I saw a number of "social experiment" videos on YouTube a while back. Nothing like shown here. The Chinese cases seemed very encouraging while the Indian ones seemed horrible. India at 30, China at 40 in your list?
How were those wallets dispersed and returned?
How many this type of "studies" did you look through?
instead of leaving wallets randomly in the streets and wanting for their return, one pretends dropping a wallet right before someone or some couple and see if they immediately pick it up and return it. The Chinese reaction is almost always noble. The Indian reaction is the opposite. Looking through the comment sections many Chinese viewers actually provide friendly explanatories for the Indian behavior, typically stating that China was the same when China was as poor as India therefore it isn't a issue with honesty but poverty.
Seeing a wallet lying on the ground with no one around is different. Not returning it doesn't necessarily imply greed . You may not know where to return it. The police in a specific culture may not feel obligated to locate the owner of the wallet..
在世界各地“丢失”钱包 被归还的可能性有多少？
如果你在街上看到了一个钱包，你会怎么办？是否会按照里面的联系方式把这个钱包归还主人？ 如果钱包里分文没有，你又会花时间归还这个钱包吗？
这就是近来一个刊登在《科学》期刊（Science）上的研究要想找到的答案。这项研究的作者希望以这样的实验评估出全球各国民众的诚实度（civic honesty）。
报告的作者认为民众的诚实度对社会资本和经济发展至关重要，但是这又和人们自身的物质利益相冲突。
研究人员通过对40个国家的355个城市进行实地实验，即故意“丢失”了1.73多万个钱包后得出了以下的结果：在诚实度前十的国家多为富裕的欧洲国家（只有位于第八的新西兰不是欧洲国家），澳大利亚的诚实度排在第12位，加拿大第17，美国第21，英国第22位。
在瑞士，有钱的钱包归还率近80%，澳大利亚为69%，美国为57%。中国则不到25%。
泰国是排名最高的亚洲国家，智利是排名最高的南美国家，南非是排名最高的非洲国家。中国则在这40个国家中排在最后一名。
对于这个结果，中国网友反应不一。
“也许看了这篇文章、我们会对人性中的善意多一份期待、多一份欣慰、世界也可能会比我们想象的温柔一些，”一位叫“蕨代霜蛟”的微博大V说。
“这不代表诚实。很多人懒得管闲事而已，”中国网友曙炜写道。
“坐标悉尼，钱包丢过5次，100%被归还的经历让我不得不爱上这个城市，”一位微博名为“瓜瓜喵咯”的网友说。
研究显示的全球民众诚实度在全球40个国家355个城市里进行，共”故意“丢失共17，000只钱包。
捷克和波兰我不是特别敢信，别的应该不太离谱。
反正捷克布拉格那种大城市够呛（这个我有亲身经历，当年去开会，5星级酒店啊。中间去听音乐会，因为晚上要回来接着开，很多人把笔记本放在会议室，回来，丢了5台！），小地方应该没问题。民风淳朴极了——我们坐公共汽车遇到老人，看着我们孩子真是忍不住笑啊，跟中国那种和善的老人一点区别没有。
同一个国家，不同城市差异也会很大，估计法国现在也不如几年前好了
Science 05 Jul 2019: Vol. 365, Issue 6448, pp. 70-73
I saw a number of "social experiment" videos on YouTube a while back. Nothing like shown here. The Chinese cases seemed very encouraging while the Indian ones seemed horrible. India at 30, China at 40 in your list?
How were those wallets dispersed and returned?
How many this type of "studies" did you look through?
你可以直接咨询《科学》杂志，我给你找到了联络方法：
1200 New York Ave, NWWashington,DC20005电话：202-326-6400
不过呢，我相信，《科学》发表的论文比你的YOUTUBER稍稍靠谱一点。
instead of leaving wallets randomly in the streets and wanting for their return, one pretends dropping a wallet right before someone or some couple and see if they immediately pick it up and return it. The Chinese reaction is almost always noble. The Indian reaction is the opposite. Looking through the comment sections many Chinese viewers actually provide friendly explanatories for the Indian behavior, typically stating that China was the same when China was as poor as India therefore it isn't a issue with honesty but poverty.
Seeing a wallet lying on the ground with no one around is different. Not returning it doesn't necessarily imply greed . You may not know where to return it. The police in a specific culture may not feel obligated to locate the owner of the wallet..
印度人普遍有信仰，拾金不昧也不少见。https://www.bilibili.com/s/video/BV1N54y1X7xp
30-40，比起50步和100步差别不大，彼此彼此。
像澳洲这样民风比较纯朴对弱势人群关怀有加可视贫富差异不大的地方，归还钱包觉得主要还是经济同理心。
衡量一个社会文明程度的重要指标就是对弱势群体的关怀。
秘鲁，卡萨克斯坦，肯尼亚，墨西哥
讲究一点的说法就是，本来无一物，何处可以丢
董明珠出门也从不带钱包
有中国网友说，这个设计不合理，现在谁还用email啊，要是有微信中国的排名一定第一。