看不下去了, 某些ID对自己家娃的学校有偏爱无可非议

w
worriedm0m
楼主 (文学城)

但是也不能没有任何事实数据就带方向误导其他家长。

b
baydad
说个具体例子吧。你这样说,就是没有具体数据在说话
w
worriedm0m
比如说比较两个学校读PREMED方向, 那就比较一下考医学院的入取率等等数据,不要张嘴就瞎忽悠
g
greenoasis
有这些实打实的数据就好了。LAC 学医比小藤学医哪个好?
f
fakegreen
Can't compare. In A most brilliant students went to WS
f
fakegreen
In UCLA most brilliant students went to Medical School
g
greenoasis
就比premed vs premed? 别人是否brilliant 是否去WS 没关系啊
f
fantasticdream
没几个人会被他忽悠的。

这里的人都猴精猴精的。

f
fakegreen
top 1% UCLA apply for Medical, and top 20-30 % A apply for medic

Top 10% A go to WS

w
worriedm0m
小藤本身就和LAC风格类似, 要看具体学校吧
M
MtDenali
也不排除有外行父母
g
greenoasis
这么一说,不是没啥可比的了。作为一个学生自己,A的几率大多了
M
MtDenali
大公校良莠不齐,即使UCLA依然如此。看SAT分数就知道

除了impact major

w
worriedm0m
亲戚是专科医生,他说去参加的知名conference , 大把的医生本科毕业于W,A, S 这几个学校
a
acreek
肯定的
f
fakegreen
Correct! My doctor graduated from W
1
12度圆缺
网上只是说明观点啊,又不是做论文。被误导的人是自己无知,谁不知道网上信息需要过滤
古道阳关
兼听则明
2
2boysmom
不要小瞧LAC啊!我娃被W和S全部WL, A没申请
w
worriedm0m
这几个学校本来就是很prestigious
v
violinpiano
哪些ID啊? 我好考古一下

w
worriedm0m
查一下关键词,喜欢用“绝对, 肯定,当然,想都不要想”和感叹号之类的

j
justdoit8
怕误导别人以后大家都不敢发言了,谁敢保证自己说的100% 正确于每一个不同的individual?
w
worriedm0m
给出这种有强烈感情色彩的观点时候,难道不应该多列举一下事实和数据来support自己吗?
a
aimyumi
W和A是什么学校?
s
sji
Williams And Amherst
花梦
What is WS?
I
Iamsosad
哈哈,太当真了,这里太多的信息都加了父母自己的感情色彩,当然要自己筛选罗
w
worriedm0m
查到一个比较旧的数据,具有一定参考性

https://www.amherst.edu/news/campus-buzz/node/501039

A: I don’t think [the number] has changed. Every year we have approximately 50 to 60 applicants for medical school, but these days, that number spans several graduating classes. So this summer we’re working with 50  applicants for medical school, along with one dental school applicant, from the classes of 2014 to 2009.

 

: Has the system been successful?

A: Yes, very. The key is that students apply when they are competitive and ready. We probably average in any given year a roughly 75 to 80 percent acceptance rate. Many students who don’t get in will reapply, and the combination of applying once and then reapplying takes our acceptance up to more than 90 percent.

We pride ourselves at Amherst in not being a cutthroat pre-med environment. We don’t have a pre-med track or major. The students here are collaborative with each other. We’re proud of that.

Our job at Amherst is to provide optimal support so our students will do as well as possible. We have a great group of candidates for medical school. [They represent]the kind of doctor we will need in the future, someone who is  not just a technician and expert in the science of disease but also a healer who is able to combine the science of medicine with the art of medicine. That’s a unique and important contribution. We feel that Amherst is great at turning out that kind of doctor. The same applies to those who end up working in other health professions fields, as an increasing number of students are doing.

f
fakegreen
花儿街
h
hhtt
是不是可以这么理解?如果你们还在究结什么学校,你们还没有成功?
f
fei_xng
被误导了 活该。,早就应该认识到那些ID 就是出来嘚瑟 何必当真
两女宝妈
同意在能力和思辨能力能达到的情况下,多给点相对客观的数据帮助会更大