"PragerU's claim that YouTube censored PragerU's speech faces a formidable threshold hurdle: YouTube is a private entity. The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government—not a private party—from abridging speech," judges wrote.
"PragerU's claim that YouTube censored PragerU's speech faces a formidable threshold hurdle: YouTube is a private entity. The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government—not a private party—from abridging speech," judges wrote.
US appeals court判决了宪法第一修正案言论自由保护不适用于Youtube之类的平台 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/02/first-amendment-doesnt-apply-on-youtube-judges-reject-prageru-lawsuit/ "PragerU's claim that YouTube censored PragerU's speech faces a formidable threshold hurdle: YouTube is a private entity. The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government—not a private party—from abridging speech," judges wrote. 宪法第一修正案已经说的很明白了，保护言论自由权不受到政府的迫害，从来都没说过公司或者网络平台之类的 论坛上大妈叽叽歪歪说什么微信封号违反言论自由还要在美国起诉他们的，先好好读读判决先例吧 公司不需要保护你的言论自由，你可以选择不去打工 微信不需要保护你的言论自由，你可以选择不用 cnisfx 发表于 2/27/2020 4:37:00 PM
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
"PragerU's claim that YouTube censored PragerU's speech faces a formidable threshold hurdle: YouTube is a private entity. The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government—not a private party—from abridging speech," judges wrote.
宪法第一修正案已经说的很明白了，保护言论自由权不受到政府的迫害，从来都没说过公司或者网络平台之类的
论坛上大妈叽叽歪歪说什么微信封号违反言论自由还要在美国起诉他们的，先好好读读判决先例吧
公司不需要保护你的言论自由，你可以选择不去打工
微信不需要保护你的言论自由，你可以选择不用
哦也
左的删右的言论，右的删左的言论，你可以去右的社交媒体啊，有人拦你了吗？
Youtube censored content确实没有受到美国政府的要求。
但是Wechat关闭账户呢？法官总要问这个问题。
美国宪法可以管到中国政府是否违宪吗？
微信封账户是按照中国政府指示，这违反美国宪法吗？说白了美国宪法第一修正案是对美国政府的约束，除此之外都不适用
既然打官司了，就得由法官裁判。
难得竟然你还有点脑子。。
这判决对Youtube确实不是啥好事。。
讨论宪法前请你读一读宪法
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.