回复 28楼mindstorm的帖子 "大家共同向前看，共同发展，甚至统一成欧盟一样才最好" Perhaps a practical and rational way indeed, I believe! 我相信，也许确实是一种实用和理性的方式！ Possibly, a China Union would be truly benefitial to both Repulic China and Free China, in order to avoid any war again. 为了避免再次发生战争，中国联盟可能对中华人国和自由中国都有真正的好处。
Perhaps a practical and rational way indeed, I believe! 我相信，也许确实是一种实用和理性的方式！
Possibly, a China Union would be truly benefitial to both Repulic China and Free China, in order to avoid any war again. 为了避免再次发生战争，中国联盟可能对中华人国和自由中国都有真正的好处。 EvenOdd 发表于 4/25/2020 5:49:36 PM
Furthermore, we would then have a Europe Union (including Africa for manufacturing) to be leaded by the European Union, An America Union (including South America for manufacturing) leaded by the US, and An Asia Union leaded by the China Union.
此外，我们将拥有一个由欧盟领导的欧洲联盟（包括非洲 for 制造），一个由美国领导的美洲联盟 (包括南美 for 制造), 和一个由中国联盟领导的亚洲联盟。
Furthermore, we would then have a Europe Union (including Africa for manufacturing) to be leaded by the European Union, An America Union (including South America for manufacturing) leaded by the US, and An Asia Union leaded by the China Union.
此外，我们将拥有一个由欧盟领导的欧洲联盟（包括非洲 for 制造），一个由美国领导的美洲联盟 (包括南美 for 制造), 和一个由中国联盟领导的亚洲联盟。
Q [Idea] Natural Peace Living: One Country Two Systems - Mainstream + Nonmainstream
Statistically and historically speaking, there is always a mainstream plus a non-mainstream in nearly all countries, regarding cultural, religious, geographical, racial, commercial, and/or other aspects.
Well-designed structure and practice of one country two systems, backed by the UN, should be applied to probably all countries individually, in order to greatly reduce conflicts, and to maintain sustainable global peace! Perhaps many wars could been avoided.
The 14th Dalai Lama's 2005 proposal for "high-level autonomy" for Tibet, evolved from a position of advocating Tibetan independence, has been compared to "one country, two systems". He has said that his proposals should be acceptable to China because "one country, two systems" is accommodated for in the Chinese Constitution. State media rejected this claim, pointing out that "one country, two systems" was designed for the capitalist social systems of Hong Kong and Macau, which had never existed in Tibet.[34]
...
One country, two systems proposals for other countries
Muhammad Cohen, writing for Asia Times, suggests the "one country, two systems" formula is possible solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.[35]
North Korea suggests the "one country, two systems" formula to bring about Korean unification, through a confederation of two systems within one country.[36] China has also promoted the idea; the difference between North Korea's motivation and China's is that North Korea seeks to maintain two separate governments, while China seeks gradual unification as it brings stability to the Korean peninsula with one centralised government.[37]
Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney said the arrangement linking Hong Kong with China could be a possible solution for addressing the fate of Northern Ireland after Brexit. The border between EU member Ireland and British-ruled Northern Ireland is becoming an increasing concern in divorce talks with Britain, with Dublin demanding that the frontier remain completely open, to avoid endangering the peace process.[38]"
U.S. version of 'one country, two systems' by Kuni Miyake
WASHINGTON – I am writing this column in a Washington hotel room at midnight. Whenever my room is upgraded, I always watch two TV sets, one with CNN on in the bedroom and another with Fox News on in the living room. Why do I do this? Because those two channels seem to represent completely different groups of American constituents. "
April 25, 2020 / 6:09 PM / in 10 hours Trump and Putin issue rare joint statement promoting cooperation Jonathan Landay
3 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin issued a rare joint statement on Saturday commemorating a 1945 World War Two link-up of U.S. and Soviet troops on their way to defeat Nazi Germany as an example of how their countries can cooperate. ...
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us, only sky Imagine all the people Livin' for today Ah Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion, too Imagine all the people Livin' life in peace You You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one Imagine no possessions I wonder if you can No need for greed or hunger A brotherhood of man Imagine all the people Sharing all the world You You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will live as one UQ
Furthermore, we would then have a Europe Union (including Africa for manufacturing) to be leaded by the European Union, An America Union (including South America for manufacturing) leaded by the US, and An Asia Union leaded by the China Union.
此外，我们将拥有一个由欧盟领导的欧洲联盟（包括非洲 for 制造），一个由美国领导的美洲联盟 (包括南美 for 制造), 和一个由中国联盟领导的亚洲联盟。
未来世界只有两极，只有一个政府，中，美联合执政。财团主导权力会很大，政府权利远远超出现在的联合国的 mindstorm 发表于 4/26/2020 1:30:52 AM
Everything could be possible for open minded people, but perpetual world peace would be attained onlywhen the super powers happily agreed to do so, imo.
It'd be better that a few bodies such as Switzerland, (Modern, not old) Russia, and Australia could independently coordinate the proposed world peace model. imo.
Theoretically, a 3-stand chair would be much mush more stable and reliable in long term, than a 2-stand chair, for the sake of balance.
对于开放的人 一切都有可能，但是只有当超级大国高兴地同意这样做时，世界永久和平才能实现。
最好由瑞士，（现代，非旧）俄罗斯, 和澳大利亚等几个机构独立协调提议的世界和平模式。 imo。
从理论上讲，为了保持平衡，三脚的椅子比两脚的椅子从长远来看更加稳定和可靠。
The history for both the US and (modern) China is still short relatively. That should allow us to be patuemtly see the pros and cons of existing super powers for their current experiences and developments. As Europe as a whole could be an effective balancing power, in theory and reality, perhaps, due to the long-time development history, rathre than imbalancing policies potentially, imo.
Everything could be possible for open minded people, but perpetual world peace would be attained onlywhen the super powers happily agreed to do so, imo.
It'd be better that a few bodies such as Switzerland, (Modern, not old) Russia, and Australia could independently coordinate the proposed world peace model. imo.
Theoretically, a 3-stand chair would be much mush more stable and reliable in long term, than a 2-stand chair, for the sake of balance.
对于开放的人 一切都有可能，但是只有当超级大国高兴地同意这样做时，世界永久和平才能实现。
最好由瑞士，（现代，非旧）俄罗斯, 和澳大利亚等几个机构独立协调提议的世界和平模式。 imo。
从理论上讲，为了保持平衡，三脚的椅子比两脚的椅子从长远来看更加稳定和可靠。
The history for both the US and (modern) China is still short relatively. That should allow us to be patuemtly see the pros and cons of existing super powers for their current experiences and developments. As Europe as a whole could be an effective balancing power, in theory and reality, perhaps, due to the long-time development history, rathre than imbalancing policies potentially, imo.
I think we should not underestimate the significancy of Europe's development.
Perhaps, when the two super powers progress too far relatively to the Europe's contemporary focus, imo, they should slow down and review to see how they could do more about inequality and weelbeing of their own citizens, before just running too far.
One example is aeroplane manufacturing, another low-cost medicare infrastrcture, besides homelessness issue. Certain missteps can be seen by now. Considering that spending so much money in preparing wars.
April 25, 2020 / 6:09 PM / in 10 hours Trump and Putin issue rare joint statement promoting cooperation Jonathan Landay
3 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin issued a rare joint statement on Saturday commemorating a 1945 World War Two link-up of U.S. and Soviet troops on their way to defeat Nazi Germany as an example of how their countries can cooperate. ...
I'd have to admit that I spent just very little time on primitive information on the topic.
My gues is a solid frameowrk of the structure already there officially, and that it's simply a rational process of normalising the relations among the relevant leaders in China.
我不得不承认，我只花很少的时间在有关该主题的原始信息上。
我的猜测是正式存在的结构的坚实基础，这只是规范中国有关领导人之间关系的合理过程。
Q 'One country, two systems' can continue beyond 2047, says Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam •16 Jan 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B91y25Mfq7Q
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam has said that ''one country, two systems'' could last beyond 2047. This latest comment is widely seen as an attempt to appeal to her critics, who are concerned about Beijing's clout over Hong Kong, and the city's future. Mrs Lam has urged young people not to misunderstand the system, saying it has ensured education and stable jobs in Hong Kong. Under the accord that saw Hong Kong's return to China from Britain, "'one country, two systems'' gives the city 50 years of autonomy. This means the city has been able to maintain its own capitalist economy and Western-style institutions, but that guarantee expires in 2047.
" The Bolshoi presents to its public opera and ballet productions of Russian classics (20th century included), Western classics (likewise inclusive of recognized 20th century masterpieces), and specially commissioned works. "
I think we should not underestimate the significancy of Europe's development.
Perhaps, when the two super powers progress too far relatively to the Europe's contemporary focus, imo, they should slow down and review to see how they could do more about inequality and weelbeing of their own citizens, before just running too far.
One example is aeroplane manufacturing, another low-cost medicare infrastrcture, besides homelessness issue. Certain missteps can be seen by now. Considering that spending so much money in preparing wars.
Another live example from news today, for a low-price affordable product from European designers that other money-greedy companies would not care to produce. 今天新闻中的另一个生动的例子是，欧洲设计师以低价买得起的产品，而其他贪婪的公司则不愿生产。
www.cam.ac.uk › research › news › open-source-ventil...
7 days ago - Built primarily for use in low- and middle-income countries, the OVSI ventilator can be cheaply and quickly manufactured from readily available ... UQ
When President Vladimir Putin ordered most Russians to stay home through April 30 to contain the coronavirus, he said employees must continue to be paid. A joke soon went viral online: “Putin walks into a bar and declares: ‘Beer for everyone. It’s on the house!’”
Weeks later, the president promised subsidies and loans for private-sector companies to help them pay wages. But businesses paralyzed by the lockdowns imposed by the majority of Russia’s 85 regions see the Kremlin’s support as sorely insufficient.
While the non-food retail and services sector ground to a halt, big state-controlled companies and industrial plants have kept operating. Putin has promised subsidies to airlines, car and aircraft plants, and defense manufacturers, among others.
The Kremlin’s approach contrasts with that of the United States and many EU nations, which provided more generous subsidies to workers and businesses.
Q February 13, 2008 "Sorry Day" - Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd addresses the Australian House of Representatives, apologizing for the government programs which took children from Aboriginal families, the "stolen generations".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKWfiFp24rA
YouTube - Feb 13, 2018 Prime Minister says sorry ABC News (Australia) YouTube - Nov 16, 2009 People also ask When did Rudd say sorry? What did Kevin Rudd say in his sorry speech? Why did Kevin Rudd Apologise to the Stolen Generation? Why did the Australian government apologize to the Aboriginal population? Rudd's apology, 10 years on: the elusive hope of a ... www.theguardian.com › australia-news › feb › looking... Feb 11, 2018 - Momentum for change has 'crumbled away' in the 10 years since Kevin Rudd said sorry, Indigenous leaders say: 'We have gone backwards' Apology to Australia's Indigenous peoples | Australian Institute ... aiatsis.gov.au › explore › articles › apology-australias-indi... Jul 31, 2012 - Uploaded by Kevin Rudd In his Apology to Australia's Indigenous people's the then Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, made the following ... Apology to Australia's Indigenous peoples - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Apology_to_Australia's_Indi... On 13 February 2008, the Parliament of Australia issued a formal apology to Indigenous ... The apology was delivered by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Stances on the proposed ... · Apology text · Opposition leader's ... Apology to Australia's Indigenous peoples | australia.gov.au info.australia.gov.au › our-country › our-people › apol... Feb 13, 2008 - Title, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, MP – Apology to Australia's Indigenous peoples. Duration, 4 minutes, 3 seconds. Recorded, Wednesday ... UQ
April 25, 2020 / 6:09 PM / in 10 hours Trump and Putin issue rare joint statement promoting cooperation Jonathan Landay
3 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin issued a rare joint statement on Saturday commemorating a 1945 World War Two link-up of U.S. and Soviet troops on their way to defeat Nazi Germany as an example of how their countries can cooperate. ...
Perhaps Trump should get a Nobel Prize after establishing a Korea Union and a China Union, with his help! By lifting their baggage, for just too much and too heavy.
imo, the model of our Peace World would require the 3 coordinators to perform their functional duties individually.
* Russia as a politics-emphasis bridge betwwen democratic and republic political systems, based on various change experences from many countries. * Switzerland as a economics-emphasis bridge between planned and liberal economic systems. The peace world should be driven by frequently updated quantitative model for the 3 major economies about fiscal and monetary policy measures. * Australia as a diplomatics-emphsis bridge between eastern and western cultural systems, in order to reduce conflicts among culturs.
1. 跟北洋政府有外交关系，苏联派驻大使
2. 跟广州国民政府有联系，苏联派顾问团
3. 跟中国共产党有联系，苏联派共产国际代表
然后，苏联玩弄中国三大势力于股掌，挑拨这三大势力内斗。先支持广州国民政府北伐，打掉北洋政府；然后支持共产党，打掉国民政府。最后，忽悠共产党参加韩战和越战，跟美国人打。
这些内斗和对外战争中，死的难道不都是中国人？
搞不懂为什么厉害国长大的一说到国际关系就是这句话。。。
这句话是谁说的？说的对不对？按照这句话为外交原则的国家现在怎么样了？
都不去考虑的。
还用得着挑拨，普京俄爹就从来没把包儿子放眼里
最后一句不对，因为游戏一方太无耻，屡次作弊犯规，这游戏没法玩下去了
能说 who cares 吗？看到其它国家疫情爆发时,厉害国人民上上下下自我膨胀成这样,17 年两次 SARS, 上上下下没有一点反省, 什么样的人民值得什么样的政府,上上下下都没有道德底线。值得互相拥有彼此, 要是能关起门来不祸害世界就更好了。
TG的尿性从来就没改过，谁帮它就骂谁坑谁，概莫能免
苏联太牛逼了！这些细节真是头一次听说。
你是五毛粉红我不应该支持你，但这句话真的没错
这些事情，多数过去都快100年了，就是韩战，也都70年前的事情了。。。不知道这个LZ想说什么。
实事求是的说，如果说共产党只是在49年统一了一切支离破碎的中国，那么苏联对于中国后期的帮助，基本上相当于直接初始化中国，让整个中国完整化，开始工业化，让中国人有饭吃。没有韩战，不会有这一切。 而美国在89年后对于中国的帮助，基本上相当于重建了中国，让中国改头换面开始快速上升，让中国人开始有钱。没有越战，没有这一切。
作为人，要多记恩情，少记仇恨。作为国家，也一样，需要多多感恩才更有未来。
你也太看得起这个帖子。这么几个字就能“挑拨中俄关系”？？
不想说什么。抗日战争，日本鬼子对华侵略也过去70， 80年了，同样要记住，前事不忘，后事之师。
日本当年，是想殖民东北。不是掠夺。所以，除了抢一些资源用于战争，其实对当地建设还好。北方民族，在中国历史上，从来对南方是侵略。这是由于气候跟资源造成的，从来没有改变过。
为什么要记住？我认为现在应当忘却这些，大家共同向前看，共同发展，甚至统一成欧盟一样才最好。为了近百年前的错误，要惩罚日本一万年？
这次肺炎，你看看全世界，哪个民族，哪个国家在刚刚开始时，对中国最支持，希望中国控制住？是日本。。。仇恨不应当蒙蔽眼睛，旧仇更不应当
不敢忘当时中国人经历的伤痛，无论是日本鬼子，还是苏联鬼子造成的。
就像德国人从不敢忘记纳粹给自己和世界造成的灾难。
这么讲的话，中国不是最应该感恩美国吗？干嘛现在还吃美国饭砸美国锅？天天从政府到民间把美国骂得狗血喷头
你可以回国问问小学生。。。。我其实也想知道
Furthermore, we would then have a Europe Union (including Africa for manufacturing) to be leaded by the European Union, An America Union (including South America for manufacturing) leaded by the US, and An Asia Union leaded by the China Union.
此外，我们将拥有一个由欧盟领导的欧洲联盟（包括非洲 for 制造），一个由美国领导的美洲联盟 (包括南美 for 制造), 和一个由中国联盟领导的亚洲联盟。
World Peae!
世界和平！
一个由中国联盟领导的亚洲联盟？大东亚共荣圈？
一个世界，两个系统
Q
[Idea] Natural Peace Living: One Country Two Systems - Mainstream + Nonmainstream
Statistically and historically speaking, there is always a mainstream plus a non-mainstream in nearly all countries, regarding cultural, religious, geographical, racial, commercial, and/or other aspects.
Well-designed structure and practice of one country two systems, backed by the UN, should be applied to probably all countries individually, in order to greatly reduce conflicts, and to maintain sustainable global peace! Perhaps many wars could been avoided.
Some people prefer to live in a capitalism region within a socialism country. Practically, some prefer to live in a socialism region within a capitalism country. ( Cf. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/capitalism-v-socialism/
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp ) As Einstein said, "Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." 正如爱因斯坦所说：“和平不能用武力维持，它只能通过理解来实现。
Hopefully, this inclusivity-based structure and practice could enhance peacefully our world's economic growth and political stability.
" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_country,_two_systems
The 14th Dalai Lama's 2005 proposal for "high-level autonomy" for Tibet, evolved from a position of advocating Tibetan independence, has been compared to "one country, two systems". He has said that his proposals should be acceptable to China because "one country, two systems" is accommodated for in the Chinese Constitution. State media rejected this claim, pointing out that "one country, two systems" was designed for the capitalist social systems of Hong Kong and Macau, which had never existed in Tibet.[34]
...
One country, two systems proposals for other countries
Muhammad Cohen, writing for Asia Times, suggests the "one country, two systems" formula is possible solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.[35]
North Korea suggests the "one country, two systems" formula to bring about Korean unification, through a confederation of two systems within one country.[36] China has also promoted the idea; the difference between North Korea's motivation and China's is that North Korea seeks to maintain two separate governments, while China seeks gradual unification as it brings stability to the Korean peninsula with one centralised government.[37]
Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney said the arrangement linking Hong Kong with China could be a possible solution for addressing the fate of Northern Ireland after Brexit. The border between EU member Ireland and British-ruled Northern Ireland is becoming an increasing concern in divorce talks with Britain, with Dublin demanding that the frontier remain completely open, to avoid endangering the peace process.[38]"
-----
Cf.
" https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/03/18/commentary/world-commentary/u-s-version-one-country-two-systems/
U.S. version of 'one country, two systems'
by Kuni Miyake
WASHINGTON – I am writing this column in a Washington hotel room at midnight. Whenever my room is upgraded, I always watch two TV sets, one with CNN on in the bedroom and another with Fox News on in the living room. Why do I do this? Because those two channels seem to represent completely different groups of American constituents. "
UQ
LOL
Don't be (too) serious, please!
建议把北京的大街命名为 斯大林大街吧??
哈哈哈
你指的是沈崇事件吧？ 沈崇事件一直有争议，真实情况怎样不好说 http://mjlsh.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/Book.aspx?cid=4&tid=2980。再说了，入军队没有很高的道德标准，任何军队里歪瓜裂枣很多；战争年代军人数量大，歪瓜裂枣更多是一定的。
俄爹某方面行径在国际上很有名，较大规模集体行动有很多文献可以考证。亲儿子不揭亲爹的短，不知道强国的历史书怎么说。
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%98%87%E8%81%AF%E6%88%B0%E7%88%AD%E7%BD%AA%E8%A1%8C#%E5%BC%B7%E5%A7%A6%E5%92%8C%E7%B6%8F%E9%9D%96
朋友，烧白宫的是加拿大人好不好
不说历史。很多问题很简单，写在老祖宗的书里，叫远交近攻。。要文化自信
你耗子到西雅图也不到彼得堡，所以你说啥都没用
斯大林风格的苏联建筑和规划还是不错啊！！
共产主义风格的大楼整整齐齐， 城市规划特别整齐漂亮啊！！
要是中国当时全部按苏联这种风格规划城市， 就好看多了．
看看老邓这个资本家的走狗，
把中国的城市搞成了什么样子， 乱七八糟， 丑到惊人．
烧白宫的当然是英国军队了，还是欧洲调来的精兵。
加拿大人说他们烧白宫，完全是吹牛，虽然他们那时候和英国是一起的。
主要是烧白宫的这场战争，美国并没有打输。
作为一个新兴小国，和大英帝国，特别是后期对付的都是大英的最精锐部队，
打成五五开，非常值得骄傲了。
俄国的一个普通大兵，把TG抗联的副司令都给打死了，也没见TG敢对老毛子做些什么～～
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hans/卢冬生
据说苏军没找到凶手，呵呵
好文, 兄台渊博. 卢沟桥事件挺有意思, 兄台有闲暇可否说说? 呵呵, 这一段我一直感兴趣, 看过些资料要么胡说八道要么遮遮掩掩有些东西明显没说透, 只是询问, 兄台看自己方便无妨. 谢谢. 我看到的无非是当时日军在荒郊演习, 结果神秘力量....显然是中共搞事, 又弄手电筒对暗号又枪击的, 于是日军和国军摩擦接着开战. 还有人说, 山东屠杀日侨事件也是国民革命军里面的共党分子搞的, 不知道兄台怎么看. 宋教仁案, 兄台觉得元凶是谁? 张作霖有说是苏联干掉的, 我觉得这个很有道理, 不知兄台怎么看?
问题有点多, 呵呵, 见谅. 我这人好奇, 看到内行的就喜欢多问几句, 请多包涵.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-jointstatement/trump-and-putin-issue-rare-joint-statement-promoting-cooperation-idUSKCN2270SK
April 25, 2020 / 6:09 PM / in 10 hours
Trump and Putin issue rare joint statement promoting cooperation
Jonathan Landay
3 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin issued a rare joint statement on Saturday commemorating a 1945 World War Two link-up of U.S. and Soviet troops on their way to defeat Nazi Germany as an example of how their countries can cooperate.
...
特朗普和普京发表罕见的促进合作的联合声明
乔纳森·兰迪
华盛顿（路透社）-美国总统唐纳德·特朗普和他的俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京在周六发表了罕见的联合声明，以纪念1945年第二次世界大战中美苏联军打败纳粹德国的方式，以此作为其国家的典范 可以合作。
UQ
Separately, below a comment from other site:
Q
如何看待俄美罕见发布联合声明？
来源：路透社：https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-jointstatement/trump-and-putin-issue-rare-joint-statement-promoting-cooperation-idUSKCN2270SK
克里姆林宫网站与路透社均报道，25日消息，俄美总统就易北河会师75周年发表联合声明，表示“易北河精神”是俄美摒弃分歧，开展合作的典范。
声明说，美苏军队在易北河会师预示着纳粹政权的最终失败，这是多国民众在《联合国宣言》框架下共同付出巨大努力的象征。
UQ
你的VISION不行。
未来世界只有两极，只有一个政府，中，美联合执政。财团主导权力会很大，政府权利远远超出现在的联合国的
Everything could be possible for open minded people, but perpetual world peace would be attained onlywhen the super powers happily agreed to do so, imo.
It'd be better that a few bodies such as Switzerland, (Modern, not old) Russia, and Australia could independently coordinate the proposed world peace model. imo.
Theoretically, a 3-stand chair would be much mush more stable and reliable in long term, than a 2-stand chair, for the sake of balance.
对于开放的人 一切都有可能，但是只有当超级大国高兴地同意这样做时，世界永久和平才能实现。
最好由瑞士，（现代，非旧）俄罗斯, 和澳大利亚等几个机构独立协调提议的世界和平模式。 imo。
从理论上讲，为了保持平衡，三脚的椅子比两脚的椅子从长远来看更加稳定和可靠。
The history for both the US and (modern) China is still short relatively. That should allow us to be patuemtly see the pros and cons of existing super powers for their current experiences and developments. As Europe as a whole could be an effective balancing power, in theory and reality, perhaps, due to the long-time development history, rathre than imbalancing policies potentially, imo.
美国和（现代）中国的历史还相对较短。 这应该使我们能够适当地了解现有超级大国在当前经验和发展方面的利弊。 在理论和现实上，由于整个欧洲可能是一个有效的平衡力量，也许由于长期的发展历史，比起过度的激进发展而言，而不是潜在的失調政策, imo。
I think we should not underestimate the significancy of Europe's development.
Perhaps, when the two super powers progress too far relatively to the Europe's contemporary focus, imo, they should slow down and review to see how they could do more about inequality and weelbeing of their own citizens, before just running too far.
我认为我们不应低估欧洲发展的意义。
也许，当这两个超级大国相对于欧洲当代关注点imo前进得太远时，他们应该放慢脚步，回顾一下他们如何才能在走得太远之前对本国公民的不平等和福祉做更多的事情。
One example is aeroplane manufacturing, another low-cost medicare infrastrcture, besides homelessness issue. Certain missteps can be seen by now. Considering that spending so much money in preparing wars.
一个例子是飞机制造，另一是低成本的医疗保险基础设施, 除了无家可归问题。现在可以看到某些失误。考虑到在准备战争方面花了那么多钱。
Of course, just a thought!
当然，只是一个想法！
就按你说的，多感恩，中国感恩苏俄了么？哦，感恩了，50年代蜜里调油，然后79年中越战争卖了苏联，帮着美国搞垮了苏联。
中国感恩美国了么？韬光养晦骗入WTO，不过图谋今日图穷匕见。
我该说你too simple too naive吗？欧盟起码有共同的政治制度，有言论自由，虽然也有各式各样的矛盾，这还搞不好呢。亚洲搞亚盟？东南亚联盟？一起建墙一起外汇管制，一起接受中国多余的产能？
有理想是好事，但是只顾自己利益只对自己有好处的理想，不是理想是自私
中国联盟中华人国100%的拥抱，对中华民国是不是有好处，看一看现在的香港，你去说服一下中华民国。
这是要一起对付梁博士吗？
回复 65楼dragonfire的帖子
I'd have to admit that I spent just very little time on primitive information on the topic.
My gues is a solid frameowrk of the structure already there officially, and that it's simply a rational process of normalising the relations among the relevant leaders in China.
我不得不承认，我只花很少的时间在有关该主题的原始信息上。
我的猜测是正式存在的结构的坚实基础，这只是规范中国有关领导人之间关系的合理过程。
Q
'One country, two systems' can continue beyond 2047, says Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam
•16 Jan 2020
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam has said that ''one country, two systems'' could last beyond 2047. This latest comment is widely seen as an attempt to appeal to her critics, who are concerned about Beijing's clout over Hong Kong, and the city's future. Mrs Lam has urged young people not to misunderstand the system, saying it has ensured education and stable jobs in Hong Kong. Under the accord that saw Hong Kong's return to China from Britain, "'one country, two systems'' gives the city 50 years of autonomy. This means the city has been able to maintain its own capitalist economy and Western-style institutions, but that guarantee expires in 2047.
香港领导人林郑月娥表示，“一个国家，两个系统”可以延续到2047年以后
•2020年1月16日
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B91y25Mfq7Q
香港行政长官林郑月娥曾表示，“一个国家，两个制度”可能会持续到2047年以后。这一最新评论被广泛认为是对她的批评者的一种呼吁，这些评论家对北京对香港的影响力以及对北京的影响力感到担忧。 城市的未来。 林郑月娥已敦促年轻人不要误解该制度，并说该制度确保了香港的教育和稳定的工作。 根据香港从英国回归中国的协议，“一国两制”赋予了香港50年的自治权，这意味着香港能够维持自己的资本主义经济和西方制度，但 该保证将于2047年到期。
UQ
Whst's that? I've seldom touched many China issues for very long time.
那是什么？ 很长时间以来，我很少接触到许多中国问题。
哪儿抄来的？俄国不会放弃任何可以咬中国一口的机会
Of course, there must be something similar or the same that can be searched and found from the Internet. Posting their links here would be welcome.
当然，必可以从Internet搜索和找到相似或相同的内容。欢迎在此处发布其链接。
如今，他们热爱文化 (而不是战争)，并免费在线介绍各自的表演。
Jesus once asked people not to always look backwards while working!
耶稣曾经要求人们在工作时不要总是向后看！
Should we catch up the change, mindfully? Or ...
我们应该注意的赶上变化吗？ 要么 ...
The real Europe:
Q
OperaVision offered by Opera Europa from many opera companies
Sometimes including, Madama Butterfly, Puccini, Tosca, The Marriage of Figaro, Carmen, The Magic Flute, La bohème, etc.
'If you want to feel like you belong to something higher, to something even beyond this universe, then go to the opera!' - Mehmet Murat Ildan
https://operavision.eu/en/library/%C3%93peras
UQ
The real Russia:
Q
Bolshoi Theatre
" The Bolshoi presents to its public opera and ballet productions of Russian classics (20th century included), Western classics (likewise inclusive of recognized 20th century masterpieces), and specially commissioned works. "
https://www.youtube.com/user/bolshoi
UQ
抗美援朝和抗苏联美的后果比较一下就不会说蠢话了
https://www.quora.com/Is-your-glass-half-empty-or-half-full
Another live example from news today, for a low-price affordable product from European designers that other money-greedy companies would not care to produce. 今天新闻中的另一个生动的例子是，欧洲设计师以低价买得起的产品，而其他贪婪的公司则不愿生产。
Q
剑桥大学研发廉价呼吸机，成本为传统一成
https://club.6parkbbs.com/finance/index.php?app=forum&act=threadview&tid=14363275
近日，英国剑桥大学有团队表示在发明廉价呼吸机，单台成本1000美元，约为传统呼吸机的十分之一。
这个新方案旨在帮助包括非洲国家等低收入、中等收入国家抗击新冠疫情。
UQ
Separarte search:
Q
www.cam.ac.uk › research › news › open-source-ventil...
7 days ago - Built primarily for use in low- and middle-income countries, the OVSI ventilator can be cheaply and quickly manufactured from readily available ...
UQ
Q
Facing disaster, Russian businesses find Kremlin aid lacking
面对灾难，俄罗斯企业发现克里姆林宫的援助缺乏
Vladimir Isachenkov - Associated Press - 55 minutes ago
https://www.barchart.com/story/news/4766367/facing-disaster-russian-businesses-find-kremlin-aid-lacking
When President Vladimir Putin ordered most Russians to stay home through April 30 to contain the coronavirus, he said employees must continue to be paid. A joke soon went viral online: “Putin walks into a bar and declares: ‘Beer for everyone. It’s on the house!’”
Weeks later, the president promised subsidies and loans for private-sector companies to help them pay wages. But businesses paralyzed by the lockdowns imposed by the majority of Russia’s 85 regions see the Kremlin’s support as sorely insufficient.
当普京总统下令大多数俄罗斯人在4月30日之前呆在家里以遏制冠状病毒时，他说必须继续向雇员付款。 一个笑话很快在网上传播开来：“普京走进一家酒吧，宣称：‘所有人提供免费啤酒, 店主付钱！’”
几周后，总统答应为私营企业提供补贴和贷款，以帮助他们支付工资。 但是，由于俄罗斯85个地区多数地区实行封锁而瘫痪的企业认为，克里姆林宫的支持远远不够。
...
While the non-food retail and services sector ground to a halt, big state-controlled companies and industrial plants have kept operating. Putin has promised subsidies to airlines, car and aircraft plants, and defense manufacturers, among others.
The Kremlin’s approach contrasts with that of the United States and many EU nations, which provided more generous subsidies to workers and businesses.
尽管非食品零售和服务业停滞不前，但大型国有控股公司和工业厂房仍在继续运营。 普京已承诺向航空公司，汽车和飞机制造厂以及国防制造商提供补贴。
克里姆林宫的做法与美国和许多欧盟国家的做法形成对比，后者为工人和企业提供了更为慷慨的补贴。
UQ
苏联红军在东北是烧杀虏掠奸淫，无恶不作，日本嘛对东北建设还是有贡献的
我觉得川普早就想联俄联朝对付中共了，只不过之前时机未到，这次瘟疫让西方国家意识到中共才是最大的敌人，所以现在走到一起算是水到渠成
Perhaps Trump should get a Nobel Prize after establishing a Korea Union and a China Union, with his help! By lifting their baggage, for just too much and too heavy.
也许特朗普在他的帮助下建立了韩国联盟和中国联盟后应该获得诺贝尔奖！通过提起行李，行李太多而又太重。
* Russia as a politics-emphasis bridge betwwen democratic and republic political systems, based on various change experences from many countries.
* Switzerland as a economics-emphasis bridge between planned and liberal economic systems. The peace world should be driven by frequently updated quantitative model for the 3 major economies about fiscal and monetary policy measures.
* Australia as a diplomatics-emphsis bridge between eastern and western cultural systems, in order to reduce conflicts among culturs.
Btw, Europe Union should be also called EMEA Union, of courese.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe,_the_Middle_East_and_Africa
imo，我们的和平世界的榜样将要求3位协调员分别履行其职责。
*俄罗斯作为民主和共和国政治制度之间的政治重点桥梁, 基于许多国家的各种变化经验。
*瑞士是计划经济体系和自由经济体系之间的经济重点桥梁。 和平世界应该由三个主要经济体经常更新的关于财政和货币政策措施的量化模型来驱动。
*澳大利亚作为东西方文化体系之间的外交重点桥梁, 为了减少文化之间的冲突。
顺便说一句，欧洲联盟也应称为欧洲，中东和非洲联盟。
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/欧洲，中欧东部和非洲