I've been thinking some major relevant issues, such as environment (clean water), food safety, inequality, inventions, public health (heathcare/sanitary), etc. about China's development progress for some time. Actually they are complex, imo, and haven't been mentioned openly, I think.
I think one important think related to all the issues would be Positioing, which would perhaps cause some consequet problems currently, when the public as a whole has been leading to compare many things against the most technolgical advanced contries, most western.
imo, China is basically a huge country, too big with too many many major or minor issues (that nobody with whatever education background or IQ is able to resolve all of them over night), that people would expect and want them to be improved and up to the standards of major western countries almost immediately. But the reality could be questionable about them.
Actually, I think inventions and patents all is basically a capitalism thing for the purpose of produce and protecting capital and risk invested in the inventions. But most non-capitalsim countries do not need so much money and personal protections about their intellectual properties, perhaps. As they have been taken care of by their leaders, who usually do not need so many inventions. What the leaders need are catch up the level of living quality they like to have in their places.
Inventions need to invest a lot of time (many years for deep inventions), money (long time support and potentially hugh) and energy (success or fail afetr many years of investing in research education in advance, such as how many post graduates in advanced scientific research hight education and facfilities that much be heavily invested after physical buildings and eqipment and books awaiting high quality and innovative students of high IQs coming in from good selective secondary schools with Free playing environment since kids. instead of forced and heavy learning pressed by their parents and teachers due to competing rankings and honours, that some parents would not like their simple and useless playing materials - rather than hard information/knowledge as parents extect)!
That, that is a long time preparation and investment, nationally, perhaps since from their parents and teachers after major mentality change and reasonable mindset!)
"Managing people's expectations!" - That is the one think the leaders care and do daily, both western and eastern ones.
If you want 1 year of prosperity, grow grain. If you want 10 years of prosperity, grow trees. If you want 100 years of prosperity, grow people. 如果想要1年的繁荣，就种谷物。 如果您想要10年的繁荣，请种树。 如果您想要100年的繁荣，那就去成长人。 UQ
“If your plan is for one year plant rice. If your plan is for ten years plant trees. If your plan is for one hundred years educate children. ”
I think one important think related to all the issues would be Positioing, which would perhaps cause some consequet problems currently, when the public as a whole has been leading to compare many things against the most technolgical advanced contries, most western.
EvenOdd 发表于 4/29/2020 7:06:44 PM
Positioning 定位
Personally, I would like to see certain improvements from the top leaders that can be practically implemented by local leaders and staff. Slowing down the national economy for the sake of inequality and healthy living quality to all citizens should be attainnable taegets to be defined during this time, rather than more and more super riches or never-ceasing amazing gdp goals. That's what I wish!
Dear Sir, The development of Western science has been based on two great achievements, the invention of the formal logical system (in Euclidean geometry) by the Greek philosophers, and the discovery of the possibility of finding out causal relationships by systematic experiment (at the Renaissance). In my opinion, one need not be astonished that the Chinese sages did not make these steps. The astonishing thing is that these discoveries were made at all.
Sincerely yours, Albert Einstein
3. 美国也曾经是拿来主义，粗放增长，不尊重英国的知识产权。参考Foreign Policy文章“We Were Pirates， Too”https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/12/06/we-were-pirates-too/ 比如美国1790年的专利法写明保护任何人的专利，但是1793年就改为只保护美国公民的专利。美国财政部长汉密尔顿设立奖金系统获取欧洲技术，褒奖商业间谍如Thomas Digges。导致英国立法限制美国，比如英国的1803年《旅客法》就限制技术工人移民美国。 有希望就对了 发表于 4/29/2020 4:53:39 AM
说得好！ 很遗憾这是真的。世界需要改变需要进步，需要开放和创新，而不是倒退、不是关闭隔绝。我们需要支持那些排除阻力、带领世界改变的力量。也需要让那些鼠目寸光的人，不管那些人在中国还是在美国，让他们看见这种进步的趋势，并且尽量不让他们阻挡历史的车轮。
血淋淋的教训！写得好！
美国也有的，在纽约黑人多的地方，比如penn station,还有纽约唐人街的麦当劳。当然大部分美国人呆的地方是没有。
同意。可不可以说根源在于对普通人人权缺乏尊重，导致资源分配严重缺乏考量、普通阶层社会资源严重匮乏。代之的是严重的官权特权，和各种资源集中。造成整个社会缺乏缺乏动力、充满戾气、不安和钻营？特权阶层以自身利益为原则有限地鼓励生产和科技创新，社会进步一定程度上受特权阶层的权利分配和个人视野能力的限制。美国也有问题，但是整个社会对人是尊重的，社会基础财富积累和资源分配达到一定程度，整体文明和教育也达到一定程度。我特别不能理解和接受的就是越来越多的homeless造成显而易见的社会问题和整体焦虑。然而社会对他们视而不见，至少是没有有效可行的办法。哪怕这些homeless有粮票和生存保障，也无法消除这种现象造成的影响。哪位总统竞选人cover了这部分问题呢？
我觉得国内的高铁站和机场就是绣花枕头。机场基本靠摆渡车这个以前有帖子讨论过。我最不懂的就是，中国国内大部分高铁站连扶手电梯都没有。我回国的时候领着一个大行李走了不少台阶。真不敢想象如果是残疾人老人出行要怎么办。
国内有一个很有中国特色的现象，就是残疾人无障碍设备是不连续的。我举个例子，国内很多机场都有无障碍通道，因为机场的审核是很严格的，所以通常会按照设计要求安装残疾人通道等设施。
但是，出了机场范围，比如说到了摆渡车车站，这个一般不在机场内部，那就没有无障碍设施了。
我回国仔细观察过，国内很多很漂亮的建筑比如说mall之类的都有无障碍设施，但是出了这些建筑，就没有了。不像美国，所有的地方都有，残疾人可以毫无障碍地从家里走到各个地点。
而国内不行。
国内高铁之类的设计时候，可能根本就没有考虑到抬行李的事情，或者会想当然地认为扛行李大家都扛，你怎么就不能扛了，然后就不设计电梯或者廊坡了。
俄罗斯和日耳曼本来就是很智商上优秀的民族，如果不是独裁制度，他们的成就更大。从前的苏联和现在的俄罗斯都是独裁半独裁政策，所以俄罗斯基本废了。德国如果不迫害犹太人，就不会被美国收割了所有的精英，现在的德国肯定会更强大。美国今天的强大虽说制度上有优势，但是降不住别的国家实行的负面制度带来的破坏。同理如果中国实行的不是共产制度，中国现在绝对可以更厉害。制度上一正一负就成了美国的强大优势。
所以在国内很少看到残疾人士，因为他们没有人帮忙，出不了门
都不要说残疾人士了，推婴儿车的妈妈也很难靠自己一个人带着两个孩子出门
我在国内探亲中，快2千万人口的城市。国内大城市就是帖子里被描述的样子：看着外壳有些华丽，细看里面并不是。我去办理事情的新建大楼里，从外面看一座新高楼，进去有的地方没装修完就烂尾了，到卫生间附近，厕所味的。大商场如大悦城的保洁好得多，但是卫生间是蹲坑。街上的汽车是奇怪的牌子：哈弗、1、等等。汽车park在人行道上，导致行人只能上马路绕行。送外卖的骑着没有声音的电动车逆行从行人身边窜过。优点有：饭馆多，整体档次比出国前高了，因为国人就爱吃，所以叫吃货国嘛。国内主流论坛乌烟瘴气，祖安文化盛行。去了亲戚家，市区内的30多层的新建5年左右的高楼，里面的电梯破败，楼道比电梯里干净点有限。我觉得，国内生活的优点就是一个吃，不用做饭，选择多。至于医疗，有微信支付挺方便的，但是需要住院，没有床位。让急诊办病床，而急诊的医保报销小，更别提疗效好的药不在医保报销以里了
strongly agree
残疾人无障碍设备连续这是发达国家的标志。能做到的没几个呀，国内要是能做到那才见鬼了。。。
我也不知道出处呀！在YouTube 上看到王剑在community 上分享这个文章就复制搬过来了，我容易吗？
agree
并不是体制特点，恰恰是中国人的聪明，但是社会没有从0到1的土壤，所以国人的全部聪明都钻在改进上，靠把别人的1做到极致来发展和挣钱。
其实抄也没什么，自己国民能过好日子就行。但是占了便宜还跑出来骂娘，然后钱都被姓赵的搂住了，让老百姓勒紧裤，告诉他们这一切都是该死的资本主义，这就有点过分了。
有点悲壮。
星星之火 可以燎原，很多有识之士和爱国精英们散播在世界各地，尤其是坚定自由民主理念的人们，我们还有希望。即使我们这一辈子看不到光明降临在那片土地上，也要把光明和火种根植在孩子们的心底。
所以要想辦法。治理污染，回收，尋找乾淨的能源。開始踩點兒火星或者其他適合居住的星球
I've been thinking some major relevant issues, such as environment (clean water), food safety, inequality, inventions, public health (heathcare/sanitary), etc. about China's development progress for some time. Actually they are complex, imo, and haven't been mentioned openly, I think.
I think one important think related to all the issues would be Positioing, which would perhaps cause some consequet problems currently, when the public as a whole has been leading to compare many things against the most technolgical advanced contries, most western.
imo, China is basically a huge country, too big with too many many major or minor issues (that nobody with whatever education background or IQ is able to resolve all of them over night), that people would expect and want them to be improved and up to the standards of major western countries almost immediately. But the reality could be questionable about them.
Actually, I think inventions and patents all is basically a capitalism thing for the purpose of produce and protecting capital and risk invested in the inventions. But most non-capitalsim countries do not need so much money and personal protections about their intellectual properties, perhaps. As they have been taken care of by their leaders, who usually do not need so many inventions. What the leaders need are catch up the level of living quality they like to have in their places.
Inventions need to invest a lot of time (many years for deep inventions), money (long time support and potentially hugh) and energy (success or fail afetr many years of investing in research education in advance, such as how many post graduates in advanced scientific research hight education and facfilities that much be heavily invested after physical buildings and eqipment and books awaiting high quality and innovative students of high IQs coming in from good selective secondary schools with Free playing environment since kids. instead of forced and heavy learning pressed by their parents and teachers due to competing rankings and honours, that some parents would not like their simple and useless playing materials - rather than hard information/knowledge as parents extect)!
That, that is a long time preparation and investment, nationally, perhaps since from their parents and teachers after major mentality change and reasonable mindset!)
"Managing people's expectations!" - That is the one think the leaders care and do daily, both western and eastern ones.
Just a thought!
我一直在思考一些有关中国发展的重大问题，例如环境 (干净的水)，食品安全，不平等，发明，公共卫生（卫生保健/卫生）等。我认为它们实际上很复杂，而且还没有公开提及。
我认为，与所有问题相关的一个重要思想是“正题”，这可能会在当前引起一系列的难题，因为整个公众一直在将许多事物与技术最先进的，最西方的事物进行比较。
imo，中国基本上是一个大国，太大而又有太多重大或次要问题（任何人都没有教育背景或智商，可以在一夜之间解决所有这些问题），人们期望并希望他们得到改善，几乎立即达到了西方主要国家的标准。但是现实可能对他们有疑问。
实际上，我认为发明和专利基本上都是资本主义，目的是生产和保护发明中的资本和风险。但是，大多数非首都国家并不需要太多的金钱和知识产权保护。正如他们的领导者所照顾的那样，他们通常不需要那么多发明。领导者需要的是赶上他们希望拥有的生活水平。
发明需要投入大量时间（深层次发明要花费很多年），金钱（需要长期的支持并可能会很费钱）和 精力（成功或失败后需要预先投资研究教育很多年），例如多少名高级研究生科研，教育和设施投入大量资金，之后，有实体建筑，设备和书籍等待着高质量和高智商的创新学生从良好的精选中学进入，这些中学自孩子起就拥有免费的游戏环境，而不是他们的强迫和沉重学习家长和老师由于排名和荣誉的竞争，有些家长不喜欢他们简单而无用的游戏材料-而不是父母夸张的硬信息/知识！
在全国范围内，这是一个漫长的准备和投资过程，这也许是由于他们的父母和老师在重大的心态转变和合理的思维方式之后！）
“满足人们的期望！” -那是一个领导者每天都在关心和做的东西，无论是西方的还是东方的。
只是一个想法！
Q
Chinese Proverb
If you want 1 year of prosperity, grow grain. If you want 10 years of prosperity, grow trees. If you want 100 years of prosperity, grow people.
如果想要1年的繁荣，就种谷物。 如果您想要10年的繁荣，请种树。 如果您想要100年的繁荣，那就去成长人。
UQ
“If your plan is for one year plant rice. If your plan is for ten years plant trees. If your plan is for one hundred years educate children. ”
― Confucius
“如果您的计划是一年, 种植水稻。 如果您的计划是十年，请种树。 如果您的计划是一百年，请教育孩子。 ”
―孔子
Positioning 定位
Personally, I would like to see certain improvements from the top leaders that can be practically implemented by local leaders and staff. Slowing down the national economy for the sake of inequality and healthy living quality to all citizens should be attainnable taegets to be defined during this time, rather than more and more super riches or never-ceasing amazing gdp goals. That's what I wish!
就个人而言，我希望看到上面的领导者可以从本地领导者和员工实际实施的某些改进。 为不平等和健康生活质量而降低国民经济水平，这应该是在这段时间内可以实现的目标，而不是越来越多的超级富豪或永不停止的惊人的国民生产总值目标。 那就是我所希望的！
Q
《China's Crisis of Success》--曾预言中国经济崛起的哈佛教授对未来的展望。
https://pincong.rocks/article/3490
3. 逐渐民主化
虽然说今年特朗普的上台、英国脱欧以及菲律宾和印度的经济停滞令狭义的西方民主失去了它曾经在国内舆论享有的地位，中国人民依然对一个能够聆听民众诉求的政治体制报有向往。所有的亚洲奇迹经济体到了最后都实现了不同程度的民主化。像中国特有的一国两制一样，中国可能会发展出自己的一套民主制度。
言而总之，作者认为不管中国的经济改革成功还是失败，中共还是会因为不同的理由在未来需要面对政治改革的问题。
作者在一个宣讲会的一句话很好地诠释了他对未来的展望:“我虽然无法像25年前那样准确地告诉你中国未来会如何，但我可以确信变化（指中共治理模式）一定是会发生的”。
UQ
美国是掠夺地球的主力之一，我觉得欧洲人对地球友好很多。
你确定去的是中国吗？
国内残疾人有多惨呢？身边认识的两个例子。一个是从小智商低，其他四肢健全，每天乐呵呵的，长到二十多岁时候，心智就五岁孩子水平，妈妈不堪重负跳楼自杀。第二个例子，心智正常，但天生四肢发育不健全，只有一只胳膊会动，自己出版过书，一度被当成残疾人自强的典型宣传，30多岁的时侯自杀，因为觉得父母年纪大了还要辛苦照顾自己，心理负担太大。ps，这两家都算国内中产，体制内工作人员。
就算广东很多地方，除了深圳广州珠海等发达一点的城市，甚至连它们里面的城中村，都是非常脏乱差。你那么差异是一直住在中南海？
This kind of article may come from the same place as the 70 cents.
It gives world a false impression that it may be still possible for China to truly join the modern world, if given one more chance.
The truth is, the next virus will kill everything in this planet
中国市场对外不开放，潜力再大也没用。看看美国一年只能出口一千多亿给中国，而中国出口五千多亿给美国。贸易战就是你不开放给我，那我也不开放给你。
是的，中国如果没有这5000亿的外汇收入，外汇储备很快就会枯竭，就会没有美元购买石油等必须的物质。
中国的外汇哪里来的，绝大部分是和美国贸易来的。
没有中国，美国还是要采购，这些外汇还是要付出给其他国家的，同样的，那些被采购国也依旧要从美国继续反采购。而且说不定还会比中国更开放。
贸易的存在就决定了市场的存在，只不过一个十四亿的市场被拆分成了各个小市场而已。
说到点子上。中国的IP保护不完善，很难有人能坚持搞创新研发。
我不觉得FB进入中国有什么进步意义，对中国的发明力毫无帮助。至于双黄连，起码中国人还是有经验逻辑可循。美国人连消毒水都能喝进去，简直不可理喻。
Agree!
The innovators in China are not protected by government.
第二点，同意每一个字。第一点和第三点不同意。
第一点，火药，蜡烛，罗盘，是0到1的能力。火药到TNT也是0到1。。。这完全是不同的发明。不能因为产品是同类，就比作1到100。。
第三点，这个层主甚至带有大外宣特有的洗地思路：几百年前你做过，所以现在我做一样的事，你也不能骂。。。。照这个思路人类就不该有法律道德，几千年前人口买卖，奴隶随意打杀，所以现在也不能骂不能罚。。。。
衷心祝愿带这个思路洗地的五毛七毛们都呆大陆享受没有人权的生活，现在能提供这种生活的国家已经不多了。