The WHO case definition for probable SARS includes radiographic evidence of infiltrates consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on chest radiograph (2). Cases reported to WHO outside the United States are probable SARS cases; the United States reports all suspected cases.
The WHO case definition for probable SARS includes radiographic evidence of infiltrates consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on chest radiograph (2). Cases reported to WHO outside the United States are probable SARS cases; the United States reports all suspected cases.
gvcc 发表于 2/19/2020 4:26:01 PM
WHO 有WHO的标准,因为SARS爆发时间短,标准不统一,CDC有自己的标准没什么问题,哪里捏造数据了?WHO的数据是数据,CDC数据就不是数据?
哎 直接给答案吧
Sars 美国166个病例,其中90多个都是白人。
啪啪打脸。
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5214a1.htm
没见哪里有答案。。谁来说一下?就事论事,阴谋论走开。
SARS美国有300多疑似,但wiki上说只有27个病例。166是哪里的数字?
CDC网站
美国有重症病人的,sars轻症很少,这166个里面也有几十个亚洲人
没读那么多文章?武汉病毒比SARS多了一节艾滋的基因链
能不能不要编造数据?
https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/2003_07_04/en/
全美总共73人,哪来的90多白人?
张嘴就喷吗?
自己看
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5214a1.htm
自己引的文章自己都不会看?把疑似都算上case自然多了。
The WHO case definition for probable SARS includes radiographic evidence of infiltrates consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on chest radiograph (2). Cases reported to WHO outside the United States are probable SARS cases; the United States reports all suspected cases.
WHO 有WHO的标准,因为SARS爆发时间短,标准不统一,CDC有自己的标准没什么问题,哪里捏造数据了?WHO的数据是数据,CDC数据就不是数据?
疑似最后被排除的当然不算了,所以WHO的数据算的是最后感染的人。这也要杠?