https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/23/us/politics/trump-power-transfer-2020-election.html Trump Won’t Commit to ‘Peaceful’ Post-Election Transfer of Power In response to a question, the president complained about mail-in ballots and said: “There won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.” WASHINGTON — President Trump declined an opportunity on Wednesday to endorse a peaceful transfer of power after the November election, renewing his baseless warnings about extensive voting fraud before saying there would be no power transfer at all. 还会继续支持川普么? 该听谁的? 民主党、共和党、最高法院、川普、军队?
川粉看看川普自己讲的话 我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力 在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
川粉看看川普自己讲的话 我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力 在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
川粉看看川普自己讲的话 我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力 在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
Full article in case you do not have a subscription: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/23/us/politics/trump-power-transfer-2020-election.html?auth=login-email&login=email Trump Won’t Commit to ‘Peaceful’ Post-Election Transfer of Power In response to a question, the president complained about mail-in ballots and said: “There won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.” President Trump has long made comments about retaining power beyond legal limits.Credit... Oliver Contreras for The New York Times WASHINGTON — President Trump declined an opportunity on Wednesday to endorse a peaceful transfer of power after the November election, renewing his baseless warnings about extensive voting fraud before saying there would be no power transfer at all. Asked whether he would “commit here today for a peaceful transferral of power after the November election,” Mr. Trump demurred, passing on a chance to call for a calm and orderly election process. “We’re going to have to see what happens,” he told a reporter during a news conference at the White House. “You know that I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” “I understand that, but people are rioting,” responded the reporter, Brian Karem of Playboy magazine, who repeated the question. “Get rid of the ballots and you’ll have a very peaceful — there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation,” the president said. That was an apparent reference to mail-in ballots, which for months he has railed against, without evidence, as rife with fraud and likely to produce a delayed, tainted or outright illegitimate election result. Mr. Trump’s refusal — or inability — to endorse perhaps the most fundamental tenet of American democracy, as any president in memory surely would have, was the latest instance in which he has cast grave uncertainty around the November election and its aftermath. Democrats are growing increasingly alarmed as Mr. Trump repeatedly questions the integrity of the vote and suggests that he might not accept the results if he loses. Earlier on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said he needed to swiftly confirm a successor for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg because he expected disputes over the election result to be resolved by the Supreme Court, which could split 4-to-4 if a ninth justice is not seated. “He’s threatening the election process and saying out loud what everyone has assumed he’s been thinking,” said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of American political history at Princeton University. “The more he makes these arguments, the more he normalizes the fact that this can be part of the conversation.” “Even if meant to distract, these are powerful words to come from a president,” Mr. Zelizer added. “He’s clearly accelerating his effort to set up a challenge to an outcome that is unfavorable to him.” Hours after Mr. Trump’s assertions, Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, expressed alarm over the comments on Twitter. “Fundamental to democracy is the peaceful transition of power; without that, there is Belarus,” Mr. Romney wrote. “Any suggestion that a president might not respect this Constitutional guarantee is both unthinkable and unacceptable.” Mr. Trump’s remarks are a continuation of a long series. During an interview with Fox News in July, Mr. Trump similarly demurred when pressed by the network’s anchor, Chris Wallace, to “give a direct answer” about whether he would accept the election results regardless of the outcome. “I have to see,” Mr. Trump said. “No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time, either,” he added, referring to his similar equivocation before the 2016 election, which he warned might be stolen from him. Even after his election that year, Mr. Trump falsely insisted that he had lost the popular vote only because millions of immigrants ineligible to vote had cast ballots for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. In this campaign, Mr. Trump has primed his supporters to believe his defeat is possible only through what he has called a “rigged” or “stolen” election. “The only way they can take this election away from us is if this is a rigged election,” Mr. Trump said last month during the Republican National Convention. Mr. Trump has also long joked about retaining power beyond legal limits, making frequent mention of serving beyond January 2025, when the Constitution — which limits presidents to two terms — requires that he leave office. In 2018, after China’s Communist Party announced the end of a two-term limit for its presidency, Mr. Trump said at a closed-door fund-raiser that China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, would be “president for life.” “I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Mr. Trump said, to cheers from his supporters. In July, Mr. Trump even floated the idea of delaying the November election — a suggestion that lacks legal authority — although he dropped the notion after Republicans criticized it. Mr. Trump did not elaborate on his Wednesday comments, in part because he abruptly ended his news briefing to take what he called “an emergency phone call,” without offering further information. The White House did not provide further comment or explanation. The once-unthinkable notion that a president might refuse to accept the results of an election and leave office without resistance has become an increasingly major theme in the 2020 campaign. This month, Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, warned that Mr. Trump might contest the election result and seek to maintain his grip on power. “What we have got to do in the next two months is to alert the American people about what that nightmarish scenario might look like in order to prepare them for that possibility and talk about what we do if that happens,” Mr. Sanders said in an interview with Politico. David Cole, the national legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement that Mr. Trump’s comments “should trouble every American.” “The peaceful transfer of power is essential to a functioning democracy,” he said. Yet the president’s remarks were a jarring contrast to the conventional words of his own attorney general, William P. Barr, just a day earlier. “What this country has going for it more than anything else is the peaceful transfer of power, and that is accomplished through elections that people have confidence in,” Mr. Barr, an outspoken opponent of widespread voting by mail, said during a news conference in Milwaukee on Tuesday in response to a question about mail-in ballots. “And so we should be doing everything to support that confidence,” he added.
川粉看看川普自己讲的话 我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力 在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
川粉看看川普自己讲的话 我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力 在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
Trump Won’t Commit to ‘Peaceful’ Post-Election Transfer of Power
In response to a question, the president complained about mail-in ballots and said: “There won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.”
WASHINGTON — President Trump declined an opportunity on Wednesday to endorse a peaceful transfer of power after the November election, renewing his baseless warnings about extensive voting fraud before saying there would be no power transfer at all.
还会继续支持川普么? 该听谁的? 民主党、共和党、最高法院、川普、军队?
共和党管理 美国南方,
民主党管理 美国北方 , 和加拿大,欧盟合并吧?
你是川普肚里的蛔虫，能不能连人还不知道，你就知道还有第三任了。真是消息灵通人士！
我只会连任！川普拒绝和平移交权力
在周三（23日）的记者会上，川普被问及会否承诺落选后和平移交权力，他表示："（选举后）不会有权力移交，而是延续。"（ there won't be a transfer, frankly, there'll be a continuation.）
有视频，TRUMP记者会亲口说的
支持川普连任吧
这是对自己和共和党有信心，你英语不好不要乱说
Trump Won’t Commit to ‘Peaceful’ Post-Election Transfer of Power In response to a question, the president complained about mail-in ballots and said: “There won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.”
President Trump has long made comments about retaining power beyond legal limits.Credit...
Oliver Contreras for The New York Times
WASHINGTON — President Trump declined an opportunity on Wednesday to endorse a peaceful transfer of power after the November election, renewing his baseless warnings about extensive voting fraud before saying there would be no power transfer at all. Asked whether he would “commit here today for a peaceful transferral of power after the November election,” Mr. Trump demurred, passing on a chance to call for a calm and orderly election process. “We’re going to have to see what happens,” he told a reporter during a news conference at the White House. “You know that I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” “I understand that, but people are rioting,” responded the reporter, Brian Karem of Playboy magazine, who repeated the question. “Get rid of the ballots and you’ll have a very peaceful — there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation,” the president said. That was an apparent reference to mail-in ballots, which for months he has railed against, without evidence, as rife with fraud and likely to produce a delayed, tainted or outright illegitimate election result. Mr. Trump’s refusal — or inability — to endorse perhaps the most fundamental tenet of American democracy, as any president in memory surely would have, was the latest instance in which he has cast grave uncertainty around the November election and its aftermath. Democrats are growing increasingly alarmed as Mr. Trump repeatedly questions the integrity of the vote and suggests that he might not accept the results if he loses. Earlier on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said he needed to swiftly confirm a successor for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg because he expected disputes over the election result to be resolved by the Supreme Court, which could split 4-to-4 if a ninth justice is not seated. “He’s threatening the election process and saying out loud what everyone has assumed he’s been thinking,” said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of American political history at Princeton University. “The more he makes these arguments, the more he normalizes the fact that this can be part of the conversation.” “Even if meant to distract, these are powerful words to come from a president,” Mr. Zelizer added. “He’s clearly accelerating his effort to set up a challenge to an outcome that is unfavorable to him.” Hours after Mr. Trump’s assertions, Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, expressed alarm over the comments on Twitter. “Fundamental to democracy is the peaceful transition of power; without that, there is Belarus,” Mr. Romney wrote. “Any suggestion that a president might not respect this Constitutional guarantee is both unthinkable and unacceptable.” Mr. Trump’s remarks are a continuation of a long series. During an interview with Fox News in July, Mr. Trump similarly demurred when pressed by the network’s anchor, Chris Wallace, to “give a direct answer” about whether he would accept the election results regardless of the outcome. “I have to see,” Mr. Trump said. “No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time, either,” he added, referring to his similar equivocation before the 2016 election, which he warned might be stolen from him. Even after his election that year, Mr. Trump falsely insisted that he had lost the popular vote only because millions of immigrants ineligible to vote had cast ballots for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. In this campaign, Mr. Trump has primed his supporters to believe his defeat is possible only through what he has called a “rigged” or “stolen” election. “The only way they can take this election away from us is if this is a rigged election,” Mr. Trump said last month during the Republican National Convention. Mr. Trump has also long joked about retaining power beyond legal limits, making frequent mention of serving beyond January 2025, when the Constitution — which limits presidents to two terms — requires that he leave office. In 2018, after China’s Communist Party announced the end of a two-term limit for its presidency, Mr. Trump said at a closed-door fund-raiser that China’s authoritarian leader, Xi Jinping, would be “president for life.” “I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Mr. Trump said, to cheers from his supporters. In July, Mr. Trump even floated the idea of delaying the November election — a suggestion that lacks legal authority — although he dropped the notion after Republicans criticized it. Mr. Trump did not elaborate on his Wednesday comments, in part because he abruptly ended his news briefing to take what he called “an emergency phone call,” without offering further information. The White House did not provide further comment or explanation. The once-unthinkable notion that a president might refuse to accept the results of an election and leave office without resistance has become an increasingly major theme in the 2020 campaign. This month, Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, warned that Mr. Trump might contest the election result and seek to maintain his grip on power. “What we have got to do in the next two months is to alert the American people about what that nightmarish scenario might look like in order to prepare them for that possibility and talk about what we do if that happens,” Mr. Sanders said in an interview with Politico. David Cole, the national legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement that Mr. Trump’s comments “should trouble every American.” “The peaceful transfer of power is essential to a functioning democracy,” he said. Yet the president’s remarks were a jarring contrast to the conventional words of his own attorney general, William P. Barr, just a day earlier. “What this country has going for it more than anything else is the peaceful transfer of power, and that is accomplished through elections that people have confidence in,” Mr. Barr, an outspoken opponent of widespread voting by mail, said during a news conference in Milwaukee on Tuesday in response to a question about mail-in ballots. “And so we should be doing everything to support that confidence,” he added.
这不是曾经的地下室拍脑袋智囊王兵专用字体吗，又反习又反川，活的真难
你是阅读障碍？ 这么简单句子都看不懂
如果被军队赶走，能往哪逃， 不会逃到香港或莫斯科吧？
唉，真为左棍的智商着急。。。川普这句话都能被理解成这样，左棍这智商怎么活这么大的?
川黑真是无耻无极限啊！这样都能解释为拒绝交接？人家是非常有信心稳赢！
就是说，如果拜登当选，肯定是作弊，对吧？ 所以川普不承认，不肯交权也是合理的，对吧？
你说的人气，不知道是怎么看出来的？我承认民调未必就代表了所以选民，但是你的人气，不是更加不可靠的民调吗？
有录音为证，记者问他如果输了选举，是不是可以保证有Peaceful Transfer of power，他说，到时候再说。估计美国历史上敢这么说的，没有第二个。
觉得邮寄选票作假难道不可以上诉吗？ bush那届选举不就是最后上诉？
你醒醒吧，川普连任是中共灾难，是美国甚至世界人民的救赎，你看太多今日头条。川普促进中东和平签署协议，只搞恐怖分子头目不发动热战搞平民，对内签署降低药价的命令，修墙保护合法移民。还有很多，当然他也有错的，比如有时说话不严谨，但比很多政客好太多太多
他们的逻辑就是这样咯 反正如果民主党赢，那铁定就是作弊（即使在川川对邮政系统干了这么多缺德事儿之后） 川川现在吃相都这样了，各种选举疯话天天说，他们也能“如果川川输了会尊重选举”一一把一件本来就应该做的正常事情描绘得多么圣人
又来了一个智商不在线的。。。
的确是，川习都是流氓，不过一个外露一个内敛。
所以他现在忙着pack最高法院啊，到时候他说了算。
你懂不懂什么叫三权分立？