“On Jan. 22, 1973, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot interfere with a woman’s right to have an abortion. The court sided with Jane Roe, an unmarried Texas woman, who wanted to safely and legally have an abortion in a state where it was prohibited unless the woman’s life was at risk. According to Planned Parenthood, at the time of the decision, nearly all states restricted abortion unless the woman’s life was in danger or in cases of rape or incest.” (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/10/20/roe-v-wade-abortion-clinton-trump-debate-womens-issues/92452822/)
哪怕在1973年,在那些禁止流产的州里,如果母亲的生命受到威胁或者是强奸案的受害人,流产也是被允许的。所以这个Roe vs Wade case能够提供的应该只是在母亲的生命没有受到威胁的情况下的流产选择。反对Roe vs Wade,反对的应该也只是在母亲没有生命威胁情况下的流产。那些支持希拉里late stage abortion的究竟在支持什么?为什么总是拿母亲的生命安全来说话?
“On Jan. 22, 1973, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot interfere with a woman’s right to have an abortion. The court sided with Jane Roe, an unmarried Texas woman, who wanted to safely and legally have an abortion in a state where it was prohibited unless the woman’s life was at risk. According to Planned Parenthood, at the time of the decision, nearly all states restricted abortion unless the woman’s life was in danger or in cases of rape or incest.” (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/10/20/roe-v-wade-abortion-clinton-trump-debate-womens-issues/92452822/)
哪怕在1973年,在那些禁止流产的州里,如果母亲的生命受到威胁流产或者是强奸案的受害人,流产也是被允许的。所以这个Roe vs Wade case能够提供的应该只是在母亲的生命没有受到威胁的情况下的流产选择。反对Roe vs Wade,反对的应该也只是在母亲没有生命威胁情况下的流产。那些支持希拉里late stage abortion的究竟在支持什么?为什么总是拿母亲的生命安全来说话?
但今年这些不是大事 大事是国防 移民 经济 还有亚裔被打压的AA
如果有些人非要觉得这是天大的事情 就为了这个问题不能选共和党非要选民主党 那我也不能劝什么 毕竟每个人侧重点不一样
但我还是希望大家好好想想希拉里上台后的诸多问题 当穆穆三天两头给你搞个恐袭 警察三天两头被杀掉 黑金贵各种打抢砸 华裔各种被压迫的时候 我希望那时侯大家能不后悔现在将堕胎问题看得如此严重 的决定
希拉里还想把枪给搞没了 虽然她昨天改口 但大家都知道她想做啥 世道混乱 警察不保 还没枪 那时候女人就算能堕胎 有什么用??
“On Jan. 22, 1973, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot interfere with a woman’s right to have an abortion. The court sided with Jane Roe, an unmarried Texas woman, who wanted to safely and legally have an abortion in a state where it was prohibited unless the woman’s life was at risk. According to Planned Parenthood, at the time of the decision, nearly all states restricted abortion unless the woman’s life was in danger or in cases of rape or incest.” (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/10/20/roe-v-wade-abortion-clinton-trump-debate-womens-issues/92452822/)
哪怕在1973年,在那些禁止流产的州里,如果母亲的生命受到威胁或者是强奸案的受害人,流产也是被允许的。所以这个Roe vs Wade case能够提供的应该只是在母亲的生命没有受到威胁的情况下的流产选择。反对Roe vs Wade,反对的应该也只是在母亲没有生命威胁情况下的流产。那些支持希拉里late stage abortion的究竟在支持什么?为什么总是拿母亲的生命安全来说话?
希拉里上台,黑墨穆至上,各种打砸抢,炸弹,活命都成问题了。另外,堕胎妇女,到底能占总人口中多少比例????难道不应该看大局,抓大放小?
Who do you trust to have her finger on the nuclear code?
不管怎么讨论也没个错对之分
16年请讲点新意啦
有的希拉里支持者是故意把人往枝节问题上引,再给Trump扣上反智,法盲的帽子。建议大家不要再去给他们顶帖。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
今年trump最大的贡献就是把往年很多不会谈得话题放到了明面上。
往年每次都是细枝末节的topic讲了一堆。要是没有trump跑出来炮轰一下illegal immigrants,这词早就被永久改成undocumented immigrants了
今年因为trump的原故,好多好多的词汇回到了普众之间,真的是太好了