主要是基于以下的文章 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/amy-coney-barrett-case-rulings 1。支持拥枪权。 acb是主张dangerous的人拥枪权被剥夺 她不认同威斯康辛政府剥夺这个non-violent felons 的拥枪权是因为政府 have failed to show, by either logic or data to show Kanter is dangerous --- that disarming Kanter substantially advances that interest. 这个不代表她认为"只要不是暴力，也有拥枪权" 暴力一定是危险的 重罪不一定是危险的 比如金融诈骗 这篇说acb是主张不危险的人 有拥枪权 并非“即使重罪犯，只要不是暴力，也有权拥枪。”这种想法是预设了重罪就是危险的。 2。对所谓的"校园强奸"，支持due process，并非倾向男生。 due process对所有人都很重要 不论男女 这点我支持她 否则kavanaugh的闹剧可能发生在你的儿子，你的兄弟，你的丈夫身上 3。反对警察滥用豁免权。 反对豁免权的滥用不代表支持支持defund police 也不代表支持blm 作为普通人，我支持反对权利的滥用 4.第4点，反堕胎 "None of the Court’s abortion decisions holds that states are powerless to prevent abortions designed to choose the sex, race, and other attributes of children," the dissent read. "Does the Constitution supply a right to evade regulation by choosing a child’s genetic makeup after conception, aborting any fetus whose genes show a likelihood that the child will be short, or nearsighted, or intellectually average, or lack perfect pitch—or be the ''''wrong'''' sex or race? [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey did not address that question." 案件主要讨论的是abortions designed to choose the sex, race, and other attributes of children 她的确说过 “life begins at conception,” 但是！她一直说个人观点不成为推翻案例的理由。 5.关于移民 首先她sided with川普的public charge，理由是 the rule was a "policy choice," that should not be resolved in litigation. Yafai v. Pompeo 的案子我没细看 但是一些人直接说她主张严厉的移民政策，那具体对谁更严厉呢；怎么个严厉法呢？欢迎补充 6.对死刑态度 "Judges cannot -- nor should they try to -- align our legal system with the Church''''''''s moral teaching whenever the two diverge," the article says. "They should, however, conform their own behavior to the Church''''''''s standard. Perhaps their good example will have some effect." According to SCOTUSBlog, Barrett said in her 2017 confirmation hearing that she would not completely disqualify herself from all capital cases and that when she clerked for late Justice Antonin Scalia that she assisted him on death penalty cases that came before the court. 关于死刑的案子会有信仰冲突，她认为自己应该回避，这样算不算不能完全履行duty？但是法官跟案子有利益冲突需要回避算不算不足呢？至少不会按自己的意愿信仰解读或者创造宪法吧
关于kingdom of God https://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2020/september/kingdom-of-god-and-supreme-court-of-united-states.html “teaching at a school with the motto, “for Christ and Kingdom,” this language is normal and widespread in the Christian church. If you want to oppose this nomination, I hope it is not because of this basic Christian terminology and emphasis.” 还有美国宪法 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. 看到另一个网友的评论“参议院审核法官应该只看两点：judicial temperament and ruling history. ”， 我非常赞同。 我并不是法律方面的人事，刚开始acb的任命消息出来之后，我也随大流的有点失望， 后来多找了点资料来读，发现事情似乎并非想象那样。而且，ACB曾经是最保守的大法官Scalia的法律助手。对于她是潜在的左派大法官的担心，我觉得比较多余。 当然我的research也很有限，希望能抛砖引玉 真关心这事的话，可以多研究下的她的history，一起讨论 各种戴帽子，没论据的口号就算了吧 还有，攻击天主教信仰的，拜登也是天主教徒 update： https://www.scotusblog.com/reference/nominations/list-of-7th-circuit-opinions-by-amy-coney-barrett/ List of 7th Circuit opinions by Amy Coney Barrett
1。支持拥枪权。 acb是主张dangerous的人拥枪权被剥夺 她不认同威斯康辛政府剥夺这个non-violent felons 的拥枪权是因为政府 have failed to show, by either logic or data to show Kanter is dangerous --- that disarming Kanter substantially advances that interest. 这个不代表她认为"只要不是暴力，也有拥枪权" 暴力一定是危险的 重罪不一定是危险的 比如金融诈骗 这篇说acb是主张不危险的人 有拥枪权 并非“即使重罪犯，只要不是暴力，也有权拥枪。”这种想法是预设了重罪就是危险的。
2。对所谓的"校园强奸"，支持due process，并非倾向男生。 due process对所有人都很重要 不论男女 这点我支持她 否则kavanaugh的闹剧可能发生在你的儿子，你的兄弟，你的丈夫身上
3。反对警察滥用豁免权。 反对豁免权的滥用不代表支持支持defund police 也不代表支持blm 作为普通人，我支持反对权利的滥用
4.第4点，反堕胎 "None of the Court’s abortion decisions holds that states are powerless to prevent abortions designed to choose the sex, race, and other attributes of children," the dissent read. "Does the Constitution supply a right to evade regulation by choosing a child’s genetic makeup after conception, aborting any fetus whose genes show a likelihood that the child will be short, or nearsighted, or intellectually average, or lack perfect pitch—or be the ''''wrong'''' sex or race? [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey did not address that question." 案件主要讨论的是abortions designed to choose the sex, race, and other attributes of children 她的确说过 “life begins at conception,” 但是！她一直说个人观点不成为推翻案例的理由。
5.关于移民 首先她sided with川普的public charge，理由是 the rule was a "policy choice," that should not be resolved in litigation. Yafai v. Pompeo 的案子我没细看 但是一些人直接说她主张严厉的移民政策，那具体对谁更严厉呢；怎么个严厉法呢？欢迎补充
6.对死刑态度 "Judges cannot -- nor should they try to -- align our legal system with the Church''''''''s moral teaching whenever the two diverge," the article says. "They should, however, conform their own behavior to the Church''''''''s standard. Perhaps their good example will have some effect." According to SCOTUSBlog, Barrett said in her 2017 confirmation hearing that she would not completely disqualify herself from all capital cases and that when she clerked for late Justice Antonin Scalia that she assisted him on death penalty cases that came before the court. 关于死刑的案子会有信仰冲突，她认为自己应该回避，这样算不算不能完全履行duty？但是法官跟案子有利益冲突需要回避算不算不足呢？至少不会按自己的意愿信仰解读或者创造宪法吧
关于kingdom of God https://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2020/september/kingdom-of-god-and-supreme-court-of-united-states.html “teaching at a school with the motto, “for Christ and Kingdom,” this language is normal and widespread in the Christian church. If you want to oppose this nomination, I hope it is not because of this basic Christian terminology and emphasis.”
还有美国宪法 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
看到另一个网友的评论“参议院审核法官应该只看两点：judicial temperament and ruling history. ”， 我非常赞同。
我并不是法律方面的人事，刚开始acb的任命消息出来之后，我也随大流的有点失望， 后来多找了点资料来读，发现事情似乎并非想象那样。而且，ACB曾经是最保守的大法官Scalia的法律助手。对于她是潜在的左派大法官的担心，我觉得比较多余。 当然我的research也很有限，希望能抛砖引玉 真关心这事的话，可以多研究下的她的history，一起讨论 各种戴帽子，没论据的口号就算了吧 还有，攻击天主教信仰的，拜登也是天主教徒
update： https://www.scotusblog.com/reference/nominations/list-of-7th-circuit-opinions-by-amy-coney-barrett/ List of 7th Circuit opinions by Amy Coney Barrett
还能复制粘贴重复发帖成这样的。。。
argue 对acb乱扣的预设，不等于说她什么都不会做 再者 你觉得如何才能保证他的个人宗教观点不会推翻Roe v. Wade 还是那句话，得看她的history 乱喊口号就算了吧
上帝的归上帝，法律的归法律