they表明不止一个人听到警察敲门，而不是那个句子里面的the only witness！明显这楼里某些带节奏的人英文烂 healthy 发表于 2020-09-24 23:41
服了。 Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness.
Louisville has since banned no-knock warrants with “Breonna’s Law,” and policymakers across the country are pushing for similar reforms at the local and national level. RIP
噢，就事论事，您能先别一边开贴一边歪曲事实造谣行吗？看在Breonna是医护人员的面子上，再回你一次。 xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:46 “只有Brett Hankison 以危害他人罪起诉，原因是子弹打到邻居家了。” FACT: Hankison子弹直接打到邻居家卧室直接危害一家三口包括一名怀孕母亲，placed those three people in “substantial danger,” 被你说的好像是因为枪法不准？？？ xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:57 回复 3楼衣凡卡的帖子 是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前... FACT: Louisville police forced their way into Taylor’s apartment in the early hours of March 13 to execute a “no-knock” search warrant for a narcotics investigation targeting Taylor’s ex-boyfriend. Taylor was home with her current boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who said he fired once toward the officers in fear. Police fired back, hitting Taylor multiple times. 毒贩是前男友，本来就是不敲门搜查，人也弄错，这时候自卫就变成枪击警察在先了？
噢，就事论事，您能先别一边开贴一边歪曲事实造谣行吗？看在Breonna是医护人员的面子上，再回你一次。 xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:46 “只有Brett Hankison 以危害他人罪起诉，原因是子弹打到邻居家了。” FACT: Hankison子弹直接打到邻居家卧室直接危害一家三口包括一名怀孕母亲，placed those three people in “substantial danger,” 被你说的好像是因为枪法不准？？？ xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:57 回复 3楼衣凡卡的帖子 是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前... FACT: Louisville police forced their way into Taylor’s apartment in the early hours of March 13 to execute a “no-knock” search warrant for a narcotics investigation targeting Taylor’s ex-boyfriend. Taylor was home with her current boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who said he fired once toward the officers in fear. Police fired back, hitting Taylor multiple times. 毒贩是前男友，本来就是不敲门搜查，人也弄错，这时候自卫就变成枪击警察在先了？
她确实死的无辜，但是算在警察头上好像也不对。 no knock的情况下，警察已经knock并announce了（我也是听NPR说的）。 knock并announce以后男朋友是不是还属于正当防卫，有待商榷。 当然男朋友可能没听清楚。 但是如果你觉得她男朋友是合理的正当防卫，那么警察开火也是合理的正当防卫。
iheartglass 发表于 2020-09-23 21:59
你们到底能不能花五分钟时间阅读一下这个案子？ 肯塔基州是有wanton endangerment law的，wanton就是介于careless和intent to murder之间的定罪。 这个案子复杂之处在于FBI弹道分析出来Breonna的致命那一枪竟然不是被起诉的Hankison开的，而另外两名经警官恰好没有被起诉，即便三名警官一共fired 32枪。一个经典的boston legal的脱罪案。 连警察局自己都with a termination letter stating that Hankison showed “an extreme indifference to the value of human life.”你再看看wanton law的定义 508.060 Wanton endangerment in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person. (2) Wanton endangerment in the first degree is a Class D felony. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 70, effective January 1, 1975.
噢，就事论事，您能先别一边开贴一边歪曲事实造谣行吗？看在Breonna是医护人员的面子上，再回你一次。 xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:46 “只有Brett Hankison 以危害他人罪起诉，原因是子弹打到邻居家了。” FACT: Hankison子弹直接打到邻居家卧室直接危害一家三口包括一名怀孕母亲，placed those three people in “substantial danger,” 被你说的好像是因为枪法不准？？？ xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:57 回复 3楼衣凡卡的帖子 是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前... FACT: Louisville police forced their way into Taylor’s apartment in the early hours of March 13 to execute a “no-knock” search warrant for a narcotics investigation targeting Taylor’s ex-boyfriend. Taylor was home with her current boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who said he fired once toward the officers in fear. Police fired back, hitting Taylor multiple times. 毒贩是前男友，本来就是不敲门搜查，人也弄错，这时候自卫就变成枪击警察在先了？
Louisville has since banned no-knock warrants with “Breonna’s Law,” and policymakers across the country are pushing for similar reforms at the local and national level. RIP coldplayy 发表于 2020-09-23 21:12
噢，就事论事，您能先别一边开贴一边歪曲事实造谣行吗？看在Breonna是医护人员的面子上，再回你一次。 xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:46 “只有Brett Hankison 以危害他人罪起诉，原因是子弹打到邻居家了。” FACT: Hankison子弹直接打到邻居家卧室直接危害一家三口包括一名怀孕母亲，placed those three people in “substantial danger,” 被你说的好像是因为枪法不准？？？ xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:57 回复 3楼衣凡卡的帖子 是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前... FACT: Louisville police forced their way into Taylor’s apartment in the early hours of March 13 to execute a “no-knock” search warrant for a narcotics investigation targeting Taylor’s ex-boyfriend. Taylor was home with her current boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who said he fired once toward the officers in fear. Police fired back, hitting Taylor multiple times. 毒贩是前男友，本来就是不敲门搜查，人也弄错，这时候自卫就变成枪击警察在先了？
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517818-grand-jury-brings-no-charges-against-officers-in-breonna-taylor-death Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness. A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517818-grand-jury-brings-no-charges-against-officers-in-breonna-taylor-death Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness. A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves. hercyna 发表于 2020-09-23 23:36
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517818-grand-jury-brings-no-charges-against-officers-in-breonna-taylor-death Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness. A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves. hercyna 发表于 2020-09-23 23:36
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517818-grand-jury-brings-no-charges-against-officers-in-breonna-taylor-death Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness. A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves. hercyna 发表于 2020-09-23 23:36
就引用的这段话，很明显，听到警察敲门并表明身份的是a dozen证人。 A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
Cherrychocolate 发表于 2020-09-24 07:24:33
You sure? The cited paragraph means there were a dozen witnesses, but only one corroborated the claim that the police knocked and identified themselves
就引用的这段话，很明显，听到警察敲门并表明身份的是a dozen证人。 A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves. Cherrychocolate 发表于 2020-09-24 07:24
A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
Cherrychocolate 发表于 2020-09-24 07:24:33
You sure? The cited paragraph means there were a dozen witnesses, but only one corroborated the claim that the police knocked and identified themselves hercyna 发表于 2020-09-24 11:45
我就是引用那位层主的话，说那篇文章里可是有“……a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves”。至于更多的证据，我要等court record release to public了再慢慢看。grand jury判的，比看已经不中立的记者report靠谱多了。
我就是引用那位层主的话，说那篇文章里可是有“……a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves”。至于更多的证据，我要等court record release to public了再慢慢看。grand jury判的，比看已经不中立的记者report靠谱多了。 Cherrychocolate 发表于 2020-09-24 12:15
人家引用的原文不是这个？真的看不懂？ reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
虽然Louisville市政府已经宣布curfew,估计还是少不了一轮 peaceful protest吧！
Update:
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/wLMCGEASe5o
Trump 对AG表态：
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/5MPC-iWqGkk
Pelosi表态
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/aJRF43eINOs
🔥 最新回帖
这楼里两个英文巨烂还反咬别人五毛的的某粉应该感谢你这样的网友为他们科普
服了。 Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness.
赔了12米~
这小学水平的英语水平就不哟再来丢人现眼了
they表明不止一个人听到警察敲门，而不是那个句子里面的the only witness！明显这楼里某些带节奏的人英文烂
🛋️ 沙发板凳
最新 fox news update
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/OSyPCrG6lzk
是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前...
你让她和警察火拼？
赔过了， 一千两百万
你可真够爱装的，退一万步讲，Breonna有什么污点？凭什么送命？
RIP
消消气，就事论事，不用人身攻击了
老黑的事儿没法说，她毒贩男友不朝cop开枪cop也不会乱枪打死她，反而正主儿毫发无损，找谁说理去，纳税人可怜，赔了12米
不是大陪审团决定不起诉其他两名警察，是检查官没有对这两名警察提起诉讼
她在睡梦中吧，主要还是找的男友垃圾。说不定是男友故意拉她挡箭牌。
猪党继续作，继续煽动，只会适得其反。
噢，就事论事，您能先别一边开贴一边歪曲事实造谣行吗？看在Breonna是医护人员的面子上，再回你一次。
xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:46 “只有Brett Hankison 以危害他人罪起诉，原因是子弹打到邻居家了。”
FACT: Hankison子弹直接打到邻居家卧室直接危害一家三口包括一名怀孕母亲，placed those three people in “substantial danger,” 被你说的好像是因为枪法不准？？？
xiaoxiao_2003 发表于：2020-09-23 20:57 回复 3楼衣凡卡的帖子 是这个案子... 不过好像比这个报道复杂多了...男友有涉毒，有犯罪前科，而且枪击警察在前...
FACT: Louisville police forced their way into Taylor’s apartment in the early hours of March 13 to execute a “no-knock” search warrant for a narcotics investigation targeting Taylor’s ex-boyfriend. Taylor was home with her current boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who said he fired once toward the officers in fear. Police fired back, hitting Taylor multiple times. 毒贩是前男友，本来就是不敲门搜查，人也弄错，这时候自卫就变成枪击警察在先了？
你是汞喝党派来的？在哪里的小报读到死者开枪打了警察？ 声明：本人认为所有looting riots全部违法理应依法被严惩。
和罪犯为伍，警察执行任务与罪犯交火交火，这姑娘点背被打死了，这个解释行不？
那人还是国内那套，以为连坐是既合理又合法。男友都开枪打警察了，女友还不该跟着中弹？有这种思想的鸟人还是回国待着好
你过分解读了吧，问题不是她该不该死，而是警察有没有罪 她不该死，所以civil lawsuit赔了一千两百万，合情合理 但是你现在要升级到criminal lawsuit，怎么警察执行任务遇到危险不该开枪自卫吗？
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/OY3Tcy8GLhg
连坐肯定不对。 她男友如果正常被捕，她啥事都没有吧。 不过警察去抓毒枭，毒枭和女人在一起，枪战的时候你说让警察保证不伤害这个女的，也不现实啊。 就这个案件，她男友毫发无伤，她中了好几枪，怎么觉得她男友很fishy 呢。
这些垃圾川粉造谣可耻！
她确实死的无辜，但是算在警察头上好像也不对。 no knock的情况下，警察已经knock并announce了（我也是听NPR说的）。 knock并announce以后男朋友是不是还属于正当防卫，有待商榷。 当然男朋友可能没听清楚。 但是如果你觉得她男朋友是合理的正当防卫，那么警察开火也是合理的正当防卫。
整栋楼，12户人家，除了一个七十多的白人老太太说她有听到警察敲门，其他所有11户都没有听到任何敲门
你们到底能不能花五分钟时间阅读一下这个案子？
肯塔基州是有wanton endangerment law的，wanton就是介于careless和intent to murder之间的定罪。 这个案子复杂之处在于FBI弹道分析出来Breonna的致命那一枪竟然不是被起诉的Hankison开的，而另外两名经警官恰好没有被起诉，即便三名警官一共fired 32枪。一个经典的boston legal的脱罪案。
连警察局自己都with a termination letter stating that Hankison showed “an extreme indifference to the value of human life.”你再看看wanton law的定义
508.060 Wanton endangerment in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person. (2) Wanton endangerment in the first degree is a Class D felony. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 70, effective January 1, 1975.
https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=19734#:~:text=the%20first%20degree.-,(1)%20A%20person%20is%20guilty%20of%20wanton%20endangerment%20in%20the,physical%20injury%20to%20another%20person.
dian zan!!
我看了新闻，是大陪审团决定的啊。
拉她做挡箭牌也没用的，子弹都能打穿墙到邻居家了还打不穿人体？女的打死了，开枪的男人毫发无伤，只能说明警察枪法烂。
和连坐没关系，中国人老话说是君子不立危墙之下，你长期和罪犯混在一起，被“事故“的可能性就高不是吗？
思路清晰，赞一个~
update:
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/wLMCGEASe5o 两名警官中枪
她现男友不是，前男友才是涉案的那个，但是前男友住的地方离她10迈远，只不过她家地址也包括在搜查里了。后来搜查她家没发现任何毒品。
现男友是合法执枪。
警察说是表明了身份的，邻居也证实听到警察是表明身份了的，男友说问了外面是谁，没人回应，警察执勤有摄像吧，出示证据就知道谁撒谎了。
现在的结果就是某族裔这边死了人，然后就名正言顺的暴乱，两个警察就被打着正义旗号的左棍猎杀了。
哪有那么多无辜的，毒品就是用死者名字邮寄的，这边的同居的男女朋友就是实质上的夫妻，每天生活在一起，说不知道这事也太假了，这边对毒贩子太宽容了。
我看新闻，no-knock不是事实。警察不但Knock了，还自曝家门，说清楚我们有warrent，是警察，要求开门。
自己去看新闻吧。不用跟他们说。事实并非媒体一开始说的那样。现在DA公布了细节。警察不但knock了，还说了我们有warrent，要求开门，不开门，后来先向警察开枪，警察被击中大腿。
新闻好像是说grand jury decision。不是DA decision。
你的信息是错的。
Omg 你真的看了整个来龙去脉？ 当时在她旁边的是她的现男友 是coca cola的一个工厂员工 不是那个毒贩！
警察并不知道里面情况。只知道里面有人开枪，自己人被击中大腿。
DA公布有人证，应该不止一个人证证实警察的说法。
现男友向警察开枪了，是先开枪的一个。在警察已经敲门，宣布自己是警察，有warrent，他还开枪，击中警察大腿。警察在不知道屋内的情况下，一个警察被打伤的情况下，开枪的。
1. 人证公布了 整栋楼 挨家挨户问 只有一个人听到了 还是他夜班后去childcare那里接他儿子 在外面听到 他也证实 只听到一次 2. 在死者旁边并且开枪的是现男友 那个可乐工厂warehouse员工 不是毒贩 他以为是死者前男友来报复 问几次没有人回答 只好开枪的 他没有任何理由害怕警察 3. 那个毒贩几进几出 比之前判的20年提早出来很多 还杀过人 他都没死 这个女孩凭什么在自己家被杀？
不管是不是毒贩，他先开枪了。有多个人证证明，警察自报家门，还说了有合法warrent。
我看完整个来龙去脉 我确信没有很多人证明
我听到的新闻不止一个人证。继续关注吧。
不管现男友身份，这个人先开枪了。在警察在门外已经说了自己是警察有warrent的情况下开枪的，还打伤了警察。警察在不知道屋内还有没有其他罪犯，有几把枪，什么时候会开枪的情况下，属于正当自卫。至于为什么这个姑娘被打中好几枪，而开枪的那个人没事，我就不知道了。需要看还原图像才行。
今天判决才出来，DA也才一点点公布细节。
我看的是新闻，比较相信新闻提供的信息。所以，再观察看看，明天一定会有更多新闻讨论的。还有Youtube上面的评论。真相就是多看几家说的，核对一下。
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517818-grand-jury-brings-no-charges-against-officers-in-breonna-taylor-death
Even though they were at Taylor's apartment with a no-knock warrant, Cameron said that the police trio banged loudly on the door and announced their presence. The head prosecutor said that this was corroborated by a single civilian witness. A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
我还是会等到明天，多看几个评论再说。媒体报错细节也不是一次两次了。我听到的是不止一个人。所以再等等看。
从公开的细节看，警察都属于正当防卫。
我觉得very sad的是这种warrant不是一般的warrant，可以no-knock clause，一般是毒窝或者对警察来说非常危险的地方才用得到，即使这样，在last minute,上级也要求他们必须先表明身份，但是他们并没有。如果他们互相知道对方是谁，这个悲剧是可以避免的。
这个是我觉得描述最全最公正的一篇报道 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/30/us/breonna-taylor-police-killing.html
我听到的报导是警察有knock。我不太相信NYT。
听说要取消no-knock warrant，这是一件很悲哀的事情。如果遇到真的毒枭怎么办？任何事情都会有危险性和不可预测性。就因为一件事情的结果把no-knock warrant取消，实在是悲哀。
如果遇到绑架儿童的变态呢？警察可以突袭吗？如果自报家门使得坏人有时间把被害人转移或者杀了呢？
这种因为一件事情全盘否定的冲动真的会害死其他许多人的。
如果是no-knock，警察破門而入，那兩個人都會被按在床上。不用證人證明，看看門就知道了。其實真按no-knock serve，根本不會有警察被打傷，平民被打死，納稅人出15米，大規模抗議，宵禁，又有警察被打傷，潛在打砸搶燒。法律就是法律，不安這來就會出問題。
你蛮天真的。住在差区有人敲门说是警察之后破门而入就真的是警察？要不是因为住的地方不好，也不会床头柜备枪了。
现在讨论的是警察开枪有没有合法性，也就是警察有没有罪，她男友在听到警察表明身份后为什么还开枪不重要。我认为如果证据证明警察已经表明身份，被枪击受伤，开枪无可厚非，很明显grand jury也是这么想的。
她该不该死，和警察该不该坐牢，是两码事好吗？她不该死，所以赔偿了一千多万。证据显示警察正当防卫，grand jury就不indict，法治社会这点都搞不明白？
就引用的这段话，很明显，听到警察敲门并表明身份的是a dozen证人。 A reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
你试试看一个亚洲人给打死赔1千二百万？你要伺候你的黑主没人拦着你。
亚洲人当年被警察打死也有被赔偿巨款的先例，亚洲人被不公平对待我照样发声。倒是看看你，语言尖酸刻薄，一看就无法正常阅读英文报道尊重事实进行任何理性讨论，张口闭口就是没受过教育的人才说的话。你还觉得自己特机灵，其实丑态尽出，你要跪舔搞分裂歧视的主子更没人拦着你！
没错，用一个特例去否定一个保护警察安全的法令，结果反而本末倒置。碰到毒枭拍门，毒枭把毒品都从马桶里冲走，那一直也不能给他们定罪。
Fact: 人没有弄错。警方怀疑Breonna帮助前男友藏匿毒品和保存赃款 法官也因此发了warrant （当然具体有没有罪就没人知道了 警方在案后没有继续搜索毒品）
就是没有body cam 所以才复杂。邻居也是各说其词 有一个说听到警方报名 2个说没听到
You sure? The cited paragraph means there were a dozen witnesses, but only one corroborated the claim that the police knocked and identified themselves
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/16/us/police-shooting-lawsuits-breonna-taylor-settlement/index.html
Breonna Taylor settlement is among largest payouts linked to a police shooting
有死命舔警察暴力反华的川粉在，有必要给老中赔钱吗？别人的赔偿是别人自己争取来的。你们极右份子认为警察暴力都是合法合理，要个屁的赔偿。
....only person out of a dozen
Breonna 脑子不好，被人利用贩毒，然后枪战还做了炮灰。就像以前马路上行人被吸毒的咬掉脸的可怜人，有啥污点，凭啥被毁了一辈子？
没错，mm明白人 离开gun control谈police reform有点耍流氓
类似于被家暴打死的妇女是脑子不好，嫁了渣男做了被害人？
枪不可能控，所以只能控警，不过真的整顿了警察牺牲率可能会高。另外美国执法机构的一般素质不高是真的，解救人质把人质先射杀了，吓得绑匪乖乖投降也就在美国会出现吧。
我们这已经开始游行了
我就是引用那位层主的话，说那篇文章里可是有“……a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves”。至于更多的证据，我要等court record release to public了再慢慢看。grand jury判的，比看已经不中立的记者report靠谱多了。
你住过差区吗？我住过我们镇的差区。学生的时候，跟人合租，找最便宜的。偶尔会有警察来，看到警车。没人panic，也没人对警察恐惧。
说什么听到警察来就直接开枪的，只能说明这个地方警察来少了，所以治安才那么差。
无辜送命的人从来就有，以后也永远不会消失吧。
被帮派火拼击中无辜送命的未成年人，就光芝加哥一地，从今年6月到7月之间，就有9个，最小的还不到两岁，那些人又做错了什么？
很多无辜受害的人不但没有污点，而且活着的时候也没有做过任何错误的决定。那些6岁， 8岁，9岁的受害者们可没和人品有问题的毒贩子交往"on and off for 7 years"。
绝大多数真正无辜的受害者不但得不到任何赔偿，而且他们被害的消息根本就不会上新闻，不管他们是黑是白还是什么其他种族，基本上就是"算你倒霉“。
为什么同样是不该死的人死了，这个人的死就得到如此的关注，她的家庭就得到创纪录的赔偿，难道这就是所谓的公平正义？
说到POLICE VIOLENCE, 我从来没有看到过比DANIEL SHAVER被强杀更残忍的POLICE SHOOTING，可他不幸是个白人，所以不但没有得到赔偿，而且用AR-15在一家旅馆走廊将也是26岁的DANIEL连射五枪致死的警察也被无罪释放，还得以保全退休金。
新闻事件的真实性，为什么有些新闻会得到不成比例的关注，大家还是且让子弹再飞一会儿再看吧。
那是不是差区就不需要警察了。反正他们自己也能用枪保护自己。
不是小报。邻局作证，警察在外面已已经表明身份而且警告了。男友先开枪打伤了一个警察的腿。
你在左右互搏吧。别人说啥都是错的。
人家引用的原文不是这个？真的看不懂？
reporter pressed Cameron on this during his press conference, citing that the witness in question was the only person out of a dozen witnesses who said that they heard the police knock and identify themselves.
我知道有三更半夜敢在差区走路的人，也知道在同一个区半夜走路被杀的，这又能说明神马。你自己主观不怕不恐惧不代表别人不该/不会恐惧害怕，后面那句话更是逻辑不知所云。
检察官已经对这位开枪现男友免予起诉。如果是你说的这样，有可能么？
Re. 看到NYT,它在我这儿已经没有credit啦。
同样的逻辑，trump university 比常青藤大学更有credit LOL
这感觉是得 三十年以前了吧？世道变了奶奶
我根本不care什么常春滕和Trump 大学。但是新闻媒体如果被某些人绑架，我care.
并没有任何人要绑架就像没人要洗脑 都是自己的选择。 但是credit and professionalism是客观标准 就像如果找医生是去江湖医生还是业内认可的有信誉的医院