A true threat is a threatening communication that can be prosecuted under the law. It is distinct from a threat that is made in jest. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that true threats are not protected under the U.S. Constitution based on three justifications: preventing fear, preventing the disruption that follows from that fear, and diminishing the likelihood that the threatened violence will occur.[1] There is some concern that even satirical speech could be regarded as a "true threat" due to concern over terrorism.[2]
The true threat doctrine was established in the 1969 Supreme Court case Watts v. United States.[3] In that case, an eighteen-year-old male was convicted in a Washington, D.C. District Court for violating a statute prohibiting persons from knowingly and willfully making threats to harm or kill the President of the United States.[3] The conviction was based on a statement made by Watts, in which he said, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J."[3] Watts appealed, leading to the Supreme Court finding the statute constitutional on its face, but reversing the conviction of Watts.
The counterspeech doctrine posits that the proper response to negative speech is to counter it with positive expression. It derives from the theory that audiences, or recipients of the expression, can weigh for themselves the values of competing ideas and, hopefully, follow the better approach.
The counterspeech doctrine is one of the most important free expression principles in First Amendment jurisprudence.
人到中年论坛上有几个川粉一直叫嚷如果川普当不上总统就开战。
请问在论坛上鼓动内战算不算违法？
https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4682611.html https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4677684.html https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4677890.html https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4682247.html https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4682419.html有投坛大佬故意把格林尼治时间说成法兰克福时间。
https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4666184.html
https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/rdzn/4672623.html
Can J2 transfer to H1 without waver? Thanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat
A true threat is a threatening communication that can be prosecuted under the law. It is distinct from a threat that is made in jest. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that true threats are not protected under the U.S. Constitution based on three justifications: preventing fear, preventing the disruption that follows from that fear, and diminishing the likelihood that the threatened violence will occur.[1] There is some concern that even satirical speech could be regarded as a "true threat" due to concern over terrorism.[2]
The true threat doctrine was established in the 1969 Supreme Court case Watts v. United States.[3] In that case, an eighteen-year-old male was convicted in a Washington, D.C. District Court for violating a statute prohibiting persons from knowingly and willfully making threats to harm or kill the President of the United States.[3] The conviction was based on a statement made by Watts, in which he said, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J."[3] Watts appealed, leading to the Supreme Court finding the statute constitutional on its face, but reversing the conviction of Watts.
看来法律没有限制狂热份子在网络上吹吹牛过过嘴瘾。
你的火力不够，看这个！
这位大佬自称是能源博士。估计没有做过IT。IT系统用Zulu time （Z stands for Zero Meridian, 零经度，就是格林威治的经度）是很平常的事。
由于数据可能来自美国几个不同的时区，一般用一个时区代表时间的比较少。我以前的工作的公司在全美都有server，很多州横跨两个时区，都用Eastern Time或者像硅谷小公司都用Pacific Time，是设计不周的一种表现。
中國獨裁早就被推翻了。
有一种说法是，中國有勇氣不怕死的人早就被政府杀光了，所以現在流传下來的基因都是怕死的基因，只要有口饭吃就不会反的
这个，可能是大外宣煽動美國內乱，呵呵，不過華人早被"祖國"镇压成软骨头，這煽動其實也是白費心機。放心啦。
还说“保持信仰”，“对数字天然的敏感”。一旦信了川普，脑子变成浆糊。
不知道过几天新总统走马上任，他们怎样解释。好奇最后老川是自己走出白宫，还是被人拖出去。
那阴谋论会越来越多，造谣零代价啊。。。这一年看文学城，有些言论令人瞠目结舌，在其它民主国家是不可能如此猖狂的，也许类似言论也有但要找那些非常极端的媒体、自媒体，我是从来没找过也没兴趣看。。。看survey,也许文学城自我定位就是极端媒体，太奇芭了。。。
美国难道没有诽谤罪？
以前美国人的假设，是对付有害言论的方法是更多的自由言论，因为假设是言论争辩的结果是真的胜过假的。所以最高法院一般最多要求选举发广告的人要disclose自己的身份，自己的资金来源，等等。
现在这个假设不一定成立了，但是最高法院还没有接受任何案件来讨论这个假设。
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/940/counterspeech-doctrine
The counterspeech doctrine posits that the proper response to negative speech is to counter it with positive expression. It derives from the theory that audiences, or recipients of the expression, can weigh for themselves the values of competing ideas and, hopefully, follow the better approach.
The counterspeech doctrine is one of the most important free expression principles in First Amendment jurisprudence.
文学城某些论坛是比较极端的，阴谋论占了上风，但是美国总体来看，这个假设目前还是成立的，拜登赢了大选还多了6百万选票就是证明。希望美国能很快找到equilibrium 。