The pay gap between college-educated workers in and out of their fields of study widened by more than half between 1993 and 2019, according to a new University of Kansas study.
One of the things that we know is that occupations tend to be sticky. If your first job out of college is well-matched with what you studied, that tends to carry forward in terms of whatever future jobs you have over the course of your career。
For example, many schools have made a concerted effort to engage more students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. But, the study found computer science and engineering graduates—particularly women—paid a bigger mismatch penalty than graduates in other fields like liberal arts. While more women are graduating in STEM fields today than in prior decades, women were less likely than men to end up getting jobs in those fields, in part because they were more likely to report worse work-life balance or fewer chances for promotion.
The reason is that women has no long term passion for science and engineering. They bolted out after a few years and turn to quality engineering, project management, etc. Women like me who still like to do true engineering are one of kind (凤毛菱角）。It's really bad investment for 左左藤校，cause mass majority of their women prodigies don't give a shit about engineering or science anymore. Poor 小中小印男who cares about engineering and science, their spots are ripped off. I wrote my observation five years ago in 文学城 after my son's college application (he was turned down by every his reach schools except one and some of his match school), lol.
https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/students-pay-a-growing-price-for-landing-a-job-outside-their-college-major/2023/04
The pay gap between college-educated workers in and out of their fields of study widened by more than half between 1993 and 2019, according to a new University of Kansas study.
One of the things that we know is that occupations tend to be sticky. If your first job out of college is well-matched with what you studied, that tends to carry forward in terms of whatever future jobs you have over the course of your career。
For example, many schools have made a concerted effort to engage more students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. But, the study found computer science and engineering graduates—particularly women—paid a bigger mismatch penalty than graduates in other fields like liberal arts. While more women are graduating in STEM fields today than in prior decades, women were less likely than men to end up getting jobs in those fields, in part because they were more likely to report worse work-life balance or fewer chances for promotion.
比如我就来了，哈哈
1，即使女孩在理工方面有不利因素，是统计上的事实。但人家有些人是真爱，不是冲钱来的
2，即使有不利，但对一些女娃，这就是她们最适合的方面了，去别的领域，也许平均来说女娃有优势，但对这部分女娃，可能劣势更大
所以，不要替人家担心
不就是糊焦点吗？还有谁知你的焦点是在靶心中央，还是在三界，多界交汇点或者说三不管地带呢？遇到这类不就要多学科或者换专业吗？
的相关性和是否都在一个field 都用得上。
The reason is that women has no long term passion for science and engineering. They bolted out after a few years and turn to quality engineering, project management, etc. Women like me who still like to do true engineering are one of kind (凤毛菱角）。It's really bad investment for 左左藤校，cause mass majority of their women prodigies don't give a shit about engineering or science anymore. Poor 小中小印男who cares about engineering and science, their spots are ripped off. I wrote my observation five years ago in 文学城 after my son's college application (he was turned down by every his reach schools except one and some of his match school), lol.
Why am I the only one in R&D hardware group everywhere I went. I know in last two decades, STEM colleges man to woman ratio is almost 50-50.
藤的比例，在这个坛子要比矿工高多了，踩藤的都那么多，踩矿工的会少吗？
40万能够横行霸道？没觉得啊
老中女几乎占领工程的主要地位。
公司R&D部门几乎都被外国移民占领, 女性里面基本都是老中女。