“The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus. “On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three,” he says.
德国上传的最早的序列是1月28日的 Germany/BavPat1/2020 Collection date 2020-01-28 Authors Corman et al Admin Division Bavaria Originating Lab Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Virology; Institut fur Mikrobiologie der Bundeswehr, Munich Submitting Lab Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Virology Country Germany Region Europe Host Human Submission Date Older Location Starnberg Clade A2 GISAID EPI ISL 406862
Collection date 2020-01-28 Authors Wang et al Admin Division Shanghai Originating Lab Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Country China Region Asia Host Human Submission Date 1-2 days ago Submitting Lab National Research Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine & Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center Clade A2 GISAID EPI ISL 416327
虽然美国开始借鉴，但是早期还是不管的，听这个总理是非常重视早期治疗的。这是亚洲和欧美国家观念不同吧，但是德国又是怎样可以把死亡率压那么低呢？
中国是不是也是这样？
这就解释了为什么她的死亡率这么outlier了，另一个outlier是意大利，他们是怎么算的死亡率？
意大利是唯恐他们的数据看起来不够惨。只要死亡病例所在的医院里有新冠感染都算新冠死亡。在所有统计为新冠死亡的病例中，只有12%是直接死于新冠。https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-catastrophe-in-italy/
“The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus. “On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three,” he says.
中国的标准不统一，不知道怎么算的。连确诊病例的标准都变了好几次，最新的为了压本土新增病例，说是阳性但无疹状的就不算确诊，复阳的不管有没有诊状一律不算新增，当然境外输入的没这限制，集中隔离，只要测出来一次阳性立马算
德国病人来自夏威夷就是中国自媒体造谣的。
德国上传的最早的序列是1月28日的
Germany/BavPat1/2020
Collection date 2020-01-28
Authors Corman et al
Admin Division Bavaria
Originating Lab Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Virology; Institut fur Mikrobiologie der Bundeswehr, Munich
Submitting Lab Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Virology
Country Germany
Region Europe
Host Human
Submission Date Older
Location Starnberg
Clade A2
GISAID EPI ISL 406862
和上海的1月28日的一个样本的基因序列一模一样。可以说德国的病例就是上海去德国出差的那个女的传过去的。跟新闻播报从时间人物地点都能对的上。
德国第一例真躺枪 中国同行到访传染得病确证人传人
发表时间： 28/01/2020 - 16:44
德国首宗武汉肺炎确诊病例是遭上周访德的中国同事传染。据信这是欧洲首起人传人病例。传染的人据信回中国后通报不适，但下文情况不明。该同行来自上海。由此或可推测，上海疫情不可轻视。
据法新社今天报道说，遭中国同事感染，德国现首例欧洲武汉病毒人传人。
德国相关官员今天表示，德国首宗武汉肺炎确诊病例是遭上周访德的中国同事传染。据信这是欧洲首起人传人病例。
据巴伐利亚州（Bavaria）健康及食品安全部门负责人扎非（Andreas Zapf）在记者会上表示，这名来自上海的中国女性员工「在1月23日的返乡飞机上开始觉得不适」。
患病的33岁德国男性与这位女同事21日共同出席巴伐利亚的一场会议，并在昨天晚间被确诊。
法新社说，与其他病患不同的是，这起德国确诊病例最近并未去过中国。
扎非说，罹病病患目前接受隔离治疗，「状况良好」。
消息没有涉及是否有其他共同参加会议的人威胁受到感染处置细节。
China/Shanghai/SH0014
Collection date 2020-01-28
Authors Wang et al
Admin Division Shanghai
Originating Lab Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Country China
Region Asia
Host Human
Submission Date 1-2 days ago
Submitting Lab National Research Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine & Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
Clade A2
GISAID EPI ISL 416327