Introduction: The provision of the Patriot Act, Section 326 - the "know your customer" provision, compelling financial institutions to demand identity documents before opening accounts or conducting financial transactions is a fundamental element of the outline below. That section authorized the executive branch to issue detailed regulations on the subject, found at 31 CFR 130.120-121. It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year. There are several ways to compel Mexico to pay for the wall including the following:
On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.
On day 2 Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico. There is no significant social safety net provided by the state in Mexico.
On day 3 tell Mexico that if the Mexican government will contribute the funds needed to the United States to pay for the wall, the Trump Administration will not promulgate the final rule, and the regulation will not go into effect.
Trade tariffs, or enforcement of existing trade rules: There is no doubt that Mexico is engaging in unfair subsidy behavior that has eliminated thousands of U.S. jobs, and which we are obligated to respond to; the impact of any tariffs on the price imports will be more than offset by the economic and income gains of increased production in the United States, in addition to revenue from any tariffs themselves. Mexico needs access to our markets much more than the reverse, so we have all the leverage and will win the negotiation. By definition, if you have a large trade deficit with a nation, it means they are selling far more to you than the reverse - thus they, not you, stand to lose from enforcing trade rules through tariffs (as has been done to save many U.S. industries in the past).
Cancelling visas: Immigration is a privilege, not a right. Mexico is totally dependent on the United States as a release valve for its own poverty - our approvals of hundreds of thousands of visas to their nationals every year is one of our greatest leverage points. We also have leverage through business and tourist visas for important people in the Mexican economy. Keep in mind, the United States has already taken in 4X more migrants than any other country on planet earth, producing lower wages and higher unemployment for our own citizens and recent migrants.
Visa fees: Even a small increase in visa fees would pay for the wall. This includes fees on border crossing cards, of which more than 1 million are issued a year. The border-crossing card is also one of the greatest sources of illegal immigration into the United States, via overstays. Mexico is also the single largest recipient of U.S. green cards, which confer a path to U.S. citizenship. Again, we have the leverage so Mexico will back down.
Conclusion: Mexico has taken advantage of us in another way as well: gangs, drug traffickers and cartels have freely exploited our open borders and committed vast numbers of crimes inside the United States. The United States has borne the extraordinary daily cost of this criminal activity, including the cost of trials and incarcerations. Not to mention the even greater human cost. We have the moral high ground here, and all the leverage. It is time we use it in order to Make America Great Again.
高，太高明了，TRUMP刚入行的时候，记者问他如何解决National Debt, 降低 middle class tax 和维持Social security， TRUMP 毫不犹疑地回答说，这个容易啊， a one-time "net worth tax" on individuals and trusts worth $10 million or more. 转眼就来钱了。
第一，成本 事实一，墙本来就已经在建了。只是obama上任后就停止了。 事实二，美-墨边境全长2,000 miles. 截至2012年，美国已经建了651 miles了！ 而且是国会强制修建的！！！ 2005年，也就是11年前，国会启动了建墙，建栅栏的工程。 到2007年，修了200miles. 到2008年，又修了215miles. 零零碎碎共修了651英里。基本都是obama之前修建的。每英里的成本各不相同，因为墙/栅栏的材质不同。 咱就用cnbc这个一直黑Trump的媒体数据吧。每英里成本是2.8-3.9 million--当然这肯定有点虚高，但我们假装相信. 所以 （2000-651)*[(3.9+2.8)/2]=4.519 billion 这这这看着好多啊。钱从哪里来？
第二，钱从哪里来 --- I am sorry to say “墨西哥，你付。“ 如果墨西哥说no,下面是几种惩罚性途径来筹集建墙经费。 1, 征收个人收入调节税，哈哈。 每年，再说一遍，每年，墨西哥人会从美国向墨西哥汇 $24 billion, 是的，单位是billion. 其中有多少从非法劳工那里来的？这里面有没有social welfare check存了，转手就寄回墨西哥呢？ you bet!!! 好，咱就说收它个10%吧，客气吧？ 24 billing * 10% =2.4 billion! Wow, 两年就付清了艾！ 那我们再多客气点吧。就收5%吧，四年付清！ 可是这还不是全部，不是全部！
第二，进口关税。 美国2015年从墨西哥进口商品$295 billion. 咱就用这个数吧。 征多少呢，咱就用最保守的进口关税都是20%-40%，取个中间数，30%吧。 你要是问，那墨西哥也向美国征税怎么办？ 美国与墨西哥2015年的进出口贸易逆差是58 billion. 这个比较复杂，要考虑的因素很多，就简单算算58 billion * 10% = 5.8 billion! wow, 一年就收回成本了艾！ 美国2014年一年投资到墨西哥过百亿，如果拿出一小部分投资在美国国内，会创造多少就业机会？还有什么补贴啊，不一而足。哪怕只征收少少的一点税收，每年都会有几个billion的筑墙经费, 零花钱，支持学费减免，支持全民医保。
第三，签证费 每年有大约0.5 million 墨西哥人合法的穿越过境。咱就算每人收取$300签证非吧。 0.5 * 300 = 150 million. 这些钱付边境巡逻，维护墙体神马的都够了。 再加上墙修好后，从前非法来的，以后就必须取得签证，这又是一笔不小的收入。
目前官方数据显示，在美的非法的墨西哥移民有6.8 million. 每年又增加72万。这都是非法的，这是官方数据。但是如果是非法入境的，你又怎么知道有多少呢？对吧？这还仅仅是相对”淳朴“的墨西哥移民。其他的就尽在不言中了。而墨西哥非法移民只是全部非法移民的50-60%。
deport了非法移民后，不知道要省多少钱。到那时，估计免费大学也不是梦了。奥巴马执政这几年，UC系统的学费从2006年的 $5,406 到 2015 的 $12,705， 135%的增长。
这还是加州居民的学费。而非居民的学费+杂费(不包括住宿）从2006年的 $25,254 到 2015年的$ 37,459, 仅仅9年就是50%的增长！预计明年会达到$39, 459! 重视孩子教育的家长，请你们睁开眼睛，看清现实。这个国家按照目前的路子走下去，不会有免费的大学，不会有免费的医疗。除非你们全家不工作。可是连你的算清楚了不工作的好处，谁还会去工作啊？not me。所以，Hillary治下免费大学是梦。不在于他们承诺了什么,而是他们能不能做到。Hillary will say anything, but do nothing!!! - Obama 2008.
Obama is the biggest Trojan horse in the human history!
数据来源：[url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-08-30-tuition-survey_x.htmhttp://www.dailycal.org/2014/12/22/history-uc-tuition-since-1868/]http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-08-30-tuition-survey_x.htmhttp://www.dailycal.org/2014/12/22/history-uc-tuition-since-1868/[/url]
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
汇钱收费的话只能银行代收，先不说这笔钱收的合不合法，银行为了这个额外收费改系统花多少钱？他们愿意吗？而且这会催生多少非法地下钱庄？
进口关税加30%，那些商人难道会自己吃进这些成本？要么转嫁给消费者，要么干脆不从老墨那进货了，一样拿不到钱。
正规签证收300。这个没有研究过，但肯定不太可行，不然全世界所有国家美签收1000块，不是更赚？
我一开始也觉得修墙这个说法虽然形象，却很荒唐，修一堵墙，而且而且，还要墨西哥人自己出钱！想法虽好，但是太可笑了啊！可是后来才发现，这真的不是笑话！因为它真的可行！而且必须有智慧的人才能明白！羊毛出在羊身上啊！！！
链接：https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/pay-for-the-wall
全文：
COMPELLING MEXICO TO PAY FOR THE WALL
Introduction: The provision of the Patriot Act, Section 326 - the "know your customer" provision, compelling financial institutions to demand identity documents before opening accounts or conducting financial transactions is a fundamental element of the outline below. That section authorized the executive branch to issue detailed regulations on the subject, found at 31 CFR 130.120-121. It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year. There are several ways to compel Mexico to pay for the wall including the following:
On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.
On day 2 Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico. There is no significant social safety net provided by the state in Mexico.
On day 3 tell Mexico that if the Mexican government will contribute the funds needed to the United States to pay for the wall, the Trump Administration will not promulgate the final rule, and the regulation will not go into effect.
Trade tariffs, or enforcement of existing trade rules: There is no doubt that Mexico is engaging in unfair subsidy behavior that has eliminated thousands of U.S. jobs, and which we are obligated to respond to; the impact of any tariffs on the price imports will be more than offset by the economic and income gains of increased production in the United States, in addition to revenue from any tariffs themselves. Mexico needs access to our markets much more than the reverse, so we have all the leverage and will win the negotiation. By definition, if you have a large trade deficit with a nation, it means they are selling far more to you than the reverse - thus they, not you, stand to lose from enforcing trade rules through tariffs (as has been done to save many U.S. industries in the past).
Cancelling visas: Immigration is a privilege, not a right. Mexico is totally dependent on the United States as a release valve for its own poverty - our approvals of hundreds of thousands of visas to their nationals every year is one of our greatest leverage points. We also have leverage through business and tourist visas for important people in the Mexican economy. Keep in mind, the United States has already taken in 4X more migrants than any other country on planet earth, producing lower wages and higher unemployment for our own citizens and recent migrants.
Visa fees: Even a small increase in visa fees would pay for the wall. This includes fees on border crossing cards, of which more than 1 million are issued a year. The border-crossing card is also one of the greatest sources of illegal immigration into the United States, via overstays. Mexico is also the single largest recipient of U.S. green cards, which confer a path to U.S. citizenship. Again, we have the leverage so Mexico will back down.
Conclusion: Mexico has taken advantage of us in another way as well: gangs, drug traffickers and cartels have freely exploited our open borders and committed vast numbers of crimes inside the United States. The United States has borne the extraordinary daily cost of this criminal activity, including the cost of trials and incarcerations. Not to mention the even greater human cost. We have the moral high ground here, and all the leverage. It is time we use it in order to Make America Great Again.
好聪明呀！
川粉用事实指明了现任政府并非在非移上不作为，而是一直在努力。欢迎接续贴奥八是如何在两院压力下接收难民的。
按照楼主这个算法，美国政府合着年年盈余一堆钱不知道该往哪儿用啊。
问一下那个进口，其实很多是美国在墨西哥的工厂吧，那如果加税会不会商家把负担加到消费者身上？
就是算给你听可以有钱修啊！美国在民主党的领导下，就是有这么多挣钱的法子不用，却一边大举外债，一边把钱塞到本国非移和别的国家口袋里，你唯一说错的地方是民主党这么做不是因为是活雷锋，而是有些是卖国贼，有些是愚蠢地被卖国贼卖了还帮着数钱。
除了粉丝，也没几个人有兴趣买他的书，你看过，就说说呗。 政府浪费钱可不是新闻，除了克林顿扭转了赤字，之后一直都赤字。
而且楼主说的可是开源修墙，而不是节流修墙，跟政府浪费钱是两个概念。
其次政府就是要花钱，所以奥八以一己之力double了美国前两百年的国债很合理，是吗？
再次，你是真心不爱看书，才自己创造出克林顿期间没欠国债？
我不爱看书，所以不懂财政赤字和国债是一回事，原来是文字游戏，哪里比得上你们川粉高智商高学历。 你继续。
等你回这句呢，原来你是在用克林顿的赤字当论据来支持奥巴马的国债，那还是你继续吧……
什么方针呢，让大家纳贡
如何消灭财政赤字 --- 加关税呗，墨西哥算啥，要给中国加，20%不够？那就200%，反正有3000亿贸易逆差，只赚不赔。
如何降低穆斯林人数---收入关费，一个人头1米，一年后管保ISIS宣布破产
高，太高明了，TRUMP刚入行的时候，记者问他如何解决National Debt, 降低 middle class tax 和维持Social security，
TRUMP 毫不犹疑地回答说，这个容易啊， a one-time "net worth tax" on individuals and trusts worth $10 million or more. 转眼就来钱了。
楼主不愧是TRUMP的粉！
哈哈哈哈，果然厉害，明明自己连赤字和国债都分不清，立刻就换张嘴脸，瞎喷用克林顿的赤字来支持奥巴马的国债。你们川粉的理解能力真是傲娇。
这么着吧，我补充一下，我觉得哪些钱是opportunity cost, 我不相信你们川粉一张嘴。第二，扭转赤字不是不可能，克林顿政府期间做到了， 至于小布什和奥巴马，那都是大大的败家子。第三，我是确实想了解一下川普在书里是怎么分析奥巴马政府浪费钱的，因为川普的business 确实有多次破产记录。他是在法律条款允许的情况下，game the system，也确实越来越富，但是我想知道他要是当总统了，怎么管理经济，总不能傲娇的一甩手说，从今天开始，国债全部不认了，破产，不还钱了。
我还以为你们真心要宣传川普的纲领，原来也就是空喊喊口号，真到实际的，立刻就都怂了。
觉得治国是过家家，想干嘛干嘛。
你放着楼主的详细计算不看，不懂，一句政府不是活雷锋所以不可能，然后转头就开始说人家在喊口号，又这样的狡辩能力，肯定永远不会怂！我想我已经被你用经验打败了，你还是自己互搏着玩吧。
你能别那么激动么。就算我最初的回帖没说清楚，我后面也解释了。我列举克林顿，是想说扭转财政赤字不是不可能。
但是你的回帖却立刻说“自己创造出克林顿期间没欠国债？”
你要是真心觉得你自己不是一时激动理解错了，那我举白旗。你用经验打败了我。
谢谢楼主花了时间和精力码字，有理有据，好文！
1. 当初BUSH打伊拉克的时候，也是很多人相信战争的花费会由伊拉克战后制裁最后买单的。事实的花费大家也看到了，是不会回本的，至少不能把希望寄托在别人买单，极大可能是每个纳税人自掏腰包。就好比中国也想让菲律宾来支付填岛的费用一样。现有的那段墙，当时O8，希拉里也是投票支持的，只那短短的一段，其实花费已经很高了，你觉得政府傻吗？能让墨西哥付钱会自掏腰包？
2. 修更长的墙要考虑有一些地形，当地岩石构造，对生态的保护，河道的破坏，实际实施起来由很多工程上的challenging. 之后的维护费用年年都要有的，不是一锤子买卖，具体最后的费用其实可能比trump的估算要多很很多。。
3. 最关键的一点，修墙花了这么多钱，并不能阻止非法移民和毒品的进入。梯子，绳子，挖地道。如果美国这边有接应，直接把毒品用简单投掷器扔过来就行了啊。事实上边境有很多地道的，我老板之前有政府要求去IMAGE地道构造，他考虑个人安全问题，没有接活。
TRUMP和大家看烦的政客不一样，不过在支持他的具体方案时候，也应该理智一些。有一些东西，民众听着很好，但是追根究底，是不会WORK的。
看了，仔细看了。
你说能挣的钱不挣就叫浪费，我的回复是，哪些钱能挣，不是你们川粉一张嘴就能盖章的。
某川粉说奥巴马浪费，我想知道川普是怎么分析的奥巴马财政的，以便更好的了解他的经济观念，因为我不相信他破产多次能管理好国家的经济。川粉说不出具体的细节，让我看书去。
我认怂了，我说了，你用经验打败了我。谁能真的宣传一下川普的经济理念，哪怕就是说说他怎么具体分析奥巴马浪费钱的，在此谢过。我很反感奥巴马，八年前就站在对立面，但是如何批判他的执政还是能让人更了解批判者的观点的。
这个我认同。本版经常是川普放个P，某些川粉都要说是提高空气质量，改善大气环境。
典型的TRUMP思维。
又要把人deport，又要把人留在这好收费。
你说这个墙有效，但是这几年大家对非法移民的抱怨越来越大，哪里看出来有效了？
你也说了，可以从没有墙的地方进来。事实上很多地段因为地形的challenging根本无法修墙。比如RIO GRANDE流域的河道已经相应广大的rechage zone.一旦破坏了，对生态的impact太大了。另外边境上也有很多私有土地，LOCAL的人并不一定有统一意见，这里不是中国，政府可以强拆。所以征得PERMIT这些，都是大工程。
事实就是美国在伊拉克战争里没有回本，当时的论调是一样的，觉得这是免费战争。能想办法让墨西哥付更好，但是纳税人还是要做好自掏腰包的准备。墨西哥的债务很多是企业的，把国家的债务转加给企业，先不说行不行得通，企业不能盈利能不能破产，最后都是消费者买单的。关键是，生意都还是要做的。
你给他数据分析，他说政府不是活雷锋所以你的数据不必看。
你不给他分析，他说你在说空话。
你给他讲书里说的，他说他不爱看书。
你给他说甲的国债，他给你说乙的赤字。
然后你指出他逻辑混乱，他说你一定没有第一时间意识到他逻辑混乱所以你才混乱。
你让他自己互搏玩去，然后他就一遍遍地说重复说上面的。
正如我前几天发帖说过，别跟神经病纠缠，他会先把你逼疯，然后用经验战胜你。别跟不要脸的人争执，他has nothing to lose. 感觉神经病们读了我前几天发的这句话以后运用得不错。
不过如果我交的税用在对社会有利的地方，我不会介意的。
哈哈哈，一边说别纠缠，一边却不敢引用的继续吵架，立得一块好牌坊。
她立牌坊水平真的不如你，一边说自己不是民主党的粉，一边到各个川粉楼里上蹿下跳的反对。
那么问题来了，你看似两边都不支持却在这跟川粉掐架，是想怎么着？
自己没投票权所以得给别人心里添添堵？找不出你喜欢的candidate还不许别人支持了~
你这“吃瓜群众”的牌坊可是立的比谁都稳呢~
一边说川粉骂人受不了一边对希粉的恶言视而不见，瞎成这样别出来挑战群众智商了真的。
我早就明确说过我讨厌川普，目前除了分裂共和党基本没干什么好事。这匾你要给我我光荣笑纳。
我也极度讨厌跪舔的川粉，这种人不仅嘴脸难看，还是 enabler。川普就算赢了总统，以他今时今日的表现，只能吹捧的，听不得一点反对的意见，睚眦必报，只能是一个独裁者。我不仅看重总统提名法官人选，更希望参众两院这届都换成共和党，好好扭转一下过左的风气。川普今天在威斯康星的表现还是相当不错的，如果能一改到处攻击共和党以及给共和党造成参众两院选举困境的做法，我一定支持。
版上除了坑王开贴公开支持过希拉里还有谁每天法轮功一样不停地变着花样吹捧希拉里？某些川粉搞得跟星宿派一样，我尊重你们的发言权，出来拍拍你们也是我的权力。你们那个高楼我从来都是捏着鼻子过，架不住总有狂热分子出来扰民。
你们那点智商，不出来丢人就行了，一个两个在自己电脑上看到华人有希拉里的广告，穆斯林头巾的广告，都敢说是希拉里花钱来华人拉票了，让人怎么挑战。