民主党搬石砸脚:川普2020年连任选举可以在2023年进行

e
en010272
楼主 (北美华人网)
美国最高法院的大法官可以延用1975年的答案,如果当选总统受到弹劾指控,但被参议院认为无罪,那么这个总统可以把被弹劾的时间加入到总统任期。结合到现在是什么意思呢

1. 川普总统要得到参议院72票(一共100票)支持他无罪

2. 如果有72名参议员认为川普无罪,那么川普2020年连任选举将在2023年进行

Supreme Court Can Extend Trump’s Term By Up To 3 Years If He’s Acquitted In The Senate

There’s a little-known precedent on the books that Democrats are trying desperately to have removed before the impeachment trial of President Trump begins. In 1974, as Nixon faced impeachment, the Republican Congress passed a law that would allow his term to be extended if he was acquitted.

The law was specific to Nixon, and was set to expire in 5 years, but Nixon resigned. The removal of the law, therefore, never happened.

According to legal analyst and constitutional scholar, Art Tubolls, the fact that the law exists at all sets a precedent:

“The law is very clear. An acquittal, which they were sure they would get until all the facts came to light, would have meant that Nixon’s term was stolen from him, and that three years or less could be added to his time in office without causing a constitutional crisis.

“Because of how Nixon ended his own career and was pardoned, the law was never struck down or removed, meaning it’s still precedent, and only the Supreme Court can take it away.

“Our sources say it would be a 5-4 vote to allow President Trump to go on for another three years, making the next Presidential election due in 2023. Trump would still be eligible to run.

“That may sound extreme and unconstitutional, but only the SCOTUS can determine that, and they are solidly behind Trump, no matter what crimes he’s committed. The office is better with him in it, and that’s all they’re supposed to care about.“

The White House says the president absolutely would request an extension if acquitted because it’s his constitutional right to do so. If the Democrats want to play dirty, they can spend the next three years campaigning and then get a beatdown like they would have in 2020 anyway.

What all of this means is that if the Democrats don’t convince 8 Republican Senators to vote to convict, we’ll be making America Great again for three extra years with no elections to worry about.

God Bless America.
g
goldengate
真这样,这些人会以死相逼的。
k
kingsland
回复 1楼en010272的帖子

72票基本不可能吧,60票估计都够呛。不过impeachment肯定应该过不了。
西
西风凉
72票?怎么可能。估计参议院也就是按照现在的53-47投票,不排除一两个红州的民主党为了自保投反对弹劾票,但是要72票,不可能。
b
bingmi
川普被弹劾了三年?

☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.14.04
弹指芳华
72票不可能
s
star1991
72票想都别想
j
jennyl
真这样,这些人会以死相逼的。
goldengate 发表于 12/15/2019 4:13:45 PM

主煤会把天下搅乱的,而且他们怎么延续那个得癌的大法官的命到2023年啊,就冲这个他们也不能让川普2023再选啊。
z
zl3341
真这样,这些人会以死相逼的。
goldengate 发表于 12/15/2019 4:13:45 PM

虽然我毫不怀疑他们会以死相逼,但是也毫不怀疑他们绝对不会真去死。
n
nyc15
真这样,这些人会以死相逼的。
goldengate 发表于 12/15/2019 4:13:45 PM


白左要是有哪怕百分之一红左的牺牲精神也就不是白左了。看看我党当年是怎么抛头颅洒热血从尸山血海里爬起来的,这帮白左差远了。

去年大法官那事福特教授要是参院投票的时候在国会山当众自焚,共和党至少丢一个大法官加上4-5个参议员,猪党拿着两院多数,早把川普玩死了。
w
westlake
要是真的有这个法律,为啥克林顿当年不用?
扶苏
回复 1楼en010272的帖子[/url]

72票基本不可能吧,60票估计都够呛。不过impeachment肯定应该过不了。

kingsland 发表于 12/15/2019 4:45:11 PM

RE 肯定过不了,和党现在至少表面上上下一心,罗姆尼安静如鸡。有几个主党有几个倒戈的。
扶苏
真这样,这些人会以死相逼的。
goldengate 发表于 12/15/2019 4:13:45 PM

这些人以死相逼不足为患,但是和党会因此而分裂的。never trumper已经忍很久了,老川任3任这件事情,和党首先无法通过。
k
kate1091
要是真的有这个法律,为啥克林顿当年不用?
westlake 发表于 12/16/2019 10:48:08 AM


Re