Dr. Lee 说有可能根本就没有性侵,内裤被污染了而已。 yuerwan 发表于 9/22/2016 4:11:01 PM
No way. Sexual offend is not determined by DNA only. A dead little girl must have physical wound to prove it, or else it could not be defined as sexual offended.
Are you kidding me? The brother should sue CBS. 指甲缝means she fight back, the murderer should have wounds on his arms. No evidence showed the brother or father have been hurt. 短裤 is most likely have semen, or she got bruise on the lower body. Otherwise how could the police know they need to take DNA from the pantie?
最近美国CBS电视台播出的一个纪录片震惊了很多人。 纪录片叫《JonBenet Ramsey的案子》,
哥哥我觉得有反社会倾向,现在长得也很creepy。
如果是哥哥失手发生意外,这父母后面的各种cover up也太奇葩了,写一封那么长的勒索信,女儿都那么惨了,还用绳子再勒女儿脖子,然后把孩子藏在地下室再报警。。。觉得很不logical
有说哥哥creepy,我想背负着“可能”杀人凶手的名号,长成正常人更creepy呢
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
不是说即使是新买来的内裤都可能有别人的DNA吗
上次看个文章说好几桩杀人案都有同一个人的DNA,后来发现那DNA是做棉签的工厂女工的DNA,也不知道这事真的假的。。。
exactly! 警察和父母是好友,也知道真相,帮着一起隐瞒,把弟弟的死转嫁到一个恋童癖的变态身上,那家伙杀了好几个孩子了。最后turn out哥哥才是真凶,并且是天生的犯罪性格。
我觉得这家人的确很有可能有问题,很多表现都很奇怪,也难怪被怀疑。
但是这个推理不太可信。如果真是9岁的哥哥不小心打死了MM,哥哥是不会被判刑的,也不存在失去儿子的问题。
而且,警察的报告称性侵发生在命案发生之前,不是跟命案有什么关系。
No way. Sexual offend is not determined by DNA only. A dead little girl must have physical wound to prove it, or else it could not be defined as sexual offended.
对此专家表示,当年在凶案现场采集到的DNA极有可能已经被污染,提取工具可能不太干净,当时现场也没有得到很好的保护,所以拿这种DNA进行对比,显然没什么可信度。
=========================
Are you kidding me? The brother should sue CBS.
指甲缝means she fight back, the murderer should have wounds on his arms. No evidence showed the brother or father have been hurt.
短裤 is most likely have semen, or she got bruise on the lower body. Otherwise how could the police know they need to take DNA from the pantie?
不怕告他们侵犯名誉么
电视台不是前一段还采访他哥哥?就这这个采访?
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
看过一些案子,都是周围的亲人被怀疑了个遍,十几二十年后,才发现真正的凶手另有其人。 对亲人真是二次伤害呀。