The Chinese Student Protection Act established permanent residence for Chinese nationals that came to the United States from June 5, 1989 to April 11, 1990. The Act was targeted towards students. The CSPA was prompted by the political repression the Chinese faced after the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. Chinese students who were in the United States during the time of the protests participated in TV interviews, demonstration rallies, and were featured in newspaper articles. Chinese nationals were eligible to apply for permanent residency, even with expired passports. Over the years, the Act granted green cards to an estimated number of 54,000 Chinese nationals。
1991 年Pelosi 访华特意去天安门抗议 2019年8x8 纪念日,她发推转当年视频纪念: “28 years ago, we traveled to Tiananmen Square to honor the courage & sacrifice of the students, workers & ordinary citizens who stood for the dignity & human rights that all people deserve. To this day, we remain committed to sharing their story with the world. #Tiananmen30“
*The provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act require that the China annual limit bereduced by 1,000 annually to compensate for cases processed under that legislation.Approximately 700 numbers remain to be offset under this provision, with a total of 210numbers being deducted from the E3 category, and 490 from the E5 category
*The provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act require that the China annual limit bereduced by 1,000 annually to compensate for cases processed under that legislation.Approximately 700 numbers remain to be offset under this provision, with a total of 210numbers being deducted from the E3 category, and 490 from the E5 category
*The provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act require that the China annual limit bereduced by 1,000 annually to compensate for cases processed under that legislation.Approximately 700 numbers remain to be offset under this provision, with a total of 210numbers being deducted from the E3 category, and 490 from the E5 category
https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/FY07_AppC.pdf Offset to the per-country numerical level: Reduction of Unused numbers from the CHINA−mainland the CHINA−mainland born annual limit born annual limit Offset FY−1993 1,000 576 1,576 FY−1994 1,000 0 1,000 FY−1995 1,000 4,329 5,329 FY−1996 1,000 3,059 4,059 FY−1997 1,000 4 1,004 FY−1998 1,000 0 1,000 FY−1999 1,000 6,330 7,330 FY−2000 1,000 2,319 3,319 FY−2001 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2002 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2003 1,000 7,922 8,922 FY−2004 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2005 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2006 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2007 1,000 0 1,000 Total 15,000 24,539 39,539
chali1234 发表于 4/28/2020 8:24:17 PM
“2800+SO-300”这是你给移民局定的法律? 能看的懂英文不?来用中文翻译下INA是怎么规定so分配的。我都跟你说了,每年中国绿卡份额实际上根本没有被扣除,原理也解释过了,你是有多傻才看不明白,偷渡过来的? Allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers in accordance with Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 202(a)(5)
INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand in a calendar quarter will be insufficient to use all available numbers in an Employment preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits.
Since under INA Section 203(e) such numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability, greater number use by one country would indicate greater demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates.
Applicability of Section 202(e): When visa demand by documentarily qualified applicants from a particular country exceeds the amount of numbers available under the annual numerical limitation, that country is considered to be oversubscribed. Oversubscription may require the establishment of an earlier cut-off date than that which applies to a particular visa category on a worldwide basis. The prorating of numbers for an oversubscribed country follows the same percentages specified for the division of the worldwide annual limitation among the preferences. (Note that visa availability cut- off dates for oversubscribed areas may not be later than worldwide cut-off dates, if any, for the respective preferences.)
左派都这样 很讽刺 黄皮右逼就恨这样的
她没有变。。。
就连古代出了名的明君有几个老年不昏庸的?难道年轻时做了明君,老了昏庸就可以为所欲为了?年轻时救了十个人,老了再杀几个就还是好人??那还批评老毛的文革干嘛?
这是真的。 而且当时拿血卡的并不是在天安门/中国各地抗议的那波人, 那波人当时绝大部分被政府卡住不能出国。 后来陆陆续续出国了, 读书工作, 拿GC排队很久, 因为分配给中国籍的名额已经被占用了。
搞了半天血卡是那个老妖婆提的。俺们现在还在给拿血卡的还债呢。
认识拿血卡的,烂人没下限
这个法案保护的是当时和89以后几个月入境美国的中国学生, 给他们发了GC.
而当时在中国参加抗议的学生, 不是这个法案的受益者, 反而是受害人, GC 排期时间大幅增加。
嗯嗯嗯,韩国日本台湾新加坡,人口密度都远低于你们亲爱的兰州
谢谢信息
然后有新移民问我是不是华人在这边赚钱特别难啊
你大概从来没有研究过每年的职业绿卡发放名额吧,理论上中国eb3和eb5每年绿卡要被扣除300和700张来换六四学卡的债,实际执行上中国的名额扣除从来没有被执行过,六四学卡法案等于白送了中国人好几万的绿卡名额,Pelosi对中国人是真的好。
颇遇到过几个拿血卡的最爱嘲笑近些年的没绿卡的学生
可以批评,但作为中国人我们要对她心怀感激
那是不是作为49年后生的所有人要对老毛心怀感激?
你神经病吧,不管49年前还是49年后,老毛做过啥好事?
感激她,但是64学运那些学生是要骂?为什么?
很多中国人都十分自私,认为只要不是自己受益,就可以随便骂。佩罗西真的可以算是始终如一的反CCP,但是对华人一直都很好的政客。我觉得作为中国人,入了美籍,政治倾向是民主党还是共和党都没关系,但至少要有是非观。
Re,看了这楼那么多这种回复,真对华人这个群体绝望。以后连白左都反华了,难道大家就高兴了?
中国人这个民族,就不值得别人对我们好,都是一群只会算计的自私鬼
Pelosi 过去做过不少有益的事,但也有许多丑恶的记录, 大家就事论事就行。
Trump 也是一样。现在媒体&民众根本不看/听他具体的话/事,either是逢川必反,or逢川必粉。
这个锅我们中国人不背~~
你说的都是从小接受共产党教育长大的那群人,
他们在国内是自干五,到了美国是川粉,
眼中只有利益,没有道义。
完全同意!!!
请问没执行过的source??
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-statistics.html
DOS官方发布的历年职业移民发卡统计,自己看看EB3和EB5给中国人少发了没
对,著名的天安门广场四君子,他和刘晓波一起,救下了最后滞留广场的几千名学生的生命。
那是中国可以吃SO,你咋不看看中国eb123每年名额都比2800多好多呢。如果不扣血卡,中国每年可以多吃1000名额。EB3少于2800的名额的年份有好多年,你哪只眼看到EB3没给中国少发。
FY2011 2129
FY2012 2426
FY2013 2725
FY2015 2770
移民局专门发过2020FY的绿卡文件,里面清楚的说明2020FY中国还剩700个64绿卡需要还,EB3扣除210个,EB5扣除490个。64血卡的债中国移民花了30年才还完。
*The provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act require that the China annual limit bereduced by 1,000 annually to compensate for cases processed under that legislation.Approximately 700 numbers remain to be offset under this provision, with a total of 210numbers being deducted from the E3 category, and 490 from the E5 category
https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Immigrant-Statistics/Annual%20%20Numerical%20%20Limits%20-%20FY2020.pdf
典型的manipulate数据。每年1000一直在扣直到还完债。不过因为中印也分其他国家用不完剩下的spill over,所以数看起来会多一些。
所以是直到今年结束,中国人终于花了30年还完了当年发的64血卡。
要请你具体说说这个64血卡名额,民权运动是怎么从白人手里挣来的。你上面那楼给了美国移民局官方的书面说法,都明确说了每年从中国人名额里扣1000,今年是最后一年,还剩700要扣。
?? 文不对题 你这个根本没说明没扣啊 别骗人了 我家eb235都有 天天盯这个。明明就是一直扣到2020。后来的eb中国人简直是b了狗了。
你是真不知道,还是故意装糊涂?
这些移民配额,都是一次次民权运动的成果。
终于理解那些只有利益没有道义的川粉们,为什么这么痛恨六四,痛恨民主运动,痛恨民主党和佩大妈了。
他说东 你说西
移民法规定吃完了自己的country cap,剩下的so要按照PD来分。睁开你的狗眼看看最近10年中国EB3每年吃了多少绿卡名额,你这种连EB3 skilled和unskilled都分不出的人就别在这献丑了。
FY2019 3682
FY2018 4312
FY2016 2815
FY2015 3211
FY2014 3676
FY2013 3229
FY2012 2827
FY2011 2542
FY2010 3676
移民配额每个国家不超过7%,请教是哪一次次民权运动的成果?please name them.肯定没有楼主说的这个法案对吧?因为这个法案并没有从白人那里弄名额给中国人,都是中国人自己的名额在倒腾。我在本楼的回帖,还有楼主的主贴,都是关于这个法案是怎么帮到中国人的,咱们就事论事行吗?
re
而且搞个political show 不分是谁的乱发一通卡 连来逛一圈的都发, 然后从后来人头上扣回来 恕我看不出来民权体现在哪里。在中国职业移民政策问题上民权民权的,我觉得你肯定没有走过h1 eb这条路。其中的担惊受怕,humiliation,实在不觉得这是谁给我争取来的民权。
还个屁,实际操作上移民局根本就没扣。给你举个例子,本来EB5总共一万个额度,其他国家吃完了自己名额剩了6000张卡,中国EB5虽然理论上没有了国家配额,但是吃到了6000张的so;如果六四法案不执行的话,中国EB5吃完了自己的700张国家配额,那就要吃剩余的5300张so,最后还是吃6000张卡。0(cap)+6000(so) = 700(cap)+5300(so)。 佩罗西的六四血卡法案等于白送了中国人好几万张绿卡。
自己先学学美国的INA移民法,看看so的分配法律是怎么规定的
谁给你说SO按PD来分的,中国FB没用的完中国EB可以先吃,世界FB没用完的世界EB才平分。
移民局白字黑子的写了中国每年要从绿卡里扣除多少名额,还嘴硬不承认。中国EB3不管超出了多少名额,都是2800+SO-300。如果SO大于300,eb3得到名额超过2800,但血卡也是实际被扣除的。
你个没在美国工作一天,EB123,H1b规则都不清,整天幻想S386的就别出来丢人现眼了。
https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/FY07_AppC.pdf
Offset to the per-country numerical level: Reduction of Unused numbers from the CHINA−mainland the CHINA−mainland born annual limit born annual limit Offset FY−1993 1,000 576 1,576 FY−1994 1,000 0 1,000 FY−1995 1,000 4,329 5,329 FY−1996 1,000 3,059 4,059 FY−1997 1,000 4 1,004 FY−1998 1,000 0 1,000 FY−1999 1,000 6,330 7,330 FY−2000 1,000 2,319 3,319 FY−2001 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2002 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2003 1,000 7,922 8,922 FY−2004 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2005 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2006 1,000 0 1,000 FY−2007 1,000 0 1,000 Total 15,000 24,539 39,539
“2800+SO-300”这是你给移民局定的法律? 能看的懂英文不?来用中文翻译下INA是怎么规定so分配的。我都跟你说了,每年中国绿卡份额实际上根本没有被扣除,原理也解释过了,你是有多傻才看不明白,偷渡过来的?
Allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers in accordance with Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA) Section 202(a)(5)
INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand in a calendar quarter
will be insufficient to use all available numbers in an Employment
preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to
the annual per-country limits.
Since under INA Section 203(e) such numbers must be provided strictly in
priority date order regardless of chargeability, greater number use by one
country would indicate greater demand by applicants from that country with
earlier priority dates.
Applicability of Section 202(e): When visa demand by documentarily qualified
applicants from a particular country exceeds the amount of numbers
available under the annual numerical limitation, that country is considered
to be oversubscribed. Oversubscription may require the establishment of an
earlier cut-off date than that which applies to a particular visa category
on a worldwide basis. The prorating of numbers for an oversubscribed country
follows the same percentages specified for the division of the worldwide
annual limitation among the preferences. (Note that visa availability cut-
off dates for oversubscribed areas may not be later than worldwide cut-off
dates, if any, for the respective preferences.)