that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.-- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed。
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.-- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed。
这种平等从来不是说每人出身时候的才貌能力经济上面必须平等，而是一个社会应该给所有的人创造一个平等的台阶，让每个人都可以拥有生命，自由与追求幸福的权力，不管他们的才貌能力经济背景如何。 artdong 发表于 11/28/2019 1:56:07 AM
all men are created equal，如果不是极左的言论，那就是童话里的世界。
是这样么？
我想，应该指客观上的平等，而非主观意义上的平等；应该指唯物的平等，而不是唯心的平等；应该是具有对称性、不变性的实验上的平等，而不是用每个人心中不同的尺去测量的平等。
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.-- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed。
这种平等从来不是说每人出身时候的才貌能力经济上面必须平等，而是一个社会应该给所有的人创造一个平等的台阶，让每个人都可以拥有生命，自由与追求幸福的权力，不管他们的才貌能力经济背景如何。
每个人生来都有权力去拥有生命，自由与追求幸福，然而每个人生来面对死亡，面对囹圄与面对不幸，却有着机会上的不平等，而这些机会上不平等，甚至能达到1%与99%的差别。
概率上的不平等给人以希望，而常量上的不平等给人以绝望。
当然了，常量是对人生为time scale意义上的常量，没有绝对意义的常量。
你说的这种客观平等在私有制社会是不存在的，上面有个原文引用说的很明白，所谓平等指的是基本人权，当然人权该怎么定义就变得很复杂，何为出生的权利，何为追求幸福的权利，言论自由是否算基本人权，等等等等，不同派别就开始吵起来了