Law number way overweighted. Each category need to be weight
By the labor pool size of that category/career.
top 100 law form only have only 100000 attorney, top tech have probably 500K -1 million employees, but law slot number in the table is much bigger than tech!
also medical school and law school does not equal top career track.
昨天对初稿的回馈中最大的意见是两个。第一个是对公校不公平,所以今天把没有标准化过的排名也登出来,虽然这个从统计学来讲不恨规范,但是会令很多人呢满意是必然的。第二个就是以whaled网友为主的关于用arbitrarily assigned numbers作为排名指数不合理的问题。因此今天第二稿全用原始数据。
第一个表是把每个学校进入5类职业(职校)的总数除以在校本科生的总数,再按所得数据(最后一列)排名。
第二个表只按每个学校进入的总数直接排名。
M怎么可能读医人数近似于cs人数?你去数数Putnam 就知道这是不可能的
CS 405
https://ir.mit.edu/gss
By the labor pool size of that category/career.
top 100 law form only have only 100000 attorney, top tech have probably 500K -1 million employees, but law slot number in the table is much bigger than tech!
also medical school and law school does not equal top career track.
I did not notice this yesterday, got to readjust.
大牛们不做employee,做founder
这些律师人均revenue不如大厂马公多
Should've been adjusted for enrollment of *relevant* majors.
前100law firm 人均revenue大概60万,大厂(秘书也算上)都在1百万到两百万
(1) Big schools with comprehensive offerings: what do their art/architecture/film majors have to do with the chosen career paths?
and
(2) Small schools with niche offerings: Caltech students have little to do with Law school or MBB, for example.
based on the preferences of members in this forum. You're certainly welcome to come up with your own rankings based on different criteria.