Alina Chan@Ayjchan Replying to @baobaoxiaoliao and @Twitter I will say this much. This new preprint has managed to singlehandedly discredit lab origins more effectively than all of the Proximal Origins-type papers combined. Scientists who believe SARS2 has natural origins should be lining up to thank Dr. Yan for this wondrous report.
Alina Chan@Ayjchan Replying to @baobaoxiaoliao and @Twitter I will say this much. This new preprint has managed to singlehandedly discredit lab origins more effectively than all of the Proximal Origins-type papers combined. Scientists who believe SARS2 has natural origins should be lining up to thank Dr. Yan for this wondrous report. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2020-09-15 18:56
Alina Chan@Ayjchan Replying to @baobaoxiaoliao and @Twitter I will say this much. This new preprint has managed to singlehandedly discredit lab origins more effectively than all of the Proximal Origins-type papers combined. Scientists who believe SARS2 has natural origins should be lining up to thank Dr. Yan for this wondrous report. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2020-09-15 18:56
再加一个: https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen Dr. Angela Rasmussen @angie_rasmussen Virologist @Columbia . Write @Forbes . Host responses to emerging viruses & systems-level mind-blowing. And pugs. 1X Jeopardy! loser. Rep: I didn''t hold back about my opinion of that preprint claiming that #SARSCoV2#COVID19#coronavirus was engineered in a lab for this piece by @arawnsley@thedailybeast Do I think their analysis adequately supported their claims? Resounding NO.
再加一个: https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen Dr. Angela Rasmussen @angie_rasmussen Virologist @Columbia . Write @Forbes . Host responses to emerging viruses & systems-level mind-blowing. And pugs. 1X Jeopardy! loser. Rep: I didn''''t hold back about my opinion of that preprint claiming that #SARSCoV2#COVID19#coronavirus was engineered in a lab for this piece by @arawnsley@thedailybeast Do I think their analysis adequately supported their claims? Resounding NO. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2020-09-15 22:09
https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-bannon-linked-groups-push-study-claiming-china-manufactured-covid The study published by Bannon’s group on Monday is therefore particularly incendiary. “This virus is not from nature,” declared Dr. Li-Meng Yan, one of the scientists who conducted the study, during a Monday appearance on a British talk show. She called reports that the virus originated in a Wuhan meat market “a smoke screen” designed to obscure its true origins. But other virologists disagree and say the paper makes false claims about a number of basic facts.“Basically, it''s all circumstantial and some of it is entirely fictional,” Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, told The Daily Beast of the study. The paper leads with a claim that the coronavirus'' genes are "suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories" in China—an assertion Rasmussen says shouldn’t be surprising because “they are related SARS-like coronaviruses.” The study’s authors made a similar claim about a portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—which viruses use to breach and infect cells—and wrote that it’s similar to the original SARS virus in a “suspicious manner” and suggests genetic manipulation. “SARS-CoV also used ACE2 as a cellular receptor, as do other SARS-like bat coronaviruses,” Rasmussen says. “It is not suspicious and is in fact expected that the receptor binding domains that bind the same protein would be similar.” Rasmussen also said that the paper misrepresented basic facts about another part of coronavirus spike proteins known as furin cleavage sites. The authors claim that SARS-CoV-2’s cleavage site is “unique” and unseen elsewhere in nature. But according to Rasmussen, “Furin cleavage sites occur naturally in many other beta-CoVs, including MERS-CoV and other SARS-like bat coronaviruses.” 也省的我费力气打字了,看这位哥伦比亚大学病毒学家的就可以了。 不懂英文的可以用google translate。 再懒的我就帮总结下: 这位病毒学家说:闫的东西是胡说八道。
再加一个: https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen Dr. Angela Rasmussen @angie_rasmussen Virologist @Columbia . Write @Forbes . Host responses to emerging viruses & systems-level mind-blowing. And pugs. 1X Jeopardy! loser. Rep: I didn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t hold back about my opinion of that preprint claiming that #SARSCoV2#COVID19#coronavirus was engineered in a lab for this piece by @arawnsley@thedailybeast Do I think their analysis adequately supported their claims? Resounding NO. 平明寻白羽 发表于 2020-09-15 22:09
那又怎么样?也不是每个人都能做出正确分析。她就其中一个。 她的话不代表真理。反对她的人也会多的是。我见过这种人,自以为是. 哥大毕业做了11年,也没几篇文章。就是个爱博眼球的 正是这个人:Columbia University virologist Dr. Angela Rasmussen was one of the health experts who said the protests were “necessary” despite the fact that they would “facilitate #COVID19 也不是什么好人,水平也不怎么样。 而Alina Chan的文章从病毒进化的角度不点名的揭示病毒是人造的。
那又怎么样?也不是每个人都能做出正确分析。她就其中一个。 她的话不代表真理。反对她的人也会多的是。我见过这种人,自以为是. 哥大毕业做了11年,也没几篇文章。就是个爱博眼球的 正是这个人:Columbia University virologist Dr. Angela Rasmussen was one of the health experts who said the protests were “necessary” despite the fact that they would “facilitate #COVID19 也不是什么好人,水平也不怎么样。 PT8964 发表于 2020-09-15 22:20
回复 1楼yaeryiyi的帖子 It is interesting that Twitter did not suspend the account of a state spokesman who said the virus was from American army, instead they did it to a scientist who released her research of the virus. Why Twitter did it ? Twitter owes the world an explanation.
应该是发布有关疫情的未经证实的信息,阴谋论等原因被封掉的。看看吧。
挣五毛钱这么昧良心,这碗饭真不容易吃。
现在赚两毛真不容易,你要继续努力💪
不是早有说nih给武汉实验室拨款吗?奥巴马时期的事情,今年早些时候还有nih的大牛出来言之凿凿的说新冠绝非人造
无毛?哈哈哈
但她那些政府阴谋的言论实在让人难以相信
政府投毒选在大过年喜庆的时候?
有啥问题吗?
歪哥的blog账户,也是因为得罪了这里的大户们,被人集团举报。。。貌似到现在还没有解封。
啥叫虚假信息?有本事所谓的专家来反驳啊,上来就封号,这是害怕什么呢?
还有这种操作?花招也折腾到国外了
搞不好也不干净,人类都干了什么
李飞飞搞的鬼?
歪哥竟然都被封号了?简直没天理了,美国什么时候才能把五毛团灭啊
G刚查了。 still blocked.
根据时间,可能是前些天被大规模封号的那批“老”ID干的~~
twitter被烂金黄。应该告twitter。 闫的文章有论据,有逻辑推理,有理有据,twitter像土共一样耍流氓,告twitter
闫博士如果是legit的,她跟郭文贵混在一起,绝对是败招,连累把自己的信誉都降低了。
你真的吗?他们反中?
我也挺好奇的,那么长的文章你怎么一看就能明白的?
这些公司雇的中文内容审查员很多就是大陆的,随随便便就被收买了背后搞鬼。
因为有发言指南?
不知道断交部立坚同志的虚假信息怎么没有被封?
嗯 ,刚刚注资路
你要对美国正规公司稍微有点sense。就知道你说的有多么扯。
怎么不着调法?怎么个谎言?展开说说。总不能你觉得是谎言就是谎言吧。
难道是真的证据拿出来了?
哈哈哈,闫的“科学”报告正在被全球biologists群嘲
https://twitter.com/ProfTomEllis/status/1305963672225878016
https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1305959113537581059
Alina Chan @Ayjchan
Replying to @baobaoxiaoliao and @Twitter I will say this much. This new preprint has managed to singlehandedly discredit lab origins more effectively than all of the Proximal Origins-type papers combined. Scientists who believe SARS2 has natural origins should be lining up to thank Dr. Yan for this wondrous report.
说郭不着调的,不是自己打脸啪啪的响吗,郭的爆料恰恰相当准
文贵爆过什么料?
早说过,折腾得越起劲,舞台越大,聚光灯越强,眼球越多,这人就丢得越大。
海航,杨兰老公,令狐的儿子,很多料的
那不算什么,毕竟懂的不多,还有非常多的五毛。再多人嘲笑也没用。土共可以搞几十亿五毛来嘲笑。真的假不了,也抹杀不了。 武汉病毒人工起源也不需要从头合成,可以像闫说的以现有病毒为骨架改造,加入人工成分。Alina Chan的文章我看过,Alina Chan的文章从病毒进化的角度不点名的揭示病毒是人造的。与闫的不矛盾,从不同角度证明武汉病毒是人工起源,虽然她自己不认同两者是一致的。 越来越多的人会认识到病毒是土共恶意放出来的
文贵的爆料有真有假,被核实的是有,被证明是假消息的也有。我看过他的直播,在游船上叼着大雪茄破口大骂,很是痞气。这个人说不定哪天就倒了,实事求是而已,没必要把他捧多高。
坚夫莹妇编造美军投毒不是妖言惑众,闫丽梦二十多页的论文有数据有分析主张病毒非自然来源反倒是?
立坚的这个推可没删。
再加一个:
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen
Dr. Angela Rasmussen @angie_rasmussen Virologist @Columbia . Write @Forbes . Host responses to emerging viruses & systems-level mind-blowing. And pugs. 1X Jeopardy! loser. Rep:
I didn''t hold back about my opinion of that preprint claiming that #SARSCoV2 #COVID19 #coronavirus was engineered in a lab for this piece by @arawnsley@thedailybeast Do I think their analysis adequately supported their claims? Resounding NO.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-bannon-linked-groups-push-study-claiming-china-manufactured-covid
The study published by Bannon’s group on Monday is therefore particularly incendiary. “This virus is not from nature,” declared Dr. Li-Meng Yan, one of the scientists who conducted the study, during a Monday appearance on a British talk show. She called reports that the virus originated in a Wuhan meat market “a smoke screen” designed to obscure its true origins. But other virologists disagree and say the paper makes false claims about a number of basic facts. “Basically, it''s all circumstantial and some of it is entirely fictional,” Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, told The Daily Beast of the study. The paper leads with a claim that the coronavirus'' genes are "suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories" in China—an assertion Rasmussen says shouldn’t be surprising because “they are related SARS-like coronaviruses.”
The study’s authors made a similar claim about a portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—which viruses use to breach and infect cells—and wrote that it’s similar to the original SARS virus in a “suspicious manner” and suggests genetic manipulation. “SARS-CoV also used ACE2 as a cellular receptor, as do other SARS-like bat coronaviruses,” Rasmussen says. “It is not suspicious and is in fact expected that the receptor binding domains that bind the same protein would be similar.” Rasmussen also said that the paper misrepresented basic facts about another part of coronavirus spike proteins known as furin cleavage sites. The authors claim that SARS-CoV-2’s cleavage site is “unique” and unseen elsewhere in nature. But according to Rasmussen, “Furin cleavage sites occur naturally in many other beta-CoVs, including MERS-CoV and other SARS-like bat coronaviruses.”
也省的我费力气打字了,看这位哥伦比亚大学病毒学家的就可以了。
不懂英文的可以用google translate。
再懒的我就帮总结下: 这位病毒学家说:闫的东西是胡说八道。
为啥改叫娟了?e
那又怎么样?也不是每个人都能做出正确分析。她就其中一个。 她的话不代表真理。反对她的人也会多的是。我见过这种人,自以为是. 哥大毕业做了11年,也没几篇文章。就是个爱博眼球的
正是这个人:Columbia University virologist Dr. Angela Rasmussen was one of the health experts who said the protests were “necessary” despite the fact that they would “facilitate #COVID19
也不是什么好人,水平也不怎么样。
而Alina Chan的文章从病毒进化的角度不点名的揭示病毒是人造的。
等着看呗。郭路德自以为得计,其实是在自掘坟墓,花大力气推个阴谋论到前台,本来自己小圈子自high没人搭理,学术界懒得搭理。进入大众视界了,学术界就不能无视阴谋论对人民的危害了。
到时候骗局彻底暴露,信用崩溃,郭路德就更会彻底成为美国政界避之唯恐不及的垃圾,挨近了就会被连带损失信用。他们在美国寻租权力的路子会越来越狭窄。
原来费尽力气,主流的也巴结不上,只攀上缺钱的半农。现在半农失实势了,就拼命搞了闫来配合美国反华政客需要,希望能攀上新人。
可惜假的终究是假的,闫的曝光度越高,学界就不得不从正务中抽身来批评反驳这个本来根本就无视的笑话,这个闹剧就结束的越快,闫就变成负资产。他们攀新保护伞的意图就更没希望。
你的这些说法都是没有根据,没有内在逻辑的推论
你是五毛吧?
请继续你的表演
It is interesting that Twitter did not suspend the account of a state spokesman who said the virus was from American army, instead they did it to a scientist who released her research of the virus.
Why Twitter did it ?
Twitter owes the world an explanation.
看这帖子里多少人在上蹿下跳, 这话送给你正合适。 文章才发了一天,几十页, 看的懂人还在读文章, 你这就发了多少贴了。
最近才开始注意这个头像,才发现有这个头像的好多人都在骂五毛
你说的都是什么乱七八糟的
其实都是给固定人看的,信阴谋论,既看不懂,也不会去看科学界的解释,会把一切反对意见归为阴谋,譬如全世界的科学家都是被收买了🤣这类受众,所以我不觉得mm需要费心解释,你只会得到大帽子。
CNN出来走两步