50%。我们应该向犹太裔学习，积极投票，多讨论参与，这其中也需要政治活动资金来支持各种宣传活动以及支持一些政治代言人。
政治捐款都是基于公开信息，不存在一些个人捐款利用信息不透明骗捐的问题
对政治捐款贴，认同其看法的可以捐款，不认同其看法的可以忽略，没有道德高下之分，不存在一部分胁迫另一部分人的问题
华人上牛人多，对政治捐款贴能很快验证真伪，提供补充事实，反对方发表的意见也有利于我们掌握全面的事实，避免了一些微信捐款贴信息片面的缺点
基于以上原因，呼吁版主容许政治捐款贴
國會都是被選上去的，難道不是代表主流觀點? 怎麼就變成是老男人觀點了?
Harris 一路睡上去还有什么疑问吗？
re 18年就被Trump内定，trump当时原话saving her for Ginsburg， 凭她的资历背景是否走了捷径还需要细想？比她更merit的多了去了 怎么打开天窗说亮话很多人还假装一副接受不了的样子
你是说她的本科学校不好吗？她在一次interview里面说了，她家里孩子多，她当时上大学的时候父母要付好几个学费，所以她选择了一个离家近有full scholarship的学校。
既然你把天窗都打开了，那就彻底点呗。她走了什么捷径，睡了哪些老男人，怎么一步步睡上去的，给大家讲讲。大周末的，解解闷也好啊。Harris的故事倒是听过了，一路睡几个老男人还真挺牛的。
最高法院本来就不是立法的
你这种把走捷径等同于睡的 有人愿意理你吗 这是讨论amy的贴 不捆绑harris你脑子里就没货了吗
哈哈哈哈，我不了解内情嘛，只能瞎猜。你的脑子里货多，你知道内情，那就讲讲Amy走了啥捷径，大家解解闷开开眼。
被吹上天的金斯伯格就是立法的
这真是赤裸裸的性别歧视的啊
终于宪法本身解释就是追随老男人？这是妥妥的性别歧视。 金斯伯格也不是第一位自由派法官，她不是不也是追随老男人。 华人取消了踩的功能，一帮左左五毛组团点赞，真是让一群妖魔鬼怪都出来了。
你这除了扣帽子，逻辑在哪里。 Amy怎么跟RBG比，学校资历都比不了吧？所以她上位靠的是啥？
仅仅拿trump的五位女性候选人来说
一，只有她不是T14 law school（这个要求真不算高，本科法学院都算进来），另外四位均是哥大/杜克/西北/康奈尔&哈佛均属于T14
二，aba committee judical rating五位候选人至少两位（Lagoa和Larsen）都是Unanimously Well Qualified，barrett只是well qualified by a mixed vote. aba 是american bar association.
三，Barrett履历闪光有名气的一点就是clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia，她自称她将成为a female Antonin Scalia，差不多让trump敲定选她，呵呵，身为一个女性高院法官，目的就是为了成为一个女版的某男性榜样，不能做最优秀的自己吗？
你给我说说就凭credentials她凭什么能压过另外四位女性连去白宫面试的机会也没有？
论credentials在其他四位候选人里也是垫底的
这也是床铺跟建制派妥协的结果，按说Lagoa比较好。Amy有成为圣母的可能
But a Republican is president, and the Senate is Republican. Elections have consequences, and so do justices’ decisions about when or whether to retire. Trump is almost certainly going to get his pick confirmed. Given that reality, it is better for the republic to have a principled, brilliant lawyer on the bench than a weaker candidate. That’s Barrett. To add to her merits, Barrett is a sincere, lovely person. I never heard her utter a word that wasn’t thoughtful and kind — including in the heat of real disagreement about important subjects. She will be an ideal colleague. I don’t really believe in “judicial temperament,” because some of the greatest justices were irascible, difficult and mercurial. But if you do believe in an ideal judicial temperament of calm and decorum, rest assured that Barrett has it. This combination of smart and nice will be scary for liberals. Her old boss, Scalia, did not have the ideal judicial temperament (too much personality, a wicked sense of humor) and managed over the years to alienate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, which may conceivably have helped produce more liberal outcomes as she moved to the left. Barrett is also a profoundly conservative thinker and a deeply committed Catholic. What of it? Constitutional interpretation draws on the full resources of the human mind. These beliefs should not be treated as disqualifying.
作者背景满足你们t14的鄙视链了吧Noah Feldman is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and host of the podcast “Deep Background.” He is a professor of law at Harvard University and was a clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter. His books include “The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President.”
这个话每个法官都要说的吧，没什么特别之处。
真不是，很多法官不是这派的。大法官干预政治越来越多，有背三权分立。
很多建国的条文里面的用词是模糊化的不是特意的，就是起草人当时理念水平就这样，因为起草人并没有留言说这个么故意留给你们后人解释。我们后人么就在这个漏洞里争来争去
原来高法比现在能动性强大得多 强大到总统都动impeachment大法官的心思了
那这个Amy到底走了啥捷径让她被提名了呢？你说的这些最多算间接证据，最好拿一些直接证据出来。有吗？
黑8呢？论资历也没干过啥了不起的事情吧，咋就获得党内提名，当选总统了呢？你的逻辑在哪里？
都取消点踩功能了，还看不清现实么。你猜这个网站现在是谁的？
不能和RGB比就是靠什么上的位，你这逻辑在哪里？左派眼里有谁比得上RGB？照这个逻辑以后选的都是靠什么上位的，对吗
就事论事四个字怎么写你知道吗？ 都给你甩出仅仅关于Barrett credentials三大facts了 理屈词穷到连前总统都抛出来了，他又没来选SCOTUS，搞笑了
SCOTUS和公司大老板的资历用同一把量尺？
此洗地方法不通，继续洗
果然语言low起来了，factual info一问三不知的川粉以为穿个马甲就可以随意攻击别人了
那我只好一句话回敬给你：你这没有脊梁骨没有自我认知没有独立人格的才会把现任总统奉若神明，就像他自己说的，他站在第五大道杀个人，你这种疯狂粉丝也不会掉，继续帮他洗地
我必須一提我們加拿大的高中supply drama teacher總理，小土豆先生
你的逻辑在哪里？Amy是跟RBG争大法官的位置吗？为什么要比RBG强？ 跟Amy能竞争也也就那个古巴裔的女法官，共和党需要的是不会变节的坚定的右派法官， 曾是斯卡利亚Clerk，信奉原旨法律的Amy显然比Barbara更保险。
凭什么上来就判断人加追随的是老男人。自由派法律观念也是老男人先有的。RBG是不是也是追随老男人。
奥黑选的大法官kagan连一天巡回法院的法官都没当过。左派有说过她没资格吗？
是啊，看看美国这两任总统，也不好意思说大法官不够格。
能具体说说她判的案例哪些是意识形态或宗教主导吗？
说得好像她每次升职你都在现场一样 你生活得是多不如意嘴才能如此恶毒
比啥？比rbg在16年说trump当选她就搬家，过了就自己当屁放了？
具體要說什麼，一下說人沒經歷，一下說他歷年判的意識形態都不行，到底是哪個case，判了哪了，寫個明白阿，就像隔壁好幾帖墮胎的，一幫人估計啥法案啥bill都沒看，就只看了wiki結論直接擼起袖子加油幹
At a 2013 event reflecting on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, she described the decision—in Notre Dame Magazine's paraphrase—as "creating through judicial fiat a framework of abortion on demand". She also remarked that it was "very unlikely" the court would overturn the core of Roe: "The fundamental element, that the woman has a right to choose abortion, will probably stand. The controversy right now is about funding. It's a question of whether abortions will be publicly or privately funded.
英美法系的司法解释权很大，因为高院的案例是可以做将来做判案依据的，这点和大陆法系严格按条文来执行，条文写得很细很具体的不同，但美国最近这些年司法权滥用干预宪法很明显，金老太就是代表，她觉得宪法过时了都可以修改，高院不用完全依照宪法审判。在这个背景下去理解这句话，不要脱离语境去字面解读这句话。