So far, 我没有在Qanon上看出任何种族主义或者暴力倾向，有的只是对一些奇怪事情的合理质疑和推论，也许有些证据不足的东西在里面吧。这个主播也没有任何根据就给这个运动下了种族主义的定义，是人云亦云吗？Qanon 研究的东西很多是大多数人都很好奇的事情吧，他们给出得解释有的合理，有的看起来挺疯狂就是了。但他们做的就是揭露啊。
说的多好啊，Q的宗旨是不要让别人 divide us by race, gender, religion...大家要团结，看清楚背后真正的敌人， 这是极右种族主义吗？ 和民粹有一根毛的关系吗？ What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations? What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology? What happens when the news is no longer free from bias? What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent? What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy? What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party? Fact becomes fiction? Fiction becomes fact? When does news become propaganda? Identity creation? How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction? Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name? Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned? ‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion]. [If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true] Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases? Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions? Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources? Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed? Threat to intellectual freedom? Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? Read again – digest. Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS. Logical thinking. Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’? How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz? No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why? Pre/post 2016 election? Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]? Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]? When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative. Control of the narrative = power When you are blind, what do you see? They want you divided. Divided by religion. Divided by race. Divided by sex. Divided by political affiliation. Divided by class. When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers]. Divided you are weak. Divided you pose no threat to their control. When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep]. When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Q
承认也可能这中间发生了一点荒唐的事情，但荒唐的事情多了，各种宗教都有荒唐的事情发生，BLM更是荒唐至极，为啥FBI偏要把这个组织定义为Domestic terror？莫非真有什么事情要FBI来压制？
你从哪里看出来我有一丁点这个意思？我想正常讨论，别转移话题好不好。
pizzagate哪里证实了？ Q的好多预言哪里证实了？
记得在Epstein 事发之前，Q说过要关注Epstein这个人，这个人的罪恶极大。
QAnon说很多名人政要都是恋童癖，批萨门啥的，一看就是右翼的阴谋论抹黑
Epstein不是在监狱里被大统领灭口了吗？
能设置帖子智商权限岂不是更重要？连FBI都不知道干什么的就可以过滤掉了
FBI就都是干啥好事的 ？陷害过的人还少吗？什么通俄门，什么福林将军案件，你要无脑信你去信你的，别妨碍别人讨论。
矮婆斯坦整天跟克林顿还有一大窝好莱坞民主党混在一起，你说他被川普杀了，真有勇气啊
Epstein事发在pizzagate前很前的 他很早很早就被捉了 只是事情没有家喻户晓而已
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/XlxROGN_Nos
你飞科纽斯读多了吧 明明是被你们希拉里和克林顿搞灭口的
而Q是16年才出现的
所以上面认为“记得在Epstein 事发之前，Q说过要关注Epstein这个人，这个人的罪恶极大。“肯定是记混了 这个事情是因为me2被炒作起来（当然也有政治斗争的需要）。 说Q揪出来Epstein是不符合时间线的
比萨门是把希拉里手下和Epstein link在了一起 当时比较重要的一个论据就是麦德林案 说的有头有尾的
然而今年麦德林案的最有可能的嫌疑人在德国被揪出来了 是个德国变态白人 证据很强 看了这个案子之后回头想想当初追比萨们的热情 觉得被深深的欺骗了
楼主你早晚有一天也会发现自己被mislead了 就像当年的我一样
另外川粉大本营the_donald.win对Q的看法一直是谨慎怀疑的。他们一直不确定Q(if it exists) on which side 是否站在Trump这边。去看看挺有意思的。
嗯那，Q这个Movement的中心是不要相信主流媒体，而是通过另外一些渠道来看到真正的东西。他们散播的消息肯定有真有假， 有些甚至可能是故意造假来迷惑别人。 当然不会每条消息都信， 但我感觉还是有相当大的真的成分吧。 这种怀疑精神我觉得值得我们借鉴，美国政府的确有过很多见不得人的事情比如Project MKULTRA , 到现在大家也没搞清楚这种操纵人的实验究竟怎么回事吧。 还有这个 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2019/01/09/holding-u-s-treasuries-beware-uncle-sam-cant-account-for-21-trillion/#324da05f7644 五角大楼凭空消失21个Trillion，这钱到底干嘛了？什么人也吃不掉21Trillion 吧，够建造几十个城市的钱啊。
很早之前事发的那次没有出来儿童岛吧，只是个别的trafficking，而且也没扯出这么多政要明星之类的吧。 pizza gate难道儿童岛还不够辅证吗？ 还有这个blog https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/ 仔细看看，难道真觉得这事情是假的吗？
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article221404845.html
In 2005, police in https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Beach,_Florida" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">Palm Beach, Florida, began investigating Epstein after a parent complained that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter.https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#cite_note-Herald_timeline-7" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">[7] Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring an https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_prostitution" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">underage girl for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#cite_note-2008_story-8" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">[8] He served almost 13 months in custody, but with extensive https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_release" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">work release. He was convicted of only these two crimes as part of a controversial https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_deal" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">plea deal; federal officials had identified 36 girls, some as young as 14 years old, whom Epstein had allegedly sexually abused.https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#cite_note-deal-9" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">[9]https://m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#cite_note-10" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(107, 75, 161)">[10]
说川普通俄通到要和普京免谈时候才有机会密商的这种傻逼阴谋论你信了吗？反正全美国几千万民主党真信了。说“反智阴谋论”，民主党是最大的窝。Schiff信誓旦旦说有大量铁证，穆勒报告出来，他也不公布川普通俄的铁证。纽约时报的妓者写通俄拿了普利策奖，我看主流媒体这些男女婊子最下贱最反智
说的好!至少右翼的阴谋论有很多可以验证证据支持，比如John podesta的晚餐什么的,虽然证据不充分，但是其data mining的能力是智商超群的人才能做得了的，即使是淘气，那也是非常精致的淘气。真正傻大黑粗的就是猪党的这些阴谋论，就靠嗓门高,其他要什么没什么，并且最喜欢喋喋不休说明显比他们智商高30个点的右翼阴谋论反智，无知者无畏，也是醉了
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/gxNfcoO3JwQ
台湾的节目，说QAnon
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations? What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology? What happens when the news is no longer free from bias? What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent? What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy? What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party? Fact becomes fiction? Fiction becomes fact? When does news become propaganda? Identity creation? How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction? Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name? Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned? ‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion]. [If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true] Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases? Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions? Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources? Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed? Threat to intellectual freedom? Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? Read again – digest. Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS. Logical thinking. Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’? How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz? No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why? Pre/post 2016 election? Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]? Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events? Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]? When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative. Control of the narrative = power When you are blind, what do you see? They want you divided. Divided by religion. Divided by race. Divided by sex. Divided by political affiliation. Divided by class. When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers]. Divided you are weak. Divided you pose no threat to their control. When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep]. When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Q