Harvard consistently rated Asian-American applicants lower than any other race on personal traits like “positive personality,” likability, courage, kindness and being “widely respected,” according to an analysis of more than 160,000 student records filed Friday in federal court in Boston by a group representing Asian-American students in a lawsuit against the university.
exactly. This is pure discrimination. "Alumni interviewers give Asian-Americans personal ratings comparable to those of whites. But the admissions office gives them the worst scores of any racial group, often without even meeting them, according to Prof. Arcidiacono."
AARA是正规的501c3组织，如果在钱上做手脚会被IRS盯上，这是美国最麻烦的事。 这次筹款就是为了集合大家的力量。Blum先生忙到没有时间去整理分析捐款数据，而我们这次到周日的筹款一共四周，会公布捐款人数，尤其是我们做了汉语宣传解释了这个筹款的必要性。以前大家分散捐款给SFFA，一直没有形成我们这次一样系统性的讨论。我们不从中拿一分钱，还从自己组织三位数的存款里垫付了wire transfer fee保证SFFA一分钱都不损失。首批三万元捐款已经得到Blum先生的来信确认和感谢。下面根据官司的进展和需要，我们可能还会组织筹款冲刺，尤其是到秋冬季一些大公司有Give Campaign match力度比较大的时候。建议捐款之前确认一下是否夫妻之中一人的雇主有donation match。如果可以，请搜索Asian American Rights Association (EIN:82-4635979），用能match的人名义捐款之后立刻request match.
Harvard’s 2013 internal review found that if Harvard considered only academic achievement, the Asian-American share of the class would rise to 43 percent from the actual 19 percent. After accounting for Harvard’s preference for recruited athletes and legacy applicants, the proportion of whites went up, while the share of Asian-Americans fell to 31 percent. Accounting for extracurricular and personal ratings, the share of whites rose again, and Asian-Americans fell to 26 percent.
What brought the Asian-American number down to roughly 18 percent, or about the actual share, was accounting for a category called “demographic,” the study found. This pushed up African-American and Hispanic numbers, while reducing whites and Asian-Americans.
Harvard’s 2013 internal review found that if Harvard considered only academic achievement, the Asian-American share of the class would rise to 43 percent from the actual 19 percent. After accounting for Harvard’s preference for recruited athletes and legacy applicants, the proportion of whites went up, while the share of Asian-Americans fell to 31 percent. Accounting for extracurricular and personal ratings, the share of whites rose again, and Asian-Americans fell to 26 percent.
What brought the Asian-American number down to roughly 18 percent, or about the actual share, was accounting for a category called “demographic,” the study found. This pushed up African-American and Hispanic numbers, while reducing whites and Asian-Americans. bbz1119 发表于 6/15/2018 1:47:58 PM
Alumni interviewers give Asian-Americans personal ratings comparable to those of whites. But the admissions office gives them the worst scores of any racial group, often without even meeting them, according to Prof. Arcidiacono.
看到这个comments : The admission criteria is not rewarding for a kid who spent 12 years of his/her life in learning, rather they are paying attention to personality that someone judged in just 20 minutes of interview. I dated my wife for 5 years I still don't understand her personality and they think that in 20 mins someone can't fake their real personality. Its like in a jungle if a lion worked on his required skill of hunting and got the prey, they will say ohh there are other lions in group who were sleeping during their training, but they are gentle to everyone and have good personality. As we need to give everyone equal chance. Leave your hunt for them. The person who worked hard to get something should not be punished. [size=0.75]Reply[size=0.75]53 Recommend
全文：
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/harvard-asian-enrollment-applicants.html
第一段：
Harvard consistently rated Asian-American applicants lower than any other race on personal traits like “positive personality,” likability, courage, kindness and being “widely respected,” according to an analysis of more than 160,000 student records filed Friday in federal court in Boston by a group representing Asian-American students in a lawsuit against the university.
重点还有：
哈佛在过去几个月中一直誓死保卫着这个研究结论不外泄。
大家看看吧！
————————————————————
下面的更新谢谢其他网友，一起放这里希望更多人看到：
“最恶心的是，原文说了，校友面试里，亚裔得分不低。
但这些白左大学的录取老师，看到亚裔名字，都没有见过面，就直接打低分，还做出各种贬低的评价。”
————————————————————
哈佛学生校报 The Crimson 的更详细报道
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2018/6/15/admissions-internal-report/
对哈佛批评更严厉。
————————————————————
更新：
相应隔壁lz号召，这是给AARA捐款的方式：
方便手机用户阅读请按下方：
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6IFzTnj389_YPdUs8jPWSw
donation link:
https://aarawa.org/donate
这是直接捐款给SFFA的链接：
https://studentsforfairadmissions.org
“最好直接捐给SFFA, 捐款数目很少的,就是希望捐的人多次数多 大家每次看见都chip in一点儿 让为咱出力的人别灰心就好了.”
————————————————
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
就是明目张胆的看你不顺眼了呗，欲加之罪何患无辞。不说了，去隔壁楼捐款去了！
对, 最高法院见!
这你除非证明一个亚裔一个白人OR黑人申请材料内容性格特质这部分差不多，但是亚裔比其他人低，才能证明人歧视。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
但这些白左大学的录取老师，看到亚裔名字，都没有见过面，就直接打低分，还做出各种贬低的评价。
啥也不说了, 给sffa捐款吧, 捐款数目很少的, 就是希望捐的人多次数多 大家每次看见都chip in一点儿 让为咱出力的人别灰心就好了
exactly. This is pure discrimination.
"Alumni interviewers give Asian-Americans personal ratings comparable to those of whites. But the admissions office gives them the worst scores of any racial group, often without even meeting them, according to Prof. Arcidiacono."
我去！同去捐款。这些招生的太可恨了。
虽然我娃还小，但他们总有长大的一天。这种事情，就是要杀鸡给猴看。 一家学校被告到，其他就不敢干了。
告它是杀鸡给猴看的
滚tmd的蛋，他说亚裔有性格问题就有啊，种族歧视!
"**个人性格**方面一贯差评" ???????????????????????
太无耻了吧？？？？ 赤裸裸的歧视哈。
所有的学校都是这样。告哈佛只是为了去高法。 不告不行了。
和ny high school的评价还蛮不一样的 ---发自Huaren 官方 iOS APP
隔壁捐款
他们敢说关于任何的黑人的steotype 吗？那不马上被骂歧视了吗？
歧视亚裔真是赤裸裸。大家去隔壁楼捐款吧，50，100不过一顿家里出去吃的饭钱而已。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.14.01
我是从公司用的捐款网站找到这个组织， 为了避免骗捐， 可以直接捐给组织 https://studentsforfairadmissions.org/
首页就有捐款link
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.14.01
可投诉可不投诉 坚决投诉
碰到什么事情 凶悍一点 不要包子
不然人家不是说你nice 是说你Submissive 奥
有的人因为不了解我们这个成立才三个月的公益组织，所以怀疑有骗子嫌疑。我们对此很理解，请大家自己设身处地想一下，几个年收入几十万的码工会不会为了骗几万块钱跟IRS玩火。以下是从回复里拷过来的解释为什么我们建议集合起来筹款，感谢大家阅读、捐款并且亲自向身边人宣传支持这次筹款，更重要的是长期支持SFFA和其他类似的为华人权益默默奋斗，在主流媒体里很少得到公正报道的好人们。谢谢！
AARA是正规的501c3组织，如果在钱上做手脚会被IRS盯上，这是美国最麻烦的事。
这次筹款就是为了集合大家的力量。Blum先生忙到没有时间去整理分析捐款数据，而我们这次到周日的筹款一共四周，会公布捐款人数，尤其是我们做了汉语宣传解释了这个筹款的必要性。以前大家分散捐款给SFFA，一直没有形成我们这次一样系统性的讨论。我们不从中拿一分钱，还从自己组织三位数的存款里垫付了wire transfer fee保证SFFA一分钱都不损失。首批三万元捐款已经得到Blum先生的来信确认和感谢。下面根据官司的进展和需要，我们可能还会组织筹款冲刺，尤其是到秋冬季一些大公司有Give Campaign match力度比较大的时候。建议捐款之前确认一下是否夫妻之中一人的雇主有donation match。如果可以，请搜索Asian American Rights Association (EIN:82-4635979），用能match的人名义捐款之后立刻request match.
用微信也是不得已的办法，因为微信比网站传播效果好。我们还很系统地介绍了SFFA起诉的意义和我们的跟踪汇报。建议大家有时间仔细读一读，也有有趣的美国法律知识。我们把组织做的正轨，也是希望不止帮助这一个官司，而是树立声誉，将来再有类似梁警官的官司，如果我们出面号召大家行动就不会像上次一样大家不知道出来筹款的人到底是不是骗子。这是我们的捐款链接：https://aarawa.org/donate/
改变系统性歧视亚裔的决战: AARA筹款支持起诉哈佛大学 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/DHrYntKwoAqDcCqmBBZAvA
AARA为SFFA筹款更新(5/22)及费用简介 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/NJKCdNQgnE_kZx1DrF7VrQ
亚裔起诉哈佛案与布朗案：高院绝非儿戏 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/FsCHxrtDUlON5HD6G8LCaw
汇报AARA为SFFA起诉哈佛案筹款，及近期文章列表 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/kADkzNy3vhIqJ-rDh1I9QA
冲刺！亚裔起诉哈佛案筹款及AARA阶段工作总结 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6IFzTnj389_YPdUs8jPWSw
克服三种心态，维护华人的自身权益！https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9NYSdeDXyndQuNmw_I1teg
一位AARA捐款者的一些看法 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xGTs7I3Te5nUMiHpa2hyZA
赞
What brought the Asian-American number down to roughly 18 percent, or about the actual share, was accounting for a category called “demographic,” the study found. This pushed up African-American and Hispanic numbers, while reducing whites and Asian-Americans.
也有明白人是站在亚裔这边的，我看到有个评论说几十年前他们也是这么对待犹太人的，各种抠人家生活习惯，其实就是找借口想遏制犹太人。如今犹太人势力壮大无法遏制了，就转而捏亚裔。
sue their ass off!
这个说的很明白了，白人确实有体育和legacy的优势，但是黑墨就是靠一张皮。
告！反正咱爬不爬藤也无所谓 风气太坏了
会定期根据案子进展捐
Alumni interviewers give Asian-Americans personal ratings comparable to those of whites. But the admissions office gives them the worst scores of any racial group, often without even meeting them, according to Prof. Arcidiacono.
这就是赤裸裸的种族歧视。
包子是不敢面对不得已的忍耐，这和包容是2回事。
不过如果把白人细分，呵呵，估计是白人中某部分受损失。
犹太人无法遏制是金融和传媒重要的航业都是他们控制，而且肤色也是白的，更容易溶入美国社会。
在该争取的时候一定不能软弱退让，这个弱肉强食的年代，必须强悍起来。软柿子就会被捏。
咱海外华人越来越向黑人看齐了，动不动告人家种族歧视。放在黑人身上你那个很清楚的看出，真是黑人缺乏自信，逃避自身问题的表现，放到自己我身上就全忘了？这就是传说中得双重标准吧？
一味读书，忽视体育,特长和性格培养，说的难道不是我们这一群人吗？
扯淡！你看了文章吗？face-to-face alumni interview的评价中，Asian并不比白人差；但是没有见过面的admission office却给打低分，这怎么解释？你看几张纸能看出性格好坏？
可以可以
据理力争也是需要练习的么对吧
"现在哈佛犹太裔占学生总数的25%，耶鲁是27%（2012年数据）。看上去其占比同亚裔学生差不多，但是亚裔人口是犹太裔的三倍以上，所以，如果按人口比例来看，犹太裔学生的录取率反倒是亚裔的三倍以上，而且越来越多的学校在提高犹太裔学生的人数。"
我不仅看了还好好思考了，因为我女儿也要考哈佛，这对我至关重要。问题是,面对自身问题，说句实话真这么痛苦吗？
你女儿性格不好和别人没关系啊，我身边的亚裔leadership都是超强的
please face this question directly: 你看几张纸能看出性格好坏？
那个银行家的case超级鼓励人！！！！
终于告赢了！！
华人忽视体育特长性格培养？你看看华人的帖子。。多少是关于体育特长的。多少是问对小孩性格担心应该怎么办的。。。华人对小孩个方面的培养都是很重视的。。。一味读书说的不是我们这群人。大概说的是你。。。不要用你代表大家。
The admission criteria is not rewarding for a kid who spent 12 years of his/her life in learning, rather they are paying attention to personality that someone judged in just 20 minutes of interview. I dated my wife for 5 years I still don't understand her personality and they think that in 20 mins someone can't fake their real personality.
Its like in a jungle if a lion worked on his required skill of hunting and got the prey, they will say ohh there are other lions in group who were sleeping during their training, but they are gentle to everyone and have good personality. As we need to give everyone equal chance. Leave your hunt for them. The person who worked hard to get something should not be punished. [size=0.75]Reply[size=0.75]53 Recommend
什么叫重视一个人的性格培养？性格是培养出来的吗？只有修养是培养和锻炼的，性格是与生俱来的，每个人各自的特点。白人的虚伪是好性格吗？是他们父母培养出来的吗？
MD！这是什么理由！
你自己的孩子忽视体育,特长和性格培养，请不要推广到别人。我认识的亚裔孩子注重体育，性格很好的非常多。
最起码说明那个妈妈的eq就很低, 在这种时候出来找事, 不知会教育出什么样的女儿
那个妈妈不是买买提的名ID老顿吗？
瞎说什么大实话 哈哈哈哈哈
你说其他亚裔是书呆子就不是人身攻击？你女儿是你自己觉得性格不错而已，跟别的孩子比垃圾一个，有你这样的妈孩子能好到哪去。