That is why I never thought 54 is fundamentally a good thing.
The personal anxiety of being victimized for one's Chinese identity certainly was exacerbated by Trump's administration, but I think it was only a dramatic point in the longer course of victimizing the Chinese identity.
I didn't visit wxc as often since a main part of the theme here has been consistently and annoyingly China bashing. It is depressing.
論壇數年，見到很多人對有關中國、中國文化的一切都鉅細無遺地貶低和汙衊。吾曾長久不理解乃至惱怒這種行為，後來才大致明白他們的動機和原因：是為了摒除或淡化自己的中國人身份。其策略有二：
一，如之前有位網友洋洋洒洒地反復强调"中國人"難以定義，他是想説"中國人"不存在，從而抵达"因為我是中國人，所以我不是中國人"的特異邏輯。這是通過拆除概念的外延，使其内涵消失於意義的海洋之中。這個策略政治上正確，(偽)理想主義，(偽)國際主義，表面上好看些，但因為空洞，故不常見，最常见的策略則是：
二，通過不斷削弱、貶低概念的内涵(凡有關中國的一切事物，樣樣牽强，樣樣不行)來摧毁"中國"這個概念的有效性，所以"中國"幾乎不存在，以期得到"因為我是中國人，所以我幾乎不是中國人"的結論。
這樣做是為了方便自己"重新做人" (做美國人、西方人、世界人)；也希望藉此規避被關進"集中营"的命運，因為集中营關的是中國人 (曾有不知疲倦地操運這個策略的網友如此表達對中美衝突的恐懼)。
這種趨利避害的行為實貭上是一種生物本能。
因其是策略行為，故此就跟學術探討、追求真理完全無關了。好比，有人用橡皮擦竭力將紙上"中國"二字擦去，而你又來把它重新描上，對方就衹好再次揮舞橡皮擦上來奮力再擦。這是一種機械運動，不可能有任何觀點的交流、改善和"進步"。
上述的策略二也是所谓"認知戰"的典型模式，常見於其中的各種"話術"。
It is already the most benign and the most sympathetic account. Reality is certainly more complicated and uglier.
I don't feel I was away for that long.
还以为我说错了什么话把你给气跑了呢
老实交代，你飘哪嘎达去了。
‘規避被關進"集中营"的命運’：这种恐惧是在川总之后吧，那怎么解释之前那么多年普遍存在的呢？但‘為了方便自己"重新做人" ，极准
这些人就是和五 毛一样的六毛，他们种种匪夷所思的言论行为不过就是为了一口饭在努力工作而已。
That is why I never thought 54 is fundamentally a good thing.
The personal anxiety of being victimized for one's Chinese identity certainly was exacerbated by Trump's administration, but I think it was only a dramatic point in the longer course of victimizing the Chinese identity.
I didn't visit wxc as often since a main part of the theme here has been consistently and annoyingly China bashing. It is depressing.
Yet recently I began to feel that some likelihood too due to the consistency of some posts that do bear characteristics of "認知戰"..
Either way, one can receive it with that kind of optimism I applauded above.
這就算才高八斗了？
总之就是尽最大努力不通过努力获取安乐。
天可怜见
多亏他们现在都不是中国人了，能勉强证明自己是个人。像我拿着中国护照作为一个留学生怎么看怎么是低等生物。