列这个不如直接列学历和W'fh比例,肯定更相关。我猜一个: Grad degree 70% College degree 50% High school degree 20% Less than high school degree 5% sunshine35 发表于 4/12/2020 8:45:16 PM
哈哈。高人!只有1%的差别!我找到了 Almost 52 percent of those with a college education or higher said they could work from home, but only 4 percent of those with less than a high school diploma said they could.
随便举例(假设的数据),比如asian workers总人数100万人,“37% of Asian workers”就是37万人。比如white workers总人数3000万人,“29.9% of white workers”就是1000多万人。WFH37万亚裔比1000万老白。WFH实际数目是别的种族远大于亚裔可WFH数量,因为亚裔工作人数远远小于白黑莫。 ———- Here's the breakdown of the share of US workers who can telework, by race and ethnicity, according to BLS data from 2017-2018: • 37% of Asian workers • 29.9% of white workers • 19.7% of black or African American workers • 16.2% of Hispanic or Latino workers • 31.4% of non-Hispanic or Latino workers
随便举例(假设的数据),比如asian workers总人数100万人,“37% of Asian workers”就是37万人。比如white workers总人数3000万人,“29.9% of white workers”就是1000多万人。WFH37万亚裔比1000万老白。WFH实际数目是别的种族远大于亚裔可WFH数量,因为亚裔工作人数远远小于白黑莫。 ———- Here's the breakdown of the share of US workers who can telework, by race and ethnicity, according to BLS data from 2017-2018: • 37% of Asian workers • 29.9% of white workers • 19.7% of black or African American workers • 16.2% of Hispanic or Latino workers • 31.4% of non-Hispanic or Latino workers
随便举例(假设的数据),比如asian workers总人数100万人,“37% of Asian workers”就是37万人。比如white workers总人数3000万人,“29.9% of white workers”就是1000多万人。WFH37万亚裔比1000万老白。WFH实际数目是别的种族远大于亚裔可WFH数量,因为亚裔工作人数远远小于白黑莫。 ———- Here's the breakdown of the share of US workers who can telework, by race and ethnicity, according to BLS data from 2017-2018: • 37% of Asian workers • 29.9% of white workers • 19.7% of black or African American workers • 16.2% of Hispanic or Latino workers • 31.4% of non-Hispanic or Latino workers
cuzemel 发表于 4/12/2020 9:15:56 PM
刚刚看到NBC说的:African-American has a population of 12.1%, but they take up 33% of all hospitalization. They did not find any genetic predisposition. 11% of African-Americans don’t have a healthy insurance, Hispanics, 19%, Native Americans, 22% with no health insurance.
Obesity rate: white, 30%, Hispanics: 35%, African-Americans, 38%, Native American, 48%. Even after this pandemic is under control, these above issues or will still be present.
同时在重复说:这些essential jobs 的American of color 是多么的危险,死亡率高。
是不是会要加强种族配额,平均上学机会,平均工作机会,平均工资…
心里七上八下!
🔥 最新回帖
你这种上来就攻击人大概又笨又蠢还很mean并且没同情心。人家媒体就这么带节奏,你能怎么办?不往好处想,天天还不郁闷死?有本事你去培养个美国总统出来帮华人发声。就算是华裔总统也不见得帮华人。人家少数族裔确实基础差,没有华人父母推娃,但人家祖祖辈辈都要做穷人?给你送菜?凭什么?死的多的族裔难道不能说?国家不给他们资源帮助他们,他们怎么活?就天天看着眼前那点利益。现在少数族裔也没跟你抢教授,码农,名校PhD/MS program,难道你就做到行业顶尖了?自己没本事还怪人家政策。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
我猜cnn。
媒体除了fox大都是左逼,坐等左逼川黑们洗地。好一个black, latino Americans dying at higher rates。那些翻墙挑拨种族矛盾的id滚哪去了?
当时新闻过去的太快,没有注意,感觉应该是全部美国的数据。当时实在是太气愤啦。好像是NBC?我大多数时间只看这个YouTube
气愤的点是电视台用虚假数据挑动种族矛盾?
这个数据在网上也能看见,但是电视台这么播出就很讨厌
确实,当时我就气的大骂 这个节目,
刚刚搜出来:Here's the breakdown of the share of US workers who can telework, by race and ethnicity, according to BLS data from 2017-2018:
但是 CNN出来渲染的
牛!我刚刚找到
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/19/us/teleworking-black-hispanic-workers/index.html
估计是CNN啦我实在是没注意哪个电视台
就是啊。这个电视台的两个黑女人在一唱一和,看得我恶心又气愤。
刚才上网搜,才发现这数据实际上是17-18年的,现在被它们拿出来解释为啥American of colors死亡率高。
我当时就大骂:怎么不去比一比 那个种族学历高,在家带娃数理化加上琴棋书画的辛苦!
他们自己选择了janitor transporter security 什么的体力劳动,该戴口罩不戴,到处去浪,而亚裔在各方面的技术中层/高层,还有医护在拼死救命,现在又抱怨死亡率高!
左逼媒体最喜欢贼喊捉贼,自己最种族歧视却骂别人种族歧视
别了,把这发出来又说招亚裔太多了,要diversity
两党都搞。。。还活不活了
Grad degree 70%
College degree 50%
High school degree 20%
Less than high school degree 5%
亚裔得抗争,媒体需要diversity啊,不能被黑墨霸占
为什么在某些人某些党眼里只有种族?p.s. 不是回楼主MM的
有意思,我看到的搞种族政治,亚裔细分,打压亚裔升学就业机会,以讨好黑墨族裔的都是民主党整出来的妖娥子,华盛顿州,加州,纽约州都是如此。
请问您什么时候看到共和党的在搞这种按人口比例分配就业大学名额的,给个链接好么?
哈哈。高人!只有1%的差别!我找到了
Almost 52 percent of those with a college education or higher said they could work from home, but only 4 percent of those with less than a high school diploma said they could.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/22/working-home-reveals-another-fault-line-americas-racial-educational-divide/
有道理!需要有人为自己发声
两个党都搞,你选谁?还是你干脆不投票了?
随便举例(假设的数据),比如asian workers总人数100万人,“37% of Asian workers”就是37万人。比如white workers总人数3000万人,“29.9% of white workers”就是1000多万人。WFH37万亚裔比1000万老白。WFH实际数目是别的种族远大于亚裔可WFH数量,因为亚裔工作人数远远小于白黑莫。
———-
Here's the breakdown of the share of US workers who can telework, by race and ethnicity, according to BLS data from 2017-2018:
• 37% of Asian workers
• 29.9% of white workers
• 19.7% of black or African American workers
• 16.2% of Hispanic or Latino workers
• 31.4% of non-Hispanic or Latino workers
亚裔媒体人也很多啊,不过一般都忙着报道中国的阴暗面,follow Andrew Yang的建议拼命prove their Americanness(whiteness),没工夫帮asian american争取权益。
CHINESE VIRUS还可以说是指VIRUS FROM CHINA,现在这个WFH比例是直接针对在美国的亚裔了,针对性非常明确。
精辟,右b讨好白人(大统领说了欢迎挪威移民),左b讨好黑墨穆,亚裔两边不是人。
赞👍解释的比我强多了!
刚刚看到NBC说的:African-American has a population of 12.1%, but they take up 33% of all hospitalization.
They did not find any genetic predisposition.
11% of African-Americans don’t have a healthy insurance, Hispanics, 19%, Native Americans, 22% with no health insurance.
Obesity rate: white, 30%, Hispanics: 35%, African-Americans, 38%, Native American, 48%.
Even after this pandemic is under control, these above issues or will still be present.
按学历分一样啊,亚裔学历高比例大,所以人家要AA.
媒体从业人员钱不多很多亚裔不愿意去干这行
成心挑事。
以后别看了。
他们有平等的机会但是自己放弃, 但是他们要求平等的结果。 这就是左派的逻辑。
只有民主党搞。
当时是有背景的为什么这么叫, 怼的是发言人, 误伤了Asian AMerican,之后人家也出来专门和Asian American道歉的。
我觉得死不至于,但这就是他们工作的主要内容,别的话题根本不会写,疫情这么严重他们也看不到有啥可讨论的,抱着种族的话题,吃一辈子的铁饭碗,这钱挣的真是容易啊,关键人家还掌握着话语权。美国疫情已经这么严重了,媒体就没点责任感吗?还在挑起矛盾,吸引眼球
你是说 把耳朵捂起来说“我不听我不听”吗?这不是掩耳盗铃么?
咱们还是争取发出自己的声音才是出路。
👍
所以要发声,要话语权!
是事实,但不是全部的事实。拿部分事实暗示某种关联从而达到政治目的,居心叵测
怎么是隐形搞种族主义?
明明是显形。
that means never vote for democrats.
你这种上来就攻击人大概又笨又蠢还很mean并且没同情心。人家媒体就这么带节奏,你能怎么办?不往好处想,天天还不郁闷死?有本事你去培养个美国总统出来帮华人发声。就算是华裔总统也不见得帮华人。人家少数族裔确实基础差,没有华人父母推娃,但人家祖祖辈辈都要做穷人?给你送菜?凭什么?死的多的族裔难道不能说?国家不给他们资源帮助他们,他们怎么活?就天天看着眼前那点利益。现在少数族裔也没跟你抢教授,码农,名校PhD/MS program,难道你就做到行业顶尖了?自己没本事还怪人家政策。