【已更新】我决定去告你们了，你们英语好的都歧视了我！

接近 12 年

101 楼

以下是引用xph在9/10/2013 12:45:00 PM的发言：

照这个例子你就去闹顶多最好不过是系里以后争取雇佣中国人可是人家完全可以说我雇了没有合适的人选啊

你怎么知道你们系没试过？而且role model 这东西female就好了中国人就说不过去了

美国top的学校怎么可能没有中国人？你想想就知道没有中国人的学校是什么水平的啦，楼主这个水平上个这种烂校都吃力，还要怪学校，真是开眼了。

meowwww

接近 12 年

102 楼

以下是引用snaillily在9/10/2013 12:45:00 PM的发言：

明白了，所以ｌｚ是想说自己ｄｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔ没有ｃｈｉｎｅｓｅ　ｒｏｌｅ　ｍｏｄｅｌ．
re。。。。她自己之前根本没说到点儿上。。。。。不过我觉得这学校招了lz这么个中国学生，以后打死也不会再招chinese role model了。。。。。

vaormd

接近 12 年

103 楼

楼主你有功夫考虑告院系，还是多动动脑筋自己“克服语言困难”吧。脑子再聪明也要用在正道上才行，歪点子少想为好。

ilovelondon

接近 12 年

104 楼

以下是引用summerwong018在9/10/2013 12:39:00 PM的发言：


     你可以搜Emeldi VS university of Oregon.下面是我copy的一个开头：

Emeldi was a Ph.D. student in the University of Oregon’s
College of Education, in its Department of Special Education.
Her advisor and dissertation committee chair, Edward
Kame’enui, took a sabbatical starting in the fall of 2005.
Emeldi asked Robert Horner, another professor, to replace
Kame’enui as her dissertation chair. Horner agreed. During
the time of Emeldi’s work with Horner, Emeldi and other
Ph.D. candidates complained to Mike Bullis, Dean of the College of Education, about lack of adequate support for female
Ph.D. candidates. In May 2007, Emeldi produced a memo
summarizing a meeting between Bullis and several graduate
students. That memo lists, as one of fifteen topics discussed,
the students’ concern about the Department’s lack of female
role models. The memo says:
Students request that qualified Women be hired into
tenured faculty positions [emphasis]. Students
attempted and were unable to identify a current
female appointment to a tenured faculty position.
Students need to experience empowered female role
models successfully working within an academic
context [emphasis]. Doctoral students request that
the college model a balance of gender appointments
that reflect the proportion of student gender population ratios.

以下是引用ilovelondon在9/10/2013 12:34:00 PM的发言：



你给的链接我都看不了，能给几个keywords吗，让我搜一下



[此贴子已经被作者于2013/9/10 12:40:43编辑过]



整篇文章太长了，就抄几段吧，看来看去，人家都是在说自己没有得到跟male candidates同等的待遇，而不是要求自己有特殊待遇：

While the University maintains that no one other than Bullis knew of the memo, Emeldi’s position was that she was told that all Department faculty received copies; that it was “common knowledge in the College of Education” that she was dissatisfied with the Department’s level of support for women; that Horner, her dissertation chair, was treating her less favorably than his male graduate students and did not give her the same support and attention that he gave male candidates; that Horner often ignored her and did not make eye contact with her; that, when Emeldi attended Horner’s group meetings with his graduate students, either she was not on the agenda, or no substantial or meaningful work of hers was discussed; and that Horner’s male students had opportunities that were not available to his female students, such as access to more and better resources, including more office space and better technology for collecting data.

最后的结论：

In sum, Emeldi’s case should fail because she has not shown enough to warrant a jury’s finding causation. But even if we give her the benefit of doubt on that requirement, she certainly has not shown enough to rebut as mere pretext Horner’s reason for resigning as her dissertation chair. The evidence, including Friestad and Horner’s testimony and Emeldi’s own documented complaints, makes it clear that Horner’s nondiscriminatory explanation was genuine: he resigned as dissertation chair because of intellectual and inter-personal incompatabilities with his Ph.D. candidate. Emeldi’s unsupported statements and speculation do not overcome this evidence, and she has not offered corroborative evidence that was available to her that would create triable issues of causation and pretext. We should not allow this case to go forward.
[此贴子已经被作者于2013/9/10 12:54:11编辑过]