川普在会上宣布，将大力提倡爱国主义思想，把爱国思想融入学校日常，宣传祖国伟大光荣的历史。此委员会将称为1776委员会。 https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/09/17/trump-launches-patriotic-education-commission-calls-1619-project-ideological-poison/ Trump Launches 'Patriotic Education’ Commission, Calls 1619 Project 'Ideological Poison’ Andrew SolenderSep 17, 2020 President Trump on Thursday announced several measures aimed at promoting what he called “patriotic education” while blasting progressive efforts at re-examining American history through a race-critical lens as “toxic propaganda.” At the White House Conference on American History, Trump took aim at the 1619 Project, a series of essays in the New York Times re-examining America’s legacy of slavery which has become a common foil for right-wing politicians, calling it “ideological poison” that will “dissolve the civic bonds” of America. Trump also called out what he said is “left-wing indoctrination” in schools and curriculum, which he claimed “views every issue through the lens of race" in an effort to impose “tyranny” and “a new segregation.” Trump instead proposed “patriotic education,” applauding a grant awarded by the National Endowment for the Humanities to develop, in his words, a” pro-American curriculum that celebrates the truth about our nation's great history." Trump also announced that he will sign an executive order establishing a commission to “promote patriotic education,” which will be called the “1776 Commission,” in contrast with the 1619 Project. At the conference, Trump – who has often been accused of disregarding the constitution – claimed the left is “attempting to demolish” the constitution and condemned them for a “vicious and violent assault on law enforcement,” which he called “the universal symbol of rule of law in America.” Trump’s executive order was met with fierce backlash from commentators, who recognized it as authoritarian; New York Times opinion columnist Farhad Manjoo tweeted, “Kim Jong Un wasn’t writing him love letters, it was an instructional manual.” Crucial Quote "The narratives about America being pushed by the far left and being chanted in the streets bear a striking resemblance to the anti-American propaganda of our adversaries,” Trump said, alleging “both groups want to see America weakened, derided and totally diminished." Chief Critic “An important note that as President Trump gears up to attack the 1619 project, [author Nikole Hannah-Jones] is a national treasure who put in context how America came to be, the black enslaved people it exploited and the way forward,” tweeted PBS News White House correspondent Yamiche Alcindor. “We should all be grateful for the 1619 Project.” Surprising Fact Trump has been pushing for something strictly prohibited by the constitution in recent weeks. “We're going to win Nevada and we're going to win four more years in the White House. And then after that, we'll negotiate,” Trump said at a rally in Minden, Nevada on Sunday despite the 22nd amendment to the Constitution prohibiting a president from running for a third term. Trump added that he was “probably entitled” to a third term “based on the way we were treated.” Follow me on Twitter. Send me a secure tip.
川普在会上宣布，将大力提倡爱国主义思想，把爱国思想融入学校日常，宣传祖国伟大光荣的历史。此委员会将称为1776委员会。 https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/09/17/trump-launches-patriotic-education-commission-calls-1619-project-ideological-poison/ Trump Launches 'Patriotic Education’ Commission, Calls 1619 Project 'Ideological Poison’ Andrew SolenderSep 17, 2020 President Trump on Thursday announced several measures aimed at promoting what he called “patriotic education” while blasting progressive efforts at re-examining American history through a race-critical lens as “toxic propaganda.” At the White House Conference on American History, Trump took aim at the 1619 Project, a series of essays in the New York Times re-examining America’s legacy of slavery which has become a common foil for right-wing politicians, calling it “ideological poison” that will “dissolve the civic bonds” of America. Trump also called out what he said is “left-wing indoctrination” in schools and curriculum, which he claimed “views every issue through the lens of race" in an effort to impose “tyranny” and “a new segregation.” Trump instead proposed “patriotic education,” applauding a grant awarded by the National Endowment for the Humanities to develop, in his words, a” pro-American curriculum that celebrates the truth about our nation's great history." Trump also announced that he will sign an executive order establishing a commission to “promote patriotic education,” which will be called the “1776 Commission,” in contrast with the 1619 Project. At the conference, Trump – who has often been accused of disregarding the constitution – claimed the left is “attempting to demolish” the constitution and condemned them for a “vicious and violent assault on law enforcement,” which he called “the universal symbol of rule of law in America.” Trump’s executive order was met with fierce backlash from commentators, who recognized it as authoritarian; New York Times opinion columnist Farhad Manjoo tweeted, “Kim Jong Un wasn’t writing him love letters, it was an instructional manual.” Crucial Quote "The narratives about America being pushed by the far left and being chanted in the streets bear a striking resemblance to the anti-American propaganda of our adversaries,” Trump said, alleging “both groups want to see America weakened, derided and totally diminished." Chief Critic “An important note that as President Trump gears up to attack the 1619 project, [author Nikole Hannah-Jones] is a national treasure who put in context how America came to be, the black enslaved people it exploited and the way forward,” tweeted PBS News White House correspondent Yamiche Alcindor. “We should all be grateful for the 1619 Project.” Surprising Fact Trump has been pushing for something strictly prohibited by the constitution in recent weeks. “We're going to win Nevada and we're going to win four more years in the White House. And then after that, we'll negotiate,” Trump said at a rally in Minden, Nevada on Sunday despite the 22nd amendment to the Constitution prohibiting a president from running for a third term. Trump added that he was “probably entitled” to a third term “based on the way we were treated.” Follow me on Twitter. Send me a secure tip. nukenyc125 发表于 2020-09-17 16:24
俺们这伟光正的西雅图学区已经实行了对洗脑从娃娃做起， 比CCP还厉害！二年级小朋友进行警察是坏人教育，还有教育二年级小朋友参与到activism多么重要，学校应该police free。捐款link给youtuber上的antipolice activist直接在课堂材料里。这些左左的老师校长心急成这样都伸手到了小娃娃那里，highly inappropriate. Two Seattle-area schools are using the Black Lives Matter movement to push anti-police curriculum to second graders. When asked why the content was chosen to begin with, districts haven’t been especially forthcoming. Among the lessons being promoted, either in the virtual classroom or via third-party resources to parents, students as young as 7-years-old are taught that racist police routinely target innocent Black Americans but don’t suffer consequences because police cover for each other. Content also pushes far-left social justice causes as students are told to become social justice activists. What’s worse, the schools only remove or revise the content after parents complain. This week in nothing makes sense: students are taught police are racist and now, apparently, classical music is steeped in white supremacy. Wow. I stopped by FOX News at Night to discuss! pic.twitter.com/dHu8xWOysV — (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) September 17, 2020 Teaching students cops are racist A second grade teacher at Grove Elementary in Marysville posted a video animation to their online system. The video is titled “Animation Series: Something Happened In Our Town.” Parents were supposed to watch the video with their kids. Later that week, the students were supposed to discuss the video in their virtual class with their teacher and classmates. The video tells the story of a white officer shooting a Black man, as told through the experiences of a young white girl and a young Black boy. While the story offers decidedly non-controversial lessons like people should be treated equally, it also forwards a not-so-subtle anti-police narrative that second graders are unlikely to understand in context. When the white girl asks why police shot the man, she’s told by her sister, “The cops shot him because he was Black.” The girl’s mom says it was a mistake to shoot the man, noting that, “It was a mistake that is part of a pattern” where white people are treated well, but not Black people. Next, a Black boy talks through the police shooting with his parents. The boy’s father notes that the officer “won’t go to jail.” The boy’s brother says, “Cops stick up for each other. And they don’t like Black men.” A second grader will certainly take these messages as facts. They are not. Grove principal, district didn’t say much Neither the school’s principal nor the teacher responded to multiple requests for comment. Instead, the school’s Director of Communications, Engagement, and Outreach emailed the Jason Rantz Show on KTTH. While Jodi Runyon lived up to the outreach part, she wasn’t initially interested much in communicating or engaging. She explained that the video issue “was successfully addressed at the school level” and said they’d provide no further comment. But she didn’t explain what, exactly, it meant to be addressed at the school level. How was the video vetted to begin with? Will it ever be shown again? After two follow-up emails, I finally got a response, though Runyon told me she wasn’t withholding information. “I was brief in my response because there really isn’t a story here, essentially, its a non-story,” she explained. That usually means there’s a story. She said the video was intended to be “an optional resource to build understanding in challenging times.” But after two parents complained, the teacher pulled the video. She says there was no “ill-intent” from the teacher and notes this happened toward the end of the last semester, when the school wasn’t just trying to figure out how to deal with the pandemic, but trying to figure out how to address social injustice. Runyon says “there was no further discussion as the teacher addressed the parent’s concerns appropriately.” Respectfully, that’s why this is a story. The video doesn’t seem to have been vetted. Pulling it shows it was inappropriate, which begs the question: Why was it put online to begin with? Teaching kids to be activists supporting left-wing causes in Gig Harbor There’s a similar controversy playing out in the Peninsula School District. Gig Harbor’s Discovery Elementary posted resources online for second grade students to explore the Black Lives Matter movement. It’s under the heading “Black Lives Matter Instructional Library.” This was on the student’s virtual classroom account. Many of the resources come in the form of books. Most of them are important and non-controversial. One, however, actively teaches your kids to become left-wing activists. The book? “A is for Activist,” read by Rage Against the Machine frontman Tom Morello. The book instructs students that “environmental justice is the way!,” celebrates May Day demonstrations, teaches students to demand “no justice, no peace” and “no war,” and asks students, “Are you an activist?” It also encourages students to “Agitate! Organize!” and promotes “Workers rights!” and “Union. Union yes!!” The story ends by promoting Zapatista, a far-left socialist political and militant group. In the video “Peaceful Fights for Equal Rights,” students are introduced to Colin Kaepernick. They’re encouraged to “take a knee.” They’re also told to organize a union and “strike.” They’re introduced to the concept that “white silence = violence.” Teaching kids to promote ‘police free schools’ At the end of the instructional library, the school offers additional resources, recommending you not reach out to the content creators with too many questions. Instead, the school asks you to “listen, reflect & donate.” Among those resources Discovery Elementary would like you to listen and donate to? The Woke Kindergarten YouTube host Ki. On her page, the content creator published a series of 60-second stories. In one, titled “Rainbow Baby,” Ki uses colors to highlight protests supporting the Black Lives Matter movement. At the end, Ki uses a photo promoting “Police-Free Schools.” In another, “Good Trouble,” Ki uses a photo from March for Our Lives, telling students it’s an example of how you show people you care about their lives. Discovery Elementary refuses comment When I first asked about the content, the principal forwarded me to their communications director. But Aimee Gordon didn’t want to discuss how the content was vetted, whether it’s appropriate for second graders, or even if they confirm if they posted the content to begin with. “We don’t have a comment for you on this topic,” she told the Jason Rantz Show on KTTH. I asked a series of follow-ups, then Gordon said she’d prepare a statement by 6:30 p.m. — 90 minutes later, no statement. If one comes, I’ll update this story. I did learn, however, that the last page of the slide (asking for donations) has been removed and the virtual classroom image of a Black fist saying “Black Lives Matter” has been replaced with three fists of different skin colors and text “A Collection of Resources Teaching Social Justice.” This is clearly inappropriate The content at these schools is very clearly inappropriate for second graders. The content is not age appropriate, whether it’s given directly to kids or offered to parents as resources. Teachers should have the judgment to understand this. And it shouldn’t take parental complaints for the schools to realize it. This should highlight the necessity to be actively involved in your child’s education, asking them what they learned and going over the material with them. When you see anything inappropriate, please screenshot it and email the show so we can review. If you have a 17-year-old in a current events course, these discussions, with an objective teacher, can be valuable as teenagers are better at grasping context. But a second grader being told all cops are racist? They’re not going to take away anything other than the direct message that all cops are racist. That belief may suit the school administration or teachers, but it shouldn’t be thrust upon young children. What’s next? Judging by some of this content, instead of giving students an A, they’ll get an ACAB.
病毒老大，你起的这个新艾迪不怕被当成恐怖主义么？
东西200斤真是soul mate
二十年的被中共渗透堕落！ 美国 到达今天， 不得不分裂 ！ 成为 恨国主义 与 爱国主义 两种 政治势力
最后， 无论是西方，东方，中方， 南方或者北方 都腐化， 堕落和败坏， 成为一模一样的无差别。
希望， 西方人，现代文明社会 一定要注意 不仅仅硬实力（军事，科学和技术）， 光明的，台面上的实力 才是实力。 软实力（看不见，摸不着），阴暗的， 台下面的实力 ， 也是实力！ 而且， 软实力的破坏性 非常强大！ 不仅仅是来源于 外部， 而且，通过内部 同样强有力， 而且， 防不胜防 例如： 黑命贵的 软实力（通过美国民主党内部来实现 从根本上颠覆）， 现在已经证明这一点很成功。
看看美国民主党 还是不是 五十年以前的 民主党！！！？？？
同理可推， 这样下去， 再过五十年以后的 美国 还是不是 现在的 美国？
这就是 软实力呀， 软实力！！！
中共深知 民主 很好！ 但是， 如果没有严格自律的法治精神，遵纪守法，素质高的好公民， 民主就是 按闹分配！ 谁没有底线， 谁 没有法律，法治的自觉意识。 谁就能够 得到 更多。从这一点来看， 中共比美国人聪明！ 美国人 认为 民主自由 是 普世价值， 放之四海而皆准。
中国宪政 时代的 袁世凯， 北洋军阀 就导致 中国宪政 根本行不通。 国民党 闹不过 枪杆子， 所以， 孙中山后来 不得不实行 一个党，一个领袖， 一支军队！ 后来， 国民党虽然得到天下，但是，民主宪政 荡然无存（蒋介石根本不搞民主， 但言论自由，新闻自由还是有的）。 中共 也深深知道， 民主 搞不过 枪杆子（暴力）， 笔杆子（欺骗）。 民主的基础 是 法治与道德素质。到了中共言论自由，新闻自由通通都没有。