Some people may feel DISGUSTED by it, and their feelings are honest, hence they have no sympathy for it. In some sense, they are not wrong since it is an awful image indeed. So they like to disassociate themselves from it.
And for some other few with strong sympathy, they identify with it as part of themselves though it is a terrifying image. Hence I called this identification a "sacred process".
Most people probably lie between these two endpoints.
The disassociating ones and the identifying ones are two completely different kinds of minds. They follow two different sets of logics. They cannot understand each other.
先引冯网友原帖：
再引冯网友原帖：
俺向冯网友请教：
您前边的帖子说因为每个生命都同等珍贵，精确的数字很重要，，“越准确越好”，后边说数字不重要，但是南京当局打出300000让数字变得重要， 愚蠢。
都是您的意见。
同时您自己后来也承认，在大量尸骨被抛长江的情况下，精确数字是不现实的。
那么，如果今天可以精确到个位123456，可以用来表明对这些死难者的“尊重”。那么没有被统计到的654321条生命呢，他们得到应有的尊重了吗？
如果不能完全统计所有死难的个体，怎么精确到个位呢？
在这种情况下，按照目前能搜集到的数据，把300000作为一个概数，标明一个量级，表示可能多一些，可能少一些。哪里不科学，哪里不严谨？
为什么用这个数字“愚蠢”？
如果精确数字不现实，按您的希望，把300000这个数字拿掉。那么当有“从地狱来的狗东西”质疑南京大屠杀时，中国说什么？
对不起，没有准确数字？
对不起，还在数？
对不起，没有姓名不全，所以不能确定数量？
得到这样的答复，”地狱来的狗东西“会得到什么结论？
俺的一个猜想：他们会说，中国人自己都搞不清楚死了多少人，哪有什么大屠杀。
我看到您多处声明，不否定大屠杀。但您的这种对精确性的严格要求的作用，却是实实在在的让人无法开口纪念大屠杀。
希望这不是您的本义。
对吗？
包括”从狱来的狗东西“（典故出自网友贴），
谁有这个资格？
such as the image shown in the photo of dry bones lying in the dust in the post below by 美國老师: https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/teatime/742057.html
Some people may feel DISGUSTED by it, and their feelings are honest, hence they have no sympathy for it. In some sense, they are not wrong since it is an awful image indeed. So they like to disassociate themselves from it.
And for some other few with strong sympathy, they identify with it as part of themselves though it is a terrifying image. Hence I called this identification a "sacred process".
Most people probably lie between these two endpoints.
The disassociating ones and the identifying ones are two completely different kinds of minds. They follow two different sets of logics. They cannot understand each other.
贴文俱在。
辛苦勒
我的麻烦是什么都不信，但容易被洗脑：）