2 and 4 are not correct. Even the virus is mutated, the anti-body still can be very useful since the virus cannot be mutated too much in the short time. That is why the flu shot can be useful for one year.
felicity2000 发表于 3/31/2020 6:10:33 PM
Your statement actually explained why flu shot does not work most of the time.
Your statement actually explained why flu shot does not work most of the time.
睿 发表于 3/31/2020 6:49:22 PM
If the flu shot doesn't work, the common reasons are as following,
1. the person cannot generate anti-body due to his/her own health issue. 2. There are so many types of virus. The flu shot only can generate anti-body for few common virus according each year's prediction. It is very hard to cover all the virus. 3. But any vaccine need to be at least 40% to 60% effective for the whole population, then that vaccine can be available to general public. That is why the vaccine will take a few months to be available and need several clinical trials.
Your statement actually explained why flu shot does not work most of the time.
路子是一样的,大量的测,尽可能保持原有的生活状态,将曲线拉缓,你忘记了最开始大家对韩国爆发的惊呼吧,他们能尽最快时间控制好是因为测试盒的及时,这点美国最开始确实没做好。日本还真不好说,我感觉潜在危险很大
真是上了一课,现在怀疑所有官场混得好的都精于此道。不论犯下什么大错,只要把目标改了就还可以exceed the expectation, do a good job
韩国不只是测,还有全民通报自己的活动范围和最新身体状况。只测也是不够的
别光过嘴瘾,骂别人一套一套的,自己猫家里键盘后。
支持你勇敢出街晃,身体力行从你自身先行实践群体免疫。
人权最重要的就是生命权健康权,连这个都不去保护,怎么能说是重视人权。
你说的不全面,生命权健康权没有错,但是要保证每个公民都有一样的健康权生命权。牺牲一部分人的生命权和健康权去保证另一部分人的,绝不是保护人权。
群体免疫其实就是建立在牺牲一部分人的人权的基础上的。而退一万步讲,即便是群体免疫,国家也应该尽力去让被牺牲的人控制到最少,少牺牲一些生命和健康,隔离口罩防疫措施就是这个功能。而如果做不到这一点或者不想做,那群体免疫就是给政府不作为的一个借口。
Sorry,我只记得2月中旬的数据是2.2%,刚才特意去查了下5%(官方的数据是5万感染,死2500),哎,武汉的数据反正也没什么参考价值,毕竟牺牲一个省来救全国,美国也不可能这样。但美国目前的数据是2%,应该不会再高了,但也不会低太多。
系统提示:若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YWupoHcoLT4
滚。请你先牺牲自己。你这种没有人性的才是人类的败类。
If the flu shot doesn't work, the common reasons are as following,
1. the person cannot generate anti-body due to his/her own health issue.
2. There are so many types of virus. The flu shot only can generate anti-body for few common virus according each year's prediction. It is very hard to cover all the virus.
3. But any vaccine need to be at least 40% to 60% effective for the whole population, then that vaccine can be available to general public. That is why the vaccine will take a few months to be available and need several clinical trials.
两个星期前, 我记得华人上有一个投票, 美国最后结果会是什么,
有一个选项是 美国中等规模爆发, 最后死几万人。选这个的比较多。
然后好几个ID上来大骂选这个都是五毛和大外宣,华人肯定被五毛占领了。这些 是翻墙带节奏的。这些人都不配呆在美国, 美国怎么会比中国差?
现在看来就是讽刺吧。
我也一直这么觉得,哪个国家会垮,是这么多人,叫有信心???
死人和病危的人还有什么人权,受够了这些鬼话空话!
美国现在的措施看不出来能flatten the curve。自欺欺人
NYC碍着你什么了?有点基本的同情心同理心吗?
支持群体免疫的自己先得了让别人安全吧。整个莫名其妙。
牛逼,卸磨杀驴,老人都该死对不,把你爹妈先贡献出来当祭品
像集权国家那样去抗疫去防毒 最后还是走这条路
终于看到明白人,版上有明白人,但是不多。
别忘了还有南半球呢,我们是夏天了,南半球可能要冬天了。
把你家老人先推出去感染了再说这话!真是没人性,打算自己几岁去世呀?
全世界都一样
自打厉害国把武汉人送往全世界就已经封不住了