A classified analysis of electronic and satellite data, conducted by the United States and Malaysian governments, calculates Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 likely crashed into the Indian Ocean on one of two possible flight paths, CNN has learned.
One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis.
A classified analysis of electronic and satellite data, conducted by the United States and Malaysian governments, calculates Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 likely crashed into the Indian Ocean on one of two possible flight paths, CNN has learned.
One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis.
A classified analysis of electronic and satellite data, conducted by the United States and Malaysian governments, calculates Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 likely crashed into the Indian Ocean on one of two possible flight paths, CNN has learned.
One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis.
A classified analysis of electronic and satellite data, conducted by the United States and Malaysian governments, calculates Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 likely crashed into the Indian Ocean on one of two possible flight paths, CNN has learned.
One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis.
A classified analysis of electronic and satellite data, conducted by the United States and Malaysian governments, calculates Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 likely crashed into the Indian Ocean on one of two possible flight paths, CNN has learned. One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis. 又breaking news 了okeanos 发表于 2014-03-14 18:01 PM
23. Could mechanical failure explain it? It's one of the stronger possibilities. The absence of a debris field could suggest that the pilot made an emergency landing on water and the plane then sank intact, but there is still the mystery of the distress signal. There wasn't one. However, aviation consultant Kit Darby has said that it's possible there was a power failure, and during the hour of backup power the pilot was attempting to return to "the airports and a region he knows." There's also the possibility that the tail or a wing tore from the fuselage. This particular Boeing had suffered a clipped wingtip in the past, but Boeing repaired it. Another possibility is that a window or door failed, which would cause the temperature inside the plane to drop to 60 degrees below zero, creating a freezing fog and giving crew members only seconds to don oxygen masks before becoming disoriented and then incapacitated.
23. Could mechanical failure explain it? It's one of the stronger possibilities. The absence of a debris field could suggest that the pilot made an emergency landing on water and the plane then sank intact, but there is still the mystery of the distress signal. There wasn't one. However, aviation consultant Kit Darby has said that it's possible there was a power failure, and during the hour of backup power the pilot was attempting to return to "the airports and a region he knows." There's also the possibility that the tail or a wing tore from the fuselage. This particular Boeing had suffered a clipped wingtip in the past, but Boeing repaired it. Another possibility is that a window or door failed, which would cause the temperature inside the plane to drop to 60 degrees below zero, creating a freezing fog and giving crew members only seconds to don oxygen masks before becoming disoriented and then incapacitated. Starry 发表于 3/14/2014 6:05:50 PM
Sharp Changes in Altitude and Course After Jet Lost Contact
Radar signals recorded by the Malaysian military appear to show the missing airliner climbing to 45,000 feet, above the approved altitude limit for a Boeing 777-200, soon after it disappeared from civilian radar and made a sharp turn to the west, according to a preliminary assessment by a person familiar with the data.
The radar track, which the Malaysian government has not released but says it has provided to the United States and China, then shows the plane descending unevenly to 23,000 feet, below normal cruising levels, as it approached the densely populated island of Penang, one of the country’s largest. There, the plane turned from a southwest-bound course, climbed to a higher altitude and flew northwest over the Strait of Malacca toward the Indian Ocean.
Investigators have also examined data transmitted from the plane’s Rolls-Royce engines that shows it descending 40,000 feet in the space of a minute, according to a senior American official briefed on the investigation. But investigators do not believe the readings are accurate because the aircraft would most likely have taken longer to fall such a distance.
同意，飞不飞得到另说，撞上也快没油了，威力大大下降。要撞也应该去撞马来西亚才对啊！
而且恐怖袭击为啥要选红眼班机，不是应该大白天让别人都看到才说得通才有威慑力嘛！凭借马来政府的智商，应该很容易得手。
越传越离谱了，777运核原料！！！
好吧，整件事情超出我的想象力，还是给资本主义打工比较简单。
One flight path suggests the plane crashed into the Bay of Bengal off the coast of India, and the other has it traveling southeast and crashing in the Indian Ocean, according to the analysis.
又breaking news 了
★ 发自Android 华人阅览器 7.2
nod，而且飞机还是自己波音的飞机
扯啥啊。。。。
美国现在知道很多内幕就是不告诉你正常
但是你说这个是它自己筹划的就鬼扯了
★ 发自Android 华人阅览器 7.2
最想了结此事的应该是马国，对吧？否则外国飞机轮船的天天在家门口转。怎么才能了结呢？要找到飞机残骸和部分乘客遗体才行，对吧？这不就可以谈了？
如果是美国当然直接出兵，马国如果是反对派组织的，出兵就是内战 当然不是普通劫机 普通人有这么大能力弄没一架飞机么？
我只是单纯想说pululu逻辑不清，绝没有说这件事是劫机，更没有说是马来反动派搞的。
我就想说，美国打马来反动派的话，不是内战。。。
请问哪点逻辑不清？我的回帖根本跟美国出不出兵没有关系，我说如果这事发生在美国，如果是普通的kbfz劫机，美国肯定就出兵了，可是这是发生在马国，马国出兵或许就内战了
至于美国出兵马国，我根本没有讨论，请看清楚再回
from CNN Q&A
23. Could mechanical failure explain it?
It's one of the stronger possibilities. The absence of a debris field could suggest that the pilot made an emergency landing on water and the plane then sank intact, but there is still the mystery of the distress signal. There wasn't one. However, aviation consultant Kit Darby has said that it's possible there was a power failure, and during the hour of backup power the pilot was attempting to return to "the airports and a region he knows." There's also the possibility that the tail or a wing tore from the fuselage. This particular Boeing had suffered a clipped wingtip in the past, but Boeing repaired it. Another possibility is that a window or door failed, which would cause the temperature inside the plane to drop to 60 degrees below zero, creating a freezing fog and giving crew members only seconds to don oxygen masks before becoming disoriented and then incapacitated.
普通机械故障，这个飞机应该坠毁在回转试图迫降吉隆坡的途中。
真的开始疲沓了
先扣好帽子，严丝合缝，然后对结果不满意了就会说，看看我早说了要隐瞒
cnn可以甩开不看。看WSJ，reuters都可以。
Radar signals recorded by the Malaysian military appear to show the missing airliner climbing to 45,000 feet, above the approved altitude limit for a Boeing 777-200, soon after it disappeared from civilian radar and made a sharp turn to the west, according to a preliminary assessment by a person familiar with the data.
The radar track, which the Malaysian government has not released but says it has provided to the United States and China, then shows the plane descending unevenly to 23,000 feet, below normal cruising levels, as it approached the densely populated island of Penang, one of the country’s largest. There, the plane turned from a southwest-bound course, climbed to a higher altitude and flew northwest over the Strait of Malacca toward the Indian Ocean.
Investigators have also examined data transmitted from the plane’s Rolls-Royce engines that shows it descending 40,000 feet in the space of a minute, according to a senior American official briefed on the investigation. But investigators do not believe the readings are accurate because the aircraft would most likely have taken longer to fall such a distance.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/15/world/asia/malaysia-military-radar.html?hp&_r=0
有说飞机经过马来半岛低空飞行以避开军用雷达，到国际区拉高高度，避开往来航线的其他航班。不管怎么说，这个飞行员很老到啊，民航飞行员有这水平吗，懂行的给说说？ 另外那个机长什么背景，以前不会真是开战斗机的吧~