手把手教:如何1分钟给加州州长Brown写email抗议种族歧视议案AB1726(可以用多个email写)Update

c
catgoose
楼主
         加州AB1726议案打着AA的谎言,把亚裔按照二战纳粹人种分类,不仅严重影响了美国华人的利益、更加践踏了美国的“自由、平等”的宪法精神。现在加州州长Brown还没有签署,恳请呼吁所有的北美华人同胞一起努力,共同抵制这里歧视法案。下面是手把手教你如何给加州州长Brown写Email抗议AB1726法案,有mm提出,可以用多个email写,我觉得可行!楼主改过了,从Pro到con。
1、找到加州州长Brown的网上联系方式:https://govnews.gov.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php     然后,打开。
2、按照图下的步骤进行:
  


3、全部填好后,可以直接点击Continue继续,然后贴英语样稿即可,不要忘记自己的姓名。

鼠标下移:

4、发好Email,就如下的图片了。



附上英语样稿,另外一个楼里mm写的:

Honorable Governor Brown:

Despite the strong opposition from many Asian American organizations, California legislature passed AB1726 (Bonta) this month. AB1726, in essence, is a duplicate of AB176 (Bonta) that you vetoed last year. We applaud your previous decision and we urge that you take the same action this time again.

Regrettably, AB1726 is equally divisive, unfair, unscientific, and infeasible. We believe that your concern over its predecessor bill AB176 holds true in this current case: “Dividing people into ethnic or other subcategories may yield more information, but not necessarily greater wisdom about what actions should follow. To focus just on ethnic identity may not be enough.”

AB1726 is clearly divisive and unfair.  It does not stipulate the collection of similar racial data from any group other than the Asian Americans Pacific Islanders.  The bill, for example, does not require Cuban Americans, or Mexican Americans to report their ethnicities other than the generic “Hispanic.”  Similarly, it does not require Jewish Americans, Arab Americans or Irish American to report ethnicities other than the generic “White.”  It is indisputable that those sub-groups within the Hispanics and Whites are ethnically and culturally diverse.  Singling out Asian Americans for stratification is not only unfair to Asian Americans, but also to all Americans.

AB1726 is unscientific.  It confuses ethnicities with national origins.  For instance, China as a country officially recognizes 56 ethnic groups among its citizens, including, for example, Korean, Hmong, Muslim and Mongolian.  So identifying oneself as “Chinese” or “Taiwanese” doesn’t disclose that person’s true ethnic and possibly cultural background. Furthermore, the impact of the citizenship of one’s ancestry -- and in many cases multiple citizenships within the family tree -- is not necessarily a deciding factor of that person’s genetic makeup, or socioeconomic situation and educational status. Therefore, such stratification tactic encoded by AB1726 wouldn’t have been a useful factor in allocating educational or health resources of California.

In addition to all the problems above, this bill cannot be realistically implemented. Besides putting substantial costs on California taxpayers, the system is not intended to, nor is it able to, monitor and verify the accuracy and integrity of the self-identified data generated under this bill.

California does not need a bill that could only divide our communities. California does not need more heightened racial tensions. Please veto AB1726.

Best Regards,

你名字
sunsnow
赞!!!!!!!!!!!
daxiguagua
谢谢楼主,这就去写
c
cleverworm
回复 1楼catgoose的帖子

email sent! Thank you!
s
snowww
赞!大家行动起来!!!!!!!
c
catgoose
隔壁帖子楼主,你有没有脑子,开个帖子,去教接受大家亚裔细分法。你是不是被人卖了,还帮人数钱啊。黑人、墨西哥人都学会抗争,华人能不能争气点啊,反抗就这么难吗?
sadcore
顶顶顶。
b
bigbilly
发了!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A
AngelBeibei
         加州AB1726议案打着AA的谎言,把亚裔按照二战纳粹人种分类,不仅严重影响了美国华人的利益、更加践踏了美国的“自由、平等”的宪法精神。现在加州州长Brown还没有签署,恳请呼吁所有的北美华人同胞一起努力,共同抵制这里歧视法案。下面是手把手教你如何给加州州长Brown写Email抗议AB1726法案。
1、找到加州州长Brown的网......
catgoose 发表于 8/11/2016 5:18:03 PM
赞楼主
牛奶白
一分钟之内就做了一次,还可以用不同email反复做吧
c
catgoose
回复 11楼牛奶白的帖子

对!我加上去了,谢谢你的意见!!!:)
rubialee

顶!
Myra
赞。。。。 赞。。。。 赞
express77
顶一个
c
catgoose
我自己顶一下!
oceanblue
那么多信内容都一样要不要紧?我可以多个email多提交几次
c
catgoose
回复 17楼oceanblue的帖子

不要紧,要的是总量!那个mm写的很不错。
m
meimaozz
发信了, 帮顶
臭臭张
我的email 没有subject这一栏
vivianlove
Ding ding
c
catgoose
回复 20楼臭臭张的帖子

你再找找,我发给几遍都有啊。
臭臭张
回复 20楼臭臭张的帖子

你再找找,我发给几遍都有啊。
catgoose 发表于 8/11/2016 11:55:36 PM
发了好几封都没有
sweettree
写了,谢谢楼主!
icylava
换个浏览器试试

我发了两封了,晚上继续

发了好几封都没有

臭臭张 发表于 8/12/2016 12:01:40 AM


☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
t
taury
我的也没有subject那一栏,换了个浏览器也没有。今天先发出去,明天换个电脑试试。
icylava
Position 选 “Pro” 好像有点问题。。。反对这个legislate不应该是Con吗?
juniebugca
反对这个legislature应该是Con
dingding001
不知道为什么支持的人这么少。讨论这个话题的人都没有讨论小三的多
oceanblue
和一楼显示的都一样,除了没有那个subject。再用家里孩子们的名字,大人的名字,多提交几份
oceanblue
大家快去发email吧。发的越多越好。可能是会有用的,我们一定要发出自己的声音。
去年还是前年我们小区附近的plaza要rezone建apartment,小区里号召大家给city council成员发email,就给了email的样板,大家就照着那个发。然后开会的时候大家都去表达反对意见,最后rezone就没批。
w
wtwyc
写了,赞楼主和写信的mm,顺便问问选项pro con是什么意思
klhengheng
楼主pro con是手滑么?细思极恐。。。
走进非洲123
赞👍
开电脑发邮件去。
tryyitry
不住加州也可以发麻?
tryyitry
PRO  CON
到底选哪个?

LZ是不是奸细来骗人的
m
mickey95
顶!
臭臭张
到底是pro 还是con?
E
Emily08
应该是con吧?
E
Emily08
应该是con吧?
Emily08 发表于 8/12/2016 5:54:07 AM
E
Emily08
刚才Google 了,pro 是支持的意思,应该选con
a
ajiemouse
要写con啊!!!别写成pro了啊!!!!lz快改过来!
nypd
发了,选的con
c
catgoose
lz刚刚改过了,谢谢大家的纠正!
s
sonwuk
我的也没有subject栏。不过我直接在信的第一行加了subject. 反正要的是量,他们也不会细看。
D
DancingAngel
晚上回去发。
腊梅
刚才发过去了。谢谢楼主这么详细解说。    
我也没有subject,  把那个标题写在mail主体了。         还打了好几个惊叹号!
t
thetisea
赞。。。。。。。。。。。。。
crowdpig
噢天哪昨天发成了pro.....
赶紧再发了一个con抵消一下= =
express77
顶下,很容易做的事情。