纽约的家长们:发电邮给教育局保护你家孩子的利益 【内有email模版】

s
sharlene
楼主 (北美华人网)
[table=98%]
Dear Parents,

The DOE is finalizing the grading policy for our students --- official statement will come any moment. Dr. Linda Chen (Chief Academic Officer, DOE) shared the proposal with elected officials on Friday 4/24. Here are the facts: To be clear, these are for the FINAL GRADE for the full academic year, not just for the remote learning period marking period.

K-7th grades: S Satisfactory or N Needs Improvement (S / N)
8th grade: S / N with the addition of Incomplete
9-12th grades: No change - use existing grading scale (0-100, 1-5) but no Fail, only Incomplete; student has until Jan 2021 to complete the work.

If you disagree with the proposed grading change above, we urge you to make your voices heard. Below is an email template you may personalize. Please send this out TODAY so that it is in their Inbox ASAP.

Directions to Parents:

Send email to:
[email protected],
[email protected].gov,
[email protected]

Suggested Subject line: Grade Policy Must Work for All Students

Please personalize: Feel free to edit this to reflect your personal position.

Sign this email with your name and your child/children's schools.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

April 26, 2020

Dear Mayor De Blasio, Chancellor Carranza and Dr. Chen,

I am a concerned parent of a NYC public school student. I understand the DOE is proposing to use Satisfactory or Needs Improvement (S/N) as the final grade for all K-8th graders and maintain existing grading for high school students.

I am opposed to this grading policy and find it to not only be unfair and inequitable, but that it also violates the concept of "do no harm".

Our kids have worked hard and earned grades for the first 6 months of the 9 month school year. To reduce the final grade for the entire year down to S / N is a crude and unfair grading metric.
This new and simplistic grading does not give the feedback we as parents want on our children's academic performance. It also does not give credit to our children's hard work and achievement before schools closed and remote learning commenced. Worse, it doesn't reward or motivate the learning that must continue in this new remote learning situation.

On the other hand, students in 9-12th grades should be given the flexibility of dropping their lowest grade in keeping with the "do no harm" approach. We should have compassion towards students who are now struggling with difficult remote learning situations and hardships and be flexible where needed, while simultaneously motivating and encouraging all students to continue to give their best efforts under these new and difficult conditions.

I urge the DOE to reconsider. The No Harm grading proposed by PLACE NYC makes the most sense: keep grading consistent during remote learning and drop the lowest grade in determining their final grade. It is the most fair and flexible approach to grading for all our students.

[Parent name, School name]

[table=98%]
s
sharlene
家长们,教育局即将推出学生评定政策,Linda Chen博士(教育局学业主管)于上周五24日把这个计划告知了一些民选官员。最重要的是:⚠️这个成绩评定将是整个学年的成绩!⚠️而不仅仅是网课期间的成绩⚠️
* 学前班-7年级:S=满意 / N=需要提高
* 8年级:S=满意 / N=需要提高和未完成
* 9-12年级: 无变化,遵照原来的方法(0-100,1-5)但是不会有Fail,而是用“未完成”取而代之。学生可于2021年1月完成任务。
如果你不同意上述评定方法,我们真切希望你能发出自己的声音!我们准备了下面👇的邮件,你也可以做一些更改,请于⚠️今天⚠️发出,这样周一早上就可以被看到!
s
sharlene
搬运: I want to explain some thing especially to middle school parents. This grading will affect high school applications. Our 8th graders go on to many screens schools in addition to the SHSAT schools. Without grades, those who don’t want screen schools or specialized HS will push for lottery admissions. This year, DOE says it won’t use attendance. The state test was cancelled. The only thing we have left is the grade. If it’s only S/N, schools won’t be able to distinguish kids with 95 from kids with 75.
E
EEswine
回复 2楼sharlene的帖子

不是很明白,是表示还是希望要分数,而不是S/N么?前后两种打分方式的影响什么呀?
南京菜农
已发,谢谢。
s
sharlene
纽约市的学校和国内类似,设立重点初中重点高中,需要看入学考试成绩、平时在校成绩和出勤。中国人买贵房子好学区,督促孩子学习很多时候就是为了提高进入重点初中和高中的机会 这次covid19,教育局要求取消考勤(这个OK),取消州考(这个也OK)。如果要求不看3月以后的平时成绩,我个人也理解。但是现在教育局要求取消整个Fall 2019-Spring 2020的成绩,也就是说,成绩好的小孩(许多华人小孩在这个类别)的努力和优势被完全抹去。 等到夏天和初秋,各个重点初中和高中开始招生。没有考勤,没有平时成绩,看什么标准呢?纽约市里深蓝的幺蛾子特别多,有些亚洲家长觉得教育局很可能趁机大力削弱靠merit录取,而是靠lottery。所以家长们在教育局对小孩教育下狠刀子以前,必须发出声音,尽量不让他们抽刀子太狠。
r
rengra
好的高中都是要考的,其他区别大吗?一般就看学区。明年申请要求会不会改也不知道,可能看6年级的。而且没state tests, 怎样能保证老师的评分公正呢。
M
MeerkatNYC
纽约市的学校和国内类似,设立重点初中重点高中,需要看入学考试成绩、平时在校成绩和出勤。中国人买贵房子好学区,督促孩子学习很多时候就是为了提高进入重点初中和高中的机会

这次covid19,教育局要求取消考勤(这个OK),取消州考(这个也OK)。如果要求不看3月以后的平时成绩,我个人也理解。但是现在教育局要求取消整个Fall 2019-Spring 2020的成绩,也就是说,成绩好的小孩(许多华人小孩在这个类别)的努力和优势被完全抹去。

等到夏天和初秋,各个重点初中和高中开始招生。没有考勤,没有平时成绩,看什么标准呢?纽约市里深蓝的幺蛾子特别多,有些亚洲家长觉得教育局很可能趁机大力削弱靠merit录取,而是靠lottery。所以家长们在教育局对小孩教育下狠刀子以前,必须发出声音,尽量不让他们抽刀子太狠。
sharlene 发表于 4/27/2020 12:04:14 PM

纽约市的幺蛾子特别多,总是趁机出来推他们的agenda. 坚决抵制!