“China shall allow U.S. financial services suppliers to apply for asset management company licenses that would permit them to acquire non-performing loans directly from Chinese banks, beginning with provincial licenses”
The provisions of the deal are subject to an enforcement mechanism that calls for several rounds of consultations. If the two sides don’t reach an agreement, the complaining party could take “remedial measure in a proportionate way”—trade lingo for reimposing tariffs. In practice, the U.S. would likely be the party bringing the complaint because it is China that is pledging to make changes and increase purchases. So long as the tariff imposition is in good faith, Beijing agreed not to retaliate. But the good-faith and proportionality requirements give China a lot of room to act. Rather than retaliate with tariffs, the deal says the party whose actions led to the complaint could withdraw from the deal. －－wsj
The provisions of the deal are subject to an enforcement mechanism that calls for several rounds of consultations. If the two sides don’t reach an agreement, the complaining party could take “remedial measure in a proportionate way”—trade lingo for reimposing tariffs. In practice, the U.S. would likely be the party bringing the complaint because it is China that is pledging to make changes and increase purchases. So long as the tariff imposition is in good faith, Beijing agreed not to retaliate. But the good-faith and proportionality requirements give China a lot of room to act. Rather than retaliate with tariffs, the deal says the party whose actions led to the complaint could withdraw from the deal. －－wsj
Tech Transfer “The Parties affirm the importance of ensuring that the transfer of technology occurs on voluntary, market-based terms and recognize that forced technology transfer is a significant concern. The Parties further recognize the importance of undertaking steps to address these issues, in light of the profound impact of technology and technological change on the world economy.”
Currency Enforcement “Enforcement Mechanism 1. Issues related to exchange rate policy or transparency shall be referred by either the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China to the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement established in Chapter 7 (Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution). 2. If there is failure to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution under the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China may also request that the IMF, consistent with its mandate: (a) undertake rigorous surveillance of the macroeconomic and exchange rate policies and data transparency and reporting policies of the requested Party; or (b) initiate formal consultations and provide input, as appropriate.” 没觉得有啥问题。。。 但想来你们这些屁都不懂的恨国党，原本就不care这些具体内容。。。。
1. Issues related to exchange rate policy or transparency shall be referred by either the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China to the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement established in Chapter 7 (Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution).
2. If there is failure to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution under the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China may also request that the IMF, consistent with its mandate: (a) undertake rigorous surveillance of the macroeconomic and exchange rate policies and data transparency and reporting policies of the requested Party; or (b) initiate formal consultations and provide input, as appropriate.”
1. Issues related to exchange rate policy or transparency shall be referred by either the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China to the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement established in Chapter 7 (Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution).
2. If there is failure to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution under the Bilateral Evaluation and Dispute Resolution Arrangement, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury or the Governor of the People’s Bank of China may also request that the IMF, consistent with its mandate: (a) undertake rigorous surveillance of the macroeconomic and exchange rate policies and data transparency and reporting policies of the requested Party; or (b) initiate formal consultations and provide input, as appropriate.”
Tech Transfer “The Parties affirm the importance of ensuring that the transfer of technology occurs on voluntary, market-based terms and recognize that forced technology transfer is a significant concern. The Parties further recognize the importance of undertaking steps to address these issues, in light of the profound impact of technology and technological change on the world economy.”
Five Key Points in the Phase One U.S.-China Trade Deal
1、知识产权：中国政府将全面重建知识产权立法和执法机制
2、2年2000亿美元采购：包括300亿农产品，500亿能源，800亿制成品，400亿服贸
3、禁止技术转让
4、人民币汇率操作，必须经过美国财政部和中国央行的共同协商
5、金融服务：4月1日前，中国的资产管理、保险、证券交易、信用机构行业，对美国公司全面开放
🔥 最新回帖
“China shall allow U.S. financial services suppliers to apply for asset management company licenses that would permit them to acquire non-performing loans directly from Chinese banks, beginning with provincial licenses”
说的是允许申请，没说一定必须要给啊。你可以申请，我有正当理由就可以拒绝你的申请
🛋️ 沙发板凳
银监会、证监会、保监会，必须在4/1对美国公司发放营业许可证，不得歧视。
金融行业范围比股市庞大的多。。。
关税
美国资金可以合法做空A股了
谁叫硅谷公司都是支持巴马的铁粉呢。。。
这会是第二第三阶段协议的内容
The provisions of the deal are subject to an enforcement mechanism that calls for several rounds of consultations. If the two sides don’t reach an agreement, the complaining party could take “remedial measure in a proportionate way”—trade lingo for reimposing tariffs. In practice, the U.S. would likely be the party bringing the complaint because it is China that is pledging to make changes and increase purchases. So long as the tariff imposition is in good faith, Beijing agreed not to retaliate. But the good-faith and proportionality requirements give China a lot of room to act. Rather than retaliate with tariffs, the deal says the party whose actions led to the complaint could withdraw from the deal. －－wsj
mark,
这个简单，选择性披露协议内容就行，怎么都能洗赢啊
re
全文出来了
https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rVaHxDBUtdew/v0
仲裁机制：
对于违反贸易协议的行为，原告可以上诉，被告必须在10天内回应，21天内中美底层官员协商解决。
如果无法达成一致，美国贸易副代表，和中国副部长，必须在45天内解决。
如果依然无法达成一致，莱特西泽和刘鹤必须在30天开会解决。
如果仍然无法达成一致，原告方可以合理地采取补偿手段（恢复关税），而被告方承诺不报复，除非彻底退出协议。
对啊， 现在算是打舒服了：
如果贸易战刚开打就签，美国加上的只有25% 500亿关税。
一年半以后现在签，习大大和共铲党，享受了：
25% 2500亿关税
7.5% 1500亿关税
华为大疆等国之重器企业被制裁
中国汽车进口关税 25% 降到15%
今后两年购买2000亿美元美国商品
看来川建国同志不断的搬石头砸自己的脚，终于把脚给砸烂了。
你高看粉们了。
我估计他们只知道美国减税了，川普怂了，不敢加税了！
应该可以了
我觉得能。我们村的信用社应该都能去天朝开分行了。想想这些乡下的小太妹被派去魔都分行站柜台，嗯，人类大同啊。
这得需要一个过程，到时候协议还在不在都是一个问题
美国不是一直想逼RMB升值嘛，这次美元是否有望一路下跌破6呢?
给你看看多伦多战狼的反应http://forum.yorkbbs.ca/chat/5059683.aspx?page=1
怎么可能禁止技术转让，一看就不是真的
我去看了这个帖子里粉红贴的中文报道：http://www.xinhuanet.com/2019-12/14/c_1125346014.htm还是满篇废话，一句细节也没讲，噗
应该是指禁止强迫性（非自愿）技术转让
Tech Transfer
“The Parties affirm the importance of ensuring that the transfer of technology occurs on voluntary, market-based terms and recognize that forced technology transfer is a significant concern. The Parties further recognize the importance of undertaking steps to address these issues, in light of the profound impact of technology and technological change on the world economy.”
Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/five-key-points-in-the-phase-one-u-s-china-trade-deal
Copyright © BloombergQuint
关税照加，还要买2000亿商品，这不平等条约将来肯定写进史册的
mark xxxx第一帖～
美国要求人民币保持稳定 维持在贸易战前的水平6-6.5之间
这就意味着TG要卖出美元消耗美元外汇储备
知道上次大概2016年为了维持人民币汇率TG花了美元外汇么？
那个人就是网上著名的五毛！
有没有贸易战，几年内也能刷的。。
2016年市场正式对外资开放，2017年各外资企业递交的申请，2018年美国运通拿到了第一张人民币结算牌照。。
其实，如果你用Discover，一直都是可以在中国刷的。。他们和中国银联有战略合作，双方渠道兼容。中国银联的卡，也可以在美国discover网点随便刷。。
Visa/Mastercard 希望在国内自建渠道，所以才面临人民币结算牌照问题。。
but again....这贴子里的那些恨国党哪会去关心这个。。。。
脸都被打得啪啪啪了还嘴硬？当初TG说的奉陪到底呢？
就这张图，刘中堂完了
美国哪里占便宜了？美国只是不想再吃亏，签一个平等可以保证可执行的协议而已
中国占了20年大便宜啦 美国不过是让中国履行承诺而已 怎么就变成美国占便宜了
看那表情好像在骂，“习近平，你奶奶个球儿的，这破活儿让我来做。。。”
虽然我一直很不喜欢tg，但说到底看到这张图还是有点心酸。
摸摸。。。TG死的时候就是所有人活的时候，快了。。。。。
心情复杂
不喜欢tg, 那你心酸个啥？
放心好了，只要tg还在，现金墙，茅台冲，就会一直有，就像咱家门前的野草，割了一茬又一茬，生生不息
想看粉红五毛器人的反应，去mitbbs看看就好了
https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5534847 专家已经解读了🤣
你知道土共最成功的是什麼嗎，洗腦！把自己隱身在中國、中國人、全世界華人Chinese裡面，所以他們的失敗就變成了中國乃至全體華人的失敗，你現在的這種感受就是證明。
可是买产品什么的，最后不还是老百姓买单吗？比如买农业产品，国内农民不就不好过了？
mark，就看接下来能不能执行了
5毛又嗨了
而且觉得自己没错，都是别人的错，还想继续这么混下去。被这么当老赖对待，应该都要羞愧死了
金融领域的开放是好事。。
中国经济目前最大的问题就是金融领域的资本配置问题，
海量资金被错配，没需要的企业信贷多到用不完，而真正有需求的企业却拿不到低息融资，民间海量资金没去处，到处制造p2p等一个个泡沫。。
引进点外企，规范化市场，绝对是好事。。只要控制一下具体金融产品，多往服务实业方向走，别进来的都去玩金融衍生品就行。。
这样说吧，开放市场，保护知识产权，降低关税和非关税壁垒，最终降低贸易顺差，这个是对中美两国人民都有好处的事情，本人在这里说过多次了。
但是，任何好事情都有loser，中美都有。
为中国在tg的领导下遭殃心酸
手续费问题。普通商家不一定愿意弄这个东西，目标客户太少。
啊？ 那第三点禁止技术转让就是乱写了。自愿技术转让还是可以的啊。也就是说，给足够的钱，大把技术可以自愿出售。
美国最强的就是金融体系。全部如贷款，期货，证卷等都是他们的杰作。
更厉害的是什麼？Derivatives... 一些搞到连华尔街那群人自己都看不太懂的东西，而从中间获利。
对中国最大的影响就是，中国四大银行能够成為世界上最大的几个金融机构，就是因為中国关门起来自己玩。所以金融业，这几年随著经济的起飞大赚特赚。
现在完全开放，就是让美国华尔街那群狼来中国圈钱了。而美国企业以后要玩弄中国金融市场，可以直接从中国找钱，（相对的降低风险）然后把获利转移到国外。
这个估计也没办法。你以为贸易战谁要打的？当然是华尔街。
第123没有问题，
第45基本就算是日本被美国驻军一个意思，只不过这是金融上的驻军，也就是钱上的驻军，不是领土驻军而已。。。
是的，基本对头。就是中国卖裤子袜子的赚的钱，以后美国要通过金融股市拿回来。
你说对了。但更重要的是，通过进口，让你的农业无法生产，无利可图，无人生产，最后控制你的粮食供应链，马上价格翻倍：中国的大豆已经完全上演过一轮了。
LOL,这叫阳谋，不叫阴谋。。。。
不是乱写，中国以前是强迫转让。
当时签也没用，后面肯定要改，怎么可能让你舒服了
为什么对消费者没有影响 ？500亿的东西影响不大？美国农业产值4000亿，明年中国要进口的东西，会一下子抽走 10%-30%的产品，不导致涨价？
中国是把哪个大公司的CEO还是股东绑架了强迫技术转让还是怎么的？
中国是市场准入和各种优惠政策换技术转让而已，说到底还是一个愿打一个愿挨
这位是火星来的，土共一系列强制转让政策这就洗没了？
WTO承诺就是不准有市场准入
你倒是火星来的，还一系列政策，你倒是举个政策的例子，哪个不是有交换条件的?
我说的是我在国内的时代经历的市场换技术的政策，那是入世贸以前