How the Tax on Extreme Wealth Would Work This tax on extreme wealth would have a progressive rate structure that would only apply to the wealthiest 180,000 households in America who are in the top 0.1 percent.
It would start with a 1 percent tax on net worth above $32 million for a married couple. That means a married couple with $32.5 million would pay a wealth tax of just $5,000.
The tax rate would increase to 2 percent on net worth from $50 to $250 million, 3 percent from $250 to $500 million, 4 percent from $500 million to $1 billion, 5 percent from $1 to $2.5 billion, 6 percent from $2.5 to $5 billion, 7 percent from $5 to $10 billion, and 8 percent on wealth over $10 billion. These brackets are halved for singles.
Under this plan, the wealth of billionaires would be cut in half over 15 years which would substantially break up the concentration of wealth and power of this small privileged class.
Under current law, the IRS is already required to assess the net worth of the wealthiest Americans when they pass away, to calculate estate tax liability. A federal wealth tax would require the IRS to make the same assessment on an annual basis for the wealthiest Americans. Steps would also be taken to streamline the process for purposes of the wealth tax.
For assets that are difficult to appraise, the Treasury Department would have the option of allowing taxpayers to have appraisals done periodically instead of annually. The Treasury Department would establish the average rates of appreciation for several classes of assets. Those appraised only every few years would be assumed to appreciate in the intervening years at the average rate established for their designated class.
Assets placed in a trust would be treated as owned by the grantor of the trust (by the person giving assets to the trust) until that person’s death.
按三得子的税法， mini mike每年得交8% wealth tax, 川大嘴交6% ， 交个15年，财富缩水一半。 富人们带着财产移民算了。
How the Tax on Extreme Wealth Would Work This tax on extreme wealth would have a progressive rate structure that would only apply to the wealthiest 180,000 households in America who are in the top 0.1 percent.
It would start with a 1 percent tax on net worth above $32 million for a married couple. That means a married couple with $32.5 million would pay a wealth tax of just $5,000.
The tax rate would increase to 2 percent on net worth from $50 to $250 million, 3 percent from $250 to $500 million, 4 percent from $500 million to $1 billion, 5 percent from $1 to $2.5 billion, 6 percent from $2.5 to $5 billion, 7 percent from $5 to $10 billion, and 8 percent on wealth over $10 billion. These brackets are halved for singles.
Under this plan, the wealth of billionaires would be cut in half over 15 years which would substantially break up the concentration of wealth and power of this small privileged class.
Under current law, the IRS is already required to assess the net worth of the wealthiest Americans when they pass away, to calculate estate tax liability. A federal wealth tax would require the IRS to make the same assessment on an annual basis for the wealthiest Americans. Steps would also be taken to streamline the process for purposes of the wealth tax.
For assets that are difficult to appraise, the Treasury Department would have the option of allowing taxpayers to have appraisals done periodically instead of annually. The Treasury Department would establish the average rates of appreciation for several classes of assets. Those appraised only every few years would be assumed to appreciate in the intervening years at the average rate established for their designated class.
Assets placed in a trust would be treated as owned by the grantor of the trust (by the person giving assets to the trust) until that person’s death.
按三得子的税法， mini mike每年得交8% wealth tax, 川大嘴交6% ， 交个15年，财富缩水一半。 富人们带着财产移民算了。
🔥 最新回帖
真心少扯淡了，挪威那么富，完全是靠石油。。
500来万人口的国家，靠石油硬是攒了超过1万亿美元的国家主权基金。。
所以他国内那点的个人所得税，资本所得税怎么折腾都无所谓。。。
三德子有本事帮美国找个50万亿美元的主权基金我看看？
Amazon就没多少盈利，凭啥让人家缴税？？
那时党国从上到下都是这么想的吧：国运来了挡不住，美国出了个傻Trump。
好吧，我错了……
🛋️ 沙发板凳
不就是北欧么。等他提出把shell，google，chase都收归国有了，再说他是共产党吧。
如果真是Sanders的话那么民主党没戏。他太左了。
别听起来了，Sanders自己都在60 minutes辟谣了，基本一辈子get nothing done, 对自己承诺的免费的东西的price tag一无所知，也没兴趣知道，而且对国会基本没啥影响力的。而且收入2万6的都不放过，都要增税，160million人失去自己的private[url=https://rd2.huaren.us/huaren.php?hrtopic_id=2510253&hrurl=https%3a%2f%2fwww.visitorscoverage.com%2f]insurance[/url].
查一下前几年法国如何征收巨富税，之后的结果。这样的愚蠢的问题还是少问。
美国需要个不是senior citizen的领袖。
No, too good to be true.
赞同这个主意
Trump的赤字窟窿大不大？
是的……
到了.1%估计眼界就不同了
这个好，下届总统你来做
说得很对 富人创造的社会价值很大 我倒是觉得应该征收不工作懶人税 没理由手脚健全不到退休年龄不交税吃福利啊
幼稚，一群行军蚁（无产阶级）把老虎（富人）干掉了，小白兔（你，中产阶级）觉得自己可以分一口老虎肉？
所以要研究，我要看看他怎么实施从超级富豪那收税，其实我感兴趣财富税，如果切实可行，那考虑投他
那样怎么可能拿到选票！
不是吧
就是让老虎吃肉的时候多留口汤而已
老虎怎么会那么容易干掉呢
让福利党劳动福利党不答应不给他们投票啊，所以还得捧着哄着割中产的肉豢养他们！
不用研究，没戏！富豪想改个国籍多容易的事情，你不能不准人家移民吧，违宪的
This tax on extreme wealth would have a progressive rate structure that would only apply to the wealthiest 180,000 households in America who are in the top 0.1 percent.
It would start with a 1 percent tax on net worth above $32 million for a married couple. That means a married couple with $32.5 million would pay a wealth tax of just $5,000.
The tax rate would increase to 2 percent on net worth from $50 to $250 million, 3 percent from $250 to $500 million, 4 percent from $500 million to $1 billion, 5 percent from $1 to $2.5 billion, 6 percent from $2.5 to $5 billion, 7 percent from $5 to $10 billion, and 8 percent on wealth over $10 billion. These brackets are halved for singles.
Under this plan, the wealth of billionaires would be cut in half over 15 years which would substantially break up the concentration of wealth and power of this small privileged class.
Under current law, the IRS is already required to assess the net worth of the wealthiest Americans when they pass away, to calculate estate tax liability. A federal wealth tax would require the IRS to make the same assessment on an annual basis for the wealthiest Americans. Steps would also be taken to streamline the process for purposes of the wealth tax.
For assets that are difficult to appraise, the Treasury Department would have the option of allowing taxpayers to have appraisals done periodically instead of annually. The Treasury Department would establish the average rates of appreciation for several classes of assets. Those appraised only every few years would be assumed to appreciate in the intervening years at the average rate established for their designated class.
Assets placed in a trust would be treated as owned by the grantor of the trust (by the person giving assets to the trust) until that person’s death.
按三得子的税法， mini mike每年得交8% wealth tax, 川大嘴交6% ， 交个15年，财富缩水一半。 富人们带着财产移民算了。
Re
历史上干掉老虎吃虎肉的有，让老虎留口汤的不曾有过。
好像也是的
😂
这么好的事！
超级富豪有100种办法避税，最后都是中产买单，别挖坑给自己卖了。
为什么？
这不是废话吗？
难道要教你1+1=2？
sanders 好像是homeless 出生，他怎么可能知道middle class的苦
忽悠老百姓的，几乎没法实施，除非很多税务条款和trust 以及公司等结构都重写。随便举个例子，
比如上边，个人一般trust都算个人的， trust 都是独立法人和税务体，现在税务要算成个人的，那trust 相关法律就要重写。charitable trust 和 foundation呢，很多财产名义上几乎都属于某个慈善机构了，怎么划分？除非把trust 这个结构取消了，回复到原始的个人时期，什么都是个人的。那当初产生这些结构解决的问题又重现来过了。
还有公司，富人直接把资产放在非pass through公司结构就行了。那为了这个tax, 公司结构法和税务法也要重写吗？
还有离岸信托，在外公司，expat那些，很多很多问题需要解决。富人还可以一走了之。
所以，听起来很美好，实际实施要从富人身上收到这些钱，几乎不可能。
确实是这样 只有挣工资的才逃不掉税
这些可行性好一些，而且不少极左支持并提出。但就效果来说，一切基于收入而不是财富的税务对真正富人来说都不伤筋动骨只是动动皮毛，最受伤害的还是中产。当然多让他们交点总比没有好，而且很多富人如果多交税能有效造福社会也是很乐意的。
不管政治，纯就避税来说。比如上边2，有点股票分红的，有资本收益的中产，都要多交税。富人把资产放进不realized 的资产里就好了，地产，公司，不到卖的时候不计算资本升值，甚至直到死了cost basis step up 给子女。
1富人也有一些规避办法，包括明的暗的灰色的。比如通过设立结构转为成本花销做抵消。
拿w-2的很难避税，富人的投资收入有很多方法避税
对的，这个AMT就是他妈的耍流氓。
我也这么想
至少值得努力一下的
十万八万应该不会hit amt吧？不然你的deduction也太🐂b了