This vacancy arose during Obama's final year as president, and shortly after Scalia's death was announced, Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president. Senate Democrats criticized the move as being unprecedented and responded saying that there was sufficient time to vote on a nominee before the election.[1]Garland's nomination expired on January 3, 2017, with the end of the 114th Congress, 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate.[2] Obama's successor, Donald Trump (a Republican), nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy on January 31, 2017, soon after taking office.[2]
在紫檀看到家长们诉说孩子们反驳家长的对话，那些话都几乎一模一样，俺就在想，奇了怪了，这些孩子们都互不认识，都在不同的州，也不上紫檀，怎么说出来的话都一模一样呢？而且观点都近似呢？学校里教的也得有教学大纲，才能五湖四海都一样啊，看了<the social dilemma>之后，俺明白了为什么一夜之间孩子们的观点都近似了，原来是他们search 的媒体新闻引导他们有这种类似的想法，足见媒体的影响之大，片中提到这种文化的影响可能会导致内战，而且是用最少的钱掀起内战。。。
Here is a list of four Republicans senators who have said they will oppose a vote before the election:
Maine Sen. Susan Collins told the New York Times, “I think that’s too close, I really do." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski in September said, "Fair is fair," and she would not vote to replace RBG before the election." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham in October 2018 said, "If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump's term, and the primary process has started, we'll wait to the next election. And I've got a pretty good chance of being the Judiciary [Chairman]. Hold the tape." IowaSen. Chuck Grassley said in July he would follow the Biden rule, "I'm just following what was established by the Biden Rule in 1986 and then emphasized by him in 1992... They set the pattern. I didn't set the pattern. But it was very legitimate that you can't have one rule for Democratic presidents and another rule for Republican presidents."
大法官去世，他俩觉得美国前途堪忧。
不温不火，嘿嘿
On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died one month earlier. At the time of his nomination, Garland was the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
This vacancy arose during Obama's final year as president, and shortly after Scalia's death was announced, Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president. Senate Democrats criticized the move as being unprecedented and responded saying that there was sufficient time to vote on a nominee before the election.[1]Garland's nomination expired on January 3, 2017, with the end of the 114th Congress, 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate.[2] Obama's successor, Donald Trump (a Republican), nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy on January 31, 2017, soon after taking office.[2]
以前南湾有娃在学校戴帽子被打了，新闻报道
在紫檀看到家长们诉说孩子们反驳家长的对话，那些话都几乎一模一样，俺就在想，奇了怪了，这些孩子们都互不认识，都在不同的州，也不上紫檀，怎么说出来的话都一模一样呢？而且观点都近似呢？学校里教的也得有教学大纲，才能五湖四海都一样啊，看了<the social dilemma>之后，俺明白了为什么一夜之间孩子们的观点都近似了，原来是他们search 的媒体新闻引导他们有这种类似的想法，足见媒体的影响之大，片中提到这种文化的影响可能会导致内战，而且是用最少的钱掀起内战。。。
说实话，还是不应该自欺欺人，癌症能饶得了谁，连Steven Jobs那么厉害厉害的人最后也抵不过癌症！
（zt from CNN）
Here is a list of four Republicans senators who have said they will oppose a vote before the election:
Maine Sen. Susan Collins told the New York Times, “I think that’s too close, I really do." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski in September said, "Fair is fair," and she would not vote to replace RBG before the election." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham in October 2018 said, "If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump's term, and the primary process has started, we'll wait to the next election. And I've got a pretty good chance of being the Judiciary [Chairman]. Hold the tape." Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said in July he would follow the Biden rule, "I'm just following what was established by the Biden Rule in 1986 and then emphasized by him in 1992... They set the pattern. I didn't set the pattern. But it was very legitimate that you can't have one rule for Democratic presidents and another rule for Republican presidents."否则和国内某些从小就被教育世俗有什么区别。
虽然是理想主义，但是这才是美国的希望所在
美国的主流啊
右到zhou老年人的程度，还是有点让人意外的。。。
最近他们看的书是《傲慢与偏见》！
-- 也是儿子的朋友先看的。那孩子是比较接近天才级别的。
因为十九世纪工业革命的结果的确是对工人阶级也就是底层人群可怕的压榨。拿人当机器用，完全无视各种人权安全最低保障等等。太过分太可怕了。所以后来才会有工人运动，慢慢有了八小时工作制，工会，各种基本权利保障。什么事都是有原因才有结果的。但是共产主义这条路看着美好，实际上走不通。多少人不信邪。以后也许还会有人去尝试。
如果社会2极分化严重，那个就会有市场。肯定还会有人去尝试的。
而不是装自己或裙带兜里。还有几十年的女权运动从男的一人工作可以养女的变成了中年老大妈很多都要养全家
其实西方尤其美国的路可能是最好的了。但是也有很多问题。人类有史以来好像这些问题就是无解。主要是人性太麻烦。
蘇共的 土共的 紅色高棉的
当然，在西方国家和经济比较好的非穆斯林亚洲国家，立法上是支持男女平等的；但人们的思想观念还有可以提高的地方。
过去妇女，无论贫富（特别是富的），为了能有存身之地，一定要嫁人；很多时候，甚至要嫁给自己不喜欢的人 -- 这还是幸运，可以自己选一选的。这种感觉太悲催了：我宁可做一个要养家糊口的中年大妈，也不要为了能生存而一定要委屈嫁人。（正在看电视剧《傲慢与偏见》。-- 当年女的太不容易了。）
的问题，也不迟。
又，男的不能“顶天立地”，要怪女的？ 你这是“大女子”主义啊。
是要多笨才會被土共騙第二次啊