In 2017, the WHO received 17% of its total funding, or $513 million, from the United States.23 It is essential that American taxpayers’ money is allocated to organizations that uniformly serve the interests of nations across the globe, not merely the interests of China’s authoritarian, communist regime. To help us and the public understand the WHO’s efforts to combat the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with the Chinese government, please provide the following documents and information: 1. All documents and communications regarding public health, including but not limited to COVID-19, nov el coronavirus, or coronavirus, between the WHO and the Chinese Communist Party or the government of China between August 2019 and present.
2. All documents and communications regarding the total number of infected persons and deceased persons related to the current COVID-19 pandemic in China, including those infected but asymptomatic.
3. All documents and communications regarding public health, including but not limited to COVID-19, nov el coronavirus, or coronavirus, between the WHO and Taiwan between August 2019 and present.
In addition to these documents, please provide a staff-lev el briefing no later than April 16, 2020. This briefing may be conducted remotely for convenience and safety issues.
Therefore, as the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Multilateral Institutions, I will be convening a Subcommittee hearing once it is safe to meet to examine the WHO’s response to nov el coronavirus, examine questions about how American taxpayers will be funding this organization in the future, and will be inviting you to attend as a witness before the panel. A formal hearing notice and invitation will be forthcoming at a later date.
4/8/2020 7:18 a.m.: US may investigate WHO''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s handling of pandemic, official says Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s coronavirus response coordinator, indicated Wednesday that the U.S. would investigate the World Health Organization''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s handling of the pandemic before deciding whether to withhold its funding to the United Nations'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' health agency. "We''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve done that before with previous outbreaks and previous issues that have occurred at WHO," Birx told ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos in an interview on "Good Morning America." During a press briefing Tuesday, President Donald Trump blamed the WHO for getting "every aspect" of the novel coronavirus pandemic wrong and threatened to freeze American funding. President Donald Trump spea ks during the daily briefing on the nov el coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on April 7, 2020, in Washington. President Donald Trump spea ks during the daily briefing on the nov el coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on April 7, 2020, in Washington.Mand el Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
The Geneva-based international body started sounding the alarm over the outbreak in China in mid-January and then designated it a global health emergency on Jan. 30. On March 11, the WHO declared the outbreak a pandemic after the virus had spread to every continent except Antarctica. "In the history of the United States and the World Health Organization, we have had times when we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve done really in-depth analysis of what has happened. When the president said he was holding funds, he didn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t say he was restricting and keeping funds permanently away, but instead said, let''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s investigate what happened," Birx said. "I think that the president wants to complete an investigation of what happened during this current outbreak." "Believe me, they already have their continuation funds from last year," she added. "So this is a year-by-year commitment to the WHO, this is our required commitment. There''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s also voluntary commitments that we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve made to the WHO through history, including over the last couple of years for HIV, malaria, TB, so a whole series of diseases." The U.S. is, by far, the single largest financial contributor to the WHO. Dr. Deborah Birx appears on "Good Morning America," April 8, 2020. Dr. Deborah Birx appears on "Good Morning America," April 8, 2020.ABC News
Birx said the White House coronavirus task force is currently concerned about the metro areas of Baltimore, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. potentially becoming the next hot spots of the country''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s outbreak. "All of our previous areas seem to be steady at least," she added. "And then certainly we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''re looking very carefully at California and Washington [state] to really understand how they''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve been able as a community of Americans to mitigate so well." Birx said they hope to roll out an antibody test "within the next 10 or 14 days" that can detect how many Americans have already had the virus but were asymptomatic. "This makes a very big difference in really understanding who can go back to work and how they can go back to work," she said. "So all of those pieces need to come together over the next couple of weeks."
" I’m not going to support funding the WHO under its current leadership ," Graham said. "They’ve been deceptive, they’ve been slow, and they’ve been Chinese apologists. I don’t think they’re a good investment under the current leadership for the United States, and until they change their behavior and get new leadership, I think it’s in America’s best interest to withhold funding because they have failed miserably when it comes to the coronavirus."
4/7/2020 Trump的推
4/6/2020 这份报纸的社论，不是随便说说的。这是要一定秋后算账的意思……
World Health Coronavirus Disinformation WHO''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s bows to Bei jing have harmed the global response to the pandemic.
By The Editorial BoardWorld Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the WHO headquaters in Geneva.PHOTO: FABRICE COFFRINI/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGESThe coronavirus pandemic will offer many lessons in what to do better to save more lives and do less economic harm the next time. But there’s already one way to ensure future pandemics are less deadly: Reform or defund the World Health Organization (WHO).
Last week Florida Senator Rick Scott called for a Congressional investigation into the United Nations agency’s “role in helping Communist China cover up information regarding the threat of the Coronavirus.” The rot at WHO goes beyond canoodling with Beijing, but that’s a good place to start. The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China, sometime in the autumn, perhaps as early as November. It accelerated in December. Caixin Global reported that Chinese labs had sequenced the coronavirus genome by the end of December but were ordered by Chinese officials to destroy samples and not publish their findings. On Dec. 30 Dr. Li Wenliang warned Chinese doctors about the virus, and several days later local authorities accused him of lies that “severely disturbed the social order.” Taiwanese officials warned WHO on Dec. 31 that they had seen evidence that the virus could be transmitted human-to-human. But the agency, bowing to Beijing, doesn’t have a normal relationship with Taiwan. On Jan. 14 WHO tweeted, “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.” The agency took another week to reverse that misinformation. On Jan. 22-23 a WHO emergency committee debated whether to declare Covid-19 a “public health emergency of international concern.” The virus already had spread to several countries, and making such a declaration would have better prepared the world. It should have been an easy decision, despite Beijing’s objections. Yet director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus declined and instead traveled to China. He finally made the declaration on Jan. 30—losing a week of precious time—and his rhetoric suggests the trip to Beijing was more about politics than public health. “The Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken,” he said. “I left in absolutely no doubt about China’s commitment to transparency.” A University of Southampton study suggests the number of coronavirus cases could have been reduced by 95% had China moved to contain the virus three weeks sooner. Yet Dr. Tedros gushed that Beijing had set “a new standard for outbreak response.” He also praised the speed with which China “sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world.” China didn’t do so until Jan. 12. On Jan. 30 Dr. Tedros also said that “WHO doesn’t recommend limiting trade and movement.” President Trump ignored the advice and announced travel restrictions on China the following day, slowing the spread of the virus. U.S. progressive elites echoed WHO and criticized Mr. Trump. WHO didn’t declare the coronavirus a pandemic until March 11. Not that any of this has prompted much soul-searching. Alluding to China, WHO official Michael Ryan said last week, “We need to be very careful also to not to be profiling certain parts of the world as being uncooperative.” Beijing touted the remarks, as it has other WHO statements. *** This record is tragic but not surprising. Much of the blame for WHO’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does WHO seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of WHO’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at WHO generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. China’s influence over WHO has been organized and consistent, whereas the U.S. response has been haphazard. Washington needs a quarterback to lead the fight against Chinese dominance at WHO and other international organizations. Yet the State Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs lacks a political appointee. The U.S. will have allies in an effort to reform WHO. A frustrated Japanese deputy prime minister called WHO the “Chinese Health Organization.” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly is rethinking U.K.-China ties over China’s lack of candor about the virus. *** Congress should investigate how WHO performed against the coronavirus and whether its judgments were corrupted by China’s political influence. Of all international institutions, WHO should be the least political. Its core mission is to coordinate international efforts against epidemics and provide honest public-health guidance. If WHO is merely a politicized Maginot Line against pandemics, then it is worse than useless and should receive no more U.S. funding. And if foreign-policy elites want to know why so many Americans mistrust international institutions, WHO is it.
Trump halts funding to WHO, criticizing group''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s pandemic responsehttps://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/14/trump-world-health-organization-funding-186786参议员再次发信传证
内容看，这分明是在调查罪犯的意思
https://www.rickscott.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/200413%20WHO.pd
4/10/2020
众议院监管和改革委员会寻证信
https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FINAL_Letter-to-WHO-re-China-Pressure-.pdf
In 2017, the WHO received 17% of its total funding, or $513 million, from the United
States.23 It is essential that American taxpayers’ money is allocated to organizations that
uniformly serve the interests of nations across the globe, not merely the interests of China’s
authoritarian, communist regime. To help us and the public understand the WHO’s efforts to
combat the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with the Chinese government,
please provide the following documents and information:
1. All documents and communications regarding public health, including but not limited to
COVID-19, nov el coronavirus, or coronavirus, between the WHO and the Chinese
Communist Party or the government of China between August 2019 and present.
2. All documents and communications regarding the total number of infected persons and
deceased persons related to the current COVID-19 pandemic in China, including those
infected but asymptomatic.
3. All documents and communications regarding public health, including but not limited to
COVID-19, nov el coronavirus, or coronavirus, between the WHO and Taiwan between
August 2019 and present.
In addition to these documents, please provide a staff-lev el briefing no later than April
16, 2020. This briefing may be conducted remotely for convenience and safety issues.
4/9/2020
参议院外交委员会将举行听证会，并会通知谭书记作证
https://www.young.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/20200408%20Letter%20to%20WHO%20Director%20General%20Tedros%20Coronavirus%20-%20Update.pdf
Therefore, as the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Multilateral
Institutions, I will be convening a Subcommittee hearing once it is safe to meet to examine the
WHO’s response to nov el coronavirus, examine questions about how American taxpayers will be
funding this organization in the future, and will be inviting you to attend as a witness before the
panel. A formal hearing notice and invitation will be forthcoming at a later date.
4/8/2020
7:18 a.m.: US may investigate WHO''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s handling of pandemic, official says Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s coronavirus response coordinator, indicated Wednesday that the U.S. would investigate the World Health Organization''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s handling of the pandemic before deciding whether to withhold its funding to the United Nations'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' health agency. "We''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve done that before with previous outbreaks and previous issues that have occurred at WHO," Birx told ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos in an interview on "Good Morning America." During a press briefing Tuesday, President Donald Trump blamed the WHO for getting "every aspect" of the novel coronavirus pandemic wrong and threatened to freeze American funding.
President Donald Trump spea ks during the daily briefing on the nov el coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on April 7, 2020, in Washington.
President Donald Trump spea ks during the daily briefing on the nov el coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on April 7, 2020, in Washington.Mand el Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
The Geneva-based international body started sounding the alarm over the outbreak in China in mid-January and then designated it a global health emergency on Jan. 30. On March 11, the WHO declared the outbreak a pandemic after the virus had spread to every continent except Antarctica. "In the history of the United States and the World Health Organization, we have had times when we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve done really in-depth analysis of what has happened. When the president said he was holding funds, he didn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t say he was restricting and keeping funds permanently away, but instead said, let''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s investigate what happened," Birx said. "I think that the president wants to complete an investigation of what happened during this current outbreak." "Believe me, they already have their continuation funds from last year," she added. "So this is a year-by-year commitment to the WHO, this is our required commitment. There''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s also voluntary commitments that we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve made to the WHO through history, including over the last couple of years for HIV, malaria, TB, so a whole series of diseases." The U.S. is, by far, the single largest financial contributor to the WHO.
Dr. Deborah Birx appears on "Good Morning America," April 8, 2020.
Dr. Deborah Birx appears on "Good Morning America," April 8, 2020.ABC News
Birx said the White House coronavirus task force is currently concerned about the metro areas of Baltimore, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. potentially becoming the next hot spots of the country''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s outbreak. "All of our previous areas seem to be steady at least," she added. "And then certainly we''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''re looking very carefully at California and Washington [state] to really understand how they''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''ve been able as a community of Americans to mitigate so well." Birx said they hope to roll out an antibody test "within the next 10 or 14 days" that can detect how many Americans have already had the virus but were asymptomatic. "This makes a very big difference in really understanding who can go back to work and how they can go back to work," she said. "So all of those pieces need to come together over the next couple of weeks."
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/491695-grahams-backs-trump-says-theres-going-to-be-no-money-for-who-in-next
参议院拨款委员会主席Graham：
Graham would use his position as chairman of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee overseeing foreign operations to ensure the WHO did not get funding from the U.S.
" I’m not going to support funding the WHO under its current leadership ," Graham said. "They’ve been deceptive, they’ve been slow, and they’ve been Chinese apologists. I don’t think they’re a good investment under the current leadership for the United States, and until they change their behavior and get new leadership, I think it’s in America’s best interest to withhold funding because they have failed miserably when it comes to the coronavirus."
4/7/2020
Trump的推
4/6/2020
这份报纸的社论，不是随便说说的。这是要一定秋后算账的意思……
World Health Coronavirus Disinformation
WHO''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s bows to Bei jing have harmed the global response to the pandemic.
By The Editorial Board
Last week Florida Senator Rick Scott called for a Congressional investigation into the United Nations agency’s “role in helping Communist China cover up information regarding the threat of the Coronavirus.” The rot at WHO goes beyond canoodling with Beijing, but that’s a good place to start. The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China, sometime in the autumn, perhaps as early as November. It accelerated in December. Caixin Global reported that Chinese labs had sequenced the coronavirus genome by the end of December but were ordered by Chinese officials to destroy samples and not publish their findings. On Dec. 30 Dr. Li Wenliang warned Chinese doctors about the virus, and several days later local authorities accused him of lies that “severely disturbed the social order.” Taiwanese officials warned WHO on Dec. 31 that they had seen evidence that the virus could be transmitted human-to-human. But the agency, bowing to Beijing, doesn’t have a normal relationship with Taiwan. On Jan. 14 WHO tweeted, “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.” The agency took another week to reverse that misinformation. On Jan. 22-23 a WHO emergency committee debated whether to declare Covid-19 a “public health emergency of international concern.” The virus already had spread to several countries, and making such a declaration would have better prepared the world. It should have been an easy decision, despite Beijing’s objections. Yet director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus declined and instead traveled to China. He finally made the declaration on Jan. 30—losing a week of precious time—and his rhetoric suggests the trip to Beijing was more about politics than public health. “The Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken,” he said. “I left in absolutely no doubt about China’s commitment to transparency.” A University of Southampton study suggests the number of coronavirus cases could have been reduced by 95% had China moved to contain the virus three weeks sooner. Yet Dr. Tedros gushed that Beijing had set “a new standard for outbreak response.” He also praised the speed with which China “sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world.” China didn’t do so until Jan. 12. On Jan. 30 Dr. Tedros also said that “WHO doesn’t recommend limiting trade and movement.” President Trump ignored the advice and announced travel restrictions on China the following day, slowing the spread of the virus. U.S. progressive elites echoed WHO and criticized Mr. Trump. WHO didn’t declare the coronavirus a pandemic until March 11. Not that any of this has prompted much soul-searching. Alluding to China, WHO official Michael Ryan said last week, “We need to be very careful also to not to be profiling certain parts of the world as being uncooperative.” Beijing touted the remarks, as it has other WHO statements. *** This record is tragic but not surprising. Much of the blame for WHO’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador. China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does WHO seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of WHO’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at WHO generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath. China’s influence over WHO has been organized and consistent, whereas the U.S. response has been haphazard. Washington needs a quarterback to lead the fight against Chinese dominance at WHO and other international organizations. Yet the State Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs lacks a political appointee. The U.S. will have allies in an effort to reform WHO. A frustrated Japanese deputy prime minister called WHO the “Chinese Health Organization.” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly is rethinking U.K.-China ties over China’s lack of candor about the virus. *** Congress should investigate how WHO performed against the coronavirus and whether its judgments were corrupted by China’s political influence. Of all international institutions, WHO should be the least political. Its core mission is to coordinate international efforts against epidemics and provide honest public-health guidance. If WHO is merely a politicized Maginot Line against pandemics, then it is worse than useless and should receive no more U.S. funding. And if foreign-policy elites want to know why so many Americans mistrust international institutions, WHO is it.
🔥 最新回帖
这个真有可能，那个摸女翻译背的世卫官员如果是在酒店和那女的睡的话，很有可能被录像了，然后就有威胁的把柄了。
人致贱则无敌
问题是怎么算啊？能把贪书记赶下台么？
🛋️ 沙发板凳
这个路子才是对的
直接搞中共并不现实。实验室病毒这个证据不好找，实验室都炸了
隐瞒疫情这个有主观成分，中共咬死了也不好弄
但是起诉WHO是最容易的，二月份它还在宣传不会对世界有影响、不要断航中国。中国疫情公开透明，“生了病最好去中国治疗”但是它们的报告显示，它们的专家根本没去武汉的传染病医院！调查WHO、调查WHO和CCP的勾兑，才是正确的第一枪。
这是正义与邪恶，良知与腐败的较量！
谭德赛会不会被灭口。。。
cdc也要重组。这帮废物，负责搞试剂盒的要出来背锅。
我以前还以为大家是搞笑，没想到他确实是红色出身
As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front
可能性很大不过WHO整个都被蓝金黄了，包括2月份那个去北京开会，嫖宿女翻译的砖家
除非安排一个WHO成员的包机旅游，然后“被空难”“被车祸”总之要整窝端
看了全文，基本上以事实支持论断。其实美国在WHO出的经费是中国的两倍，但是中国在国内是非常懂得蓝金黄的，现在出口到WHO，战无不胜。
这个是无能，目前没有证据显示主观故意…
击中要害，五毛害怕了？
是啊，看了两遍确定是WSJ的文章，尤其是那段揭露谭书记老底。
"实验室都炸了" 这个是真的么
这是转移目标啊
反正记者都被北京驱逐了，对北京的那个记者签证不报念想了呗
分析得很好！的确是这样
他们还不认清时务也会被清算的
太可能了, 跳樓 臥軌 心臟病突發 飛機失事, you name it, 土共沒一個不得心應手的
蠢和坏是有质的区别的
cdc那个头还出席发布会呢，不算背锅，就是负责吧
我想不是故意搞砸的吧
一定要起诉他们，还有带头搞群体免疫那个英国政府，看着自己人民死，不作为，这可是100%反人类罪！ ，
cdc即蠢又坏，我可不信那些专家真那么蠢，他们有些行为就是出于某些目的故意的
文中，潭书记的底裤被扒下来了
美国的实验室吧，去年就关闭了。
后面还有有一波骚操作，
为了让WHO把草药无效的声明去掉
又贿赂了2000万美元
劣币淘汰良币的经典。
CDC搞不出试剂盒是蠢，但是谁制定标准说没有旅游史接触史不给测就是坏了。支持彻查CDC
+1，谢谢推荐，仔细看了一遍。写得很好。timeline和事实很清晰
不是这些国际组织本身是什么烂货色，是中共利用了联合国一国一票的规则把这些国际组织搞成了烂货色，要不国内养着那么多亚非拉的留学生干嘛呢，不仅给奖学金，连陪学这种下三滥的破事都能做得出来
中共要行个好，自己带着一帮小弟成立个什么国际组织，总部设在北京，时不时搞个万邦来朝，那真的是对这个世界做的最大善事
可傻子都知道WHO背后是谁。厉害国上层已经知道世界舆论会对中国非常不利了，看看这位习的发言人是怎么说的，不解的是他们这样煽动wm和外宣有用吗。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/WlC4-PEXUAU
link please
这个走狗是应该被清算！
想起来这个，觉得好好玩^_^
CDC 本来就是monitor，prevention， research等。。行政是必须作出决定的。政府从2016年就瘫痪了，然后medical supply还让一个毫无资格的女婿来负责，知道trump和他女婿家是怎么以权谋私吧。女婿就爸爸还是个经济罪犯。
不急！罪恶之手有1万亿美元在美国财政部账户里押这呢
这是你墙国内的驾轻就熟的手段，当官必学的第一课，怪不得你这么明白呢。
承让承让，师承贵国，不敢造次
他被灭口也是应得其所。因为他的渎职死了多少人？灭口也不关我们的事。
cnn还好，wsj有点，终于不是一盘散沙了么？