看看隔壁无数帖子因为采访时一句话“没说对”而感到义愤填膺。 那面对这个不公平该怎么反应？这个不公平该花多少时间去给议员打电话讲道理？ 来看一下： The California Constitution, pursuant to provisions enacted by the initiative Proposition 209 in 1996, prohibits the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. The California Constitution defines the state for these purposes to include the state, any city, county, public university system, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of, or within, the state. This measure would repeal these provisions.
。。。WHEREAS, Proposition 209, entitled the California Civil Rights Initiative, amended Article I of the California Constitution to prohibit race- and gender-conscious remedies to rectify the underutilization of women and people of color in public employment, as well as public contracting and education;
找到了“ Jonathan Burdick, vice provost for enrollment at Cornell University encourages us to consider this from a different perspective. He says, “count me among those who worry that a dramatic increase in what is already tremendous uncertainty ultimately privileges (once again) those who have access to the best information fastest. That is not a formula for improving access, it’s a formula for a market even more characterized than ever by ‘insider trading’ behavior. If all colleges are test-optional, what will they use instead to make good decisions? Among the devices are: better quality of application submissions, including an increased emphasis on the quality of a recommendation letter or six; evidence of co-curricular activity and leadership, competitions, etc.; ‘proven’ reputations for academic rigor in specific schools; grading practices designed to ‘show improvement’ and minimize the effects of small differences, etc. And, most basic of all, the likelihood of paying tuition.” Rhetorically he asks, “Do any of these sound like access options?”
🔥 最新回帖
🛋️ 沙发板凳
那面对这个不公平该怎么反应？这个不公平该花多少时间去给议员打电话讲道理？
来看一下：
The California Constitution, pursuant to provisions enacted by the initiative Proposition 209 in 1996, prohibits the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. The California Constitution defines the state for these purposes to include the state, any city, county, public university system, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of, or within, the state.
This measure would repeal these provisions.
。。。WHEREAS, Proposition 209, entitled the California Civil Rights Initiative, amended Article I of the California Constitution to prohibit race- and gender-conscious remedies to rectify the underutilization of women and people of color in public employment, as well as public contracting and education;
同觉得签名没用，给议员打电话效果多少会好点。
华人入学是 努力学习家长投入earn 的，和某些族裔需要这个那个照顾不一样。 现在是这个法案是族裔名额制，让华人把 earn 的名额让出来给需要照顾的族裔。 不知道和你口罩的例子有啥关系。
移民美国的中国人三观都比较偏个人主义
自私自利到极点的言论。接着挑唆啊。什么都要抢光抢尽，总有一天在美华人会发现，不存在“别人死光了就我活着”这回事。
可以帮忙给个List 吗？ 反正在家没事， 打电话时间特别多。
是的，签名没有用，打电话。
你这帖子满满的外宣元素。夸大并渲染所谓的歧视。我来美国20年就从来没见过歧视。你要整天感觉被歧视，只能说你能力非常有问题，你的娃能力也非常有问题。
你按本事，你不需要生存在这个社会大环境中，你何必跟人家争人家社会一部分的大学呢？你花大量时间学习是为了你自己接受更好的教育，对这个社会没有任何贡献，人家的大学建立的宗旨就不是为了只选拔精英只培养利己主义者，凭什么要别人对你只按入学条件录取。你按本事那现在疫情流行入院治疗也按照能力来好了，在美国无亲无故没有社会背景没有依靠又没枪的华人靠边站，先治疗精英人才。
好像是说要把大学名额按照种族分配，然后各个种族内部竞争。
比如黑人只需要和黑人竞争，分数再烂也可以上
亚裔需要和亚裔竞争，分数再高也可能被挤下来。
这个法案已经提了好多年了。
接着爬藤啊，爬到藤尽头人家依然歧视你。因为你这样的人，连我都不愿跟你一个community。
那你考什么gre托福看什么gpa，sat，act科学荼毒？杠精么
说实话不能同意更多
Trump甩锅强调Chinese Virus激发歧视仇恨的时候 一堆人给他洗白
华人小孩捐献口罩上了电视 一堆人跳出来声讨说人家抢功
疫情刚开始踩中国踩得那个欢 中国做什么都是错 好像自动筛除亲人朋友在国内积极抗疫
两个月后风向变了 大统领做了同样的事 hoax，big flu, everything under control... 白白浪费两个月 每天数字上万的跳 这都不关大统领的事 错在中国
哦对了 这几天华人的新风向 离婚家暴成了新主题
难怪Andrew Yang参选的时候根本不把华人作为base 不然还没出线 估计就祖宗八代被挖 被各种口水淹死
顶🆙
首先反对这个提案并不是反对帮助弱势群体。不能按种族给名额有两个原因，1。 帮助穷人和弱势群体，有一个比种族更管用的指标叫Socioeconomic status, 就是华人说的贫困线。按照这个照顾有需要的群体更公平，比如每个种族都有富人穷人，按钱更公平。
2。种族是一个人不能改变的东西，不应该作为被帮助的标准，这样对那些meritbased 录取的colored学生很不公平。别人会觉得他们是被照顾入学，而不是凭自己的实力。而按照上面的socioeconomic status的照顾，无法直接从皮肤看出来，而且一个人的socioeconomic status是可以通过努力被改变的，那些被帮助的人通过努力，达到了贫困线，就不应该继续接受帮助，而是把资源留给没到贫困线的人。
签了
顶一下，本州的打个电话呗。
昨天在哪看到的一个英文评论说的很好，其实去掉考试，看领导才能，看课外活动，看比赛得奖这些穷人的孩子更竞争不过，而且富人有更多的机会钻空子，考试不是最公平的方式，但也就只有考试让穷人有了竞争的可能。