Matt H 23 minutes ago can’t believe people believe this garbage. Pete? Seriously? Obviously DNC dollars are at work Quint 41 minutes ago Man, they’re really trying to screw Bernie AGAIN. It would be funny if it weren’t so scary. nintubegoogification 56 minutes ago Why even have an app that was involved with Buttigieg among other candidates? If another country had attempted the same thing we would call it what it is. Establishment controlled rigged elections. OCTHCTV 1 hour ago They didn't even say Bernie Sanders. They said Joe Biden. Yeah, play it off like it was a mistake, we know your intent. AnonyPersona 49 minutes ago "Coding Error" LOL. All you have to do is COUNT VOTES. An elementary coder could have made an app that did this LMAO. This isn't like AI, auto-pilot, or image recognition or generation.
Moxieman 22 minutes ago My god how can anyone believe anything the DNC says or does? It's a total shitshow. Caleb Clark 19 minutes ago It's not surprising to anyone whose paid any attention in the past 3 months mmafighting 40 minutes ago Snake in the grass.. Pete's campaign financed the Iowa causcus app, it's public knowledge. The internet exists. He is making a fool of himself acting like he won anything. Bernie won and everyone knows it, once again the internet exists. Jeff Woods 27 minutes ago I'm glad the shadow software by the democrats is not in question or thought to be rigged..if people on the left cannot see this corruption, there is no hope for them .. Zeno of Citium 41 minutes ago (edited) THIS IS PLURALITY VOTING INSANITY. We will never know the true support of each candidate. This tells us NOTHING. And someone will win, with "I got the highest number". smh. Yeah, but the majority didn't want you! (as far as we know).
Zeno of Citium 41 minutes ago (edited) THIS IS PLURALITY VOTING INSANITY. We will never know the true support of each candidate. This tells us NOTHING. And someone will win, with "I got the highest number". smh. Yeah, but the majority didn't want you! (as far as we know). goldengate 发表于 2/4/2020 7:47:25 PM
Is this a joke? Under 2000 votes for all Dems? zvents 发表于 2/4/2020 7:45:08 PM
Any voter registered with a party can participate in a caucus. Fewer eligible voters take part in a caucus because it is a more time-consuming process, says Robert Spitzer, political science professor at the State University of New York at Cortland. With some major exceptions, like Iowa, turnout in caucus states probably remains “well under 10 percent of the registered voters,” says Abramowitz.
Indeed, the entire situation vindicated Bloomberg’s unusual strategy of skipping the caucus — a move that was likely rooted as much in face-saving as in challenging the status quo. Bloomberg's late entry into the primary all but rendered him untenable in a state that demands months of retail politicking.
71%点票的数据（https://www.realclearpolitics.com/） 总票数（votes）是Sanders领先，但Pete在District and State Delegates（SDE）上领先，最终的选举人团（Del.）上两人各10票 另外，Iowa总共的选举人团是41张票，外加8张superdelegates
71%点票的数据（https://www.realclearpolitics.com/） 总票数（votes）是Sanders领先，但Pete在District and State Delegates（SDE）上领先，最终的选举人团（Del.）上两人各10票 另外，Iowa总共的选举人团是41张票，外加8张superdelegates
71%点票的数据（ https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ ） 总票数（votes）是Sanders领先，但Pete在District and State Delegates（SDE）上领先，最终的选举人团（Del.）上两人各10票 另外，Iowa总共的选举人团是41张票，外加8张superdelegates xizzhu 发表于 2/5/2020 2:14:00 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/03/us/elections/results-super-tuesday-primary-election.html
https://www.cnn.com
Joe Biden 比预期赢的更多。
🔥 最新回帖
是哪次？你也没告诉人家啊？
你如果是共和党我就不说话。如果你是中立，那么可以告诉你，美国现代最有名的弊端选举是哪次。
这次大概率没人过半，然后民主党大佬钦定Biden。
你觉得Sanders 能过半吗？现在大概率已经不行了。如果Biden 不过半，大概率 contested convention 也是一样的，
亲 这次没有super delegate了。除非是最后没人过半
🛋️ 沙发板凳
哈哈 熱鬧。 轉幾個過來看看？
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Vaf3-YC2_go
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/rlWPi6RIkyY
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/ndftfHoUv1M
建制派，Pete or Biden。
就想問一句：你瞎嗎 😀
Any voter registered with a party can participate in a caucus. Fewer eligible voters take part in a caucus because it is a more time-consuming process, says Robert Spitzer, political science professor at the State University of New York at Cortland. With some major exceptions, like Iowa, turnout in caucus states probably remains “well under 10 percent of the registered voters,” says Abramowitz.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/caucus-system-us-presidential-nominating-process
可以看上面的文章。
估计他们有专用硬币的。
他要是有这个guts早在16年出来选了。 更别说现在了，混套房子不容易，别强人所难
他没注册这州。
决不能轻敌，主党不知道要耍什么阴招。
第八名
民主党现在很痛苦。Biden不行，他们只能让pete上，宁可输给Trump也不会让Sanders上。金主不会放过他们。
这个是被骂的原因之一。意思是他们不知道要搞多久。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/fayZiyMktEc
Pete Buttigieg 下面访问都是骂他的。
这种初选只有家里没事做的老人大妈，建制派排出的打手等去参加。
说他是华尔街挑的。不过我看他各种不顺眼。根本不知道他的政纲是什么。
是的，是被big donner选出来专门去选的跟奥巴马差不多。卖形象卖包装。
Indeed, the entire situation vindicated Bloomberg’s unusual strategy of skipping the caucus — a move that was likely rooted as much in face-saving as in challenging the status quo. Bloomberg's late entry into the primary all but rendered him untenable in a state that demands months of retail politicking.
一再向选民暴露了民主党的本性
杨也干不过trump。 民主党最racists， 他们根本容不得亚裔， 所以杨从trump这里抢到票的远不够抵消他丢的民主党选票。
同感，这货色心里非常看不起大陆人，多多少少表现出来。看不出一点真诚，非常政客化。 选这种人上去，华人特别是大陆人有的苦吃了。
哈，有个毛威胁，一副又怂又坏的样子，碰瓷多少次了川普都不搭理，三秃子倒是很能忽悠一部分年轻人。
总票数（votes）是Sanders领先，但Pete在District and State Delegates（SDE）上领先，最终的选举人团（Del.）上两人各10票
另外，Iowa总共的选举人团是41张票，外加8张superdelegates
谢谢提供信息。其实就是民主党rig了sanders。
写色情小说的品德能高尚到哪里去
Bloomberg参加初选，但一直没上辩论，前两天DNC才改规则允许他参加辩论。。
他的策略基本就是等着接盘Biden的选民了，昨天才宣布把竞选团队和资金翻番，主攻Super Tuesday。现在是天天看他的广告，烦死了～～
我觉得不一定是作弊，感觉整个主党瘫痪了，可能没有能力作弊。应该就是出错了，多年沉疴，这个党的核心价值多年来一直往左走，不看重会做事的，看重嘴特别会说的所谓social justice的一群人，会出错其实也在情理之中。只是作为美国唯二的大党没想到真会到今天这个地步。何况奥巴才下任多久？这么快竟然离心离德到这个地步。
我跑去听了一下，感觉她不是那种让人特别讨厌的建制派，也不算极端，估计吸收了一部分中间选民的投票。
民主党基本上他们的rule就是决定了他们是建制派说了算的。大把超级选举人选票，所以Sanders如果得不到支持，根本不可能出现。现在就要看看建制派要不要向progressive 屈服了。
她就是去分sanders选票的。让她放弃估计没有那么早。
Sanders 还是很厉害的，Texas他现在领先。Warren能吸引Sanders的粉吗？他们不会一怒之下不去投票了吧。
不会用涡轮 花街硅谷怕涡轮远胜三的事
我觉得Warren在今天后，会退出并endorse Biden, 交换条件是她可以当VP候选人。民主党大佬会同意，因为warren可以帮她们赢女性选民。
trump好像希望bernie赢，他自己发推说的
哈