手把手教:如何1分钟给加州州长Brown写email抗议种族歧视议案AB1726(可以用多个email写)Update

北美华人网
huaren
Chats&&华人闲话
最新回复:2016年8月15日 9点45分 PT
c
catgoose
楼主 (北美华人网)
         加州AB1726议案打着AA的谎言,把亚裔按照二战纳粹人种分类,不仅严重影响了美国华人的利益、更加践踏了美国的“自由、平等”的宪法精神。现在加州州长Brown还没有签署,恳请呼吁所有的北美华人同胞一起努力,共同抵制这里歧视法案。下面是手把手教你如何给加州州长Brown写Email抗议AB1726法案,有mm提出,可以用多个email写,我觉得可行!楼主改过了,从Pro到con。
1、找到加州州长Brown的网上联系方式:https://govnews.gov.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php     然后,打开。
2、按照图下的步骤进行:
  


3、全部填好后,可以直接点击Continue继续,然后贴英语样稿即可,不要忘记自己的姓名。

鼠标下移:

4、发好Email,就如下的图片了。



附上英语样稿,另外一个楼里mm写的:

Honorable Governor Brown:

Despite the strong opposition from many Asian American organizations, California legislature passed AB1726 (Bonta) this month. AB1726, in essence, is a duplicate of AB176 (Bonta) that you vetoed last year. We applaud your previous decision and we urge that you take the same action this time again.

Regrettably, AB1726 is equally divisive, unfair, unscientific, and infeasible. We believe that your concern over its predecessor bill AB176 holds true in this current case: “Dividing people into ethnic or other subcategories may yield more information, but not necessarily greater wisdom about what actions should follow. To focus just on ethnic identity may not be enough.”

AB1726 is clearly divisive and unfair.  It does not stipulate the collection of similar racial data from any group other than the Asian Americans Pacific Islanders.  The bill, for example, does not require Cuban Americans, or Mexican Americans to report their ethnicities other than the generic “Hispanic.”  Similarly, it does not require Jewish Americans, Arab Americans or Irish American to report ethnicities other than the generic “White.”  It is indisputable that those sub-groups within the Hispanics and Whites are ethnically and culturally diverse.  Singling out Asian Americans for stratification is not only unfair to Asian Americans, but also to all Americans.

AB1726 is unscientific.  It confuses ethnicities with national origins.  For instance, China as a country officially recognizes 56 ethnic groups among its citizens, including, for example, Korean, Hmong, Muslim and Mongolian.  So identifying oneself as “Chinese” or “Taiwanese” doesn’t disclose that person’s true ethnic and possibly cultural background. Furthermore, the impact of the citizenship of one’s ancestry -- and in many cases multiple citizenships within the family tree -- is not necessarily a deciding factor of that person’s genetic makeup, or socioeconomic situation and educational status. Therefore, such stratification tactic encoded by AB1726 wouldn’t have been a useful factor in allocating educational or health resources of California.

In addition to all the problems above, this bill cannot be realistically implemented. Besides putting substantial costs on California taxpayers, the system is not intended to, nor is it able to, monitor and verify the accuracy and integrity of the self-identified data generated under this bill.

California does not need a bill that could only divide our communities. California does not need more heightened racial tensions. Please veto AB1726.

Best Regards,

你名字
sunsnow
2 楼
赞!!!!!!!!!!!
daxiguagua
3 楼
谢谢楼主,这就去写
c
cleverworm
4 楼
回复 1楼catgoose的帖子

email sent! Thank you!
s
snowww
5 楼
赞!大家行动起来!!!!!!!
c
catgoose
6 楼
隔壁帖子楼主,你有没有脑子,开个帖子,去教接受大家亚裔细分法。你是不是被人卖了,还帮人数钱啊。黑人、墨西哥人都学会抗争,华人能不能争气点啊,反抗就这么难吗?
sadcore
7 楼
顶顶顶。
[email protected]
8 楼
赞 赞 赞
b
bigbilly
9 楼
发了!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A
AngelBeibei
10 楼
         加州AB1726议案打着AA的谎言,把亚裔按照二战纳粹人种分类,不仅严重影响了美国华人的利益、更加践踏了美国的“自由、平等”的宪法精神。现在加州州长Brown还没有签署,恳请呼吁所有的北美华人同胞一起努力,共同抵制这里歧视法案。下面是手把手教你如何给加州州长Brown写Email抗议AB1726法案。
1、找到加州州长Brown的网......
catgoose 发表于 8/11/2016 5:18:03 PM
赞楼主
牛奶白
11 楼
一分钟之内就做了一次,还可以用不同email反复做吧
c
catgoose
12 楼
回复 11楼牛奶白的帖子

对!我加上去了,谢谢你的意见!!!:)
rubialee
13 楼

顶!
Myra
14 楼
赞。。。。 赞。。。。 赞
express77
15 楼
顶一个
c
catgoose
16 楼
我自己顶一下!
oceanblue
17 楼
那么多信内容都一样要不要紧?我可以多个email多提交几次
c
catgoose
18 楼
回复 17楼oceanblue的帖子

不要紧,要的是总量!那个mm写的很不错。
m
meimaozz
19 楼
发信了, 帮顶
臭臭张
20 楼
我的email 没有subject这一栏
vivianlove
21 楼
Ding ding
c
catgoose
22 楼
回复 20楼臭臭张的帖子

你再找找,我发给几遍都有啊。
臭臭张
23 楼
回复 20楼臭臭张的帖子

你再找找,我发给几遍都有啊。
catgoose 发表于 8/11/2016 11:55:36 PM
发了好几封都没有
sweettree
24 楼
写了,谢谢楼主!
icylava
25 楼
换个浏览器试试

我发了两封了,晚上继续

发了好几封都没有

臭臭张 发表于 8/12/2016 12:01:40 AM


☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
t
taury
26 楼
我的也没有subject那一栏,换了个浏览器也没有。今天先发出去,明天换个电脑试试。
icylava
27 楼
Position 选 “Pro” 好像有点问题。。。反对这个legislate不应该是Con吗?
juniebugca
28 楼
反对这个legislature应该是Con
dingding001
29 楼
不知道为什么支持的人这么少。讨论这个话题的人都没有讨论小三的多
oceanblue
30 楼
和一楼显示的都一样,除了没有那个subject。再用家里孩子们的名字,大人的名字,多提交几份
oceanblue
31 楼
大家快去发email吧。发的越多越好。可能是会有用的,我们一定要发出自己的声音。
去年还是前年我们小区附近的plaza要rezone建apartment,小区里号召大家给city council成员发email,就给了email的样板,大家就照着那个发。然后开会的时候大家都去表达反对意见,最后rezone就没批。
w
wtwyc
32 楼
写了,赞楼主和写信的mm,顺便问问选项pro con是什么意思
klhengheng
33 楼
楼主pro con是手滑么?细思极恐。。。
走进非洲123
34 楼
赞👍
开电脑发邮件去。
tryyitry
35 楼
不住加州也可以发麻?
tryyitry
36 楼
PRO  CON
到底选哪个?

LZ是不是奸细来骗人的
m
mickey95
37 楼
顶!
臭臭张
38 楼
到底是pro 还是con?
E
Emily08
39 楼
应该是con吧?
E
Emily08
40 楼
应该是con吧?
Emily08 发表于 8/12/2016 5:54:07 AM
E
Emily08
41 楼
刚才Google 了,pro 是支持的意思,应该选con
a
ajiemouse
42 楼
要写con啊!!!别写成pro了啊!!!!lz快改过来!
nypd
43 楼
发了,选的con
c
catgoose
44 楼
lz刚刚改过了,谢谢大家的纠正!
s
sonwuk
45 楼
我的也没有subject栏。不过我直接在信的第一行加了subject. 反正要的是量,他们也不会细看。
D
DancingAngel
46 楼
晚上回去发。
腊梅
47 楼
刚才发过去了。谢谢楼主这么详细解说。    
我也没有subject,  把那个标题写在mail主体了。         还打了好几个惊叹号!
t
thetisea
48 楼
赞。。。。。。。。。。。。。
crowdpig
49 楼
噢天哪昨天发成了pro.....
赶紧再发了一个con抵消一下= =
express77
50 楼
顶下,很容易做的事情。
小蓝飞飞
51 楼
已写,必须写,人人都要写!!!
z
zhanuanhuanhan
52 楼
顶一下
不得不注册
53 楼
巳发出,谢谢楼主
lunaxuan
54 楼
Send the emails. Thank you. We have to do this for our kids.
c
catgoose
55 楼
很抱歉,前面的一个失误,再次感谢大家的指正,我很感激。插一段题外话,我在学校读书的时候一直是Pron vs Con,写文章也好、思维也好,都是这个思路,Pron第一,Con第二,很少用Con vs Pron的,楼主也编过几个网站,虽然不精通,但是基本的Div + CSS还是会的,这个应该用<li>的命令行,民主党州长网站设计成Con第一、Pron第二,我个人感觉设计的非常tricky。好了,大家继续写吧。我也要重新单独写几份新的。
臭臭张
56 楼
重新发了 顶起来
c
catgoose
57 楼
我再次顶起来,有消息称,加州旁边的Oregon州开始试点学校AA,不过据说是联邦政府的。呼吁继续给加州州长写email。
s
sheepsheep2
58 楼
我再次顶起来,有消息称,加州旁边的Oregon州开始试点学校AA,不过据说是联邦政府的。呼吁继续给加州州长写email。
catgoose 发表于 8/12/2016 6:57:51 PM
我怎么听说是搞亚裔细分啊。全国已经很多地方早就开始搞AA了。芝加哥好像是最早开始的,毕竟是那位出道的地方。
c
catgoose
59 楼
回复 58楼sheepsheep2的帖子

一般AA是平权,没有细分亚裔的。你亚裔还是亚裔,不分什么中国人、韩国人、日本人、柬埔寨人、菲律宾人等,现在加州把亚裔单独拆开,没有拆开黑人、西裔和白人。原来的AA在录取上是按照亚裔、黑人、白人和西裔几个大类录取的,现在如果亚裔细分的话,那么原本就非常少名额的亚裔就变得更加稀释,华人就是牵连的对象之一。现在很多高科技企业就开始AA了。
s
sheepsheep2
60 楼
细分比AA更险恶.全面细分的话,中国人就等着被挑出来任意吊打了。
tryyitry
61 楼
不是加州也发了
含笑的猫
62 楼
顶。。。。。。。。。
E
Emily08
63 楼
Support!!!!!!
lz3456
64 楼
不在加州也发了
z
zhanuanhuanhan
65 楼
顶一下楼主
A
AngelBeibei
66 楼
         加州AB1726议案打着AA的谎言,把亚裔按照二战纳粹人种分类,不仅严重影响了美国华人的利益、更加践踏了美国的“自由、平等”的宪法精神。现在加州州长Brown还没有签署,恳请呼吁所有的北美华人同胞一起努力,共同抵制这里歧视法案。下面是手把手教你如何给加州州长Brown写Email抗议AB1726法案,有mm提出,可以用多个email写,我觉得可行!楼主改过了,从P......
catgoose 发表于 8/11/2016 5:18:03 PM
一个邮箱发一封
千堆雪
67 楼
该用户帖子内容已被屏蔽
臭臭张
68 楼
upppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
h
hapfor
69 楼
顶! 防止悲剧重演
h
hey233
70 楼
please sign petition to say no to AB1726, 一分钟的时间
https://www.change.org/p/california-governor-veto-ab-1726
c
catgoose
71 楼
来来,周末的大家都发一下!发好了,麻烦你们给周边不知道的华人同胞来普及一下!谢谢!
c
catgoose
72 楼
回复 67楼千堆雪的帖子

谢谢你表扬!
xiaofeidream
73 楼
please sign petition to say no to AB1726, 一分钟的时间
https://www.change.org/p/california-governor-veto-ab-1726
hey233 发表于 8/13/2016 12:59:30 AM
已投。
看到有些Asian支持这个法案…… 其实我kind of能理解Asian里人数少的一些民族不想跟Asian学霸们一起承受不公正待遇。
但不想承受不公正的关键是反对AA啊!是:我们也是minority,AA没有照顾到我们,所以AA根本不合理啊!细分Asian有毛用!在美国这样的国家,受欺负就是因为人少。以为不跟别的Asian站在一起了,就能占到什么便宜吗?太天真了。

其实就算想平分教育资源,也应该是改变选拔机制。哪怕觉得Asian光会学习你加考体育也显得公平一点啊,起码选上的人都是自己挣来的。或者哪怕成绩过了某条线以后全部lottery决定是否录取也公平一点啊,起码一切全凭运气大家都不用多努力了,Asian的孩子也可以多享受享受生活了。现在这样强行强迫Asian的孩子必须更出色,你努力我们就给你增加难度,完完全全是不平等和歧视。

网上看到一个孩子写的comment,好心酸:
To whom it may concern,

Please support repealing the AB 1726 bill.

I am a Chinese-American high school student from a high school in California who has just completed 11th grade 6 days ago. I value education and hard work, because I have been taught that if you worked hard, were passionate about your education, and believed in the American dream of opportunity, you can at least open more doors of opportunity for myself (in this case, one of my stepping stones to success is to be accepted by a good college/university). At school, my teachers had taught me that if I worked hard academically and maintained a balanced and well-rounded lifestyle, I would improve my chances of getting into a good college. After all, the teachers were at least fair in the sense that if you studied hard for your test, you'd reap the reward of scoring higher on your tests on most occasions. Indeed, it made sense to me that since America's Olympic game's basketball team (composed of not a single Asian) didn't pull a good portion of the current players from the team out, on the basis of racial diversity in representation, to be replaced by a Asian-American players in order to strengthen Asian-American's foundation in the area of sports, it didn't occur to me that a different rule based on race would need to be applied to the educational field. However, I was never told by my teachers that I would have to score much higher on my SAT and have a much higher GPA than my non-Asian classmates sitting right next to me in class, because I was born into the "wrong" race (in terms of college entrance): the Asian race. This year, I witnessed some of my Asian classmates who were just as qualified or more qualified (from both the high school I had transferred from and the high school I currently am in) be rejected, rejected, and rejected by all of the IVY league schools. Many of these Asian-American students were well rounded and excelled in school. In the end, I learned that NONE of these Asian-American students from both high schools had been accepted by the IVY league schools. Who got in to the IVY leagues schools from both schools? The answer is, students from non-Asian decent did...because of the need for "diversity".

Some people seem to value the need of diversity over how much time, energy, effort, and sacrifices I have put into my education. They seem to think that because of the need to help other races have a leg up in education, it's ok to take advantage of the Asian-American students through Affirmative Action laws, such as AB 1726, by giving away their rightfully earned spots into their dream university to another equally qualified, but of non-Asian decent, applicant. They seem to think that it's ok to plant the idea into thousands of Asian students' minds that no matter how hard they work, they will have to sacrifice more and suffer through more of the pain in conquering more obstacles in life in their academic field, because they were born as an Asian-American. In this sense, they seem to think that it's ok to hurt thousands of dedicated Asian-American students' motivations, ambitions, dreams, and innocence in believing in equality.

As a high school student, fresh out of 11th grade, I can testify that it is extremely discouraging to have to fill in the bubble on my answer sheet of being from an Asian decent on my SAT bubble answer sheet, my 15 AP test bubble answer sheet, my ACT bubble sheet, and my college application-related bubble answer sheets. Why? Because I know that I will be categorized by my race and judged for that by the colleges that I have worked so hard to get into. I know that the moment the college admission officers see a dark bubble next to the word "Asian", they will expect a much higher SAT/ACT score, a much higher GPA, and an amazing extracurricular profile. In essence, they will be asking me to be a nearly perfect student in the eyes of many to get into an IVY league school.

Assemblyman Bonta, how would you feel if you were in my shoes?
h
hapfor
74 楼
顶上去,为了尊严和安全。
A
AngelBeibei
75 楼
已投。
看到有些Asian支持这个法案…… 其实我kind of能理解Asian里人数少的一些民族不想跟Asian学霸们一起承受不公正待遇。
但不想承受不公正的关键是反对AA啊!是:我们也是minority,AA没有照顾到我们,所以AA根本不合理啊!细分Asian有毛用!在美国这样的国家,受欺负就是因为人少。以为不跟别的Asian站在一起了,就能占到什么便宜吗?太天真了。

其实就算想平分......
xiaofeidream 发表于 8/13/2016 4:31:07 PM
这孩子写得真实。
w
wodehuaren
76 楼

谢谢楼主, 赞~~~
c
catgoose
77 楼
周日了,再来顶一下!希望更加多的人能够看到!谢谢大家的支持和转发!
j9dong
78 楼
upupupup
E
Emily08
79 楼
just sent the email. it only took 5 seconds
E
Emily08
80 楼
sent out 2 emails, one for me and one for my husband
tryyitry
81 楼
sent two emails
lumpenbourgeoisie
82 楼
外州的能写吗?还是只能是加州的?
臭臭张
83 楼
外州的能写吗?还是只能是加州的?
lumpenbourgeoisie 发表于 8/15/2016 12:43:52 PM
都可以写 谢谢支持